The effect of a combined indomethacin and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on short-term postplacement bleeding profile: a randomized proof-of-concept trial.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraceptives, including hormonal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems, are the most effective methods of reversible contraception. However, unfavorable bleeding, particularly during the first months of use, is one of the most important reasons for discontinuation or avoidance. Minimizing this as early as possible would be highly beneficial. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis are known to reduce bleeding and pain at time of menses. A levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system has been developed with an additional reservoir containing indomethacin, designed to be released during the initial postplacement period. OBJECTIVE: This proof-of-concept study aimed to establish whether the addition of indomethacin to the currently available levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (average in vivo levonorgestrel release rate of 8 µg/24 h during the first year of use) reduces the number of bleeding and spotting days during the first 90 days of use compared with the unmodified system. The dose-finding analysis included 3 doses of indomethacin-low (6.5 mg), middle (12.5 mg), and high (15.4 mg)-to determine the ideal dose of indomethacin to reduce bleeding and spotting days with minimal side-effects. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, controlled phase II trial conducted between June 2018 and June 2019 at 6 centers in Europe. Three indomethacin dose-ranging treatment groups (low-, middle-, and high-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) were compared with the unmodified levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system group, with participants randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the number of uterine bleeding and spotting days over a 90-day reference (treatment) period. Secondary outcomes were the number of women showing endometrial histology expected for intrauterine levonorgestrel application and the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events. Point estimates and 2-sided 90% credible intervals were calculated for mean and median differences between treatment groups and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin. Point and interval estimates were determined using a Bayesian analysis. RESULTS: A total of 174 healthy, premenopausal women, aged 18 to 45 years, were randomized, with 160 women eligible for the per-protocol analysis set. Fewer bleeding and spotting days were observed in the 90-day reference period for the 3 indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system dose groups than for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin group. The largest reduction in bleeding and spotting days was achieved with low-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, which demonstrated a point estimate difference of -32% (90% credible interval, -45% to -19%) compared with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin. Differences for high- and middle-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system groups relative to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin were -19% and -16%, respectively. Overall, 97 women (58.1%) experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event considered related to the study drug, with similar incidence across all treatment groups including the unmodified levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. These were all mild or moderate in intensity, with 6 leading to discontinuation. Endometrial biopsy findings were consistent with effects expected for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. CONCLUSION: All 3 doses of indomethacin substantially reduced the number of bleeding and spotting days in the first 90 days after placement of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, thus providing proof of concept. Adding indomethacin to the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system can reduce the number of bleeding and spotting days in the initial 90 days postplacement, without affecting the safety profile, and potentially improving patient acceptability and satisfaction.

Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems and levonorgestrel-containing contraceptives with oral or subdermal administration route.

OBJECTIVE: To compare systemic exposure to levonorgestrel (LNG) released from commercially available intrauterine systems (IUSs), a subdermal implant, and oral contraceptives. METHODS: An integrated population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis of data from over 3400 individuals in ten clinical studies with six different LNG-releasing contraceptives (four long-acting reversible contraceptives [LARCs: LNG-IUS 8, 12, and 20, initially releasing LNG 14, 17.5, and 20 µg/day, a subdermal implant initially releasing LNG 100 µg/day according to label]; progestin-only pill [POP: LNG 30 µg/day]; and combined oral contraceptive [COC] pill [LNG 100 µg/day and ethinylestradiol 20 µg/day]), was conducted to generate a popPK model. LNG release rates, and total and unbound serum/plasma LNG concentrations with LARCs were estimated over the indicated period of use; maximum (Cmax) and average (Cav) serum LNG concentrations were estimated at steady state for oral contraceptives. Influence of body weight on LNG PK was also investigated. RESULTS: Serum LNG concentration with LARCs increased with increasing daily LNG release rate, being lowest with LNG-IUS 8, higher with LNG-IUS 12 and LNG-IUS 20, and highest with the subdermal implant (1.7-2.1-times that with LNG-IUS 20). Compared with early serum LNG concentrations with LNG-IUS 20, Cav and Cmax were 1.7- and 4.5-fold higher with POP, and 8.6- and 18-fold higher with COC. Total LNG bioavailability was >97% for the LNG-IUSs and 66-80% with other contraceptives. Serum/plasma LNG concentrations decreased with increasing body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Among the contraceptives examined, COC had the highest and LNG-IUSs the lowest systemic exposure to LNG. Systemic LNG concentration was inversely correlated to body weight.

Pharmacokinetic overview of ethinyl estradiol dose and bioavailability using two transdermal contraceptive systems and a standard combined oral contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative bioavailability of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and gestodene (GSD) after application of a novel transdermal contraceptive patch vs. a standard combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill (study 1), and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of EE after application of the EE/GSD patch compared with an EE/norelgestromin (NGMN) patch (study 2). MATERIALS: Participants were healthy, nonobese women aged 18 - 45 years (study 1) or 18 - 35 years (study 2). Compositions of study treatments were as follows: 0.55 mg EE/2.1 mg GSD (EE/GSD patch); 0.02 mg EE/0.075 mg GSD (standard COC); 0.6 mg EE/6 mg NGMN (EE/NGMN patch). METHODS: In study 1, which consisted of 3 treatment periods (each followed by 7 patch- or pill-free days), treatments were administered in one of two randomized orders: either P-M-E (EE/GSD patch (P) every 7 days for 28 days → COC (M) once-daily for 21 days → two 7-day patch-wearing periods followed by one 10-day patch-wearing phase (E)), or the same treatments administered in sequence M-P-E. For study 2, participants received either the EE/GSD patch or EE/NGMN patch for seven treatment cycles (one patch per week for 3 weeks followed by a 7-day patch-free interval). RESULTS: In study 1, average daily exposure to EE was similar for treatments P and M; the mean daily area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio of treatment P vs. treatment M for EE was 1.06 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.964 - 1.16), indicating average daily delivery similar to oral administration of 0.019 - 0.023 mg EE. For unbound GSD, average daily exposure was lower for treatment P vs. treatment M. The mean AUC ratio of treatment P vs. treatment M for unbound GSD was 0.820 (90% CI: 0.760 - 0.885), indicating average daily delivery from the patch of 0.057 - 0.066 mg GSD. Prolonged patch wearing did not result in a distinct decline in GSD and EE serum concentrations. In study 2, AUC at steady state (AUC0-168,ss), average steady-state serum concentration, and maximum steady-state serum concentration for EE was 2.0 - 2.7-fold higher for the EE/NGMN patch vs. the EE/GSD patch. The EE/GSD patch was well tolerated in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the 90% CI of the AUC ratio of oral treatment vs. patch application for unbound GSD and EE, the daily doses of GSD and EE released from the EE/GSD patch over the 7-day application period provided the same systemic exposure as those recorded after daily oral administration of a COC containing 0.02 mg EE and 0.06 mg GSD. The EE/GSD patch showed reduced EE exposure compared with the EE/NGMN patch. Together with its good tolerability, these properties support the EE/GSD patch as an effective and well-tolerated alternative to available transdermal and oral contraceptives.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of the Novel Tetrameric, High-Relaxivity, Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Gadoquatrane in Healthy Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents are well established in clinical routine and have been proven safe and effective. However, there is a need for "next-generation" Gd-based contrast agents that would allow lowering the Gd dose used for routine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging procedures. The objective of this first-in-human study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and tolerability of gadoquatrane, a novel high-relaxivity Gd-based contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in 2018/2019 as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled, escalating-dose study. Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned (6:2) to intravenous administration of gadoquatrane (0.025 to 0.2 mmol Gd/kg body weight) or placebo. Study procedures included collection of blood samples and excreta for pharmacokinetic analyses and safety assessments. RESULTS: Forty-nine healthy study participants (mean age ± SD, 35 ± 6.3 years; 24 female) were evaluated. The effective half-life of gadoquatrane in plasma was short and similar in all dose groups (1.4-1.7 hours). Plasma concentrations around the lower quantitation limit (0.0318 µmol Gd/L) were reached 15-72 hours after administration. The volume of distribution at steady state was ~0.2 L/kg in all dose groups. The clearance (total and renal) was ~0.1 L/h per kilogram in all groups. Across dose groups, the exposure of gadoquatrane increased dose-proportionally. Metabolite profiling revealed no hint of degradation in vivo or release of free Gd. Seven of 36 participants (19.4%) receiving gadoquatrane and 4 of 13 participants (30.8%) receiving placebo experienced mild or moderate treatment-emergent adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred. The analysis of the Gd concentration-QTc interval relationship indicated no risk of QT/QTc prolongation (>10 milliseconds) with gadoquatrane at clinical dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: Gadoquatrane with its high-relaxivity, pharmacokinetic similarity to established Gd-based contrast agents and high tolerability is a promising "next-generation" contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the novel tetrameric gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent gadoquatrane in healthy Chinese and Japanese men: Two randomized dose-escalation studies including concentration-QTc modeling.

PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the novel tetrameric high-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agent gadoquatrane in Japanese (Study 1) and Chinese men (Study 2). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: In two similarly designed single-center, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, consecutive-cohort dose-escalation studies, healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to intravenous administration of gadoquatrane (0.01-0.1 mmol gadolinium/kg body weight) or placebo. Study procedures included blood sampling and collection of urine for pharmacokinetic analyses and safety assessments. RESULTS: Twenty-five healthy Japanese men (mean age ± standard deviation: 26±5.9 years) and 23 healthy Chinese men (31±7.6 years old) were evaluated. In both studies, the pharmacokinetic profile of gadoquatrane was characterized by rapid distribution of the drug into the extracellular space and fast renal elimination. Postdose gadolinium concentrations rapidly declined with a geometric mean effective half-life of 1.3-1.4 h. The exposure increased approximately dose-proportionally with dose. The body weight-normalized volume of distribution was constant across dose levels (0.21-0.24 L/kg). Total recovery of gadolinium in urine amounted to 82-95 % (Study 1) and 96-99 % (Study 2) of the dose administered. Only a few mild, transient adverse events were reported, none of which gave rise to any safety concerns. Exploratory drug concentration-QTc modeling indicated no risk of a clinically relevant QT/QTc prolongation at the anticipated diagnostic dose. CONCLUSION: Gadoquatrane was safe and well tolerated at all doses tested. The pharmacokinetic profile was essentially the same as that of other extracellular macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents and was consequentially also similar for Japanese and Chinese participants.

Relationship of Dose and Signal Enhancement Properties of Gadoquatrane, a New Tetrameric, Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent, Compared With Gadobutrol: A Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the signal-enhancement properties of the tetrameric gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadoquatrane in relation to the administered dose and compare its properties to those of a standard dose of gadobutrol, as a representative of the currently established macrocyclic GBCAs for magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind, 4 × 4 crossover study, 43 healthy adults (19-50 years of age) received 3 single IV injections of gadoquatrane (0.01, 0.03, and 0.06 mmol gadolinium/kg body weight) and 1 injection of gadobutrol (0.1 mmol gadolinium/kg body weight) in randomized sequence with 1-week washout periods between administrations. The relative signal enhancement (RSE) was determined in predefined areas of interest in magnetic resonance image sets of the head-neck region. RSE-vs-dose curves (dose-response curves) were established by linear regression, and comparator-equivalent doses were determined by Bayesian inverse regression analysis. Further, 3 blood samples were taken after each injection for pharmacokinetic analyses, and safety data were assessed. RESULTS: The RSE increased with gadoquatrane dose. A linear function adequately fitted this relationship. In line with the more than 2-fold higher r1 relaxivity of gadoquatrane per gadolinium ion, gadobutrol-equivalent RSE was achieved with gadoquatrane at less than half the gadolinium dose and less than one eighth of the molecule dose.Administration of gadoquatrane and gadobutrol resulted in very similar dose-normalized gadolinium concentrations in plasma, indicating that the pharmacokinetic profiles are essentially the same. Both contrast agents were well tolerated. Adverse events were rare and not dependent on the dose administered. CONCLUSIONS: Gadoquatrane has the potential to be an effective GBCA that can be used at substantially lower doses in clinical routine than the currently established macrocyclic GBCAs.

Extended use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52 mg: A population pharmacokinetic approach to estimate in vivo levonorgestrel release rates and systemic exposure including comparison with two other LNG-IUSs.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize performance of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52mg (Mirena) over 8 years of use and facilitate comparisons with LNG-IUS 19.5mg and LNG-IUS 13.5mg. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated in vivo levonorgestrel (LNG) release rates and LNG plasma/serum concentrations for LNG-IUS 52mg up to 8 years of use with a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) approach using data from the Mirena Extension Trial (MET) and earlier clinical trials. We compared these with previously published release rates and exposure data for LNG-IUS 19.5mg and 13.5mg. Our 8-year popPK and release models were developed based on measured plasma/serum LNG and sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations and residual LNG content from removed LNG-IUS 52mg devices. RESULTS: Model-based estimated LNG release rates for LNG-IUS 52mg decreased from ∼21 µg/d after insertion to ∼7.0 µg/d after 8 years, similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg after 5 years (7.6 µg/d) and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg after 3 years (5.5 µg/d). Model-based estimated and measured plasma/serum LNG concentrations showed satisfactory agreement. Average model-based estimated LNG concentrations after 8 years of LNG-IUS 52mg use (100 ng/L [coefficient of variance 39.9%]) were similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg after 5 years (84.8 ng/L [39.9%]) and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg after 3 years (58.1 ng/L [40.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: The 8-year release and popPK models provide reliable in vivo LNG release rates and concentration estimates, respectively, facilitating direct comparisons between the 3 studied LNG-IUSs. LNG release rates from LNG-IUS 52mg at 8 years are similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg at 5 years and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg at 3 years. IMPLICATIONS: Levonorgestrel release from intrauterine system reservoirs declines with duration of use in a predictable way, and in relation to the initial load. As release rates and plasma concentrations of levonorgestrel may influence endometrial and systemic side effects, these data may assist clinical decision-making.

Development of an Intrauterine Device Releasing Both Indomethacin and Levonorgestrel During the First Months of Use: Pharmacokinetic Characterization in Healthy Women.

BACKGROUND: Post-placement menstrual bleeding pattern changes with intrauterine contraceptives (IUCs), including levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUS), can be a reason for avoidance or early discontinuation. Prostaglandins play an important role in menstrual bleeding and pain. The key drivers of prostaglandin synthesis are cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, which are inhibited by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In this study, we report the findings from pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses undertaken with an LNG-IUS (LNG-IUS 8) modified with an additional reservoir containing indomethacin (IND). METHODS: The IND/LNG-IUS 8 is a proof-of-concept device studied in a phase II proof-of-concept/dose-finding study. IND/LNG-IUS 8 contains the same LNG content as the unmodified LNG-IUS 8 (13.5 mg) but was prepared with three different IND doses (low, 6.5 mg; middle, 12.5 mg; and high, 15.4 mg), resulting in different daily release rates. Overall, 174 healthy, premenopausal women were randomized to one of the four treatment arms (low-, middle-, high-dose IND/LNG-IUS 8 or LNG-IUS 8). Initial and residual IND and LNG content were collected and the amount of IND and LNG released in vivo over the period of use was calculated. A subset of 62 participants underwent dense blood sampling for PK analysis. Concentrations of IND and LNG in plasma were determined by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods and plotted over time. Descriptive statistics were calculated for plasma drug concentrations and PK parameters. RESULTS: High-dose IND/LNG-IUS 8 initially released much higher levels of IND than expected based on in vitro release data, followed by a steep decline, with the reservoir emptied by 4.5 months. Middle- and low-dose IND/LNG-IUS 8 demonstrated steady sustained release of IND over time, emptying after 7.4 and 8.4 months, respectively. Peak plasma concentrations of IND for low- and middle-dose IND/LNG-IUS 8 remained below the 20% maximal inhibitory concentration (IC20) values for COX enzymes. The average daily IND release rate in vivo was 49 µg/day for low-dose and 112 µg/day for middle-dose IND/LNG-IUS 8. The IND release rate profile and IND plasma concentrations in vitro both decreased steadily over time with low- and middle-dose IND/LNG-IUS 8. The LNG release rate profile was comparable for all IND/LNG-IUS 8 dose groups and LNG-IUS 8. CONCLUSION: This PK study demonstrates that two different drugs can be released at different rates from an IUS designed with two drug reservoirs. Inclusion of IND does not impact the LNG PK profile. Low- and middle-dose IND/LNG-IUS 8 were associated with a systemic IND exposure that should preclude the occurrence of adverse events typically observed after oral IND dosing. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT03562624.

[Implications for health services research in GP practices using the example of an intervention study on palliative care]. / Implikationen für Versorgungsforschung in Hausarztpraxen am Beispiel einer Interventionsstudie zur Palliativversorgung.

INTRODUCTION: So far there has been little evidence of the extent to which project steps can affect the timing and successful implementation of research projects in general practitioner (GP) practices. Using the example of an intervention study on palliative care, the aim of this article is to report a) how the overall course of the project turned out compared to the original planning, and b) what recommendations can be derived to promote efficient implementation of intervention studies in GP practices. METHODS: In two workshops each, GP practice teams selected specific measures to improve their palliative care and tested them during a four-month implementation phase. In order to track the progress of the project, the times at which the practice teams reported their participation in the study, the individual project steps and the contacts were documented and descriptively analysed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Due to a high willingness of practice teams to participate in the intervention study, recruitment was completed on time. The overall duration of the project was extended due to an increased workload for the preparation of an unexpectedly high number of selected measures to improve palliative care. DISCUSSION: Conducting intervention studies in GP practices is promising if practice teams take an active and co-determining role during the entire research process. Research projects can best be implemented if they involve minimal time commitment for the practice teams, and if continuous personal support from the study team is ensured. CONCLUSION: When planning future intervention studies with a high participatory share of GP practice teams, it is advisable to take into account potential additional work for the preparation and further development of intervention measures.

Sagopilone crosses the blood-brain barrier in vivo to inhibit brain tumor growth and metastases.

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sagopilone (ZK-EPO), a novel epothilone, compared with other anticancer agents in orthotopic models of human primary and secondary brain tumors. Autoradiography and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on rats and mice to determine passage across the blood-brain barrier and organ distribution of sagopilone. Mice bearing intracerebral human tumors (U373 or U87 glioblastoma, MDA-MB-435 melanoma, or patient-derived non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC]) were treated with sagopilone 5-10 mg/kg, paclitaxel 8-12.5 mg/kg (or temozolomide, 100 mg/kg) or control (vehicle only). Tumor volume was measured to assess antitumor activity. Sagopilone crossed the blood-brain barrier in both rat and mouse models, leading to therapeutically relevant concentrations in the brain with a long half-life. Sagopilone exhibited significant antitumor activity in both the U373 and U87 models of human glioblastoma, while paclitaxel showed a limited effect in the U373 model. Sagopilone significantly inhibited the growth of tumors from CNS metastasis models (MDA-MB-435 melanoma and patient-derived Lu7187 and Lu7466 NSCLC) implanted in the brains of nude mice, in contrast to paclitaxel or temozolomide. Sagopilone has free access to the brain. Sagopilone demonstrated significant antitumor activity in orthotopic models of both glioblastoma and CNS metastases compared with paclitaxel or temozolomide, underlining the value of further research evaluating sagopilone in the treatment of brain tumors. Sagopilone is currently being investigated in a broad phase II clinical trial program, including patients with glioblastoma, NSCLC, breast cancer, and melanoma.

An Integrated Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize Levonorgestrel Pharmacokinetics After Different Administration Routes.

To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the progestin levonorgestrel for various routes of administration, an integrated population PK analysis was performed. This analysis integrated data from 10 clinical pharmacology studies and resulted in a single, comprehensive population PK model (and its applications) describing the PK of levonorgestrel and its variability for 6 levonorgestrel-containing contraceptives: 3 intrauterine systems (IUSs; levonorgestrel [LNG]-IUS 20 [Mirena® ], LNG-IUS 12 [Kyleena® ], and LNG-IUS 8 [Jaydess® /Skyla® ]); 2 oral contraceptives (the progestin-only pill [Microlut® /Norgeston® ] and the combined oral contraceptive [Miranova® ]); and a subdermal implant (Jadelle® ). The levonorgestrel-containing contraceptives administered orally or as an implant act mainly via their systemic (unbound) levonorgestrel exposure, whereas levonorgestrel administered via an IUS is released directly into the uterine cavity, resulting in lower systemic levonorgestrel concentrations. The integrated population PK analysis revealed that the combined oral contraceptive led to the highest levonorgestrel exposure, followed by the progestin-only pill and the implant, which led to similar levonorgestrel exposure, and the IUSs, which led to the lowest levonorgestrel exposure (in decreasing order: LNG-IUS 20, LNG-IUS 12, and LNG-IUS 8). The difference was even more distinct at the end of the indicated duration of use of 3 years (LNG-IUS 8) and 5 years (LNG-IUS 20 and LNG-IUS 12). Comparing the 3 IUSs and the implant, in vivo release rates were highest for the implant, followed by LNG-IUS 20, then LNG-IUS 12, and were lowest for LNG-IUS 8. This is in line with the comparison of the total levonorgestrel concentrations.

Optical molecular imaging of lymph nodes using a targeted vascular contrast agent.

We develop a highly specific antibody-dye conjugate for optical imaging of peripheral lymph nodes. The contrast agent consists of the monoclonal antibody recognizing endothelial ligands for the lymphocyte homing receptor L-selectin, MECA-79, and a near-infrared (near-IR) fluorescent indotricarbocyanine dye. The targeting and biodistribution behavior of MECA-79 is studied after radio-iodination and intravenous injection into mice demonstrating specific uptake in lymph nodes and accumulation in high endothelial venules (HEV). After conjugation of MECA-79 with indotricarbocyanine dye, the fluorescence imaging properties of the MECA-79 dye conjugate are examined by intravenous injection in nude mice and laser-induced fluorescence whole-body imaging in vivo. The MECA-79 antibody-dye conjugate accumulates in peripheral lymph nodes, whereas an isotype antibody-dye conjugate does not. Specific lymph node near-IR fluorescent signals become detectable within minutes after injection, and stable imaging persists for more than 24 h. The results demonstrate that vascular targeting of endothelial expression of glyocproteins is feasible to visualize the accumulation of near-IR fluorescent MECA-79 in lymph nodes, making this technology potentially useful to characterize processes of inflammation.

Plasma pharmacokinetics, whole-body distribution, metabolism, and radiation dosimetry of 68Ga bombesin antagonist BAY 86-7548 in healthy men.

UNLABELLED: This first-in-human study investigated the safety, tolerability, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry of (68)Ga-bombesin antagonist (68)Ga-DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethylpiperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2 (BAY 86-7548). METHODS: Five healthy men underwent dynamic whole-body PET/CT after an intravenous injection of BAY 86-7548 (138 ± 5 MBq). Besides total radioactivity, plasma samples were analyzed by radio-high-performance liquid chromatography for metabolism of the tracer. Dosimetry was calculated using the OLINDA/EXM software. RESULTS: Three radioactive plasma metabolites were detected. The proportion of unchanged BAY 86-7548 decreased from 92% ± 9% at 1 min after injection to 19% ± 2% at 65 min. The organs with the highest absorbed doses were the urinary bladder wall (0.62 mSv/MBq) and the pancreas (0.51 mSv/MBq). The mean effective dose was 0.051 mSv/MBq. BAY 86-7548 was well tolerated by all subjects. CONCLUSION: Intravenously injected BAY 86-7548 is safe, and rapid metabolism is demonstrated. A 150-MBq injection of BAY 86-7548 results in an effective dose of 7.7 mSv, which could be reduced to 5.7 mSv with frequent bladder voids.