Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Venous and Arterial Thrombotic Events in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: COVID-PACT.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of prophylactic full-dose anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in critically ill COVID-19 patients remain uncertain. METHODS: COVID-PACT (Prevention of Arteriovenous Thrombotic Events in Critically-ill COVID-19 Patients Trial) was a multicenter, 2×2 factorial, open-label, randomized-controlled trial with blinded end point adjudication in intensive care unit-level patients with COVID-19. Patients were randomly assigned to a strategy of full-dose anticoagulation or standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation. Absent an indication for antiplatelet therapy, patients were additionally randomly assigned to either clopidogrel or no antiplatelet therapy. The primary efficacy outcome was the hierarchical composite of death attributable to venous or arterial thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, clinically evident deep venous thrombosis, type 1 myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic embolic event or acute limb ischemia, or clinically silent deep venous thrombosis, through hospital discharge or 28 days. The primary efficacy analyses included an unmatched win ratio and time-to-first event analysis while patients were on treatment. The primary safety outcome was fatal or life-threatening bleeding. The secondary safety outcome was moderate to severe bleeding. Recruitment was stopped early in March 2022 (≈50% planned recruitment) because of waning intensive care unit-level COVID-19 rates. RESULTS: At 34 centers in the United States, 390 patients were randomly assigned between anticoagulation strategies and 292 between antiplatelet strategies (382 and 290 in the on-treatment analyses). At randomization, 99% of patients required advanced respiratory therapy, including 15% requiring invasive mechanical ventilation; 40% required invasive ventilation during hospitalization. Comparing anticoagulation strategies, a greater proportion of wins occurred with full-dose anticoagulation (12.3%) versus standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (6.4%; win ratio, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.08-3.55]; P=0.028). Results were consistent in time-to-event analysis for the primary efficacy end point (full-dose versus standard-dose incidence 19/191 [9.9%] versus 29/191 [15.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.99]; P=0.046). The primary safety end point occurred in 4 (2.1%) on full dose and in 1 (0.5%) on standard dose (P=0.19); the secondary safety end point occurred in 15 (7.9%) versus 1 (0.5%; P=0.002). There was no difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.56-1.48]; P=0.70). There were no differences in the primary efficacy or safety end points with clopidogrel versus no antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with COVID-19, full-dose anticoagulation, but not clopidogrel, reduced thrombotic complications with an increase in bleeding, driven primarily by transfusions in hemodynamically stable patients, and no apparent excess in mortality. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04409834.

Validation of a Crisis Standards of Care Model for Prioritization of Limited Resources During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Crisis in an Urban, Safety-Net, Academic Medical Center.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare resources even in wealthy nations, necessitating rationing of limited resources without previously established crisis standards of care protocols. In Massachusetts, triage guidelines were designed based on acute illness and chronic life-limiting conditions. In this study, we sought to retrospectively validate this protocol to cohorts of critically ill patients from our hospital. DESIGN: We applied our hospital-adopted guidelines, which defined severe and major chronic conditions as those associated with a greater than 50% likelihood of 1- and 5-year mortality, respectively, to a critically ill patient population. We investigated mortality for the same intervals. SETTING: An urban safety-net hospital ICU. PATIENTS: All adults hospitalized during April of 2015 and April 2019 identified through a clinical database search. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 365 admitted patients, 15.89% had one or more defined chronic life-limiting conditions. These patients had higher 1-year (46.55% vs 13.68%; p < 0.01) and 5-year (50.00% vs 17.22%; p < 0.01) mortality rates than those without underlying conditions. Irrespective of classification of disease severity, patients with metastatic cancer, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and neurodegenerative disease had greater than 50% 1-year mortality, whereas patients with chronic lung disease and cirrhosis had less than 50% 1-year mortality. Observed 1- and 5-year mortality for cirrhosis, heart failure, and metastatic cancer were more variable when subdivided into severe and major categories. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with major and severe chronic medical conditions overall had 46.55% and 50.00% mortality at 1 and 5 years, respectively. However, mortality varied between conditions. Our findings appear to support a crisis standards protocol which focuses on acute illness severity and only considers underlying conditions carrying a greater than 50% predicted likelihood of 1-year mortality. Modifications to the chronic lung disease, congestive heart failure, and cirrhosis criteria should be refined if they are to be included in future models.

Implementation of a Phenobarbital-based Pathway for Severe Alcohol Withdrawal: A Mixed-Method Study.

Rationale: Several institutions have implemented phenobarbital-based pathways for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). However, little is known about the care processes, effectiveness, and safety of phenobarbital-based pathways for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Objectives: To examine clinician acceptability and feasibility and patient outcomes after the implementation of a phenobarbital-based pathway for medical ICU (MICU) patients with severe AWS. Methods: We conducted a mixed-method study of a quality-improvement intervention designed to improve the workflow without deleterious effects on outcomes. We used semistructured, qualitative interviews and surveys of clinicians to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the phenobarbital-based pathway and a previous benzodiazepine-based pathway. We used a noninferiority interrupted-time-series analysis to compare mechanical ventilation rates before and after implementation among MICU patients within an urban safety-net hospital who were admitted with severe alcohol withdrawal. We explored several secondary outcomes, including physical restraint use and hospital length of stay. Results: Four themes related to clinician acceptability and feasibility of the phenobarbital-based pathway emerged: 1) designing a pathway that balanced standardization with clinical judgment promoted acceptability, 2) pathway simplicity promoted feasibility, 3) implementing pathway-driven care streamlined the workflow, and 4) ad hoc implementation strategies facilitated new pathway uptake. Two hundred thirty-three and 252 patients were initiated on the benzodiazepine- and phenobarbital-based pathways, respectively. The rate of mechanical ventilation decreased from 17.1% to 12.9% after implementation of the phenobarbital-based pathway, and an adjusted mean difference of -4.9% (95% upper confidence interval [CI]: 0.7%) corresponding to relative change in the 95% upper limit of 4%, which was below the a priori noninferiority margin, was shown. After implementation, use of physical restraints decreased from 51.6% to 32.4% (mean difference, -18.0%; 95% CI: -26.4% to -9.7%), and the hospital length of stay was shorter (8.6-6.8 d; mean difference, -1.8 d; 95% CI: -3.4 to -0.2 d). Conclusions: Clinicians believed that the phenobarbital-based pathway was more efficient and simpler to use, and patient mechanical ventilation rates were noninferior compared with the previous benzodiazepine-based pathway for the treatment of severe AWS.

Early administration of interleukin-6 inhibitors for patients with severe COVID-19 disease is associated with decreased intubation, reduced mortality, and increased discharge.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this observational study was to determine the optimal timing of interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL6ri) administration for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 were given an IL6ri (sarilumab or tocilizumab) based on iteratively reviewed guidelines. IL6ri were initially reserved for critically ill patients, but after review, treatment was liberalized to patients with lower oxygen requirements. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring ≤45% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (termed stage IIB) and those requiring >45% FiO2 (termed stage III) at the time of IL6ri administration. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality, discharge alive from hospital, and extubation. RESULTS: A total of 255 COVID-19 patients were treated with IL6ri (149 stage IIB and 106 stage III). Patients treated in stage IIB had lower mortality than those treated in stage III (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.74). Overall, 218 (85.5%) patients were discharged alive. Patients treated in stage IIB were more likely to be discharged (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.93) and were less likely to be intubated (aHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: IL6ri administration prior to >45% FiO2 requirement was associated with improved COVID-19 outcomes. This can guide clinical management pending results from randomized controlled trials.

Human immunodeficiency virus infection alters tumor necrosis factor alpha production via Toll-like receptor-dependent pathways in alveolar macrophages and U1 cells.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive persons are predisposed to pulmonary infections, even after receiving effective highly active antiretroviral therapy. The reasons for this are unclear but may involve changes in innate immune function. HIV type 1 infection of macrophages impairs effector functions, including cytokine production. We observed decreased constitutive tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) concentrations and increased soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type II (sTNFRII) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from HIV-positive subjects compared to healthy controls. Moreover, net proinflammatory TNF-alpha activity, as measured by the TNF-alpha/sTNFRII ratio, decreased as HIV-related disease progressed, as manifested by decreasing CD4 cell count and increasing HIV RNA (viral load). Since TNF-alpha is an important component of the innate immune system and is produced upon activation of Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathways, we hypothesized that the mechanism associated with deficient TNF-alpha production in the lung involved altered TLR expression or a deficit in the TLR signaling cascade. We found decreased Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1) and TLR4 surface expression in HIV-infected U1 monocytic cells compared to the uninfected parental U937 cell line and decreased TLR message in alveolar macrophages (AMs) from HIV-positive subjects. In addition, stimulation with TLR1/2 ligand (Pam(3)Cys) or TLR4 ligand (lipopolysaccharide) resulted in decreased intracellular phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase and subsequent decreased transcription and expression of TNF-alpha in U1 cells compared to U937 cells. AMs from HIV-positive subjects also showed decreased TNF-alpha production in response to these TLR2 and TLR4 ligands. We postulate that HIV infection alters expression of TLRs with subsequent changes in mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and cytokine production that ultimately leads to deficiencies of innate immune responses that predispose HIV-positive subjects to infection.

Comparison of Methods To Identify Advance Care Planning in Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Yet, ACP documentation is often inaccessible at the time of impending respiratory failure, which may lead to unwanted and costly medical intensive care unit admissions. Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain directive fields and the ability to search for keywords and phrases, but these strategies to rapidly identify ACP have not been validated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to identify the percentage of patients with severe COPD exacerbation who have outpatient ACP documentation and validate two EMR-based methods of rapidly identifying ACP documentation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Patients who required medical intensive care unit admission for exacerbation of COPD at an urban safety-net hospital between 2009 and 2014 were observed. MEASUREMENTS: We analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of two methods to rapidly identify outpatient ACP documentation: (1) documentation in the EMR directive field and (2) text string search of notes for key phrases, compared with a gold standard clinician review. RESULTS: Our cohort (n = 311) was racially diverse and severely ill with obstructive lung disease. One hundred thirty-two patients (43%) had ACP documentation by gold standard chart review. Compared with a gold standard chart review, a parsimonious text string search was both sensitive (95%) and specific (97%), while the directive box was specific (100%), but not sensitive (54%), for identifying outpatient ACP documentation. CONCLUSIONS: EMR directive fields may substantially underestimate ACP when used alone. As full clinician chart reviews are impractical in the emergent setting, text string searches may be a useful strategy to rapidly identify ACP discussions for clinical care and research.

Macrophage apoptosis in response to high intracellular burden of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by a novel caspase-independent pathway.

We previously reported that macrophage exposure to attenuated strains of pathogenic mycobacteria at multiplicities of infection (MOI) < or = 10 triggers TNF-alpha-mediated apoptosis which reduces the viability of intracellular bacilli. Virulent strains were found to suppress macrophage apoptosis, and it was proposed that apoptosis is an innate defense against intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis analogous to apoptosis of virus-infected cells. The potential similarity of host cell responses to intracellular infection with mycobacteria and viruses suggests that M. tuberculosis might lyse infected macrophage when that niche is no longer needed. To investigate this question, we challenged murine macrophages with high intracellular bacillary loads. A sharp increase in cytolysis within 24 h was observed at MOI > or = 25. The primary death mode was apoptosis, based on nuclear morphology and phosphatidyl serine exposure, although the apoptotic cells progressed rapidly to necrosis. Apoptosis at high MOI differs markedly from low MOI apoptosis: it is potently induced by virulent M. tuberculosis, it is TNF-alpha-independent, and it does not reduce mycobacterial viability. Caspase inhibitors failed to prevent high MOI apoptosis, and macrophages deficient in caspase-3, MyD88, or TLR4 were equally susceptible as wild type. Apoptosis was reduced in the presence of cathepsin inhibitors, suggesting the involvement of lysosomal proteases in this novel death response. We conclude that the presence of high numbers of intracellular M. tuberculosis bacilli triggers a macrophage cell death pathway that could promote extracellular spread of infection and contribute to the formation of necrotic lesions in tuberculosis.