RESUMO
STUDY QUESTION: Is there a non-invasive biomarker for the diagnosis of testicular inflammatory lesions? SUMMARY ANSWER: In sera from infertile azoospermic patients with histologically confirmed low-grade testicular inflammation, significantly elevated titers of autoantibodies against disulfide isomerase family A, member 3 (ER-60) were found. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Infection and inflammation of the genital tract are supposed to be responsible for up to 15% of cases among infertile males. However, specific seminal or serological markers are not available to assess subacute or chronic inflammatory conditions in the testis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study consisted of the identification of autoantibodies for testicular antigens in sera of patients with low-grade testicular inflammation, validation of candidates, development of an ELISA for the most promising target antigen and measurement of autoantibodies titers in healthy normozoospermic men (n = 20); male blood donors (n = 14); men with impaired semen quality without (n = 14) or with (n = 26) symptoms of genital tract infection/inflammation; azoospermic men with histologically confirmed testicular inflammatory lesions (n = 16); men after pharmacotherapy of genital tract infection/inflammation (n = 15) and men with acute epididymo-orchitis (n = 30). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Proteins in lysates of normal testicular tissue were separated by high-resolution 2D gel electrophoresis and probed with sera of 13 patients with histologically confirmed chronic testicular inflammation. There were 14 proteins that immunoreacted with a majority of these sera and could be identified by mass spectrometry. Of these 14 proteins, disulfide isomerase family A, member 3 (ER-60), transferrin and chaperonin containing TCP1 complex, subunit 5 (epsilon) (CCT5) were considered as specific. Since ER-60 reacted with 92% of patient sera, an ER-60-autoantibody ELISA was developed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The newly established ELISA detected significantly elevated titers of autoantibodies against ER-60 in the sera from infertile men with histologically confirmed chronic testicular inflammation (median 8.6; P < 0.01) compared with the control groups. Moreover, elevated levels of anti-ER-60 titers were detected in patients suffering from acute epididymo-orchitis (median 3.3; P < 0.05) as compared with healthy normozoospermic men (median 2.13; P < 0.001), male blood donors with unknown fertility status (median 2.72; P < 0.01), patients with impaired semen quality but no infection/inflammation (median 2.59; P < 0.001) and patients with symptoms of genital tract infections and/or inflammation (median 2.18; P < 0.001). Significantly lower levels of anti-ER-60 antibodies were measured in sera from patients after application of anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy (median 1.9; P < 0.01) compared with those with histologically confirmed chronic testicular inflammation. The cut-off value of the assay was set to 6.6 U/ml based on a calculated sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 81.2%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results obtained in this study showed statistically significant elevated titers of ER-60 antibodies in sera from patients with histologically confirmed testicular inflammatory lesions and from a few patients with acute epididymo-orchitis. However, the number of serum samples tested was limited. Severe testicular damage seen in azoospermic patients could represent a bias towards ER-60 reactivity, while the assay does not allow for different etiologies of the lesions to be distinguished. Due to ethical reasons, the prevalence of testicular inflammatory lesions among controls and non-azoospermic men cannot be studied at the histological level. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Measurement of ER-60 autoantibody titers in serum could be a novel non-invasive marker for the diagnosis of asymptomatic testicular inflammation causing male fertility disturbances. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (ME 1323/4-4) and the Translational Science Fund (Wirtschafts-und Strukturbank Hessen-WI Bank). M.F., A.P., W.W., H.-C.S. and A.M. are supported by the LOEWE focus group 'MIBIE' (Male infertility during infection and inflammation). The ER-60 ELISA is protected by a patent to the Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen with A.M. and M.F. as inventors (patent no. DE 10 2008 053 503). T.Z. as employee of the DRG Company was responsible for the ELISA development.
Assuntos
Autoanticorpos/análise , Infertilidade Masculina/diagnóstico , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Isomerases de Dissulfetos de Proteínas/imunologia , Testículo/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Azoospermia/diagnóstico , Azoospermia/imunologia , Azoospermia/patologia , Biomarcadores/análise , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/imunologia , Infertilidade Masculina/patologia , Inflamação/imunologia , Inflamação/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise do Sêmen , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend a structured symptom screening (SC) for especially advanced cancer patients (CPs). The aim of this multicenter German prospective quality assurance project KeSBa (Kennzahl Symptom- und Belastungserfassung) was to gain knowledge on SC procedures in Oncology Centers (OCs) for advanced cancer patients and a first impression on the consequences of SC. METHODS: The KeSBa project consisted of three phases: pilot, 3 months screening and feedback phase. Participating OCs decided to use either the Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS) or the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) and defined the cutoff values for positive screening results. RESULTS: Out of 172 certified German OCs, 40 (23%) participated in the KeSBa pilot phase, 29 (16.8%) in the 3 months screening phase using MIDOS (n = 18, 58.6%) or IPOS (n = 11, 41.3%) and in the feedback round. 25/29 performed paper-based screening (86.2%). 2.963 CPs were screened. Results were documented for 1255 (42.2%, SC +) positive and 874 (29.5%, SC-) negative screenings depending on the center´s schedules: 452 SC + CPs (28.4%) and 42 SC- CPs (2.6%) had contact to specialized palliative care or other supportive specialist teams afterwards, 458 SC + CPs (28.8%) and 605 SC- CPs (38.1%) remained in standard oncology care. In the feedback round missing resources (personal and IT) and improved communication were mentioned most often. CONCLUSION: Routine SC is feasible in advanced CPs treated in OCs but associated with considerable workload. In 42.2% of CPs SC was classified as positive, indicating the need of further diagnostics or professional judgment. SC requires staff and IT resources.