Prognostic significance of high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.

AIM: Colonoscopy to detect and remove polyps has contributed to a reduction in colorectal carcinoma. Three-year follow up is recommended for patients considered to be at high risk (at least three adenomas, adenoma ≥ 1 cm, villous or high-grade features). Our study focused on patients diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia with regard to initial management and follow up. METHOD: A search of patients who had had endoscopic removal of a high-grade adenoma was carried out. Patients with the following were excluded: follow up of < 1 year, polyposis syndromes, prior colon cancer and a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma within 6 months following initial diagnosis. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients treated between 1999 and 2007 for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in a colorectal adenoma were identified. Over a median follow-up period of 4 years, 53 (64%) developed further adenomatous polyps. Among these, 7% had an adenoma with HGD or an adenocarcinoma. In all these patients, the initial high-grade adenoma was > 1 cm in diameter. Initial follow-up colonoscopy was performed on average 7 months following the initial diagnosis. Ten per cent of patients underwent prophylactic segmental resection, and 6% received argon laser therapy. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that patients who have a colorectal adenoma > 1 cm with HGD may be at high risk of developing further adenomas with HGD or carcinoma. Close follow up is warranted.

Quality of life following radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The impact of the diagnosis and treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus on quality of life (QoL) is poorly understood. This study assessed the influence of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus on QoL and evaluated whether endoscopic treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) improves QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed changes in QoL in the AIM Dysplasia Trial, a multicenter study of patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus who were randomly allocated to RFA therapy or a sham intervention. We developed a 10-item questionnaire to assess the influence of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus on QoL. The questionnaire was completed by patients at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: 127 patients were randomized to RFA (n = 84) or sham (n = 43). At baseline, most patients reported worry about esophageal cancer (71 % RFA, 85 % sham) and esophagectomy (61 % RFA, 68 % sham). Patients also reported depression, impaired QoL, worry, stress, and dissatisfaction with the condition of their esophagus. Of those randomized, 117 patients completed the study to the 12-month end point. Compared with the sham group, patients treated with RFA had significantly less worry about esophageal cancer ( P=0.003) and esophagectomy ( P =0.009). They also had significantly reduced depression ( P=0.02), general worry about the condition of their esophagus ( P≤0.001), impact on daily QoL ( P=0.009), stress ( P=0.03), dissatisfaction with the condition of their esophagus ( P≤0.001), and impact on work and family life ( P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion in the treatment group of this randomized, sham-controlled trial of RFA was associated with improvement in disease-specific health-related quality of life. This improvement appears secondary to a perceived decrease in the risk of cancer.

A survey of oesophageal cancer: pathology, stage and clinical presentation.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Previously, oesophageal cancer was mainly squamous cell, presenting late with dysphagia and weight loss. AIMS: To examine the distribution of oesophageal cancer histopathology at a large, urban hospital; to determine the tumour stage and symptoms at presentation; and to evaluate the impact of endoscopic surveillance in Barrett's oesophagus. METHODS: From 1999 to 2004, all patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer were evaluated retrospectively for demographics and tumour stage at presentation using endoscopic ultrasonography and computerized tomography. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included. 81% of tumours were adenocarcinomas; most localized to the distal oesophagus (97%). Patients presented with dysphagia (56%), pain (30%) and/or weight loss (16%). Irrespective of histology, locally advanced lesions accounted for most cases. Thirteen patients had lesions detected in Barrett's surveillance; these were early or intermediate stage in nine patients, but late stage in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adenocarcinoma has become the dominant histologic subtype, comprising 81% of proven malignancies. Despite a change in histopathology, most cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage, presenting with dysphagia, pain and/or weight loss. Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus allows earlier diagnosis of cancer in most, but not all, patients.

Adenosquamous carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus presenting as pseudoachalasia.

A case of pseudoachalasia resulting from adenosquamous carcinoma arising from the mucous epithelium of a Barrett's esophagus is presented. This case represents an unusual combination of Barrett's esophagus giving rise to an esophageal carcinoma with squamous as well as glandular features, rather than the usual adenocarcinoma and pseudoachalasia.

A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of prophylactic octreotide on ERCP-induced pancreatitis.

Eight-four patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were randomized to receive 100 micrograms of octreotide intravenously immediately prior to ERCP, and 100 micrograms subcutaneously 45 min after the initial dose, or placebo. Amylase, lipase, and glucose were measured and clinical assessment was performed before, and 2 and 24 h after, ERCP. We define clinical pancreatitis as the combination of elevated amylase or lipase with abdominal pain and tenderness. Interim analysis in 84 patients revealed an 11% incidence of clinical pancreatitis in the control group and 35% in the treatment group (p < 0.01). There were no differences in either group with respect to sphincterotomy, gender, age, duration of ERCP, number of cannulations of the pancreatic duct, degree of duct injection, or the volume of contrast injected. Analysis of group differences stratified by sphincterotomy revealed the following: 1) In patients who did not undergo a sphincterotomy, there was a significantly higher rate of pancreatitis in the treatment group [10/17 (59%) versus 1/17 (6%) RR 10.0 (95% CI 1.4-69.8)]. 2) Sphincterotomy reduced the rate of pancreatitis in patients who received octreotide from 10/17 (59% no sphincterotomy), to 3/20 (15% sphincterotomy) (p = 0.01), which equals the rate in patients who received placebo and underwent sphincterotomy [4/25 (16%)]. 3) Although the incidence of pancreatitis was higher in the treatment group, octreotide may reduce the severity of pancreatitis measured by the number of days NPO (Wilcoxon rank sum, p = 0.02), length of stay after ERCP (p = 0.13), the number of days of pain (p = 0.11), and the degree of amylase elevation (p = 0.04). We conclude that: 1) Octreotide appears to increase the incidence of pancreatitis when given prophylactically for diagnostic ERCP. 2) Although pancreatitis was more common in the octreotide group, it was less severe than the placebo group. 3) Sphincterotomy may afford protection against pancreatitis in patients who received octreotide. 4) We cannot recommend the use of prophylactic octreotide during diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP.