RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reirradiation in standard fractionation for locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after a previous course of high-dose radiotherapy is often associated with substantial late toxicity, negating its overall benefit. We therefore aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of hyperfractionation compared with standard fractionation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done in three centres in Guangzhou, China. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with histopathologically confirmed undifferentiated or differentiated, non-keratinising, advanced locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive hyperfractionation (65 Gy in 54 fractions, given twice daily with an interfractional time interval of at least 6 h) or standard fractionation (60 Gy in 27 fractions, given once a day). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used in both groups. A computer program generated the assignment sequence and randomisation was stratified by treatment centre, recurrent tumour stage (T2-T3 vs T4), and recurrent nodal stage (N0 vs N1-N2), determined at the time of randomisation. The two primary endpoints were the incidence of severe late complications defined as the incidence of grade 3 or worse late radiation-induced complications occurring 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy until the latest follow-up in the safety population, and overall survival defined as the time interval from randomisation to death due to any cause in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02456506. FINDINGS: Between July 10, 2015, and Dec 23, 2019, 178 patients were screened for eligibility, 144 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to hyperfractionation or standard fractionation (n=72 in each group). 35 (24%) participants were women and 109 (76%) were men. After a median follow-up of 45·0 months (IQR 37·3-53·3), there was a significantly lower incidence of grade 3 or worse late radiation-induced toxicity in the hyperfractionation group (23 [34%] of 68 patients) versus the standard fractionation group (39 [57%] of 68 patients; between-group difference -23% [95% CI -39 to -7]; p=0·023). Patients in the hyperfractionation group had better 3-year overall survival than those in the standard fractionation group (74·6% [95% CI 64·4 to 84·8] vs 55·0% [43·4 to 66·6]; hazard ratio for death 0·54 [95% CI 0·33 to 0·88]; p=0·014). There were fewer grade 5 late complications in the hyperfractionation group (five [7%] nasal haemorrhage) than in the standard fractionation group (16 [24%], including two [3%] nasopharyngeal necrosis, 11 [16%] nasal haemorrhage, and three [4%] temporal lobe necrosis). INTERPRETATION: Hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy could significantly decrease the rate of severe late complications and improve overall survival among patients with locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Our findings suggest that hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy could be used as the standard of care for these patients. FUNDING: Key-Area Research and Development of Guangdong Province, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Special Support Program for High-level Talents in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project, and the National Ten Thousand Talents Program Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talents, Sun Yat-Sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , HemorragiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of surgery compared with reirradiation in the primary treatment of patients with resectable, locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who have previously received radiotherapy is a matter of debate. In this trial, we compared the efficacy and safety outcomes of salvage endoscopic surgery versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with resectable locally recurrent NPC. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done in three hospitals in southern China. We included patients aged 18-70 years with a Karnofsky Performance Status score of at least 70 who were histopathologically diagnosed with undifferentiated or differentiated, non-keratinising, locally recurrent NPC with tumours confined to the nasopharyngeal cavity, the post-naris or nasal septum, the superficial parapharyngeal space, or the base wall of the sphenoid sinus. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG group) or IMRT (IMRT group). Randomisation was done manually using a computer-generated random number code and patients were stratified by treatment centre. Treatment group assignment was not masked. The primary endpoint was overall survival, compared between the groups at 3 years. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. Safety analysis was done in patients who received treatment according to the treatment they actually received. This trial was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-11001573, and is currently in follow-up. FINDINGS: Between Sept 30, 2011, and Jan 16, 2017, 200 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either ENPG (n=100) or IMRT (n=100). At a median follow-up of 56·0 months (IQR 42·0-69·0), 74 patients had died (29 [29%] of 100 patients in the ENPG group and 45 [45%] of 100 patients in the IMRT group). The 3-year overall survival was 85·8% (95% CI 78·9-92·7) in the ENPG group and 68·0% (58·6-77·4) in the IMRT group (hazard ratio 0·47, 95% CI 0·29-0·76; p=0·0015). The most common grade 3 or worse radiation-related late adverse event was pharyngeal mucositis (in five [5%] of 99 patients who underwent ENPG and 26 [26%] of 101 patients who underwent IMRT). Five [5%] of the 99 patients who underwent ENPG and 20 [20%] of the 101 patients who underwent IMRT died due to late toxic effects specific to radiotherapy; attribution to previous radiotherapy or trial radiotherapy is unclear due to the long-term nature of radiation-related toxicity. INTERPRETATION: Endoscopic surgery significantly improved overall survival compared with IMRT in patients with resectable locally recurrent NPC. These results suggest that ENPG could be considered as the standard treatment option for this patient population, although long-term follow-up is needed to further determine the efficacy and toxicity of this strategy. FUNDING: Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/mortalidade , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patologia , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with cisplatin (CDDP) versus cetuximab (CTX) and nimotuzumab (NTZ) for Stage II-IVb Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC). A total of 1,837 patients with stage II-IVb NPC who received IMRT plus CTX or NTZ, or CDDP between January 2009 and December 2013 were included in the current analysis. Using propensity scores to adjust for potential prognostic factors, a well-balanced cohort of 715 patients was created by matching each patient who underwent IMRT plus concomitant NTZ/CTX with four patients who underwent IMRT plus concomitant CDDP (1:4). Efficacy and safety were compared between the CTX/NTZ and CDDP groups of this well-balanced cohort. Furthermore, we conducted multivariate analysis and subgroup analysis based on all the 1,837 eligible cases. There was no significant difference between CTX/NTZ group and CDDP group in terms of DFS (3-year, 86.7% vs. 86.2%, p > 0.05), LRRFS (96.2% vs. 96.3%, p > 0.05), DMFS (91.1% vs. 92.3%, p > 0.05) and OS (91.7% vs. 91.9%, p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant interaction effect between patients with IMRT plus CTX/NTZ and N3 node stage on LRRFS with the highest risk of loco-regional relapse (HR 8.85, p = 0.001). Significantly increased hematologic toxicities, gastrointestinal reactions were observed in the CDDP group (p < 0.05). Patients of 3.4-4.7% experienced severe hematologic toxicities during the treatment with concomitant CTX and NTZ. Increased rate of CTX related-skin reaction and mucositis was observed in the CTX group. CTX/NTZ used concurrently with IMRT may be comparable to those of the standard CDDP-IMRT combination for maximizing survival for patients with stage II-IVb NPC.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Cetuximab/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) could be used to predict the prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Patients (n = 1261) who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic NPC between January 2008 and December 2010 were recruited. The peripheral platelet and lymphocyte counts were retrieved, and the PLR was calculated. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess their association with PLR: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). The elevated PLR, using the third quartile values (153.64) as the optimal cutoff values, was found to be associated with the significant decline in CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.27-2.63, P < 0.001), OS (HR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.28-2.56, P < 0.001), and DMFS (HR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.15-2.23, P = 0.005) that remained significant during the multivariable analyses (CCS HR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.26-2.67, P < 0.001; OS HR 1.83, 95 % CI 1.28-2.61, P < 0.001; DMFS HR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.11-2.19, P = 0.011). Subgroup analyses indicated that the PLR could be used to stratify prognosis effectively for patients with early- or advanced-stage NPC, and Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels of ≥1500 copies/mL. In conclusions, elevated PLR values were associated with poor CSS, OS, and DMFS for patients with NPC; this easily accessed variable based on a large amount of cases multivariate analysis is valuable for predicting prognosis in patients with NPC.
Assuntos
Plaquetas/patologia , Linfócitos/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Adulto , Carcinoma , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Human myxovirus resistant protein A (MxA), encoded by the myxovirus resistance 1 (Mx1) gene, is an interferon (IFN)-triggered dynamin-like multi-domain GTPase involved in innate immune responses against viral infections. Recent studies suggest that MxA is associated with several human cancers and may be a tumor suppressor and a promising biomarker for IFN therapy. Mx1 gene mutations in the coding region for MxA have been discovered in many types of cancer, suggesting potential biological associations between mutations in MxA protein and corresponding cancers. In this study, we performed a systematic analysis based on the crystal structures of MxA and elucidated how these mutations specifically affect the structure and therefore the function of MxA protein. METHODS: Cancer-associated Mx1 mutations were collected and screened from the COSMIC database. Twenty-two unique mutations that cause single amino acid alterations in the MxA protein were chosen for the analysis. Amino acid sequence alignment was performed using Clustal W to check the conservation level of mutation sites in Mx proteins and dynamins. Structural analysis of the mutants was carried out with Coot. Structural models of selected mutants were generated by the SWISS-MODEL server for comparison with the corresponding non-mutated structures. All structural figures were generated using PyMOL. RESULTS: We analyzed the conservation level of the single-point mutation sites and mapped them on different domains of MxA. Through individual structural analysis, we found that some mutations severely affect the stability and function of MxA either by disrupting the intra-/inter-molecular interactions supported by the original residues or by incurring unfavorable configuration alterations, whereas other mutations lead to gentle or no interference to the protein stability and function because of positions or polarity features. The potential clinical value of the mutations that lead to drastic influence on MxA protein is also assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Among all of the reported tumor-associated single-point mutations, seven of them notably affect the structure and function of MxA and therefore deserve more attention with respect to potential clinical applications. Our research provides an example for systematic analysis and consequence evaluation of single-point mutations on a given cancer-related protein.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Resistência a Myxovirus/genética , Neoplasias/genética , Mutação Puntual , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/genética , Cristalografia por Raios X , Bases de Dados Genéticas , Humanos , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Domínios Proteicos/genética , Dobramento de Proteína , Alinhamento de Sequência , Estereoisomerismo , Relação Estrutura-AtividadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis (PRNN) frequently develops after second-course radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PRNN can lead to internal carotid artery (ICA) massive hemorrhage due to ICA rupture, resulting in sudden death. This study aims to explore the pretreatment of the ICA to prevent fatal massive hemorrhage in PRNN patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with NPC and PRNN from January 2010 to September 2022 were included. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to analyze risk factors for massive hemorrhage and survival. A nomogram was developed to integrate prognostic models and perform parameter calibration. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-four PRNN patients were included in this study. Prophylactic ICA occlusion significantly reduced the risk of ICA hemorrhage compared to no prophylactic ICA occlusion (3.6% vs 40.6%, P < .001). Surgical repair on necrosis significantly prevented hemorrhage and improved survival. The nomogram, incorporating the above 2 factors and the nearest distance from necrosis to ICA ≤ 3 mm, exhibited excellent discriminative ability for hemorrhage. We identified 3 high-risk factors that indicate the need for prophylactic ICA management in PRNN patients: (1) exposure of ICA by rhinoscopy; (2) signs of ICA erosion on MRA scanning; (3) the depth of soft tissue coverage surrounding the ICA wall within the necrotic cavity is less than 3 mm on magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSION: We have identified 3 high-risk factors for PRNN patients that necessitate prophylactic ICA management. These findings are expected to contribute to improving the quality of life and overall survival of PRNN patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Humanos , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Artéria Carótida Interna/patologia , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Necrose/etiologia , Necrose/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) with en bloc resection has been well accepted in resectable localized recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC), but it is a difficult technique to master for most otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgeons. Ablation surgery is a new and simplified method to remove tumors. We designed a novel method using low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation (LPRA) and evaluated the survival benefit. METHODS: A total of 56 localized rNPC patients were explained in detail and retrospectively analyzed. The surgery method was ablated from the resection margin to the center of the tumor. The postmetastatic overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS) rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: All surgeries were successfully performed without any severe postoperative complications or deaths. The median operation time of ablation and harvested NSFF respectively were 29 min (range, 15-100 min) and 101 min (range, 30-180 min). The average number of hospital days postoperation was 3 days (range, 2-5 days). All cases (100.0%) had radical ablation with negative resection margins. The nasopharyngeal defects were completely re-epithelialized in 54 (96.4%) patients. As of the data cutoff (September 3, 2023), the median follow-up time was 44.3 months (range, 17.1-52.7 months, 95% CI: 40.4-48.2). The 3-year OS, LRFS, PFS and DMFS of the entire cohort were 92.9% (95% CI: 0.862-0.996), 89.3% (95% CI: 0.813-0.973), 87.5% (95% CI: 0.789-0.961), and 92.9% (95% CI: 0.862-0.996), respectively. Cycles of radiotherapy were independent risk factors for OS (p = 0.003; HR, 32.041; 95% CI: 3.365-305.064), LRFS (p = 0.002; HR, 10.762; 95% CI: 2.440-47.459), PFS (p = 0.004; HR, 7.457; 95% CI: 1.925-28.877), and DMFS (p = 0.002; HR, 34.776; 95% CI: 3.806-317.799). CONCLUSION: Radical endoscopic nasopharyngectomy by using low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation is a novel, safe and simplified method to master and disseminate for treating resectable rNPC. However, further data and longer follow-up time are needed to prove its efficacy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Temperatura , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologiaRESUMO
Postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis is an important late effect of radiotherapy that affects prognosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In the present study, we reviewed the clinical and imaging features of 67 patients with pathologically diagnosed postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis who were treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between June 2006 and January 2010. Their clinical manifestations, endoscopic findings, and imaging features were analyzed. Early nasopharyngeal necrosis was limited to a local site in the nasopharyngeal region, and the tissue defect was not obvious, whereas deep parapharyngeal ulcer or signs of osteoradionecrosis in the basilar region was observed in serious cases. Those with osteoradionecrosis and/or exposed carotid artery had a high mortality. In conclusion, Postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis has characteristic magnetic resonance imaging appearances, which associate well with clinical findings, but pathologic examination is essential to make the diagnosis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Nasofaringe/patologia , Osteorradionecrose/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Nasofaringe/efeitos da radiação , Necrose , Osteorradionecrose/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologiaRESUMO
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy is the most common treatment regimen for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Whether chronomodulated infusion of chemotherapy can reduce its toxicity is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the toxic and therapeutic effects of sinusoidal chronomodulated infusion versus flat intermittent infusion of cisplatin (DDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by radiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Patients with biopsy-diagnosed untreated stages III and IV NPC (according to the 2002 UICC staging system) were randomized to undergo 2 cycles of sinusoidal chronomodulated infusion (Arm A) or flat intermittent constant rate infusion (Arm B) of DDP and 5-FU followed by radical radiotherapy. Using a "MELODIE" multi-channel programmed pump, the patients were given 12-hour continuous infusions of DDP (20 mg/m2) and 5-FU (750 mg/m2) for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. DDP was administered from 10:00 am to 10:00 pm, and 5-FU was administered from 10:00 pm to 10:00 am each day. Chronomodulated infusion was performed in Arm A, with the peak deliveries of 5-FU at 4:00 am and DDP at 4:00 pm. The patients in Arm B underwent a constant rate of infusion. Radiotherapy was initiated in the fifth week, and both arms were treated with the same radiotherapy techniques and dose fractions. Between June 2004 and June 2006, 125 patients were registered, and 124 were eligible for analysis of response and toxicity. The major toxicity observed during neoadjuvant chemotherapy was neutropenia. The incidence of acute toxicity was similar in both arms. During radiotherapy, the incidence of stomatitis was significantly lower in Arm A than in Arm B (38.1% vs. 59.0%, P = 0.020). No significant differences were observed for other toxicities. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 88.9%, 82.4%, and 74.8% for Arm A and 91.8%, 90.2%, and 82.1% for Arm B. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 91.7%, 88.1%, and 85.2% for Arm A and 100%, 94.5%, and 86.9% for Arm B. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 82.5%, 79.1%, and 79.1% for Arm A and 90.2%, 85.2%, and 81.7% for Arm B. Chronochemotherapy significantly reduced stomatitis but was not superior to standard chemotherapy in terms of hematologic toxicities and therapeutic response.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cronofarmacoterapia , Quimioterapia de Indução , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Radioterapia de Alta Energia , Estomatite/etiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The trajectories of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) during and after the treatment along with their associated factors are seldom investigated in longitudinal studies. This study aims to investigate the longitudinal trajectories of HRQoL over time and their associated factors in patients with newly diagnosed NPC. METHODS: Between July 2018 and September 2019, a total of 500 patients were finally involved in this study. HRQoL was measured at four time points, from before treatment to the follow-up period after treatment. Group-based multi-trajectory modeling was applied to identify trajectories of five HRQoL functioning domains during the longitudinal period. Multinomial logistic regression models were applied to investigate potential independent factors associated with the multi-trajectory groups. RESULTS: We identified four distinct multi-trajectory groups, including the "initially lowest functioning" group (19.8%), the "initially lower functioning" group (20.8%), the "initially higher functioning" group (46.0%), and the "consistently highest functioning" group (13.4%). Patients who were older than 45 years or had T4 stage disease were more likely to be in the "initially lowest functioning" group, while those with EBV DNA ≥ 1500 copies/mL before the treatment were more likely to be in the "initially lowest functioning" or the "initially lower functioning" groups. CONCLUSIONS: We report the presence of heterogeneity in HRQoL trajectories among patients with NPC, and found that older age, advanced T stage, and higher EBV DNA level before treatment were significantly associated with poor HRQoL trajectories. Further studies are needed to examine the generalizability of these identified HRQoL trajectories and their associations with psychosocial and survival outcomes.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Modelos LogísticosRESUMO
Importance: Unlike substantial evidence in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), research in the prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is currently lacking. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant weekly vs every 3 weeks for the prevention of nausea and emesis caused by CCRT among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single cancer center from November 24, 2020, to July 26, 2021, among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who had achieved CINV control after 2 to 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy. Efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population. Data were analyzed on November 4, 2022. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive fosaprepitant either weekly or every 3 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with sustained complete response (defined as no emesis and no rescue therapy) during CCRT. Secondary end points were sustained no emesis, no nausea, no significant nausea, mean time to first emetic episode, quality of life, and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 100 patients (mean [SD] age, 46.6 [10.9] years; 83 [83.0%] male) who had achieved CINV control after induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive fosaprepitant weekly (50 patients) or every 3 weeks (50 patients). There was no significantly significant difference in cumulative risk of emesis or rescue therapy in the group that received weekly fosaprepitant compared with those who received fosaprepitant every 3 weeks (subhazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.43-1.02]; P = .06). The proportion of patients with sustained no emesis (38% vs 14%; P = .003) or no significant nausea (92% vs 72%; P = .002) was significantly higher in the group that received fosaprepitant weekly vs those who received fosaprepitant every 3 weeks. Treatments were well tolerated. Patients in the weekly group had improved scores for multiple quality-of-life measures. There was no significant difference in survival outcomes between groups (91.8% vs 93.7%; P = .99). In the mean brainstem dose subgroups, a possible treatment interaction effect was observed in sustained complete response (mean brainstem dose ≥36 Gy: hazard ratio [HR], 0.32 [95% CI, 0.15-0.69]; mean brainstem dose <36 Gy: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.55-1.63]) and sustained no emesis (mean brainstem dose ≥36 Gy: HR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.08-0.53]; mean brainstem dose <36 Gy: HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.41-1.28]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this pilot randomized clinical trial, there was no statistically significant difference in the complete response primary end point, but patients receiving weekly fosaprepitant were less likely to experience emesis compared with those who received fosaprepitant every 3 weeks, especially in the subgroup with a mean brainstem dose of 36 Gy or more. Weekly fosaprepitant was well tolerated and improved quality of life of patients without compromising survival. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04636632.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos Piloto , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/prevenção & controle , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/prevenção & controle , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Background: Treatment options for patients with recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) are not clear after progression on previous treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitor; critical gaps in evidence remain for such cases. Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy has been reported to have synergistic antitumor activity. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus famitinib in patients with RM-NPC who failed treatment with PD-1 inhibitor-containing regimens. Methods: This multicenter, adaptive Simon minimax two-stage, phase II study enrolled patients with RM-NPC refractory to at least one line of systemic platinum-containing chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. The patient received camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks and famitinib 20 mg once per day. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the study could be stopped early as criterion for efficacy was met (>5 responses). Key secondary endpoints included time to response (TTR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04346381. Findings: Between October 12, 2020, and December 6, 2021, a total of 18 patients were enrolled since six responses were observed. The ORR was 33.3% (90% CI, 15.6-55.4) and the DCR was 77.8% (90% CI, 56.1-92.0). The median TTR was 2.1 months, the median DoR was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.0-not reach), and the median PFS was 7.2 months (90% CI, 4.4-13.3), with a median follow-up duration of 16.7 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 were reported in eight (44.4%) patients, with the most common being decreased platelet count and/or neutropenia (n = 4, 22.2%). Treatment-related serious AEs occurred in six (33.3%) patients, and no deaths occurred due to TRAEs. Four patients developed grade ≥3 nasopharyngeal necrosis; two of them developed grade 3-4 major epistaxis, and they were cured by nasal packing and vascular embolization. Interpretation: Camrelizumab plus famitinib exhibited encouraging efficacy and tolerable safety profiles in patients with RM-NPC who failed frontline immunotherapy. Further studies are needed to confirm and expand these findings. Funding: Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic therapy reportedly have potential synergistic antitumor activity. We investigated the activity and safety of this regimen for recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: This single-arm, Simon two-stage study enrolled patients with recurrent/metastatic NPC who were refractory to at least first-line systemic therapy and treatment-naive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The patients received camrelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks and apatinib 250 mg once per day. The primary end point was the objective response rate. Key secondary end points included disease control rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: Between October 14, 2020, and December 23, 2021, 58 patients were enrolled, and all were included in the efficacy and safety analysis set. The objective response rate was 65.5% (95% CI, 51.9 to 77.5), and the disease control rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 74.6 to 93.9). The median duration of response was not reached, and the median progression-free survival was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.2 to 13.6), with a median follow-up duration of 12.4 months (range, 2.1-19.9 months). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 3 or higher were reported in 34 (58.6%) patients, with the most common being hypertension (19.0%), nasopharyngeal necrosis (15.5%), headache (12.1%), AST elevation (10.3%), and creatine phosphokinase elevation (10.3%). Sixteen (27.6%) patients discontinued apatinib treatment before progression because of unbearable TRAEs, and the most common complication was nasopharyngeal necrosis (9/16; 56.3%). Recurrent nasopharyngeal lesions (odds ratio, 5.94 [95% CI, 1.45 to 24.24]) and reirradiation (odds ratio, 5.33 [95% CI, 1.15 to 24.79]) were significantly positively correlated with nasopharyngeal necrosis. CONCLUSION: Camrelizumab plus apatinib had promising antitumor activity in patients with refractory recurrent/metastatic NPC who failed first-line therapy. Moderate to severe TRAEs were experienced by 58.6%, including nasopharyngeal necrosis associated with local recurrence and a history of reirradiation.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Necrose/tratamento farmacológico , Necrose/etiologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Locoregional radiotherapy added to chemotherapy has significantly improved survival in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC). However, only 54% of de novo mNPC patients who received sequential chemoradiotherapy have complete or partial response 3 months after radiotherapy. This Simon's optimal two-stage design phase II study (NCT04398056) investigates whether PD-1 inhibitor could improve tumor control in combination with chemoradiation. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) at 3 months after radiotherapy. Twenty-two patients with primary mNPC are enrolled. The ORR at 3 months after radiotherapy is 81.8% (22.7% complete response, n = 5; 59.1% partial response, n = 13), and the disease control rate is 81.8%. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate is 44.9% (95% confidence interval 26.4%-76.3%). Fifteen patients (68.2%) experienced grade 3-4 adverse events. Patients with high baseline plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA copy number (>104 cps/mL) show worse PFS. Addition of toripalimab to sequential chemoradiotherapy suggests promising tumor response in patients with primary mNPC.
Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) is a reasonable choice for resectable recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC). However, in past decades, complete removal of the tumor was not feasible when the recurrent lesion was adjacent to the internal carotid artery (ICA). The present article introduces innovative strategies to ensure sufficient surgical margins while avoiding accidental injury to the ICA. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed rT2-3 rNPC patients with tumor lesions adjacent to the ICA (<5 mm) who underwent ENPG at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2015 and June 2020. Thirty-seven patients were selected for this study. Seventeen patients underwent ENPG using direct dissection, 10 patients underwent endoscopic-assisted transcervical protection of the parapharyngeal ICA combined with ENPG, and 10 patients underwent ICA embolization followed by ENPG. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 31 months (range, 5 to 53 months), the 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates of salvage ENPG for rNPC adjacent to the ICA were 88.7%, 72.0%, 72.0%, and 97.3%, respectively. The incidences of grade 1-2 and grade 3-5 postoperative complications were 16.2% and 13.5%, respectively. Two patients experienced ICA rupture during direct dissection but were out of danger after vascular embolization therapy. One patient had a positive margin. Two patients had severe nasopharyngeal wound infections with mucosal flap necrosis. CONCLUSION: ENPG combined with ICA pretreatment allows the feasible and effective resection of rNPC lesions adjacent to the ICA.
Assuntos
Artéria Carótida Interna , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Artéria Carótida Interna/patologia , Artéria Carótida Interna/cirurgia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of a triple combination of gemcitabine (chemotherapy) plus apatinib (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGFR]) and toripalimab (anti-PD-1) (GAT) in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) is unclear. METHODS: Between August 2019 and April 2020, 41 patients with RM-NPC were enrolled and received GAT for up to 6 cycles followed by apatinib and toripalimab. The primary endpoint was the safety. The secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Integrated genomic and transcriptional analyses were conducted to identify the patients who benefited in response to this novel combination therapy. FINDINGS: As of April 1, 2022, treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 23 of 41 patients (56.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 41%-70.1%). G3-4 nasopharyngeal necrosis was observed in 9 (9/41, 21.9%) patients. High-risk factors for necrosis included repeated radiotherapy and an interval of less than 12 months from the last radiotherapy. The ORR was 90.2% (95% CI: 76.9%-97.2%). The median PFS was 25.8 months (95% CI: not reached (NR)-NR), and the 24-month PFS rate was 50.7% (95% CI: 34.0%-67.4%). MAS-related GPR family member F (MRGPRF) high expression in tumors correlated with poor PFS from the GAT therapy, characterized by high epithelial mesenchymal transition signatures. Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing could predict PFS outcomes to combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: GAT therapy exhibits a promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicities in patients with RM-NPC. Patients with repeated radiotherapy and an interval of less than 12 months from the last radiotherapy should be carefully selected for antiangiogenic therapies. MRGPRF expression and serial ctDNA monitoring could identify patients that derive benefits from the combination therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04073784. FUNDING: This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81772895 and 82002857), the Key-Area Research and Development of Guangdong Province (2020B1111190001), the Special Support Program for High-level Talents in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (202103010001), and the National "Ten Thousand Talents Program" Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talents (84000-41180005).
Assuntos
Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , DNA Tumoral Circulante , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fatores de Crescimento Endotelial/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Necrose , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Piridinas , GencitabinaRESUMO
Background: Studies of local therapy (LT) to metastatic foci from nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are inconsistent and controversial. Here, we aimed to explore the survival benefit of LT directed at metastatic foci from NPC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in NPC patients with liver, lung, and/or bone metastases. The postmetastatic overall survival (OS) rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox hazard model. Subgroup analyses evaluating the effect of LT were performed for prespecified covariates. Propensity score matching was applied to homogenize the compared arms. Results: Overall, 2041 of 2962 patients were eligible for analysis. At a median follow-up of 43.4 months, the 5-year OS improved by an absolute difference of 14.6%, from 46.2% in the LT group versus 31.6% in the non-LT group, which led to a hazard ratio of 0.634 for death (p < 0.001). Matched-pair analyses confirmed that LT was associated with improved OS (p = 0.003), and the survival benefits of LT remained consistent in the subcohorts of liver and lung metastasis (p = 0.009 and p = 0.007, respectively) but not of bone metastasis (BoM; p = 0.614). Radiotherapy was predominantly used for BoM and biological effective dose (BED) >60 Gy was found to yield more survival benefit than that of BED ⩽ 60 Gy. Conclusions: The addition of LT directed at metastasis has demonstrated an improvement to OS compared with non-LT group in the present matched-pair study, especially for patients with liver and/or lung metastases.
RESUMO
Importance: Induction chemotherapy added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the optimal induction regimen remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (TPC) improves survival vs cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) prior to chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial recruited 238 patients at 4 hospitals in China from October 20, 2016, to August 29, 2019. Patients were 18 to 65 years of age with treatment-naive, nonkeratinizing stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive induction chemotherapy with two 21-day cycles of TPC (intravenous paclitaxel [150 mg/m2, day 1], intravenous cisplatin [60 mg/m2, day 1], and oral capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily, days 1-14]) or PF (intravenous cisplatin [100 mg/m2, day 1] and fluorouracil [800 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5]), followed by chemoradiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was failure-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, overall survival, tumor response, and safety. Results: Overall, 238 eligible patients (187 men [78.6%]; median age, 45 years [range, 18-65 years]) were randomly assigned to receive TPC (n = 118) or PF (n = 120). The median follow-up duration was 48.4 months (IQR, 39.6-53.3 months). Failure-free survival at 3 years was 83.5% (95% CI, 77.0%-90.6%) in the TPC group and 68.9% (95% CI, 61.1%-77.8%) in the PF group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79; P = .004). Induction with the TPC regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of distant metastases (stratified HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-0.98]; P = .04) and locoregional recurrence (stratified HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18-0.93]; P = .03) compared with the PF regimen. However, there was no effect on early overall survival (stratified HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.17-1.18]; P = .10). The incidences of grade 3 to 4 acute adverse events and late-onset toxicities were 57.6% (n = 68) and 13.6% (16 of 118), respectively, in the TPC group and 65.8% (n = 79) and 17.9% (21 of 117), respectively, in the PF group. One treatment-related death occurred in the PF group. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of TPC for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma improved failure-free survival compared with 2 cycles of PF, with no increase in the toxicity profile. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02940925.
Assuntos
Quimioterapia de Indução , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is the most important primary treatment for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Generally, the treatment duration of radiotherapy takes six or six and half weeks with 30 to 33 fractions. The current study was conducted to evaluate the association between prognosis and the duration of radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Patients with primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with or without induction chemotherapy between January, 2008 and December, 2013 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 1292 patients were included. At a median follow-up of 71.0 months (range 2.0-126.0 months), locoregional recurrence, distant failure and death were observed in 8.8%, 12.2% and 15.6% of all patients, respectively. Estimated 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with radiation ≤ 7 weeks versus patients with radiation >7 weeks were: 93.2% versus 87.0% (P < 0.001), 89.4% versus 84.4% (P = 0.016), 79.8% versus 70.6% (P < 0.001) and 87.2% versus 78.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged duration of radiotherapy with a significantly higher risk of distant metastasis and death in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Understanding this point, healthcare providers should make efforts to avoid prolonged duration of radiotherapy to minimize the risk of treatment failure.
RESUMO
Introduction: Biopsy is essential for some patients with suspected distant metastasis, so we aim to figure out whether biopsy of distant metastasis is associated with impaired survival in NPC. Methods: A total of 743 synchronous metastatic NPC patients from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Propensity score matching was used to control confounders and create a well-balanced cohort. Five-year survival rate estimates and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to identify independent prognostic factors for survival. Results: Of 743 eligible patients, 194 (26.11%) underwent biopsy of distant metastasis. After control for demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, patients with biopsy of distant metastasis achieved comparable 5-year overall survival (OS) (20.3% vs 24.7%; P = 0.41) and 5-year cancer specific survival (CSS) (31.0% vs 33.6%; P = 0.35) with patients without biopsies. Multivariate analysis further confirmed that biopsy of distant metastasis was not associated with impaired OS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.84-1.25; P = 0.80) or CSS (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.86-1.34; P = 0.54). Conclusions: Biopsy of distant metastasis was not associated with impaired survival outcomes for synchronous metastatic NPC patients. Biopsy of distant metastasis could be another diagnosed choice for patients with suspected distant metastasis.