RESUMO
The protection of the replication fork structure under stress conditions is essential for genome maintenance and cancer prevention. A key signaling pathway for fork protection involves TRPV2-mediated Ca2+ release from the ER, which is triggered after the generation of cytosolic DNA and the activation of cGAS/STING. This results in CaMKK2/AMPK activation and subsequent Exo1 phosphorylation, which prevent aberrant fork processing, thereby ensuring genome stability. However, it remains poorly understood how the TRPV2 channel is activated by the presence of cytosolic DNA. Here, through a genome-wide CRISPR-based screen, we identify TRPM8 channel-associated factor 1 (TCAF1) as a key factor promoting TRPV2-mediated Ca2+ release under replication stress or other conditions that activate cGAS/STING. Mechanistically, TCAF1 assists Ca2+ release by facilitating the dissociation of STING from TRPV2, thereby relieving TRPV2 repression. Consistent with this function, TCAF1 is required for fork protection, chromosomal stability, and cell survival after replication stress.
Assuntos
Cálcio , Citosol , Replicação do DNA , Proteínas de Membrana , Canais de Cátion TRPV , Humanos , Canais de Cátion TRPV/metabolismo , Canais de Cátion TRPV/genética , Cálcio/metabolismo , Citosol/metabolismo , Proteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Células HEK293 , DNA/metabolismo , Células HeLa , Quinase da Proteína Quinase Dependente de Cálcio-Calmodulina/metabolismo , Quinase da Proteína Quinase Dependente de Cálcio-Calmodulina/genética , Fosforilação , Instabilidade Genômica , Dano ao DNA , AnimaisRESUMO
G2 and S phase-expressed-1 (GTSE1) has been reported to be associated with poor prognosis in many cancer types. However, the knowledge of GTSE1 across 33 cancer types remains scarce, and the mechanisms by which GTSE1 promotes cancer development remain incompletely understood. R language and TIMER2.0 were used to analyze the clinical relevance of GTSE1 acrossâ >â 10,000 subjects representing 33 cancer types based on the cancer genome atlas databases. The expression of GTSE1 was upregulated in almost all cancer types and hyperactivity of GTSE1 is likely to induce DNA repair response and positively correlates with the tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability which are both promising predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy. GTSE1 was upregulated in TP53 mutation patients. Additionally, GTSE1 also positively correlates with tumor purity and tumor infiltration of immune-suppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Consistently, high expression of GTSE1 is associated with poor patient survival in many cancer types. Conclusion: Our study provides new insights into the diagnostic and prognostic role of GTSE1 in cancers and suggests therapeutic approaches for GTSE1-overexpressing cancers by targeting DNA repair response, and the tumor immune microenvironment.