RESUMO
Atherosclerosis, a complex metabolic-immune disease characterized by chronic inflammation driven by the buildup of lipid-rich plaques within arterial walls, has emerged as a pivotal factor in the intricate interplay between cancer and cardiovascular disease. This bidirectional relationship, marked by shared risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms, underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of how these two formidable health challenges intersect and influence each other. Cancer and its treatments can contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis, while atherosclerosis, with its inflammatory microenvironment, can exert profound effects on cancer development and outcomes. Both cancer and cardiovascular disease involve intricate interactions between general and personal exposomes. In this review, we aim to summarize the state of the art of translational data and try to show how oncologic studies on cardiotoxicity can broaden our knowledge of crucial pathways in cardiovascular biology and exert a positive impact on precision cardiology and cardio-oncology.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/complicações , Aterosclerose/metabolismo , Aterosclerose/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , Animais , Fatores de Risco , Pesquisa Translacional BiomédicaRESUMO
Cancer patients, especially long cancer survivors, are exposed to several cardio-metabolic diseases, including diabetes, heart failure, and atherosclerosis, which increase their risk of cardiovascular mortality. Therapy with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists demonstrated several beneficial cardiovascular effects, including atherosclerosis and heart failure prevention. Cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) suggest that GLP-1 RA could exert cardiorenal benefits and systemic anti-inflammatory effects in patients with type-2 diabetes through the activation of cAMP and PI3K/AkT pathways and the inhibition of NLRP-3 and MyD88. In this narrative review, we highlight the biochemical properties of GLP-1 RA through a deep analysis of the clinical and preclinical evidence of the primary prevention of cardiomyopathies. The overall picture of this review encourages the study of GLP-1 RA in cancer patients with type-2 diabetes, as a potential primary prevention strategy against heart failure and atherosclerosis.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/metabolismo , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Animais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Aterosclerose/metabolismo , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/metabolismo , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Cardio-OncologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have reshaped the treatment of cancer, but they are characterized by peculiar toxicity consisting of immune-related adverse events that may potentially affect any organ or system. In this review, we summarize data on clinical presentation, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of the main immune-related cardiovascular toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors. RECENT FINDINGS: The most relevant immune-related cardiovascular toxicity is myocarditis, but other non-negligible reported events include non-inflammatory heart failure, conduction abnormalities, pericardial disease, and vasculitis. More recently, growing evidence suggests a role for immune checkpoint inhibitors in accelerating atherosclerosis and promoting plaque inflammation, thus leading to myocardial infarction. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with several forms of cardiovascular toxicity; thus, an accurate cardiovascular baseline evaluation and periodical monitoring are required. Furthermore, the optimization of cardiovascular risk factors before, during, and after treatment may contribute to mitigating both short-term and long-term cardiovascular toxicity of these drugs.
Assuntos
Miocardite , Neoplasias , Humanos , Miocardite/induzido quimicamente , Miocardite/diagnóstico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Coração , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of early immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) upon immunotherapy is not fully understood. METHODS: The Leading to Treatment Discontinuation cohort included 24 patients experiencing severe irAEs after one of two administrations of single anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in any line setting for metastatic NSCLC between November 2015 and June 2019. The control cohort was composed of 526 patients treated with single anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in any line setting with no severe irAE reported. The primary end points were median progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, risk of progression of disease and risk of death. The correlation of clinic pathological features with early severe irAEs represented the secondary end point. RESULTS: Median PFS was 9.3 and 8.4 months, median OS was 12.0 months and 14.2 months at a median follow-up of 18.1 and 22.6 months in the LTD cohort and in the control cohort, respectively. The ORR was 40% (95% CI 17.2-78.8) in the LTD cohort and 32.7% (95% CI 27.8-38.2) in the control cohort. The risk of disease progression was higher in the LTD cohort (HR 2.52 [95% 1.10-5.78], P = .0288). CONCLUSIONS: We found no survival benefit in LTD cohort compared to the control cohort. However, early and severe irAEs might underly an immune anti-tumor activation. We identified a significant association with first-line immune checkpoints inhibitors treatment and good PS. Further studies on risk prediction and management of serious and early irAEs in NSCLC patients are needed.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antígeno B7-H1 , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be complicated by cardiovascular toxicity, including pericardial disease. To date, no prospective studies specifically investigated the optimal treatment of ICI-associated pericardial disease, and the available evidence is based on case reports and series only. We performed a systematic review of case reports and series including 20 publications for a total of 28 cases of ICI-associated pericardial disease. In this review, pericardial disease was reversible in the majority of cases (75%), although 2 deaths were reported. The majority of cases were life-threatening (G4, 53.6%) or severe (G3, 21.4%), requiring pericardiocentesis. Higher rates of improvement were associated with administration of corticosteroids (86.7% vs 61.5%), presence of other immune-related adverse events (90.9% vs. 64.7%), and non-malignant effusions (86.7% vs 42.8%). ICIs were discontinued in the majority of cases and then restarted in 7 patients with no recurrence of pericardial disease. Based on these results, ICI-associated G3-G4 pericardial disease as well as G2 pericardial disease with moderate-severe effusion should be treated with ICIs discontinuation and high-dose steroids, also performing pericardiocentesis, pericardial drainage or pericardial window in case of cardiac tamponade. For G2 with small effusion or G1 pericardial disease, ICIs might be continued and colchicine or NSAIDs could be considered. For patients requiring ICIs discontinuation, a rechallenge with ICIs seems to be feasible after resolution or meaningful improvement of pericardial disease.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Derrame Pericárdico/complicações , HumanosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a cornerstone for the treatment of many advanced tumors. When 65 is considered as a cut-off age, ICIs are equally effective in younger and older patients. However, the efficacy of ICIs among patients aged ≥ 75 remains uncertain, since those patients were generally under-represented in clinical trials. We performed a pooled analysis of major randomized trials including data of outcome in very older population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials published from the inception of each database to November 22th, 2019. We only included (1) randomized studies comparing ICIs alone or in combinations with no ICIs, (2) studies reporting data of patients older than 75 years, (3) studies for solid tumors, and (4) studies with HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) available for OS based on 75 years as cut-off age. All data were expressed as the combination of HR and 95% CI, and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of n = 8 publications for a total of n = 12 randomized studies were aggregated in the quantitative analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed a borderline significant OS benefit for ICIs compared to no ICIs arms (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.7-1; P = 0.05) in particular in first-line trials with HR = 0.77 (95%CI 0.61-0.96; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: We conclude that ICIs may be offered in patients older than 75 years, providing a complete geriatric and clinical evaluation is performed in all subjects before starting therapy.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Neoplasias/patologia , Prognóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The favourable safety profile and the increasing confidence with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might have boosted their prescription in frail patients with short life expectancies, who usually are not treated with standard chemotherapy. METHODS: The present analysis aims to describe clinicians' attitudes towards ICIs administration during late stages of life within a multicenter cohort of advanced cancer patients treated with single agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in Italy. RESULTS: Overall, 1149 patients with advanced cancer who received single agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors were screened. The final study population consisted of 567 deceased patients. 166 patients (29.3%) had received ICIs within 30 days of death; among them there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (28.3% vs 11.5%, p < 0.0001) and with a higher burden of disease (69.3% vs 59.4%, p = 0.0266). In total, 35 patients (6.2%) started ICIs within 30 days of death; among them there was a higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (45.7% vs 14.5%, p < 0.0001) and with a higher burden of disease (82.9% vs 60.9%, p = 0.0266). Primary tumors were significantly different across subgroups (p = 0.0172), with a higher prevalence of NSCLC patients (80% vs 60.9%) among those who started ICIs within 30 days of death. Lastly, 123 patients (21.7%) started ICIs within 3 months of death. Similarly, within this subgroup there was a higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (29.3% vs 12.8%, p < 0.0001), with a higher burden of disease (74.0% vs 59.0%, p = 0.0025) and with NSCLC (74.0% vs 58.8%, p = 0.0236). CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed a trend toward an increasing ICIs prescription in frail patients, during the late stages of life. Caution should be exercised when evaluating an ICI treatment for patients with a poor PS and a high burden of disease.
Assuntos
Antígeno B7-H1 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Itália , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: One year is the standard duration of adjuvant trastuzumab for human epidermal receptor-2 (HER2) positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC). Indeed, a shorter duration of trastuzumab can reduce cardiotoxicity and the costs involved and could provide the same benefit as a one-year treatment. We evaluated the available evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by comparing 1 year versus a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2+ BC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and conference proceedings was carried out in order to identify the RCTs that investigated a standard versus a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2+ BC patients. Using the fixed and random effects models, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cardiac events. RESULTS: Five RCTs with a total of 11,381 patients were included. Overall, one year of adjuvant trastuzumab improved OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39; P = 0.003) and DFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.3; P < 0.001) compared with a shorter duration (6 months and 9 weeks). In the subgroup analysis, there was a trend towards better DFS with the 1-year duration for patients with high-risk features, and also for concomitant administration of chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Cardiac events were significantly lower with a shorter duration (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.32-0.49; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One-year adjuvant trastuzumab is associated with better DFS and OS compared with shorter durations and should still be considered the standard duration. However, selected patients with low-risk HER2+ BC can most likely be spared from an excess of cardiac toxicity with a shorter course.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Cardiotoxicidade/prevenção & controle , Trastuzumab/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/imunologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo , Trastuzumab/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Cardiovascular disease and cancer are leading causes of death. Both diseases share the same risk factors and, having the highest incidence and prevalence in the elderly, they often coexist in the same individual. Furthermore, the enhanced survival of cancer patients registered in the last decades and linked to early diagnosis and improvement of care, not infrequently exposes them to the appearance of ominous cardiovascular complications due to the deleterious effects of cancer treatment on the heart and circulatory system. The above considerations have led to the development of a new branch of clinical cardiology based on the principles of multidisciplinary collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists: Cardio-oncology, which aims to find solutions to the prevention, monitoring, diagnosis and treatment of heart damage induced by cancer care in order to pursue, in the individual patient, the best possible care for cancer while minimizing the risk of cardiac toxicity. In this consensus document we provide practical recommendations on how to assess, monitor, treat and supervise the candidate or patient treated with potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapy in order to treat cancer and protect the heart at all stages of the oncological disease. Cardiovascular diseases and cancer often share the same risk factors and can coexist in the same individual. Such possibility is amplified by the deleterious effects of cancer treatment on the heart. The above considerations have led to the development of a new branch of clinical cardiology, based on multidisciplinary collaboration between cardiologist and oncologist: the cardio-oncology. It aims to prevent, monitor, and treat heart damages induced by cancer therapies in order to achieve the most effective cancer treatment, while minimizing the risk of cardiac toxicity. In this paper, we provide practical recommendations on how to assess, monitor, treat and supervise patients treated with potential cardiotoxic cancer therapies.
RESUMO
UNLABELLED: : Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast is considered a rare entity, and for this reason there are no data from prospective clinical trials on its optimal management. Early stage tumors are usually treated with the same strategy used for the other types of invasive breast cancer. Anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens represent the most frequently administered chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, as well as for metastatic disease, although combinations of platinum compounds and etoposide have been widely used, in particular for small-cell histology and tumors with a high proliferation index. For metastatic disease, a multimodality therapeutic strategy can be considered on an individual basis, with chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, radiation therapy, surgery, or a combination of the above. In the near future, a better knowledge of the biology of these tumors will hopefully provide new therapeutic targets for personalized treatment. In this review, we discuss the current evidence and the future perspectives on diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (NECB) is a distinct entity of breast cancer. Clinical features and morphology are not helpful to distinguish NECB from other subtypes of breast cancer; therefore, immunohistochemistry markers for neuroendocrine differentiation, mainly chromogranin and synaptophysin, should be routinely used to confirm the diagnosis, especially in cases of mucinous or solid papillary carcinoma in which the suspicion of NECB may be relevant. Adjuvant treatment should be offered according to the same recommendations given for the other types of invasive breast cancer. An accurate diagnosis of NECB is also important in the metastatic setting, in which a multimodality approach including specific therapies such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy can be considered.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/patologia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/secundário , Diferenciação Celular , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Neoplásica , Medicina de PrecisãoRESUMO
Mitomycin-C (MMC) combined with fluoropyrimidines has historically been used for pretreated patients with some activity in this setting, in particular, as third-line chemotherapy (CT) or beyond. We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMC-based therapy as a further line of CT in advanced colorectal cancer. Prospective or retrospective studies of MMC-based CT were included in the pooled analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library database and CINAHL were searched systematically. The outcomes were progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate and grades 3-4 drug-related adverse events. Seventeen trials involving 681 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, the pooled average weighted progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-3.1] and 7.47 (95% CI 6-8.9) months, respectively. The corresponding pooled overall response rate was 7.2% (95% CI 5.2-9.9%) and the pooled disease control rate was 38.7% (95% CI 31.7-46.3%). The G3-4 neutropenia and anaemia were the most frequent haematological toxicities (range 0-20%). Nonhaematological G3-4 toxicities were compatible with the associated agent. MMC with fluoropyrimidines represents a viable and active combination for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. It is thus an option when other agents have failed, or are unavailable or not indicated.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Mitomicina/administração & dosagem , Mitomicina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised the treatment of metastatic NSCLC and have become standard first-line therapy both as monotherapy, for patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, and in combination with chemotherapy (CT), regardless of PD-L1 expression. This study used an artificial intelligence technique, the IPDfromKM method, to reconstruct individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves of phase III randomised clinical trial results to provide a comparative overview of different first-line chemo-immunotherapy options. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using hazard ratios and restricted mean survival time (RMST). Ten clinical trials were included in the analysis. In the squamous population, combinations of cemiplimab + CT (HR = 0.56), pembrolizumab + CT (HR = 0.67), and nivolumab + ipilimumab + CT (HR = 0.71) significantly improved OS compared with CT alone, with no difference between treatments. At longer follow-up, nivolumab + ipilimumab + CT showed longer RMST compared to pembrolizumab + CT in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup (24.9 months vs. 22.8 months). In non-squamous NSCLC, the survival benefit of ICIs + CT was much more homogeneous, with similar results across the different options. Overall, pembrolizumab + CT showed the best results both in terms of HR (0.68, 95%CI 0.60-0.77) and RMST at long follow-up (30.4 months in the PDL-1 ≥ 1% subgroup and 24 months in the PDL-1 < 1% population). In conclusion, there are some differences between frontline options for treating metastatic NSCLC based on tumour histology and PD-L1 expression. However, further head-to-head trials and longer follow-up are needed to clarify the clinical impact of these differences.
RESUMO
Dual-energy CT (DECT) is an innovative technology that is increasingly widespread in clinical practice. DECT allows for tissue characterization beyond that of conventional CT as imaging is performed using different energy spectra that can help differentiate tissues based on their specific attenuation properties at different X-ray energies. The most employed post-processing applications of DECT include virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs), iodine density maps, virtual non-contrast images (VNC), and virtual non-calcium (VNCa) for bone marrow edema (BME) detection. The diverse array of images obtained through DECT acquisitions offers numerous benefits, including enhanced lesion detection and characterization, precise determination of material composition, decreased iodine dose, and reduced artifacts. These versatile applications play an increasingly significant role in tumor assessment and oncologic imaging, encompassing the diagnosis of primary tumors, local and metastatic staging, post-therapy evaluation, and complication management. This article provides a comprehensive review of the principal applications and post-processing techniques of DECT, with a specific focus on its utility in managing oncologic patients.
Assuntos
Artefatos , Iodo , Humanos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
Background: The efficacy of immunotherapy for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is relatively low, and the tumor microenvironment of SCLC brain metastases is still unknown. Therefore, we investigated the distribution of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in patients with brain metastases from SCLC to explore the tumor microenvironment of SCLC brain metastases. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 12 surgical specimens of brain metastases from patients with SCLC treated in the Department of Neurosurgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2017 to June 2022. The inclusion criteria for this study were the following: (I) a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of SCLC brain metastases; (II) surgical resection of brain metastases; (III) age >18 years; (IV) and complete clinical data. Patient-related data were retrieved from the inpatient medical record system, telephone follow-up of patients date of death, and overall survival (OS). The immunofluorescence-based tissue microenvironment analysis panel (MAP) was utilized for the detection of TILs, including CD3, CD8, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and PD-L1, in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded archival specimens of brain metastases. The expression levels of PD-L1 in tumor cells were detected by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between the OS and the above-mentioned markers was analyzed in the 12 patients. Results: Twelve patients were included in the study. The patients' ages ranged from 51-78 years with a median of 68 years, with 1 female and 11 males. Among 12 patients with SCLC brain metastases: positive rates of CD3+ TILs in the tumor parenchyma vs. tumor stroma were 0.60%±0.94% vs. 1.76%±2.72% (P=0.01), respectively; positive rates of CD8+ TILs in the tumor parenchyma vs. tumor stroma were 0.80%±0.78% vs. 2.46%±3.72% (P=0.02), respectively. There was no co-expression of CD8+ and PD-1+ TILs in the tumor parenchyma of 11 cases, and the infiltration density of coexpressed CD3+ and PD-1+ TILs was more than 10/mm2 in only 1 case. There was no coexpression of CD3+ and PD-1+ TIL in the stroma of 10 cases, and the infiltration density of CD8+ and PD-1+ TILs was more than 10/mm2 in 2 cases. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of PD-L1 in 12 cases of SCLC metastatic lesions, and 3 cases (25%) were positive. Survival analysis showed that patients with positive intraepithelial CD3+ TILs had significantly longer OS [hazard ratio 3.383, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.959-11.940; P=0.04]. Conclusions: Our study further demonstrated the immune microenvironment of SCLC brain metastases. The distribution of TILs in SCLC brain metastases is low and mainly distributed in the stroma, with the expression of PD-L1 in these tumor tissues being low. Further exploration of the immune microenvironment of SCLC brain metastases is of great significance for potential treatment.
RESUMO
(1) Background: The identification of tumor subtypes is fundamental in precision medicine for accurate diagnoses and personalized therapies. Cancer development is often driven by the accumulation of somatic mutations that can cause alterations in tissue functions and morphologies. In this work, a method based on a deep neural network integrated into a network-based stratification framework (D3NS) is proposed to stratify tumors according to somatic mutations. (2) Methods: This approach leverages the power of deep neural networks to detect hidden information in the data by combining the knowledge contained in a network of gene interactions, as typical of network-based stratification methods. D3NS was applied using real-world data from The Cancer Genome Atlas for bladder, ovarian, and kidney cancers. (3) Results: This technique allows for the identification of tumor subtypes characterized by different survival rates and significant associations with several clinical outcomes (tumor stage, grade or response to therapy). (4) Conclusion: D3NS can provide a base model in cancer research and could be considered as a useful tool for tumor stratification, offering potential support in clinical settings.
RESUMO
Introduction: Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs) have been investigated for the treatment of several tumor types. Both ICIs and AIs may lead to cardiovascular adverse events, and their combination may potentially increase the risk for cardiovascular toxicity. In the present meta-analysis, we aim to assess the cardiovascular toxicity of ICIs plus AIs vs. AIs alone. Secondary objectives are non-cardiovascular adverse events and efficacy. Methods: Systematic review was performed according to PRISMA statement. Phase II and III randomized clinical trials were identified by searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library and ASCO Meeting abstracts, from inception to June 2022. The pooled risks for overall response rate (ORR), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), immune-related AEs, (irAEs), hypertension, and vascular events defined as stroke, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolisms, were calculated. Results: In terms of cardiovascular toxicity, we found higher risk for severe hypertension among patients treated with ICIs plus AIs as compared with those receiving AIs (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.53), but no significant difference was found for any-grade hypertension, and for vascular events. There was also no difference in terms of overall AEs, whereas the incidence of irAEs was increased in the ICIs plus AIs arm, as expected. In terms of efficacy, ICIs plus AIs achieved better ORR (OR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.70-2.97) and PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39-0.63) as compared to AIs alone. Conclusion: The addition of ICIs to AIs significantly increased the risk of high-grade hypertension, but not that of acute vascular events.
RESUMO
Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the two leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. The emerging field of cardio-oncology described several shared risk factors that predispose patients to both cardiovascular disease and cancer. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome is a chronic condition that occurs in many patients who have experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection, mainly based on chronic fatigue, sedentary lifestyle, cramps, breathing difficulties, and reduced lung performance. Post-acute COVID-19 exposes patients to increased visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, myosteatosis, and white adipose tissue content (surrounded by M1 macrophages and characterized by a Th1/Th17 phenotype), which increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality and cancer recurrence. In this review, the main metabolic affections of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome in cancer patients at low and high risk of cardiomyopathies will be summarized. Furthermore, several non-pharmacological strategies aimed at reducing atherosclerotic and cardiac risk will be provided, especially through anti-inflammatory nutrition with a low insulin and glycemic index, appropriate physical activity, and immune-modulating bioactivities able to reduce visceral obesity and myosteatosis, improving insulin-related signaling and myocardial metabolism.
RESUMO
Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathies and sarcopenia are frequently seen in cancer patients, affecting their overall survival and quality of life; therefore, new cardioprotective and anti-sarcopenic strategies are needed. Vericiguat is a new oral guanylate cyclase activator that reduces heart failure hospitalizations or cardiovascular death. This study highlighted the potential cardioprotective and anti-sarcopenic properties of vericiguat during anthracycline therapy. Human cardiomyocytes and primary skeletal muscle cells were exposed to doxorubicin (DOXO) with or without a pre-treatment with vericiguat. Mitochondrial cell viability, LDH, and Cytochrome C release were performed to study cytoprotective properties. Intracellular Ca++ content, TUNEL assay, cGMP, NLRP-3, Myd-88, and cytokine intracellular levels were quantified through colorimetric and selective ELISA methods. Vericiguat exerts significant cytoprotective and anti-apoptotic effects during exposure to doxorubicin. A drastic increase in cGMP expression and reduction in NLRP-3, MyD-88 levels were also seen in Vericiguat-DOXO groups vs. DOXO groups (p < 0.001) in both cardiomyocytes and human muscle cells. GCa vericiguat reduces cytokines and chemokines involved in heart failure and sarcopenia. The findings that emerged from this study could provide the rationale for further preclinical and clinical investigations aimed at reducing anthracycline cardiotoxicity and sarcopenia in cancer patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is still undertreated in most patients, as evidence for pharmacological treatments is limited and conflicting. Also, the efficacy of the pharmacological agents relative to each other is still unclear. Therefore, medications that may potentially contribute to improving CRF will be investigated in this head-to-head trial. Our main objective is to compare the efficacy of methylphenidate vs. bupropion vs. ginseng vs. amantadine vs. placebo in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: The 5-EPIFAT study is a 5-arm, randomized, multi-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial that will use a parallel-group design with an equal allocation ratio comparing the efficacy and safety of four medications (Methylphenidate vs. Bupropion vs. Ginseng vs. Amantadine) versus placebo for management of CRF. We will recruit 255 adult patients with advanced cancer who experience fatigue intensity ≥ 4 based on a 0-10 scale. The study period includes a 4-week intervention and a 4-week follow-up with repeated measurements over time. The primary outcome is the cancer-related fatigue level over time, which will be measured by the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue (FACIT-F) scale. To evaluate safety, the secondary outcome is the symptomatic adverse events, which will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in cancer clinical trials (PRO-CTCAE). Also, a subgroup analysis based on a decision tree-based machine learning algorithm will be employed for the clinical prediction of different agents in homogeneous subgroups. DISCUSSION: The findings of the 5-EPIFAT trial could be helpful to guide clinical decision-making, personalization treatment approach, design of future trials, as well as the development of CRF management guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT.ir IRCT20150302021307N6. Registered on 13 May 2023.
Assuntos
Metilfenidato , Neoplasias , Panax , Adulto , Humanos , Amantadina/uso terapêutico , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Fadiga/diagnóstico , Fadiga/tratamento farmacológico , Fadiga/etiologia , Metilfenidato/uso terapêutico , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Neoplasias/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of various cancers leading to a clear survival benefit with cured or long-surviving patients. Atherosclerosis and cancer share risk factors and molecular mechanisms and have as their common thread a state of chronic inflammation linked to a deregulation of the immune system. A growing body of evidence is accumulating on the potential worsening effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors on atherosclerosis, with subsequent worsening of patients' long-term cardiovascular risk. The molecular pathways implicated in the growth and deregulation of atherosclerotic plaques seem to be the same (CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1) as those on which the anti-tumor effect is exerted. Owing to the increasing number of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy and the improved survival with the possibility of prolonged disease control, it is necessary to know the potential increase in cardiovascular risk for atherosclerosis-related events and to establish all prevention measures to reduce it.