Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Radiol ; 34(8): 5228-5238, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244046

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the inter-reader reliability and diagnostic performance of classification and severity scales of Neuropathy Score Reporting And Data System (NS-RADS) among readers of differing experience levels after limited teaching of the scoring system. METHODS: This is a multi-institutional, cross-sectional, retrospective study of MRI cases of proven peripheral neuropathy (PN) conditions. Thirty-two radiology readers with varying experience levels were recruited from different institutions. Each reader attended and received a structured presentation that described the NS-RADS classification system containing examples and reviewed published articles on this subject. The readers were then asked to perform NS-RADS scoring with recording of category, subcategory, and most likely diagnosis. Inter-reader agreements were evaluated by Conger's kappa and diagnostic accuracy was calculated for each reader as percent correct diagnosis. A linear mixed model was used to estimate and compare accuracy between trainees and attendings. RESULTS: Across all readers, agreement was good for NS-RADS category and moderate for subcategory. Inter-reader agreement of trainees was comparable to attendings (0.65 vs 0.65). Reader accuracy for attendings was 75% (95% CI 73%, 77%), slightly higher than for trainees (71% (69%, 72%), p = 0.0006) for nerves and comparable for muscles (attendings, 87.5% (95% CI 86.1-88.8%) and trainees, 86.6% (95% CI 85.2-87.9%), p = 0.4). NS-RADS accuracy was also higher than average accuracy for the most plausible diagnosis for attending radiologists at 67% (95% CI 63%, 71%) and for trainees at 65% (95% CI 60%, 69%) (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Non-expert radiologists interpreted PN conditions with good accuracy and moderate-to-good inter-reader reliability using the NS-RADS scoring system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The Neuropathy Score Reporting And Data System (NS-RADS) is an accurate and reliable MRI-based image scoring system for practical use for the diagnosis and grading of severity of peripheral neuromuscular disorders by both experienced and general radiologists. KEY POINTS: • The Neuropathy Score Reporting And Data System (NS-RADS) can be used effectively by non-expert radiologists to categorize peripheral neuropathy. • Across 32 different experience-level readers, the agreement was good for NS-RADS category and moderate for NS-RADS subcategory. • NS-RADS accuracy was higher than the average accuracy for the most plausible diagnosis for both attending radiologists and trainees (at 75%, 71% and 65%, 65%, respectively).


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Humanos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Radiologistas , Competência Clínica , Radiologia/educação
2.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 19: 100335, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39055240

RESUMO

Background: Spinal Infection (SI) is associated with various comorbidities. The interaction of these comorbidities and their impact on costs and complexity of care has not been fully assessed. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of SI patients in an urban hospital system to characterize comorbidities and outcomes in adult patients with SI. Adult patients in our hospital system who were hospitalized with an initial diagnosis of SI between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019 were included. Outcomes measures included length of stay (LOS) of the index hospitalization for SI, charges and payments for the index hospitalization, and hospital readmissions within one year after discharge from the index hospitalization. Data was obtained by querying our Electronic Data Warehouse (EDW) using ICD-10-CM and CPT procedure codes. Spearman's correlation was used to summarize the relationships between LOS, charges, and payments. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate associations of demographics, comorbidities, and other factors with LOS. Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate associations of demographics, comorbidities, and other factors with hospital readmissions. Results: 403 patients with a first diagnosis of SI were identified. The average number of comorbidities per patient was 1.3. 294 (73%) had at least 1 medical comorbidity, and 54 (13%) had 3 or more comorbidities. The most common medical comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (26%), intravenous drug use (IVDU, 26%), and malnutrition (20%). 112 patients (28%) had a surgical site infection (SSI). DM (p<.001) and SSI (p=.016) were more common among older patients while IVDU was more common among younger patients (p<.001). Median LOS was 12 days. A larger number of medical comorbidities was associated with a longer LOS (p<.001) while the presence of a SSI was associated with a shorter LOS (p=.007) after multivariable adjustment. LOS was positively correlated with both charges (r=0.83) and payments (r=0.61). Among 389 patients discharged after the index hospitalization, 36% had a readmission within 1 year. The rate of readmission was twice as high for patients with three or more comorbidities than patients with zero comorbidities (hazard ratio: 1.95, p=.017). Conclusions: Patients with SI often have multiple comorbidities, and the specific type of comorbidity is associated with the patient's age. The presence of multiple comorbidities correlates with initial LOS, cost of care, and readmission rate. Readmission in the first year post-discharge is high.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA