Effectiveness of spiritual care using spiritual pain assessment sheet for advanced cancer patients: A pilot non-randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain preliminary knowledge to design a randomized controlled trial to clarify the effects of spiritual care using the Spiritual Pain Assessment Sheet (SpiPas). METHOD: The study was designed as a nonrandomized controlled trial. The study took place between January 2015 and July 2015 in a hematology and oncology ward and two palliative care units in Japan. Among 54 eligible patients with advanced cancer, 46 were recruited (24 in the control group vs. 22 in the intervention group). The intervention group received spiritual care using SpiPas and usual care; the control group received usual care. The primary outcome was the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp). The secondary outcomes were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Comprehensive Quality of Life Outcome (CoQoLo).ResultA total of 33 (72%) and 23 (50%) patients completed 2- and 3-week follow-up evaluations, respectively. The differences in the changes during 2 weeks in total scores of FACIT-Sp and HADS were significant (95% confidence intervals, 3.65, 14.4, p < 0.01; -11.2 to -1.09, p = .02, respectively). No significant changes were observed in the total score of CoQoLo.Significance of resultsSpiritual care using the SpiPas might be useful for improving patient spiritual well-being. This controlled clinical trial could be performed and a future clinical trial is promising if outcomes are obtained within 2 weeks.

Verbal communication of families with cancer patients at end of life: A questionnaire survey with bereaved family members.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the verbal communication of feelings between families and patients in Japanese palliative care units from the perspective of bereaved family members by examining (1) proportions of families' and patients' verbalization of six feelings (gratitude, love, seeking forgiveness, giving forgiveness, wishes after death, and continuing bonds), (2) recognition of receiving these feelings through verbalization from the family's perspective, and (3) the specific attitudes of family members that influence their verbalizations. METHODS: In 2010, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with 968 bereaved families of cancer patients in palliative care units across Japan. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-seven responses were analyzed. (1) "Gratitude" was verbalized most often (families: 47%; patients: 61%), and "expressing forgiveness" least often (families: 16%; patients: 11%). (2) Even if the words were not used, 81.2% to 88.2% of families answered that they had received the patient's feelings, and 71.8% to 85.4% of families felt the patient had received their feelings. (3) Multiple logistic regression analyses indicated that the strongest attitudes determining verbalizing were "not wanting to say farewell without conveying feelings," "a daily basis of expressing," and "heart-to-heart communication" (ishin-denshin). CONCLUSIONS: For both families and patients, verbalizing feelings was difficult. Our results showed that families' and patients' verbalizing and receiving of feelings must be aligned to understand their communication at the end of life in Japan. Future research is needed to verify how attitude helps promote or inhibit verbalization.

Nursing Care for Spiritual Pain in Terminal Cancer Patients: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.

CONTEXT: Spiritual well-being is important for terminal cancer patients; however, appropriate interventions remain to be established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of nursing care to alleviate spiritual pain in daily clinical practice using a Spiritual Pain Assessment Sheet-based spiritual care program for nurses (SpiPas-SCP-N). METHODS: A nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted in five palliative care units in Japan. The intervention group received spiritual care based on SpiPas-SCP-N by ward nurses. The primary outcome was the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp). Secondary outcomes included: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Comprehensive Quality of life Outcome (CoQoLo), and the Japanese version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-J). Propensity score matching was used for adjustment. RESULTS: Terminal cancer patients were assigned to the control and intervention groups (n = 140 and 157, respectively); of whom, 97 (69.8%) and 106 (68.0%), respectively, completed two weeks. Seventy-three patients were matched in each group. The total score of FACIT-Sp increased in the intervention group and decreased in the control group; however, there was no significant difference (95% CI, -3.98, 1.41, P = 0.347). HADS total score significantly increased (95% CI, 0.15, 3.87, P = 0.035), whereas there were no significant changes in CoQoLo and MDASI-J scores. The effect size of changes in FACIT-Sp subscales were 0.25 in the meaning/peace subscale and 0.04 in the faith subscale. CONCLUSION: SpiPas-SCP-N for spiritual pain may have a positive impact on terminal cancer patients. Future research using larger samples, randomized design, and the meaning/peace subscale of FACIT-Sp as the primary outcome is necessary as well as supervision and continuous training in daily nursing practice.

Nurse education program on meaninglessness in terminally ill cancer patients: a randomized controlled study of a novel two-day workshop.

BACKGROUND: Fostering patients' sense of meaning is an essential task for palliative care clinicians. Few studies have reported the effects on nurses of a short-term training program aimed at improving skills to relieve feelings of meaninglessness in terminally ill cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to determine the impact on nurses of a novel two-day education program focusing on care that addresses patients' feelings of meaninglessness. Measured were impacts on nurses' confidence, self-reported practice, attitudes toward caring for such patients, burnout, meaning of life, and knowledge. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial using the waiting list control. Intervention consisted of a two-day interactive education program. A total of 76 nurses randomly allocated to two groups completed the study. Outcome measures included confidence scale; self-reported practice scale; scales of nursing attitudes toward caring for patients who experience feelings of meaningless (willingness to help, positive appraisal, helplessness, nurse-perceived value of being, and nurse-perceived value of patients' inner power); Maslach burnout scale, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual, and knowledge scale. RESULTS: There were significant intervention effects in nurse-reported confidence and nurse-perceived value of patients' inner power. Nurse-reported helplessness showed marginally significant improvement after intervention (p=0.067). No significant intervention effects were observed in the self-reported practice scale; attitudes toward caring for patients (willingness to help, positive appraisal, and nurse-perceived value of being); burnout scale, meaning of life; and knowledge score. The percentages of nurses who evaluated this program as useful or very useful were 95% (understanding the conceptual framework) and 85% (helping to learn how to provide care for patients feeling meaninglessness in clinical practice). CONCLUSION: This short-term educational intervention had a significant beneficial effect on nurses' confidence and modest effects on attitudes.

Development of a spiritual pain assessment sheet for terminal cancer patients: targeting terminal cancer patients admitted to palliative care units in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: This research explores the potential benefit of a spiritual pain assessment sheet to clinical practice. With spiritual pain defined as "pain caused by extinction of the being and meaning of the self," the spiritual pain assessment sheet was developed by Hisayuki Murata from his conceptual framework reflecting the three dimensions of a human being as a being founded on temporality, a being in relationship, and a being with autonomy. The assessment sheet was developed from reviews of the literature and examinations from a philosophical perspective on the structure of spiritual pain. METHODS: Patients admitted to palliative care units in Japan were interviewed using the assessment sheet. The responses were analyzed qualitatively. The usefulness of the assessment sheet and the burden placed on the patients by its use were also investigated. RESULTS: The spiritual pain elucidated by the assessment sheet was the same as that revealed in the earlier research of Morita. The patients reported that they did not find the use of the assessment sheet a burden, and more than half reported that it was useful. The burden of the assessment sheet on the subjects was thus determined to be low. Positive feedback on the assessment sheet was also received from the nurses who conducted the patient interviews, who said the assessment sheet made it easier to talk with the patients about their spiritual pain. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESEARCH: The research results indicate that the spiritual pain assessment sheet provided an appropriate assessment of spiritual pain among terminal cancer patients, showing that such a sheet could be used as an assessment tool in the future.