Body-piercing associated appendicitis in the pregnant patient incidentally discovered during Caesarian section.

Appendicitis is the most common general surgery condition encountered in pregnant patients. Its presentation and diagnosis can be confounded by physiological changes of pregnancy causing atypical symptoms and overlap between pregnancy symptoms and appendicitis. Diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnancy is important, as pregnant persons have a much higher rate of complication from appendicitis. In this case report, we describe a patient with a history of right lower quadrant pain thought to be related to round ligament pain. Her previously undiagnosed appendicitis was discovered during routine inspection during caesarian section. The patient's final pathology revealed a metallic foreign body, one of the rarest causes of appendicitis.

Adverse maternal outcomes associated with major fetal malformations after singleton live birth.

BACKGROUND: Major fetal malformations complicate 2% to 5% of live births. It is unclear what effect fetal malformations have on severe maternal morbidity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare maternal outcomes between individuals with a fetus with major or minor fetal malformations and those with a fetus without major or minor fetal malformations. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor database. Our study was limited to the current analysis of pregnant individuals with a singleton live birth. Major fetal malformations based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's criteria were defined. Fetal malformations that did not meet the criteria for major fetal malformations were categorized as minor fetal malformations. Our primary maternal outcome was severe maternal morbidity as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Missing values were imputed by multiple imputation using the k-nearest neighbor imputation method. Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to obtain adjusted relative risks with 95% confidence intervals, controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Of 216,881 deliveries, there were 201,860 cases (93.1%) with no congenital malformation, 12,106 cases (5.6%) with minor fetal malformations, and 2845 cases (1.3%) with major fetal malformations. Compared with individuals with no fetal malformation, those with major fetal malformations were more likely to have severe maternal morbidity (0.7% vs 1.2%; adjusted relative risk, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.12), postpartum hemorrhage (3.6% vs 6.9%; adjusted relative risk, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-2.06), preeclampsia (5.1% vs 8.3%; adjusted relative risk, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.67), and cesarean delivery (26.7% vs 42.3%; adjusted relative risk, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-1.58). Compared with individuals with no fetal malformation, those with minor fetal malformations were more likely to have severe maternal morbidity (0.7% vs 1.4%; adjusted relative risk, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.02), maternal death (0.01% vs 0.03%; adjusted relative risk, 4.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-17.19), postpartum hemorrhage (3.6% vs 6.1%; adjusted relative risk, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.68), preeclampsia (5.1% vs 8.6%; adjusted relative risk, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.60), superimposed preeclampsia (1.2% vs 2.4%; adjusted relative risk, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.38), cesarean delivery (26.7% vs 39.6%; adjusted relative risk, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.41), chorioamnionitis (3.0% vs 4.7%; adjusted relative risk, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.53), and postpartum endometritis (0.6% vs 1.0%; adjusted relative risk, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.90). CONCLUSION: Major and minor congenital fetal malformations are independent risk factors for severe maternal morbidity and other pregnancy complications.

Termination of Pregnancy as a Means to Reduce Maternal Mortality in Pregnant Women With Medical Comorbidities.

The United States is the world's only developed country with a rising maternal mortality rate, with an increase of 26% between 2000 and 2014. Of the approximately 700 pregnancy-related deaths per year in the United States, nearly 30% are attributable to preexisting disease. Maternal-fetal medicine physicians are in a unique position-they are tasked with counseling patients regarding the risks of pregnancy in the context of their medical comorbidities. Individual physicians' opinions regarding the level of risk of death at which a termination of pregnancy would be considered "medically indicated" are highly variable and are influenced by where physicians are from, where they trained, and their knowledge regarding the safety of termination of pregnancy. Additionally, 43 states have legislated restrictions to abortion access that contain exceptions to protect women's life or health, but what constitutes a risk to a woman's life or health is not well-defined and appropriates medical terminology for political purposes. The current statements from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine advocate for safe, legal, and unobstructed access to pregnancy termination services. These statements attempt to remove health care providers' own biases regarding the exact risk level at which they would consider an abortion to be medically indicated. Because the risk of death from a first- or second-trimester termination is less than that of a traditional delivery, any medical problem that increases that risk of death could be considered an indication for counseling patients regarding the option of termination of pregnancy as a means to reduce mortality or morbidity.

Discussion: 'Hypnotic analgesia during first-trimester termination' by Marc et al.

In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed: Marc I, Rainville P, Masse B, et al. Hypnotic analgesia intervention during first-trimester pregnancy termination: an open randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:469.e1-469.e9.

Hypnotic analgesia during first-trimester termination: Marc et al.

The article below summarizes a roundtable discussion of a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed: Marc I, Rainville P, Masse B, et al. Hypnotic analgesia intervention during first-trimester pregnancy termination: an open randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:469.e1-469.e9. The full discussion appears at www.AJOG.org, page e1-e5.

Uterine trauma with fetal loss associated with chronic perforation of the inferior vena cava by an infrarenal vena cava filter.

Gestational complications in pregnant women have been considered a theoretical sequelae of vena cava filters (VCFs) positioned in the infrarenal segment of the inferior vena cava. We describe a 32-year-old woman who became pregnant with the known existence of an asymptomatic but chronically perforated, permanent infrarenal VCF. At 24 weeks gestation, uterine trauma leading to massive intraperitoneal hemorrhage and fetal loss occurred. Our case documents that gestational risk, heretofore theoretical, is real and calls for heightened awareness of the need for appropriate VCF management in women of childbearing age and consideration for preconception evaluation of the filter-bearing inferior vena cava in women considering pregnancy in whom VCFs have been previously implanted.

Vagal nerve stimulator use during pregnancy for treatment of refractory seizure disorder.

BACKGROUND: In patients with medically refractory seizures, vagal nerve stimulation is becoming an increasingly common adjunctive therapy. Although its safety and efficacy have been proven in the general population, little is known about its use during pregnancy. CASE: A 19-year-old primigravid woman presented during the first trimester for routine prenatal care. She had a past medical history significant for generalized tonic-clonic seizure disorder since childhood. Multiple medical regimens had failed, and a vagal nerve stimulator was implanted approximately 2 months before conception. The patient continued to take phenytoin, with improved seizure control. She had a term spontaneous delivery complicated by mild preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive treatment of medically refractory seizures with a vagal nerve stimulator is a viable option during pregnancy.