RESUMO
Tax collection and management is an important factor affecting corporate pollution emissions, but currently, few studies systematically and rigorously identify its effects. Based on China's tax collection and management reform and a microenterprise database, this paper uses a regression discontinuity design model to empirically analyze the impact of tax collection and management reform on environmental pollution and the mechanism of this impact. This study found that the tax collection and management reforms have significantly increased environmental pollution. On average, the environmental pollution of enterprises affected by the reform has increased by approximately 10.8%. This effect is more pronounced in companies with high innovation capabilities and financing constraints, companies in underdeveloped areas, zombie companies, large-scale companies, and non-labor-intensive companies. The impact mechanism analysis shows that tax collection and management reforms increase the tax burden and costs of enterprises and reduce enterprise operating performance, thereby exacerbating environmental pollution. The findings of this article help clarify the impact of government taxation decisions on environmental pollution decisions and have enlightening significance for improving taxation system design and reducing environmental pollution in developing countries.
Assuntos
Poluição Ambiental , Impostos , China , Governo , Bases de Dados FactuaisRESUMO
Strict environmental regulations may change the behavioral decisions of firms. Based on the exogenous impact of the Chinese Central Government's inclusion of environmental performance in the assessment targets of municipal officials in 2007, this study uses the difference-in-difference method to explore the impact of environmental regulations on employee income. We find that (1) environmental regulations will significantly reduce the average wage level of employees in polluting industries and have no significant impact in nonpolluting industries. (2) This effect is more pronounced in eastern China, where environmental regulations are more stringent, and in areas where political promotion incentives are stronger. (3) Mechanistic analysis finds that environmental regulations will affect employee income by increasing costs and constraining financing. (4) More importantly, we find that the decline in the average wage level of firms is mainly due to the decline in the average wage level of ordinary employees, and the average wage level of management has not decreased significantly, which means that environmental regulations have expanded the functional income distribution. Our findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of environmental regulatory policy implementation and associated economic cost issues.