Sex Differences in the Management of Oral Anticoagulation and Outcomes for Emergency Department Presentation of Incident Atrial Fibrillation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine sex differences in oral anticoagulation management and outcomes among patients with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We identified patients older than 20 years presenting to the ED with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation between April 1, 2012, and March 30, 2019, using linked administrative databases in Alberta, Canada. We assessed the use of and adherence to oral anticoagulants at 1 year using the proportion of days covered for direct oral anticoagulants and time in therapeutic range for warfarin. Outcomes included stroke, heart failure, and all-cause mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 28,886 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation presenting to ED, 44% were females. After adjustment, the rate of oral anticoagulant use was 5% lower in females with a guideline indication than that in males (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91 to 0.99) discharged home, and there was no difference among admitted patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05). Females had high adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (≥80% proportion of days covered) compared to males (discharged: 77.7% versus 74.0%; admitted: 80.0% versus 76.7%; adjusted odds ratio for females: 1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.29). More than half of the females and males had poor warfarin control (time in therapeutic range <65%) regardless of discharge status. In multivariable analyses, there was no sex difference in outcomes except a 1.48-fold (95% CI 1.14 to 1.92) higher risk of stroke in females. CONCLUSION: Females with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation discharged from the ED are less likely to receive oral anticoagulants than males. When oral anticoagulant treatment is initiated, females have high adherence to direct oral anticoagulants, and both the sexes have poor warfarin control. At 1 year, females were at a significantly higher risk of developing stroke.

A feasibility study for CODE-MI: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin-Optimizing the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction/injury in women.

BACKGROUND: CODE-MI is a pan-Canadian, multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial that evaluates the impact of using the female-specific 99th percentile threshold for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) on the diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of women presenting to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms suggestive for myocardial ischemia. A feasibility study was conducted to estimate the number of eligible patients, the rate of the study's primary outcome under control conditions, and the statistical power to detect a clinically important difference in the primary outcome. METHODS: Using linked administrative data from 11 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, from October 2014 to September 2017, the following estimates were obtained: number of women presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia and a 24-hour peak hs-cTn value within the female-specific and overall thresholds (ie, primary cohort); the rate of the 1-year composite outcome of all-cause mortality, re-admission for nonfatal myocardial infarction, incident heart failure, or emergent/urgent coronary revascularization. Study power was evaluated via simulations. RESULTS: Overall, 2,073,849 ED visits were assessed. Among women, chest pain (with or without cardiac features) and shortness of breath were the most common complaints associated with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. An estimated 7.7% of women with these complaints are eligible for inclusion in the primary cohort. The rate of the 1-year outcome in the primary cohort varied significantly across hospitals with a median rate of 12.2% (95%CI: 7.9%-17.7%). With 30 hospitals, randomized at 5-month intervals in 5 steps, approximately 19,600 women are expected to be included in CODE-MI, resulting in >82% power to detect a 20% decrease in the odds of the primary outcome at a 0.05 significance level. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study greatly enhanced the design of CODE-MI, allowed accurate evaluation of the study power, and demonstrated the strength of using linked administrative health data to guide the design of pragmatic clinical trials.

Association of "hypertriglyceridemic waist" with increased 5-year risk of subclinical atherosclerosis in a multi-ethnic population: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertriglyceridemic waist (HTGW), which incorporates measures of waist circumference and levels of triglyceride in blood, could act as an early-stage predictor to identify the individuals at high-risk for subclinical atherosclerosis. Previous studies have explored the cross-sectional association between HTGW and atherosclerosis; however, understanding how this association might change over time is necessary. This study will assess the association between HTGW with 5-year subclinical carotid atherosclerosis. METHODS: 517 participants of Aboriginal, Chinese, European, and South Asian ethnicities were examined for baseline HTGW and 5-year indices of subclinical atherosclerosis (intima media thickness (mm), total area (mm2), and plaque presence). Family history of cardiovascular disease, sociodemographic measures (age, sex, ethnicity, income level, maximum education), and traditional risk factors (systolic blood pressure, smoking status, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index) were incorporated into the models of association. These models used multiple linear regression and logistic regression. RESULTS: Baseline HTGW phenotype is a statistically significant and clinically meaningful predictor of 5-year intima media thickness (ß = 0.08 [0.04, 0.11], p < 0.001), total area (ß = 0.20 [0.07, 0.33], p = 0.002), and plaque presence (OR = 2.17 [1.13, 4.19], p = 0.02) compared to the non-HTGW group independent of sociodemographic factors and family history. However, this association is no longer significant after adjusting for the traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis (p = 0.27, p = 0.45, p = 0.66, respectively). Moreover, change in status of HTGW phenotype does not correlate with change in indices of atherosclerosis over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when the traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis are known, HTGW may not offer additional value as a predictor of subclinical atherosclerosis progression over 5 years.

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin-Optimizing the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction/Injury in Women (CODE-MI): Rationale and design for a multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial.

Despite evidence that high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) levels in women are lower than in men, a single threshold based on the 99th percentile upper reference limit of the overall reference population is commonly used to diagnose myocardial infarction in clinical practice. This trial aims to determine whether the use of a lower female-specific hs-cTn threshold would improve the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of women presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia. METHODS/DESIGN: CODE-MI (hs-cTn-Optimizing the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction/Injury in Women) is a multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of 30 secondary and tertiary care hospitals across 8 Canadian provinces, with the unit of randomization being the hospital. All adults (≥20 years of age) presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia and at least 1 hs-cTn test are eligible for inclusion. Over five, 5-month intervals, hospitals will be randomized to implement lower female hs-cTn thresholds according to the assay being used at each site. Men will continue to be assessed using the overall thresholds throughout. Women with a peak hs-cTn value between the female-specific and the overall thresholds will form our primary cohort. The primary outcome, a 1-year composite of all-cause mortality or readmission for nonfatal myocardial infarction, incident heart failure, or emergent/urgent coronary revascularization, will be compared before and after the implementation of female thresholds using mixed-effects logistic regression models. The cohort and outcomes will be obtained from routinely collected administrative data. The trial is designed to detect a 20% relative risk difference in the primary outcome, or a 2.2% absolute difference, with 82% power. CONCLUSIONS: This pragmatic trial will assess whether adopting lower female hs-cTn thresholds leads to appropriate assessment of women with symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction, thereby improving treatment and outcomes.

Ranolazine for Symptomatic Management of Microvascular Angina.

BACKGROUND: Ranolazine is approved in the United States and Europe for chronic stable angina. Microvascular angina (MVA) is defined as angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease. STUDY QUESTION: Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of ranolazine at improving angina scores and quality of life in a Canadian cohort with severe refractory angina due to MVA. STUDY DESIGN: We administered questionnaires to 31 patients at baseline and after at least 6 weeks of ranolazine treatment. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Validated, clinically significant changes for each Seattle Angina Questionnaire domain and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form were obtained from the literature. Score changes between baseline and postranolazine use were analyzed using sign test. RESULTS: Patients were mostly female (27 of 31 patients) with a median age of 57 years. After initiation of ranolazine treatment, patients experienced improvements in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form scores (80.6%; P < 0.01) and in 3 of the 4 domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (physical limitation: 73.3%; P = 0.02; treatment satisfaction: 80.6%; P < 0.01; and disease perception: 77.4%; P < 0.01). Patients were less likely to have interactions with the health care system after ranolazine treatment as compared with before (35.5% vs. 93.5%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Ranolazine significantly improves symptom control and quality of life in patients with MVA and severe refractory angina and reduces their interaction with the health care system. Given the potentially debilitating effect of chronic angina in MVA, ranolazine may be an effective treatment option.

Electrolyte minerals intake and cardiovascular health.

Appropriate intake of micronutrient, such as electrolyte minerals is critical for the well-being of the cardiovascular health system. However, there are some debates regarding the impacts of dietary and/or supplemental intake of these minerals, on the risk of cardiovascular events and associated risk factors. High sodium intake is adversely associated with the risk of hypertension. Although many reports refered to the positive association of Na intake and cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, however, other studies indicated that low Na intake is related to higher risk of all-cause mortality and HF-related events. By contrast, dietary potassium, magnesium and calcium have an inverse correlation with cardiovascular events and risk factors, especially with blood pressure. There are some controversies about cardiovascular effects and all-cause mortality of high Ca intake, including no effect, preventive or adverse effect with or without vitamin D. Calcium supplementation might be beneficial for prevention of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality only in individuals with low intake. Moreover, calcium intake showed a J- or U-shaped association with the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Due to the controversies of the effect of electrolyte minerals especially sodium and calcium intake on cardiovascular events, large scale, well-designed long-term randomized clinical trials are required to evaluate the effect of minerals intake on cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. In this review, we discuss the role of dietary and or supplemental sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, in cardiovascular health, as well as their clinical applications, benefits, and risks for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, in general population.

Trace minerals intake: Risks and benefits for cardiovascular health.

Minerals play a major role in regulating cardiovascular function. Imbalances in electrolyte minerals are frequent and potentially hazardous occurrences that may lead to the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Transition metals, such as iron, zinc, copper and selenium, play a major role in cell metabolism. However, there is controversy over the effects of dietary and supplemental intake of these metals on cardiovascular risk factors and events. Since their pro-oxidant or antioxidant functions can have different effects on cardiovascular health. While deficiency of these trace elements can cause cardiovascular dysfunction, several studies have also shown a positive association between metal serum levels and cardiovascular risk factors and events. Thus, a J- or U-shaped relationship between the transition minerals and cardiovascular events has been proposed. Given the existing controversies, large, well-designed, long-term, randomized clinical trials are required to better examine the effects of trace mineral intake on cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in the general population. In this review, we discuss the role of dietary and/or supplemental iron, copper, zinc, and selenium on cardiovascular health. We will also clarify their clinical applications, benefits, and harms in CVDs prevention.

Determinants of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with angina but without obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: The long-term prognosis of angina in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is uncertain. To assess the incidence of long-term adverse outcomes in such patients. Methods and results: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, the Embase database, and the Clinical Trials Registry for studies published in English until January 2017, assessing the composite primary outcome of all-cause death and non-fatal myocardial infarction using random-effects models to estimate pooled incidences. We identified 54 studies, reporting outcomes in overall 35 039 patients (mean age 56, male/female ratio 0.51, 99 770 person-years) with angina and no obstructive CAD. After a median follow-up of 5 years (interquartile range 3-7 years), the pooled incidence of the primary outcome was 0.98/100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.19%], with considerable heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 91%, P < 0.001). The primary outcome was associated with prevalent dyslipidaemia (P = 0.016), diabetes (P = 0.035), and hypertension (P = 0.016). Studies enrolling patients with less-than-obstructive CAD showed a higher incidence of the primary outcome (1.32/100 person-years, 95% CI 1.02-1.62) compared with studies including only patients with 'entirely normal' coronary arteries (0.52/100 person-years, 95% CI 0.34-0.79, respectively; P < 0.01). The incidence of the primary outcome did not differ significantly between studies enrolling only patients with documented myocardial ischaemia and those studies enrolling patients regardless of presence of ischaemia. However, ischaemia documented by non-invasive imaging techniques was associated with a higher incidence of events (P = 0.02). Overall, these patients, however, suffered from a high incidence of recurrent hospitalization. Conclusion: Angina without obstructive CAD has a heterogeneous prognosis. A main determinant of major adverse events is the presence of 'some' coronary atherosclerosis, with unequivocal myocardial ischaemia being associated with worse clinical outcomes. Patients' quality of life is also worsened by the high incidence of hospitalization, angina recurrence, and repeated coronary angiography.

Outcomes following percutaneous coronary revascularization among South Asian and Chinese Canadians.

BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest significant ethnic differences in outcomes following percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI), though previous studies have focused on subgroups of PCI patients or used administrative data only. We sought to compare outcomes in a population-based cohort of men and women of South Asian (SA), Chinese and "Other" ethnicity. METHODS: Using a population-based registry, we identified 41,792 patients who underwent first revascularization via PCI in British Columbia, Canada, between 2001 and 2010. We defined three ethnic groups (SA, 3904 [9.3%]; Chinese, 1345 [3.2%]; and all "Others" 36,543 [87.4%]). Differences in mortality, repeat revascularization (RRV) and target vessel revascularization (TVR), at 30 days and from 31 days to 2 years were examined. RESULTS: Adjusted mortality from 31 days to 2 years was lower in Chinese patients than in "Others" (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.97), but not different between SAs and "Others". SA patients had higher RRV at 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% CI: 1.12-1.51) and from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06-1.30) compared to "Others". In contrast, Chinese patients had a lower rate of RRV from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.96) versus "Others". SA patients also had higher rates of TVR at 30 days (adjusted OR 1.35; 95% CI: 1.10-1.66) and from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06-1.34) compared to "Others". Chinese patients had a lower rate of TVR from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: SA had higher RRV and TVR rates while Chinese Canadians had lower rates of long-term RRV, compared to those of "Other" ethnicity. Further research to elucidate the reasons for these differences could inform targeted strategies to improve outcomes.

Sex-Specific Differences at Presentation and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Female sex is associated with poorer outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Data on sex-specific differences after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: To examine sex-specific differences in patients undergoing TAVR in the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the randomized and nonrandomized portions of the PARTNER trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00530894). SETTING: 25 hospitals in the United States, Canada, and Germany. PATIENTS: High-risk and inoperable patients (1220 women and 1339 men). INTERVENTION: TAVR. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics, cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities, mortality, stroke, rehospitalization, vascular complications, bleeding complications, and echocardiographic valve parameters. RESULTS: At baseline, women had lower rates of hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, and renal disease but higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores (11.9% vs. 11.1%; P < 0.001). After TAVR, women had more vascular complications (17.3% vs. 10.0%; difference, 7.29 percentage points [95% CI, 4.63 to 9.95 percentage points]; P < 0.001) and major bleeding (10.5% vs. 7.7%; difference, 2.8 percentage points [CI, 0.57 to 5.04 percentage points]; P = 0.012) but less frequent moderate and severe paravalvular regurgitation (6.0% vs. 14.3%; difference, -8.3 percentage points [CI, -11.7 to -5.0 percentage points]; P < 0.001). At 30 days, the unadjusted all-cause mortality rate (6.5% vs. 5.9%; difference, 0.6 percentage point [CI, -1.29 to 2.45 percentage points]; P = 0.52) and stroke incidence (3.8% vs. 3.0%; difference, 0.8 percentage point [CI, -0.62 to 2.19 percentage points]; P = 0.28) were similar. At 1 year, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in women than in men (19.0% vs. 25.9%; hazard ratio, 0.72 [CI, 0.61 to 0.85]; P < 0.001). LIMITATION: Secondary analysis that included nonrandomized trial data. CONCLUSION: Despite a higher incidence of vascular and bleeding complications, women having TAVR had lower mortality than men at 1 year. Thus, sex-specific risk in TAVR is the opposite of that in SAVR, for which female sex has been shown to be independently associated with an adverse prognosis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Edwards Lifesciences.

Warfarin use and the risk for stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Current observational studies on warfarin use and the risk for stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing dialysis found conflicting results. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years admitted to a hospital with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF, in Quebec and Ontario, Canada from 1998 to 2007. The AF cohort was grouped into dialysis (hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) and nondialysis patients and into warfarin and no-warfarin users according to the first prescription filled for warfarin within 30 days after AF hospital discharge. We determined the association between warfarin use and the risk for stroke and bleeding in dialysis and nondialysis patients. The cohort comprised 1626 dialysis patients and 204 210 nondialysis patients. Among dialysis patients, 46% (756/1626) patients were prescribed warfarin. Among dialysis patients, warfarin users had more congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus, but fewer prior bleeding events in comparison with the no-warfarin users. Among dialysis patients, warfarin use, in comparison with no-warfarin use, was not associated with a lower risk for stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.67) but was associated with a 44% higher risk for bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.85) after adjusting for potential confounders. Propensity score-adjusted analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that warfarin use is not beneficial in reducing stroke risk, but it is associated with a higher bleeding risk in patients with AF undergoing dialysis.

A meta-analysis of sex-related differences in outcomes after primary percutaneous intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) has improved clinical outcome in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, but the impact of sex on early and mid-term outcomes remains to be defined. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central, and Google Scholar were searched for articles describing differences in baseline, periprocedural, and midterm outcomes after pPCI, by sex. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at early and mid-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital bleeding and stroke. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included. Women were older, had more frequent hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia, as well as longer ischemia time and more shock at presentation. Men were more likely to have had a previous myocardial infarction. Female sex emerged as independently associated to early mortality (OR 1.1; 95%CI, 1.02-1.18) but not to mid-term mortality (OR, 1.01; 95%CI, 0.99-1.03). The pooled analysis showed a significantly higher risk of in hospital stroke (OR, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.11-2.56) and major bleeding (OR, 2.04; 95%CI, 1.51-2.77) in women. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to men, women undergoing pPCI have more bleedings and strokes, and a worse early, but not mid-term mortality. These findings may allow a better risk stratification of pPCI patients.

Sex-related differences in access to care among patients with premature acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Access to care may be implicated in disparities between men and women in death after acute coronary syndrome, especially among younger adults. We aimed to assess sex-related differences in access to care among patients with premature acute coronary syndrome and to identify clinical and gender-related determinants of access to care. METHODS: We studied 1123 patients (18-55 yr) admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome and enrolled in the GENESIS-PRAXY cohort study. Outcome measures were door-to-electrocardiography, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, as well as proportions of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, reperfusion or nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify clinical and gender-related determinants of timely procedures and use of invasive procedures. RESULTS: Women were less likely than men to receive care within benchmark times for electrocardiography (≤ 10 min: 29% v. 38%, p = 0.02) or fibrinolysis (≤ 30 min: 32% v. 57%, p = 0.01). Women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) were less likely than men to undergo reperfusion therapy (primary percutaneous coronary intervention or fibrinolysis) (83% v. 91%, p = 0.01), and women with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina were less likely to undergo nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention (48% v. 66%, p < 0.001). Clinical determinants of poorer access to care included anxiety, increased number of risk factors and absence of chest pain. Gender-related determinants included feminine traits of personality and responsibility for housework. INTERPRETATION: Among younger adults with acute coronary syndrome, women and men had different access to care. Moreover, fewer than half of men and women with ST-segment elevation MI received timely primary coronary intervention. Our results also highlight that men and women with no chest pain and those with anxiety, several traditional risk factors and feminine personality traits were at particularly increased risk of poorer access to care.

The Importance of Nontraditional and Sex-Specific Risk Factors in Young Women With Vasomotor Nonobstructive vs Obstructive Coronary Syndromes.

Background: Heart disease is the leading cause of premature death for women in Canada. Ischemic heart disease is categorized as myocardial infarction (MI) with no obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA), ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA), and atherosclerotic obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with MI (MI-CAD) or without MI (non-MI-CAD). This study aims to study the prevalence of traditional and nontraditional ischemic heart disease risk factors and their relationships with (M)INOCA, compared to MI-CAD and non-MI-CAD in young women. Methods: This study investigated women who presented with premature (at age ≤ 55 years) vasomotor entities of (M)INOCA or obstructive CAD confirmed by coronary angiography, who are currently enrolled in either the Leslie Diamond Women's Heart Health Clinic Registry (WHC) or the Study to Avoid Cardiovascular Events in British Columbia (SAVEBC). Univariable and multivariable regression models were applied to investigate associations of risk factors with odds of (M)INOCA, MI-CAD, and non-MI-CAD. Results: A total of 254 women enrolled between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed, as follows: 77 with INOCA and 37 with MINOCA from the registry, and 66 with non-MI-CAD and 74 with MI-CAD from the study. Regression analyses demonstrated that migraines and preeclampsia or gestational hypertension were the most significant risk factors, with a higher likelihood of being associated with premature (M)INOCA, relative to obstructive CAD. Conversely, the presence of diabetes and a current or previous smoking history had the highest likelihood of being associated with premature CAD. Conclusions: The risk factor profiles of patients with premature (M)INOCA, compared to obstructive CAD, have significant differences.

Contexte: Au Canada, la cardiopathie est la principale cause de décès prématuré chez les femmes. La cardiopathie ischémique est catégorisée comme suit : infarctus du myocarde (IM) en l'absence de coronaropathie obstructive (MINOCA), ischémie sans obstruction des artères coronaires (INOCA) et athérosclérose coronaire obstructive accompagnée d'un IM ou sans IM. La présente étude vise à examiner la prévalence des facteurs de risque classiques et non classiques de cardiopathie ischémique et leurs liens avec le (M)INOCA, comparativement à l'athérosclérose coronaire obstructive accompagnée d'un IM ou sans IM chez les femmes jeunes. Méthodologie: Cette étude portait sur des femmes qui avaient prématurément (55 ans ou moins) souffert d'un (M)INOCA ou d'une coronaropathie obstructive confirmés par coronarographie et qui étaient inscrites au registre de la Leslie Diamond Women's Heart Health Clinic (WHC) ou qui participaient à l'étude visant à éviter les événements cardiovasculaires en Colombie-Britannique (Study toAvoid CardiovascularEvents inBC; SAVEBC). Des modèles de régression univariés et multivariés ont été utilisés pour explorer les associations entre les facteurs de risque et les probabilités de (M)INOCA, ainsi que d'athérosclérose coronaire obstructive accompagnée ou non d'un IM. Résultats: Au total, 254 femmes inscrites de 2015 à 2022 ont été recensées, soit 77 présentant une INOCA et 37, un MINOCA selon le registre WHC, et 66 présentant une athérosclérose coronaire obstructive sans IM et 74, une athérosclérose coronaire obstructive accompagnée d'un IM selon l'étude SAVEBC. Les analyses de régression ont démontré que les migraines et la prééclampsie ou l'hypertension gestationnelle étaient les facteurs de risque les plus importants associés à une probabilité la plus élevée de (M)INOCA comparativement à une coronaropathie obstructive. En revanche, la présence d'un diabète et d'un tabagisme actuel ou passé était associée à la probabilité la plus élevée de coronaropathie prématurée. Conclusions: Il existe d'importantes différences pour ce qui est des profils de facteurs de risque des patientes ayant prématurément souffert d'un (M)INOCA en comparaison d'une coronaropathie obstructive.

Imprecision of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays at the female 99th-percentile.

BACKGROUND: An analytical benchmark for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays is to achieve a coefficient of variation (CV) of ≤ 10.0 % at the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) used for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Few prospective multicenter studies have evaluated assay imprecision and none have determined precision at the female URL which is lower than the male URL for all cardiac troponin assays. METHODS: Human serum and plasma matrix samples were constructed to yield hs-cTn concentrations near the female URLs for the Abbott, Beckman, Roche, and Siemens hs-cTn assays. These materials were sent (on dry ice) to 35 Canadian hospital laboratories (n = 64 instruments evaluated) participating in a larger clinical trial, with instructions for storage, handling, and monthly testing over one year. The mean concentration, standard deviation, and CV for each instrument type and an overall pooled CV for each manufacturer were calculated. RESULTS: The CVs for all individual instruments and overall were ≤ 10.0 % for two manufacturers (Abbott CVpooled = 6.3 % and Beckman CVpooled = 7.0 %). One of four Siemens Atellica instruments yielded a CV > 10.0 % (CVpooled = 7.7 %), whereas 15 of 41 Roche instruments yielded CVs > 10.0 % at the female URL of 9 ng/L used worldwide (6 cobas e411, 1 cobas e601, 4 cobas e602, and 4 cobas e801) (CVpooled = 11.7 %). Four Roche instruments also yielded CVs > 10.0 % near the female URL of 14 ng/L used in the United States (CVpooled = 8.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The number of instruments achieving a CV ≤ 10.0 % at the female 99th-percentile URL varies by manufacturer and by instrument. Monitoring assay precision at the female URL is necessary for some assays to ensure optimal use of this threshold in clinical practice.

Rhythm versus rate control therapy and subsequent stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a debilitating condition with an increased risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Although data from clinical trials suggest that both rate and rhythm control are acceptable approaches with comparable rates of mortality in the short term, it is unclear whether stroke rates differ between patients who filled prescriptions for rhythm or rate control therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a population-based observational study of Quebec patients ≥65 years with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation during the period 1999 to 2007 with the use of linked administrative data from hospital discharge and prescription drug claims databases. We compared rates of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) among patients using rhythm (class Ia, Ic, and III antiarrhythmics), versus rate control (ß-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and digoxin) treatment strategies (either current or new users). The cohort consisted of 16 325 patients who filled a prescription for rhythm control therapy (with or without rate control therapy) and 41 193 patients who filled a prescription for rate control therapy, with a mean follow-up of 2.8 years (maximum 8.2 years). A lower proportion of patients on rhythm control therapy than on rate control therapy had a CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, and previous stroke or TIA) score of ≥2 (58.1% versus 67.0%, P<0.001). Treatment with any antithrombotic drug was comparable in the 2 groups (76.8% in rhythm control versus 77.8% in rate control group). Crude stroke/TIA incidence rate was lower in patients treated with rhythm control in comparison with rate control therapy (1.74 versus 2.49, per 100 person-years, P<0.001). This association was more marked in patients in the moderate- and high-risk groups for stroke according to the CHADS(2) risk score. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, rhythm control therapy was associated with a lower risk of stroke/TIA in comparison with rate control therapy (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.74, 0.87). The lower stroke/TIA rate was confirmed in a propensity score-matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with rate control therapy, the use of rhythm control therapy was associated with lower rates of stroke/TIA among patients with atrial fibrillation, in particular, among those with moderate and high risk of stroke.

Sex differences in clinical outcomes in patients with stable angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: We comparatively evaluated clinical outcomes in men and women presenting with stable angina with no coronary artery disease (CAD), nonobstructive CAD, and obstructive CAD on coronary angiography. METHODS: We studied all patients ≥20 years with stable angina, undergoing coronary angiography in British Columbia, Canada, from July 1999 to December 2002 (n = 13,695) with maximum follow-up to 3 years. No CAD, nonobstructive CAD, and obstructive CAD were defined as 0%, 1% to 49%, and ≥50% luminal narrowing in any epicardial coronary artery, respectively. Freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), which included the combined end points of all-cause mortality, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and heart failure admissions, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for MACE were estimated up to 3 years postcatheterization and compared between sex and CAD groups. RESULTS: Within the first year, women with nonobstructive CAD had a higher risk of MACE than men with nonobstructive CAD (adjusted HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.08-5.49). Furthermore, women with nonobstructive CAD had a 2.55-fold higher risk of MACE than women with no CAD (95% CI 1.33-4.88). In contrast, men with nonobstructive CAD had a similar risk as men with no CAD (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.26-1.45). The differences in MACE according to extent of CAD were not evident in the longer term. CONCLUSIONS: Women with stable angina and nonobstructive CAD are 3 times more likely to experience a cardiac event within the first year of cardiac catheterization than men. A prospective trial to examine the impact of medical therapy on MACE in patients with nonobstructive CAD is warranted.

Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaque Regression and Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Regression Analysis.

Importance: The association between changes in atherosclerotic plaque induced by lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) and reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) remains controversial. Objective: To evaluate the association between coronary plaque regression assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and MACEs. Data Sources: A comprehensive, systematic search of publications in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science was performed. Study Selection: Clinical prospective studies of LLTs reporting change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) assessed by IVUS and describing MACE components were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Reporting was performed in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The association between mean change in PAV and MACEs was analyzed by meta-regression using mixed-effects, 2-level binomial logistic regression models, unadjusted and adjusted for clinical covariates, including mean age, baseline PAV, baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and study duration. Main Outcome and Measures: Mean PAV change and MACE in intervention and comparator arms were assessed in an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis of IVUS trials of LLTs that also reported MACEs. Results: This meta-analysis included 23 studies published between July 2001 and July 2022, including 7407 patients and trial durations ranging from 11 to 104 weeks. Mean (SD) patient age ranged from 55.8 (9.8) to 70.2 (7.6) years, and the number of male patients from 245 of 507 (48.3%) to 24 of 26 (92.3%). Change in PAV across 46 study arms ranged from -5.6% to 3.1%. The number of MACEs ranged from 0 to 72 per study arm (17 groups [37%] reported no events, 9 [20%] reported 1-2 events, and 20 [43%] reported ≥3 events). In unadjusted analysis, a 1% decrease in mean PAV was associated with 17% reduced odds of MACEs (unadjusted OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .03), and with a 14% reduction in MACEs in adjusted analysis (adjusted OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00; P = .050). Further adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors showed a 19% reduced risk (adjusted OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; P = .01) per 1% decrease in PAV. A 1% reduction of PAV change between intervention and comparator arms within studies was also associated with a significant 25% reduction in MACEs (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-1.00; P = .046). Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, regression of atherosclerotic plaque by 1% was associated with a 25% reduction in the odds of MACEs. These findings suggest that change in PAV could be a surrogate marker for MACEs, but given the heterogeneity in the outcomes, additional data are needed.

Gender differences in symptoms of myocardial ischaemia.

AIMS: Better understanding of symptoms of myocardial ischaemia is needed to improve timeliness of treatment for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although researchers have suggested sex differences exist in ischaemic symptoms, methodological issues prevent conclusions. Using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) balloon inflation as a model of myocardial ischaemia, we explored sex differences in reported symptoms of ischaemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients having non-emergent PCI, but not haemodynamic instability or left bundle branch block or non-acute coronary occlusion, were prospectively recruited. Pre-procedure, descriptions of pre-existing symptoms were obtained using open-ended questioning. Inflation was maintained for 2 min or until moderate discomfort or clinical instability occurred. During inflation, subjects were exhaustively questioned about their symptoms. Concurrent ECG data were collected. The final sample was 305 [39.7% women; mean age 63.9 (± 10.6)]. No sex differences were found in rates of chest or typical ischaemic discomfort, regardless of ischaemic status. Women were significantly more likely to report throat/jaw discomfort [odds ratio: 2.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.58-5.37] even after statistical adjustment for clinical and demographic variables. CONCLUSION: This prospective study with ECG-affirmed ischaemia found no statistically significant differences in women's and men's rates of chest and other typical symptoms during ischaemia, although women were more likely to experience throat and jaw discomfort. Currently both popular press and some patient education materials suggest women experience myocardial ischaemia differently from men. Steps to ensure women and health professionals are alert for the classic symptoms of myocardial ischaemia in women, as well as men, may be warranted.