Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase variants: the new threat to global public health.

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants, which refer to the substitution, insertion, or deletion of amino acid sequence compared to wild blaKPC type, have reduced utility of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), a pioneer antimicrobial agent in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections. So far, more than 150 blaKPC variants have been reported worldwide, and most of the new variants were discovered in the past 3 years, which calls for public alarm. The KPC variant protein enhances the affinity to ceftazidime and weakens the affinity to avibactam by changing the KPC structure, thereby mediating bacterial resistance to CZA. At present, there are still no guidelines or expert consensus to make recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of infections caused by KPC variants. In addition, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, and other new ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations have little discussion on KPC variants. This review aims to discuss the clinical characteristics, risk factors, epidemiological characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, methods for detecting blaKPC variants, treatment options, and future perspectives of blaKPC variants worldwide to alert this new great public health threat.

Comparison of three colloidal gold immunoassays and GeneXpert Carba-R for the detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae blaKPC-2 variants.

The increasing use of ceftazidime-avibactam has led to the emergence of a wide range of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant blaKPC-2 variants. Particularly, the conventional carbapenemase phenotypic assay exhibited a high false-negative rate for KPC-2 variants. In this study, three colloidal gold immunoassays, including the Gold Mountainriver CGI test, Dynamiker CGI test and NG-Test CARBA5, and GeneXpert Carba-R, were used to detect the presence of KPC-2 carbapenemase and its various variants in 42 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. These strains covered blaKPC-2 (13/42) and 16 other blaKPC-2 variants including blaKPC-12 (1/42), blaKPC-23 (1/42), blaKPC-25 (1/42), blaKPC-33 (6/42), blaKPC-35 (1/42), blaKPC-44 (1/42), blaKPC-71 (1/42), blaKPC-76 (8/42), blaKPC-78 (1/42), blaKPC-79 (1/42), blaKPC-100 (1/42), blaKPC-127 (1/42), blaKPC-128 (1/42), blaKPC-144 (1/42), blaKPC-157 (2/42), and blaKPC-180 (1/42). For KPC-2 strains, all four assays showed 100% negative percentage agreement (NPA) and 100% positive percentage agreement (PPA) with sequencing results. For all 16 KPC-2 variants, GeneXpert Carba-R showed 100% NPA and 100% PPA, and the three colloidal gold immunoassays showed 100% NPA, while the PPAs of the Gold Mountainriver CGI test, Dynamiker CGI test, and NG-Test CARBA5 were 87.5%, 87.5%, and 68.8%, respectively. We also found a correlation between the mutation site in the amino acid of the variants and false-negative results by colloidal gold immunoassays. In conclusion, the GeneXpert Carba-R has been proven to be a reliable method in detecting KPC-2 and its variants, and the colloidal gold immunoassay tests offer a practical and cost-effective approach for their detection. For the sample with a negative result by a colloidal gold immunoassay test but not matching the drug-resistant phenotype, it is recommended to retest using another type of kit or the GeneXpert Carba-R assay, which can significantly improve the accuracy of detection.

Performance of disk diffusion method for aztreonam in combination with avibactam against Enterobacteriales.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of an in-house developed disk diffusion method for aztreonam in combination with avibactam against Enterobacteriales. METHODS: The in vitro antibacterial activity of aztreonam with avibactam against 204 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriales was determined by a disk diffusion method, with a broth microdilution method as a reference. RESULTS: The optimal S/R breakpoints for disk diffusion tests of 30/20 and 10/4 µg disks, calculated by the dBETs software using the model-based approaches, were ≥22/≤21 and ≥12/≤11 mm, respectively. On the basis of the estimated breakpoints, the CAs for disk diffusion tests of 30/20 and 10/4 µg aztreonam/avibactam disks were both 98.0%, with 0.5% major error and 37.5% very major error. CONCLUSIONS: The home-made disk diffusion method is an economical and practical method for clinical microbiology laboratories to determine the antibacterial susceptibility of aztreonam with avibactam against Enterobacteriales.

Establishment of epidemiological cut-off values for eravacycline, against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the epidemiology cut-off (ECOFF) values of eravacycline against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus, from a multi-centre study in China. METHODS: We collected 2500 clinical isolates from five hospitals in China from 2017 to 2020. The MICs of eravacycline were determined using broth microdilution. The ECOFF values of eravacycline against the five species commonly causing cIAIs were calculated using visual estimation and ECOFFinder following the EUCAST guideline. RESULTS: The MICs of eravacycline against all the strains were in the range of 0.004-16 mg/L. The ECOFF values of eravacycline were 0.5 mg/L for E. coli, 2 mg/L for K. pneumonia and E. cloacae, and 0.25 mg/L for A. baumannii and S. aureus, consistent with the newest EUCAST publication of eravacycline ECOFF values for the populations. No discrepancy was found between the visually estimated and 99.00% ECOFF values calculated using ECOFFinder. CONCLUSIONS: The determined ECOFF values of eravacycline against the five species can assist in distinguishing wild-type from non-wild-type strains. Given its promising activity, eravacycline may represent a member of the tetracycline class in treating cIAIs caused by commonly encountered Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens.

Evaluation of the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. Baumannii by the broth disk elution test.

To evaluate the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii using the broth disk elution testing, a total of 150 A. baumannii isolates were collected from across China between January 2019 and January 2021, including 51 carbapenem-susceptible and 99 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Broth disk elution (BDE) and the broth microdilution (BMD) method were performed for all strains. The concentration range of the BDE was 10/10 µg/mL, 20/20 µg/mL, and 30/30 µg/mL for ampicillin-sulbactam, and 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, 112.5/45 µg/mL, and 150/60 µg/mL for cefoperazone-sulbactam, respectively. Compared with BMD, the BDE results of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam showed a categorical agreement of 83.3% (125/150) and 95.3% (143/150), with minor errors of 16.7% (25/150) and 4.7% (7/150), respectively. No major error or very major errors were detected. The sensitivity differences by BDE of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) to different concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam showed statistically significant (p < 0.017), while those to cefoperazone-sulbactam at 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, and 112.5/45 µg/mL were significant (p < 0.008). However, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between 112.5/45 µg/mL and 150/60 µg/mL (p > 0.008). In conclusion, the BDE is a reliable and convenient method to detect the in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii, and the results could serve as a clinical reference value when deciding whether or not to use high-dose sulbactam for the treatment of A. baumannii infections.

Clinical characteristics and antimicrobial therapy of healthcare-associated carbapenem-non-susceptible gram-negative bacterial meningitis: a 16-year retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare-associated Gram-negative bacterial meningitis is a substantial clinical issue with poor outcomes, especially for neurosurgical patients. Here, we aimed to study the characteristics and treatment options of patients with healthcare-associated carbapenem-non-susceptible (Carba-NS) Gram-negative bacterial meningitis. METHODS: This observational cohort study was conducted at a teaching hospital from 2004 to 2019. The clinical characteristics of patients with meningitis with Carba-NS and carbapenem-susceptible (Carba-S) bacilli were compared, and the antimicrobial chemotherapy regimens and outcomes for Carba-NS Gram-negative bacterial meningitis were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 505 patients were included, of whom 83.8% were post-neurosurgical patients. The most common isolates were Acinetobacter spp. and Klebsiella spp., which had meropenem-resistance rates of 50.6% and 42.5%, respectively, and showed a markedly growing carbapenem-resistance trend. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that Carba-NS Gram-negative bacilli were associated with a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate (18.8%, 35/186) compared to the Carba-S group (7.4%, 9/122; P = 0.001). For Carba-NS Enterobacterales meningitis, aminoglycoside-based and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-based regimens yielded significantly higher clinical efficacy rates than non-aminoglycoside-based and non-trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-based regimens (69.0% vs. 38.7%, P = 0.019 and 81.8% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.036, respectively). For Carba-NS A. baumannii complex meningitis, tetracycline-based (including doxycycline, minocycline, or tigecycline) therapy achieved a significantly higher clinical efficacy rate (62.9%, 22/35) than the non-tetracycline-based therapy group (40.4%, 19/47; P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed that Carba-NS Gram-negative bacilli are associated with higher in-hospital mortality in patients with healthcare-associated meningitis. The combination therapies involving particular old antibiotics may improve patients' outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Register under ChiCTR2000036572 (08/2020).

Setting of the tentative epidemiological cut-off values of contezolid for Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus agalactiae.

OBJECTIVES: To set the tentative epidemiological cut-off values (TECOFFs) of contezolid for Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus agalactiae based on the distributions of inhibition zone diameters and MICs. METHODS: A total of 1358 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Gram-positive bacteria were collected from the patients across China from 2017 to 2020. The isolates were tested for susceptibility to contezolid and the comparator linezolid by broth microdilution and disc diffusion methods in three microbiology laboratories. The zone diameters and MICs of linezolid WT strains were used to set the WT TECOFFs of contezolid by normalized resistance interpretation calculations. RESULTS: Contezolid showed an aggregate MIC range from 0.03 to 8 mg/L and MIC90 value of 1-2 mg/L against all of the Gram-positive bacterial strains tested. The TECOFF of contezolid based on MIC distributions was 4 mg/L for both S. aureus and Enterococcus species, and 2 mg/L for S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae. The TECOFF of contezolid based on zone diameter was 24 mm for S. aureus, 18 mm for E. faecalis, 20 mm for E. faecium and S. pneumoniae, and 17 mm for S. agalactiae. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiological cut-off values of contezolid were set tentatively for selected Gram-positive bacteria using the MIC and zone diameter distributions. These data are helpful for clinical microbiologists and clinicians to interpret the antimicrobial susceptibility results of contezolid.

Antibiotic resistance and resistance mechanism of Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii isolated from patients with mastadenitis.

To investigate the antibiotic resistance and resistance mechanism of Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii (C. kroppenstedtii) isolated from patients with mastadenitis. Ninety C. kroppenstedtii clinical isolates were obtained from clinical specimens in 2018-2019. Species identification was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the broth microdilution method. The resistance genes were detected using PCR and DNA sequencing. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that the resistance rates of C. kroppenstedtii to erythromycin and clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were 88.9%, 88.9%, 67.8%, 62.2%, and 46.6%, respectively. None of the C. kroppenstedtii isolates was resistant to rifampicin, linezolid, vancomycin, or gentamicin. The gene of erm(X) was detected in all clindamycin and erythromycin-resistant strains. The gene of sul(1) and tet(W) were detected among all trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole-resistant strains and tetracycline-resistant strains, respectively. Furthermore, 1 or 2 amino acid mutations (mainly single mutation) were observed in the gyrA gene among ciprofloxacin-resistant strains.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole and comparator agents when tested against gram-positive and -negative organisms collected across China (2016-2018).

BACKGROUND: Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin which has been reported to have broad antibacterial spectrum when tested against bacteria collected from other countries except China. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole in comparison with other comparators against clinically significant isolates collected across from China. RESULTS: Susceptibility testing of ceftobiprole and comparators against 1163 clinically isolated Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was performed with broth micro dilution method following the CLSI guidelines. All 110 S. aureus were susceptible to ceftobiprole with MIC50/90 of 1/2 mg/L for MRSA and 0.5/1 mg/L for MSSA. For Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), MIC50/90 of ceftobiprole for MRCNS and MSCNS was 1/2 mg/L and 0.25/0.5 mg/L. Ceftobiprole demonstrated good potency against E. faecalis (MIC50/90 of 0.5/1 mg/L) but limited activity against E. faecium (MIC50/90 of > 32/ > 32 mg/L). Ceftobiprole demonstrated potent activity against all 39 ß-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. with MIC50/90 ≤ 0.015/ ≤ 0.015-2 mg/L and 110 of PSSP with 98.2% susceptibility. Ceftobiprole inhibited all isolates of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis at ≤ 1 mg/L. 91.8% and 98.2% of the ESBL-negative E. coli and K. pneumoniae were susceptible to ceftobiprole, but most of the ESBL-positive or carbapenem-resistant strains were also resistant to ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole inhibited 84.2% of carbapenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa and 94.1% of carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii at ≤ 8 mg/L, but only 52.6% of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and 5.3% of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. CONCLUSION: Ceftobiprole demonstrated good in vitro activity against a broad range of clinically relevant contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates.

Establishment of epidemiological cut-off values for cefoselis, a new fourth-generation cephalosporin, against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for cefoselis against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: We collected 2288 non-repetitive clinical isolates from five laboratories throughout four cities in China. The cefoselis MICs and inhibition zone diameters for all isolates were established using the broth microdilution method and the disc diffusion method following EUCAST guidelines. MIC ECOFFs were determined by visual estimation and ECOFFinder software. Zone diameter ECOFFs were set if a high correlation of MICs and inhibition zone diameters was found by Pearson correlation. Zone diameter ECOFFs were finally determined by the visual estimate method. RESULTS: MICs of cefoselis were distributed from 0.008 to >256 mg/L for the four Enterobacterales species and from 0.25 to >256 mg/L for P. aeruginosa. MIC ECOFFs were 0.125 mg/L for E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis, 0.25 mg/L for E. cloacae and 32 mg/L for P. aeruginosa. A high correlation of MICs and zone diameters was observed for all Enterobacterales (|r| > 0.8, P < 0.001) and a relatively high correlation was found for P. aeruginosa (|r| = 0.71, P < 0.001). The zone diameter ECOFF was 24 mm for E. cloacae, E. coli and K. pneumoniae, 26 mm for P. mirabilis and 21 mm for P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: We determined MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs for cefoselis against four Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa. The establishment of ECOFFs for cefoselis provides clinicians with helpful guidance to differentiate WT and non-WT pathogens.

Determination of norvancomycin epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus hominis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) of norvancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus hominis. METHODS: We collected 1199 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus species from five laboratories located in four cities in China. MICs and inhibitory zone diameters of norvancomycin were determined by broth microdilution and the disc diffusion method, separately. ECOFFs of norvancomycin for four species were calculated by ECOFFinder software following EUCAST principles. Methicillin and vancomycin resistance genes (mecA/mecC and vanA/vanB/vanC/vanD/vanE) were screened for by PCR in all isolates. Pearson correlation and χ2 test were used to calculate the correlation of MICs and inhibition zone diameters, and MICs and resistance genes, respectively. RESULTS: MICs of norvancomycin for all strains from five laboratories fell in the range of 0.12-2 mg/L. ECOFFs of norvancomycin were determined to be 2 mg/L for S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus and 1 mg/L for S. aureus and S. hominis. A weak correlation was observed between MIC values and zone diameters for S. haemolyticus (r = -0.36) and S. hominis (r = -0.26), while no correlation was found for S. epidermidis and S. aureus. The mecA gene was detected in 63.1% of Staphylococcus, whereas no isolate carried mecC, vanA, vanB, vanC, vanD or vanE. ECOFFs of norvancomycin were not correlated with mecA gene carriage in Staphylococcus species. CONCLUSIONS: ECOFFs of norvancomycin for four Staphylococcus species were determined, which will be helpful to differentiate WT strains. The correlation of MICs and zone diameters of norvancomycin was weak in Staphylococcus species.

Comparative activities of sitafloxacin against recent clinical isolates in hospitals across China.

Sitafloxacin is one of the newer generation fluoroquinolones. Considering the ever-changing antimicrobial resistance, it is necessary to monitor the activities of sitafloxacin against recent pathogenic isolates. Therefore, we determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of sitafloxacin and comparators by broth microdilution or agar dilution method against 1101 clinical isolates collected from 2017 to 2019 in 31 hospitals across China. Sitafloxacin was highly active against gram-positive isolates evidenced by the MICs required to inhibit the growth of 50%/90% isolates (MIC50/90): ≤ 0.03/0.25, ≤ 0.03/0.125, ≤ 0.03/2, 0.125/0.25, 0.25/2, and 0.125/0.125 mg/L for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MSCNS), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant CNS, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, respectively. Sitafloxacin inhibited 82.8% of the MRSA strains and 97.5% of MRCNS strains. Sitafloxacin was also potent against ciprofloxacin-susceptible Escherichia coli (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.06 mg/L) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.125 mg/L), non-ESBL-producing E. coli (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/1 mg/L) and K. pneumoniae (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.5 mg/L), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90: ≤0.015/0.06 mg/L), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (MIC50/90: 0.125/0.5 mg/L), Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.015/≤ 0.015 mg/L), Bacteroides fragilis (MIC50/90: 0.06/2 mg/L), Peptostreptococcus (MIC50/90: 0.125/4 mg/L), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (≤ 0.03/≤ 0.03 mg/L). However, sitafloxacin was less active for Enterococcus faecium, ciprofloxacin-resistant and/or ESBL-producing E. coli, and K. pneumoniae strains. Sitafloxacin was superior or comparable to most of the comparators in activities against the abovementioned isolates, so sitafloxacin is still highly active against most of the clinical isolates in hospitals across China, proving its utility in treatment of the abovementioned susceptible strains.

Performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion compared to reference broth microdilution for testing tigecycline susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii in a multicenter study in China.

Tigecycline is an alternative antibiotic for managing carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, disk diffusion and automated testing often show false-intermediate or false-resistant results in tigecycline susceptibility, misleading clinical antimicrobial therapy. Broth microdilution (BMD) is the reference method for testing tigecycline susceptibility, but it is labor intensive and time consuming to perform in clinical laboratories. Therefore, a simple and accurate method is urgently needed. We evaluated the performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion (KB), and modified KB disk diffusion (mKB) versus BMD in testing tigecycline susceptibility of 372 strains of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and 346 strains of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). BMD confirmed that 96.8% of CRKP and 91% of CRAB strains were susceptible to tigecycline. E-test, VITEK 2, KB, and mKB yielded categorical agreement of 96.7/59.3%, 69.9/54.3%, 78.5/87.3%, and 96.5%/91% for CRKP/CRAB, respectively. No very major error was found for either CRKP or CRAB by any method. No major error was found for CRKP or CRAB by the mKB method. The mKB method enhanced by R-buffer is simple, accurate, and inexpensive for clinical laboratories to test the susceptibility of CRKP and CRAB isolates to tigecycline.

Multicenter evaluation of three different MALDI-TOF MS systems for identification of clinically relevant filamentous fungi.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) holds promise as a potential tool for clinical identification of filamentous fungi. However, due to the lack of an appropriate extraction protocol and the difficulty of database building, the identification power of each system differs. In this study, we selected 126 clinical mould isolates comprising 28 species identified using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing as the reference method to evaluate three MALDI-TOF MS systems. When using cultures and sample preparation as recommended by the respective vendors, of the 126 strains tested, VITEK MS identified 121 (96.0%) to species-level and 124 (98.4%) to genus-level; Biotyper identified 53 (42.1%) to species-level and 54 (42.9%) to genus-level; Autof identified 74 (58.7%) to species-level and 76 (60.3%) to genus-level. For the Autof system, the tube extraction method recommended by the vendor performed better (59%) than the on-plate lysis (51%). Our study demonstrates that MALDI-TOF MS systems can successfully identify most clinically relevant fungi, while performance is still highly dependent on the database and sample preparation protocol.

The Predominance of Strain Replacement Among Enterobacteriaceae Pairs With Emerging Carbapenem Resistance During Hospitalization.

Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae collected from the same patient can lose carbapenem susceptibility during antimicrobial therapy, but little attention has been given to how this conversion takes place. In the current study, we retrospectively analyzed microbiological and clinical data from patients with enterobacterial infections at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. After screening 4795 patients and 7120 Enterobacteriaceae isolates over the 3-year study period, we found the change from carbapenem susceptible to carbapenem resistant in 41 pairs of isolates, of which 35 pairs (85.4%) were K. pneumoniae and 25 (61.0%) were from the same anatomic sites. Thirty-six isolate pairs showed different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns between the carbapenem-susceptible and the corresponding resistant strain, and 5 pairs displayed identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. Thirty-three (91.7%) of the 36 pairs of Enterobacteriaceae isolates were carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae with blaKPC-2, and 28 pairs (90.3%) of K. pneumoniae isolates had different sequence types (STs), with ST11 the most common ST found in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates. Forty of the 41 patients had received antimicrobial therapy such as carbapenems, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones, before the isolation of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. These results demonstrated that strain replacement is the main cause of emerging carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae during hospitalization. The loss of carbapenem susceptibility was not mainly due to in vivo development of carbapenem resistance.

The Colonization of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Epidemiology, Resistance Mechanisms, and Risk Factors in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units in China.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has become a threat to public health, most notably as a superbug causing nosocomial infections. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at increased risk of hospital-acquired K pneumoniae infection, especially CRKP. This study was conducted to investigate the frequency of gastrointestinal and nasopharyngeal K pneumoniae colonization and its contribution to infections in ICU patients. METHODS: A 3-month prospective cohort study was performed in which 243 ICU patients were screened for intestinal and nasopharyngeal carriage of K pneumoniae at admission and once per week thereafter. The colonization and clinical infection isolates were analyzed by antimicrobial susceptibility testing to identify CRKP and were characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole-genome sequencing combined with epidemiological data to investigate the resistance mechanisms and assess the possible transmitted infection. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent (68 of 243) of patients tested positive for carriage of K pneumoniae immediately upon admission to ICU, 54% (37 of 68) of which were nonduplicate CRKP isolates. Patients with carbapenem-susceptible K pneumoniae (CSKP) colonization at admission were more likely to acquire CRKP colonization during the ICU stay compared with patients without K pneumoniae colonization at admission. The incidence of subsequent CRKP infection in the baseline CSKP (32.3%, 10 of 31) and CRKP (45.9%, 17 of 37) carrier group was significantly higher than that of the baseline non-KP carrier group (8.6%, 15 of 175). The risk factors associated with acquired CRKP colonization during the ICU stay among negative CRKP colonization at admission included previous exposure to carbapenem, tigecycline or ß-lactam/ß-lactamases inhibitor, and invasive processes or surgical operations. Sixty-four percent (27 of 42) of patients with K pneumoniae infection were colonized by clonally related K pneumoniae strains according to enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence-polymerase chain reaction analysis. ST11 (72%, 53 of 74) was the most predominant MLST type of clonally related CRKP isolate colonizing these patients, followed by ST15 (26%, 19 of 74). CONCLUSIONS: The colonization of K pneumoniae may increase the incidence of corresponding K pneumoniae infection in critically ill patients in the ICU. High prevalence of ST11 CRKP (due to blaKPC-2) carriage and infection in ICU was observed.

Emergence and Recovery of Ceftazidime-avibactam Resistance in blaKPC-33-Harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae Sequence Type 11 Isolates in China.

This is the first report of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance caused by the blaKPC-33 mutation through the D179Y variant during the treatment of blaKPC-2-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae-related infections in China. The blaKPC-33-containing K. pneumoniae was susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, tigecycline, and polymyxin B. The blaKPC-33 gene was located on a 77 551-bp transformable plasmid harboring qnrS1 and blaLAP-2. Detecting blaKPC-33-positive K. pneumoniae clinical strains is important for infection control.

In Vitro Activity of Imipenem/Relebactam Against Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Obtained from Intra-abdominal, Respiratory Tract, and Urinary Tract Infections in China: Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART), 2015-2018.

BACKGROUND: Considering the increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in China, this study aimed to establish the in vitro effectiveness of imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) on clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates derived from intra-abdominal infections (IAIs), respiratory tract infections (RTIs), and urinary tract infections (UTIs) in China between 2015 and 2018. METHODS: In total, 8781 Enterobacteriaceae isolates from IAI, RTI, and UTI samples were collected from 22 hospitals across 7 geographic regions of China. Susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs was tested using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution and breakpoints, and IMI/REL activity was assessed using United States Food and Drug Administration guidelines. RESULTS: In 2015-2018, the most frequently identified Enterobacteriaceae species was Escherichia coli (n = 4676 [53.3%]), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2949 [33.6%]) and Enterobacter cloacae (n = 542 [6.2%]). The Enterobacteriaceae isolates showed 95.2% overall susceptibility to IMI/REL, of which the susceptibility rates in isolates from IAI, RTI, and UTI were 95.8%, 91.4%, and 96.6%, respectively. Overall, the susceptibilities of both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU Enterobacteriaceae isolates to colistin were 92.9%, followed by IMI/REL (90.7% [95.9%]) and amikacin (83.3% [92.3%]). In addition, IMI/REL restored 66.3% susceptibility in imipenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Given their high in vitro susceptibility, Enterobacteriaceae infections in China should be considered for IMI/REL treatment, especially with isolates that are not susceptible to carbapenems.

Comparative In Vitro Activities of Ceftaroline and Tedizolid against Clinical Strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus: Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2018.

The in vitro activities of ceftaroline and tedizolid were compared against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates collected from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network. Ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against S. aureus isolates (MIC50/90, ≤0.25/1 mg/liter). Tedizolid was also highly active against S. aureus (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/liter) and Enterococcus (MIC50/90, 0.5/0.5 mg/liter) isolates. Our results support the clinical usefulness of ceftaroline and tedizolid in treating Gram-positive infections.

In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Zidebactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Other Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii: Results from China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2018.

This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefepime-zidebactam in comparison with that of ceftazidime-avibactam and other comparators against clinically significant Gram-negative bacillus isolates. A total of 3,400 nonduplicate Gram-negative clinical isolates were collected from 45 medical centers across China in the CHINET Program in 2018, including Enterobacterales (n = 2,228), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 657), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 515). The activities of cefepime-zidebactam and 20 comparators were determined by broth microdilution as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated potent activity against almost all Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.125/1 mg/liter) and good activity against P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 2/8 mg/liter). Among the 373 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 57.3% (213/373) and 15.3% (57/373) were positive for blaKPC-2 and blaNDM, respectively. Cefepime-zidebactam showed a MIC of ≤2 mg/liter for 92.0% (196/213) of blaKPC-2 producers and 79.7% (47/59) of blaNDM producers. Ceftazidime-avibactam showed good in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.25/2 mg/liter; 94.0% susceptible) and P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 4/16 mg/liter; 86.9% susceptible). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 9.1% of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli isolates (63.6% were blaNDM producers) and 84.6% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (74.3% were blaKPC producers). Most (90.1%) blaKPC-2 producers were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated limited activity (MIC50/90, 16/32 mg/liter) against the 515 A. baumannii isolates (79.2% were carbapenem resistant), and ceftazidime-avibactam was less active (MIC50/90, 64/>64 mg/liter). Cefepime-zidebactam was highly active against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, including blaKPC-2-positive Enterobacterales and blaNDM-positive Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa And ceftazidime-avibactam was highly active against blaKPC-2-positive Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa.