Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Recipient Indication Does Not Impact Outcome After Heart Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Heart transplant is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage heart failure who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. The primary indications for heart transplant worldwide have been nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy. For the 2 indications, patients differ in underlying pathomechanisms leading to their disease and consecutively in relevant comorbidities. However, the influence of an indication of ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy for heart transplant on recipient outcomes posttransplant remains controversial. Here, we investigated whether ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy indication were associated with patient morbidity and mortality after heart transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients undergoing heart transplant in our center between September 2010 and June 2021 (n = 218). Recipients were divided into 2 groups related to their indication: ischemic (n = 92; 42%) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 126; 58%). Recipient and donor variables were reviewed and compared, including peri- and postoperative characteristics and recipient survival up to 5 years posttransplant. RESULTS: Although patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were significantly younger (51.7 vs 59.1 years; P < .001), had fewer previous cardiac surgeries (56% vs 75%; P = .01), and less frequent severe infections or sepsis (19% vs 32%; P = .03), other outcome-related parameters such as need for extracorporeal life support posttransplant (26% vs 33%), rejection within index stay (7% vs 8%), and survival after 30 days (88% vs 92%), 90 days (85% vs 88%) or 1 year (76% vs 77%) were different. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, although barring different baseline characteristics, ischemic versus nonischemic recipient diagnosis was not associated with outcome or survival after heart transplant.

Intracerebral bleeding in donors is associated with reduced short-term to midterm survival of heart transplant recipients.

AIM: The quality of the donor heart is known to have a crucial effect on outcome after heart transplantation (HTx). Although leading to brain death in the end, the initial cause of death of the donor and its potential influences on organ quality are heterogeneous. However, it is still controversial to which extent the donor cause of death is associated with outcome or survival post-HTx. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included all patients undergoing HTx in our centre between September 2010 and June 2021 (n = 218). Recipients were divided in five groups related to their donor cause of death: intracerebral bleeding ('ICB', n = 95, 44%), traumatic brain injury ('trauma', n = 54, 25%), hypoxic brain damage ('hypoxic', n = 34, 16%), cerebrovascular ('vascular', n = 15, 7%), or other cause (n = 20, 9%). Baseline characteristics, perioperative parameters, and survival after 30 and 90 days as well as 5 years after transplantation were collected. RESULTS: Intracerebral bleeding in donors compared with traumatic brain injury is associated with higher probability of need for ECLS post-HTx (35% vs. 19%, P = 0.04) and significantly reduced survival up to 5 years post-HTx (i.e. 1 year survival: 61% vs. 95%, P < 0.0001). Although other conditions also show significant changes in outcome and survival, the effect is strongest for ICB, where survival is also reduced compared with all other causes (1 year: 61% vs. 89%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, donor cause of death is associated with differing outcome and survival after HTx. Intracerebral bleeding hereby shows strongest decline in outcome and survival in comparison with all other causes.

[COVID-19 after heart transplantation: experiences from a German transplantation center]. / COVID-19 nach Herztransplantation: Erfahrungen eines deutschen Transplantationszentrums.

Background: The pandemic caused by SARS-CoV­2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2) has led to hospitalizations and increased mortality worldwide. With potentially high prevalence and severity of COVID-19 in cardiac transplantation, there is a great need to generate data in this at-risk cohort. Objective: We report here our experience with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) in heart transplant recipients at a German transplantation center longitudinally over the previous pandemic waves and place it in context to published experiences of other centers. Material and methods: All adult patients who had received a heart transplant at our center and had confirmed COVID-19 infection (n = 12) were included and retrospectively characterized. Results: The mean age was 61.5 (49-63) years, and the majority were male (83%). Comorbidities such as diabetes (42%), arterial hypertension (43%), and chronic renal failure (67%) were found. Passive immunization (convalescent plasma/monoclonal antibodies) was performed in 50%. Oxygen administration was required in 33% of patients; only one patient required noninvasive ventilation (8%), and no patient required invasive ventilation or mechanical cardiovascular support (ECMO). No new cardiovascular or thromboembolic events were found. Conclusion: We could longitudinally not detect severe courses or increased mortality of COVID-19 in heart transplant patients. Prospective studies are needed to make better prognostic estimates of COVID-19 in (heart) transplant patients in the future.