Distinguishing the need for crisis mental health services among college students.

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in Psychological Services on Aug 19 2021 (see record 2021-78000-001). In the original article, the Method heading that appears above the Crisis Walk-In Sessions heading should appear instead as the Results. All versions of this article have been corrected.] The increasing frequency of college students' use of crisis mental health services at college counseling centers is exacerbating the existing challenges college counseling centers face to meet students' growing demand for mental healthcare on campus. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether any clinical or demographic variables distinguished between students in the clinical population who did and did not use crisis services, including crisis walk-in sessions and transport to the hospital for emergency psychiatric evaluation. Clinical and demographic data from the intake paperwork of 408 students who received services from a university counseling center over a 2-year time-period were collected and analyzed to determine whether any variables were associated with significantly higher levels of crisis service use. Only prior use of self-harm as a coping strategy was associated with both increased likelihood of accessing crisis walk-in sessions and hospital transports. Black students were more likely to use crisis walk-in sessions than White students and students with a history of prior counseling were more likely to attend multiple crisis walk-in sessions. A higher likelihood of being transported to the hospital was associated with history of prior counseling, suicidal ideation at intake, higher scores on the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms-62 depression and social anxiety subscales, and use of one versus multiple crisis walk-in sessions. Results are discussed in the context of how counseling centers might employ these findings to identify students who are more likely to require crisis services and target interventions proactively to mitigate this need. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

"Distinguishing the need for crisis mental health services among college students": Correction to Sapadin and Hollander.

Reports an error in "Distinguishing the need for crisis mental health services among college students" by Kate Sapadin and Beth L. G. Hollander (Psychological Services, Advanced Online Publication, Mar 18, 2021, np). In the original article, the Method heading that appears above the Crisis Walk-In Sessions heading should appear instead as the Results. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2021-25597-001). The increasing frequency of college students' use of crisis mental health services at college counseling centers is exacerbating the existing challenges college counseling centers face to meet students' growing demand for mental healthcare on campus. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether any clinical or demographic variables distinguished between students in the clinical population who did and did not use crisis services, including crisis walk-in sessions and transport to the hospital for emergency psychiatric evaluation. Clinical and demographic data from the intake paperwork of 408 students who received services from a university counseling center over a 2-year time-period were collected and analyzed to determine whether any variables were associated with significantly higher levels of crisis service use. Only prior use of self-harm as a coping strategy was associated with both increased likelihood of accessing crisis walk-in sessions and hospital transports. Black students were more likely to use crisis walk-in sessions than White students and students with a history of prior counseling were more likely to attend multiple crisis walk-in sessions. A higher likelihood of being transported to the hospital was associated with history of prior counseling, suicidal ideation at intake, higher scores on the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms-62 depression and social anxiety subscales, and use of one versus multiple crisis walk-in sessions. Results are discussed in the context of how counseling centers might employ these findings to identify students who are more likely to require crisis services and target interventions proactively to mitigate this need. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Characterization of psychiatrically hospitalized college students.

Objective: To characterize contemporary college students requiring psychiatric hospitalization. Participants and methods: Sociodemographic and diagnostic information was gathered retrospectively and analyzed from the electronic medical records (EMRs) of the consecutive inpatient hospitalizations of 905 college students admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit. Results: Significantly more females compared to males experienced the following: more hospitalizations, more family and financial stressors, more depression, and less psychotic and bipolar disorder. The most frequent diagnosis was a depressive disorder, followed by bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, and personality disorder, most frequently borderline personality disorder. Half of participants had comorbid diagnoses with substance abuse most common. More than two-thirds of students endorsed social or intimate relationship, academic, and family challenges as psychosocial stressors. In all, 15% of participants had repeat admissions. Conclusions: The present study provides demographic data from a sample of psychiatrically hospitalized college students. Findings can help improve screening and identification of decompensation in college students.

Validation of the Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS) with psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the concurrent validity of the Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS) for adolescent inpatients. METHOD: Participants included 97 adolescents ages 12 to 18 admitted to an adolescent inpatient unit. Participants were administered the ChIPS and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (present questions only). Participants also completed self-report measures of adjustment (e.g., the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale-2). RESULTS: More diagnoses were made with the ChIPS (mean 4.44) compared to the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (mean 3.04; p <.001). The percentage of agreement ranged from 59% to 98%. Kappa coefficients indicated agreement ranging from slight for oppositional defiant disorder (kappa = .18) to substantial for substance use (kappa = .66); the majority of kappa values ranged from .26 to.60. When ChIPS endorsements were examined relative to construct-specific self-report measures of impairment, adolescents diagnosed by the ChIPS with a disorder scored significantly higher than adolescents who were not diagnosed with a disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate moderate agreement between ChIPS diagnoses and Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version diagnoses. ChIPS diagnoses appear consistent with self-report measures of adjustment.