The place of splenectomy in the therapeutic management of patients with infective endocarditis and splenic abscess: A single center experience and a literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis(IE) has a low incidence, but it remains a serious disease with high mortality rates. Only 5 % of these patients will develop a splenic abscess, and the number of patients that have IE and a splenic abscess requiring surgery is low. The current guidelines recommend that splenectomy should be performed prior to valve replacement, but there is no strong evidence to support this statement and no evidence to clearly endorse the order in which the surgical interventions should be performed. The objective of this review and case series is to establish the proper treatment strategy, to assess the adequate order of the surgical interventions and to clarify the role of percutaneous drainage in the management of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with infective endocarditis and splenic abscess who underwent surgery in our institution, between January 2008 and December 2020 were included in this study, excluding patients which had cardiac device related endocarditis. Literature review on the matter included a number of 30 studies which were selected from the PubMed database. RESULTS: Assessing the literature and case series no reinfection was reported for simultaneously performing splenectomy(S) and valvular surgery(VS) nor for VS followed by S. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous drainage of the splenic abscesses is a feasible solution as definitive therapy in high-risk patients or as bridge therapy. Additional studies are needed, even though they are difficult to conduct, therefore a national/international infectious endocarditis register may be of use to clarify these challenges.

Achalasia Treatment. Robotic Approach or Laparoscopy?

Background: Nowadays the question persists whether to choose the endoscopic or surgical method as the first treatment of choice for achalasia. Another debate topic is about the differences between the outcomes of the two approaches of minimally invasive surgical treatment and their feasibility. Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 193 patients with achalasia treated between 2008 and 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups (A and B): 152 with minimally invasive heller myotomy (HM), and 41 with pneumatic dilation (PD). Patients surgically treated were then subdivided into robotic group (RG) and laparoscopic group (LG). Results: The recurrence rate was significantly higher in PD group (Ã?2 = 16.81, DF = 1, p 0.0001), with a success rate of 63,4%, comparing with 92,7% in HM group. No significant difference was obtained between the 2 groups concerning symptom relief on patients successfully treated. The success rate was comparable between the robotic and laparoscopic groups (p = 1). Significant difference was obtained in length of hospital stay between the 2 groups, with a mean of 4.78 +-1.59 days in the RG and, respectively, 5.52 +-2.1 days in the LG (t = 2.40, DF = 124.34, p = 0.0177). Postprocedural esophagitis rates were higher in patients with no fundoplication (6 out of 37 - 16.2%) and in patients treated with pneumatic dilation (4 out of 26 - 15.4%) than in patients with fundoplication (4 out of 46 - 8.5%). Conclusion: The present study indicates that surgery may be a better choice in fit patients for the treatment of achalasia. The procedure has a better success rate, even if the long-term outcomes are comparable in patients successfully treated. The success rate and long-term results were comparable between laparoscopy and robotic surgery.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: Urgent vs. Delayed and the Outcome of Same-Admission Cholecystectomy.

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) represents a major burden for the medical system, associating important morbidity and mortality rates. This paper is focused on debatable aspects of the management of biliary AP, namely indications, timing and outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on the hand and, on the other hand, same-admission cholecystectomy as a preventive measure for recurrent disease. Material and methods: This is a retrospective study including 108 patients with biliary AP in whom ERCP was performed, treated in the Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest between 2016 and 2020. According to the urgency of the ERCP, we divided the patients into two groups: urgent versus delayed ERCP. Results: Urgent ERCP was performed in 52 patients, while delayed ERCP was performed in 56 patients; the hospital stay was higher in the urgent group than in the delayed group (10 days vs 8 days, p = 0.299) with no difference in morbidity rates. The mean time between ERCP and surgery was 5 days, without significant difference between the groups. The laparoscopic approach was the preferred method, with a conversion rate of 7%. Conclusion: ERCP with stone extraction followed by same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe therapeutic option, that prevents recurrent pancreatitis. The timing of the procedures remains debatable, further prospective studies being needed to achieve statistical significance.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Although cirrhotic patients are considered to have a higher risk for surgical procedures than non-cirrhotic ones, there are certain pathologies such as gallstones cholecystitis that cannot be treated otherwise. The focus of this study is to evaluate the main characteristics of the patients with lithiasic cholecystitis and liver cirrhosis and to assess if there is a correlation between them and postoperative morbidity evaluated with Dindo-Clavien classification. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study. The database from General Surgery Department of Fundeni Clinical Institute was queried between 2014-2018 using as key words "cirrhosis" and "cholecystitis". The initial interrogation reveled 57 cases out of which 3 were excluded since other resections were associated. Results: This study identified that Dindo-Clavien classification positively correlates with the open approach (0.405, p=0.002), emergency surgery (0.599, p=0.000), acute cholecystitis (0.476, p=0.000), high MELD score (0.291, p=0.008) and Child score (0.346, p=0.007) and furthermore with high levels of total bilirubin (0.220, p=0.047), high INR (0.286, p=0.010), the presence of ascites (0.303, p=0.022) and portal hypertension (0.266, p=0.044). It also correlates negatively with the levels of hemoglobin (-0.295, p=0.044). Conclusion: Adequate estimation of perioperative mortality and morbidity is generally limited by the retrospective nature of most studies and the patient's selection criteria. Emergency surgery, acute cholecystitis and the open approach carry the highest risk for unfavorable results of cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients.