Prognostic analysis of patients with operable gastric cancer and tolerability to adjuvant radio-chemo-therapy.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and toxicity of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to analyze the prognosis in patients with operable gastric cancer. The retrospective analysis included 723 patients with operable gastric cancer; stage IB-IV (M0), received adjuvant CRT from 8 Medical Centers in Turkey between 2003 and 2010. The patients' age, sex, tumor localization, Lauren classification, grade and stage of the disease, type of dissection, the toxicity and tolerability status and survival rate were analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups as tolerable group to adjuvant CRT and intolerable group to adjuvant CRT .Among the patient, 73.9% had stage III-IVM0 disease; 61.0% had the intestinal type of gastric cancer, 51.1% had the distal type, and 61.4% had undergone D2 dissections. The number of patients who completed the entire course of the adjuvant CRT was 545 (75.4%).The median follow-up period was 20.8 months (range: 1.5-107 months). Overall Survival (OS) rates were 80% and 52%, while the relapse free survival (RFS) rates were 75% and 48% at 1 and 3 years, respectively.In the univariate analysis of the groups based on the the age defined as <65 or ≥ 65 (p=0.16 / p=0.003), Lauren classification (p=0.004 / p<0.001), localization of tumor (p=0.02 / p=0.04), tumor grade (p=0.06 / p=0.003), disease stage (p<0.001 / p<0.001), type of dissection (p=0.445 / p=0.043), presence or absence of toxicity (p=0.062 / p=0.077) and tolerability of the therapy (p=0.002 / p=0.001). In the cox regression analysis, tumor stage (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.332; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.195-0.566; p<0.001), and tolerability (HR: 0.516; 95% CI: 0.305-0.872; p=0.014), were found to be related with the OS. Tumor stage (HR: 0.318; 95% CI: 0.190-0.533; p=<0.001) and tolerability (HR: 0.604; 95% CI: 0.367-0.995; p=0.048) were observed to be statistically significant in terms of the RFS.We have observed that whether a patient can or cannot tolerate adjuvant CRT due to its toxicity is an independent prognostic factor besides the known prognostic factors like tumor stage and Lauren classification. We are of the opinion that the treatment of patients who cannot tolerate adjuvant CRT should be replaced with less toxic adjuvant therapies.

Sequential adjuvant docetaxel and anthracycline chemotherapy for node positive breast cancers: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Anthracyclines and taxanes are the most active agents in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer (BC). They can be used simultaneously or sequentially. The optimal schedule and duration for their administration is unknown. We analyzed the efficacy of sequential adjuvant anthracycline and docetaxel administration in node positive BC patients. METHODS: Node positive BC patients (N=539) from 6 medical oncology centers in Turkey who received sequential adjuvant anthracycline-based regimens and taxane chemotherapy were included in this study between 2006 - 2010. One-hundred and thirty-eight (25%) patients received 3 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel (3+3) and 401 (75%) patients received 4 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel (4+4). Prognostic factors analyzed were estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, tumor grade, and nodal status in relation to disease free survival (DFS) and HER2 status in relation to overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The patient median age was 48 years (range 18-79). Most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia, mucositis and arthralgia. No treatment-related toxic deaths were seen. With a median follow up of 26 months (range 1-115) 61 (11.3%) recurrences and 11 (2%) deaths were registered. Three-year DFS was 81% and OS 96% for all patients. There was no statistically significant difference between 3+3 and 4+4 groups in terms of survival (3-year DFS 88% and 79% [p=0.28] and OS 97% and 95% [p=0.60), respectively). CONCLUSION: Sequential chemotherapy with 4+4 cycles of anthracycline and docetaxel every 3 weeks is an acceptable regimen for adjuvant treatment of node positive BC patients. Duration of chemotherapy should be planned depending on prognostic factors. In this study there was no difference between 3+3 and 4+4 groups in DFS and OS despite the presence of good prognostic factors in the 3+3 group.

Endocrine therapy alone vs. chemotherapy plus endocrine therapies for the treatment of elderly patients with endocrine-responsive and node positive breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of a multicenter study (Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology).

PURPOSE: The extra benefit of adding chemotherapy to effective endocrine therapy (ET) has not been clearly or consistently identified in patients older than 70 years with estrogen receptor (ER) positive and node positive breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant ET vs. chemotherapy plus endocrine therapies (Chemo/ET) in such patients. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study 191 patients ≥ 70 years with operated hormone receptor breast cancer, who were administered adjuvant ET or Chemo/ET were assessed. RESULTS: The median patient follow-up time was 29.0 months (range 1-252). Therefore disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis was limited, due to the rather short median follow-up, and only 30-month cumulative percentages are reported herein. The 30-month DFS rates were 50.0% in the ET arm and 49.0% in the Chemo/ET arm (p=0.79). The 30-month OS rates were 86% in the ET arm and 96.0% in the Chemo/ET arm (p=0.08). Cox proportional hazard model showed that only surgery was independent prognostic factor for survival (p=0.047), while tumor size showed a strong trend for statistical significance (p=0.051). CONCLUSION: The addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy in older patients has no significant impact on DFS and OS.

Docetaxel and Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil compared with Modified Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of single institution.

Gastric cancer is the second most common among cancer-related deaths in the world. Systemic chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer has limited impact on overall survival. We performed a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and side effects of Docetaxel and Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil (DCF) versus Modified-Dose Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil (mDCF) in the metastatic gastric cancer with first-line chemotherapy treated patients. Retrospectively were reviewed 107 locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients who were treated DCF or mDCF as first-line treatment from June 2007 to August 2011 in Dicle University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology.The DCF protocol included 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and cisplatin on day 1 and 750 mg/m2/day 5-FU infusion for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks. The mDCF protocol included 60 mg/m² docetaxel and cisplatin on day 1 and 600 mg/m² 5-Fluorouracil continuous infusion per day on days 1-5, every 3 weeks.Patients were treated using DCF arm 85 (M: 56, F: 29), the mDCF arm 22 (M: 13, F: 9) After treatment toxicities were: Grade III-IV neutropenia (48.2% vs 13.6% p=0.003), anemia (21.2% vs 4.5% p=0.06), nausea (44.7% vs 13.6% p=0.008) and vomiting (31.8% vs 4.5%, p=0.01) was higher in the DCF arm. Other toxicities profile was similar in both groups (p>0.05). The rate of response was similar in both arm. Among patients with the DCF and mDCF arm rate complete response (10.3% vs 6.7%, p>0.05), partial response (35.3% vs 40.0%, p>0.05), stable disease (32.4% vs 33.3%, p>0.05), progressive disease (22.1% vs 20.0%, p>0.05) and overall response (45.6% vs 46.7%, p>0.05) did not have a statistically difference (p>0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were more favorable in the DCF arm than mDCF arm, but the difference was not significant statistically (9.9 vs 8.6, 7.4 vs 6.5 p>0.05)In conclusion, the response rate, median PFS and median OS are similar in both arms, while the mDCF regimen are more favorable than the DCF for toxicity profile regimen in advanced gastric cancer patients who were undergoing first-line palliative treatment. Therefore, a prospective and larger clinical trials are needed.

Gemcitabine alone versus combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of multicenter study.

The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer is of advanced disease. Several randomized Phase II and III trials suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) response rates were higher than Gemcitabine (Gem) alone, however the trials were not enough powered to indicate a statistically significant prolongation of survival in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study is to evaluated the efficiency of Gem alone versus GemCis in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma .A total of 406 patients, from fourteen centers were evaluated retrospectively. All patients received Gem or GemCis as first-line treatment between September 2005 to March 2011. Primary end of this study were to evaluate the toxicity, clinical response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the arms. There were 156 patients (M: 98, F: 58) in Gem arm and 250 patients (M: 175, F: 75) in the combination arm. Gemcitabin arm patients older than the combination arm ( median 63 vs 57.5, p=0.001). In patients with the combination arm had a higher dose reduction (25.2% vs 11.3%, p=0.001) and dose delay (34% vs 16.8%, p=0.001). Among patients with the combination and Gemcitabin arm gender, diabetes mellitus, performance status, cholestasis, grade, stage did not have a statistically difference (p>0.05). Clinical response rate to the combination arm was higher than the Gem arm (69.0% vs 49.7%, p=0.001). PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance (8.9 vs 6.0, p=0.08). OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm (12.0 vs 10.2, p>0.05). Grade III-IV hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were higher in the combination arm. PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance. OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm.

Prognostic factors in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of single institution.

PURPOSE: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) makes up 80-85% of all lung cancers cases. Lung cancer in older individuals is frequently undertreated. Patients eligible for cisplatin- based chemotherapy should be selected carefully. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to evaluate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in elderly (≥65 years) patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 110 elderly patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had been administered cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy between December 2004 and November 2011. Seventeen potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with OS. RESULTS: Among the 17 variables of univariate analysis, 4 were identified to have prognostic significance for OS: comorbidities (p<0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (p=0.02), first-line chemotherapy cycles (p<0.001) and serum albumin level (p=0.04). Multivariate analysis showed that only ECOG PS (p=0.01) was independent prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSION: PS was important prognostic factor in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The findings of this study may facilitate pretreatment prediction of OS and therefore can be used for selecting the most appropriate treatment for elderly patients.

Prognostic value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: single center experience.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective single-center study was to evaluate the prognostic implication on overall survival (OS) of the F-18 FDG PET scan in locally advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 120 locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients (December 2004-November 2011) treated/followed at the Dicle University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology. SUVmax and other potential prognostic variables (n=18) were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS: Among 18 variables of univariate analysis, 6 were identified to bear prognostic significance: sex (p=0.01), performance status (PS) (p =0.03), stage (p=0.04), bone metastases (p=0.002), serum albumin (p=0.01) and blood glucose level (p=0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that PS, bone metastases and serum albumin level were independent prognostic factors for OS (p=0.01, p=0.004, p=0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: PS, serum albumin levels and bone metastases were independent prognostic factors, while FDG uptake of the primary lesion was not associated with prognosis of OS in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients.

Contribution of low-molecular weight heparin addition to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common brain tumor in adults and has a very aggressive course. Median survival is as short as 2 years with standard treatment (chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant temozolomide). The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) addition to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of GBM. METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed GBM between March 2004-May 2009 were evaluated. After surgical intervention (total, subtotal resection or only biopsy) all of them were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (2 Gy daily, 5 days a week, 30 fractions, total tumor dose 60 Gy; and 75 mg/m² temozolomide, 7 days a week), followed by adjuvant temozolomide (6 cycles, 150-200 mg/m², 5 days every 28 days), with or without LMWH (4000 IU/day, 7 days a week, concomitant with radiotherapy) because of risk of thrombosis. The primary endpoint was the determination of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were 1- and 2-year OS survival. RESULTS: 30 patients (13 patients in the group non receiving LMWH (LMWH-) and 17 patients in the group receiving LMWH (LMWH+)) were included in the study. Median age was 54 years (range 24-75). Median PFS was 57 and 38 weeks in LMWH+ and LMWH- groups, respectively (p=0.068). Median OS was 69 and 44 weeks (p=0.095), 1-year OS survival 84.6 and 41.2% (p=0.016), and 2-year OS survival 38.5 and 5.9% in LMWH+ and LMWH-, respectively (p=0.061). No significant difference was noted between the two groups for grade 3-4 toxicity (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Better PFS, OS and 2-year OS survival were obtained in present study with the addition of LMWH to concomitant chemoradiation for GBM but without statistical significance. One-year OS survival was statistically significant favoring the LMWH group. The addition of LMWH did not increase temozolomide toxicity.

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced disease. Systemic chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer has limited impact on overall survival (OS). Patients eligible for chemotherapy should be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic factors for OS in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with first-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 343 locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who were treated with gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy between December 2000 and June 2011. Fifteen potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with OS. Univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to determine prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among the 15 variables of univariate analysis, 6 were identified to have prognostic significance: stage (p<0.001), cholestasis (p=0.02), weight loss, prior pancreatectomy, serum CEA level (p<0.001) and serum CA19-9 level (p>0.001). In addition, age, chemotherapy and liver metastasis were of borderline significance (p=0.06). Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) included the 6 significant prognostic factors of univariate analysis and showed that stage was independent prognostic factor for OS, as were weight loss, and serum CEA level. CONCLUSION: Stage, weight loss, and serum CEA level were identified as important prognostic factors for OS in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. These findings may also facilitate pretreatment prediction of OS and can be used for selecting patients for treatment.

Mitomycin-C in combination with fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after oxaliplatin and irinotecan failure.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mitomycin-C (MMC) in combination with fluoropyrimidines as salvage 3rd -or 4th-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients. METHODS: All patients in this study had previously failed oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Patients were treated with MMC (6 mg/m(2) intravenously/i.v.) on day 1 in combination with either oral UFT (500 mg/m(2)) and oral leucovorin (LV) (30 mg) on days 1-14 every 3 weeks (group A) or infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by deGramont regimen with i.v. LV (200 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks (group B). RESULTS: Thirty-nine MCRC patients were analyzed. Twenty-two of them were in group A and 17 in group B. Thirty-three were evaluable for clinical efficacy. The clinical benefit in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was 30.8%. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% confidence interval/ CI 4-8) and median overall survival (OS) 9 months (95% CI 6.5-11.5). Median PFS was 3 months (95% CI 2.4-3.6) in group A and 7 months (95% CI 5.1-8.9) in group B (p=0.009). Median OS was 7 months (95% CI 4.3-9.7) in group A and 12 months (95% CI 5.4-18.6) in group B (p=0.422). The combination of MMC and fluoropyrimidines was generally well tolerated. The most common severe toxicities were nausea and vomiting, neutropenia, hepatotoxicity and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: MMC in combination with fluoropyrimidines is safe and active in heavily-pretreated MCRC patients. This combination remains a viable option in these patients. However, better therapies are urgently needed.

The prognostic role of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax and SUVmax change in patients with node-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. / El papel pronóstico del SUVmáx basal y cambio del SUVmáx en la PET/TC con18F-FDG en pacientes con cáncer de mama con ganglios positivos que reciben quimioterapia neoadyuvante.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prognostic role of baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) obtained by pretreatment PET/CT and the change in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax [%]) in patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients with baseline SUVmax and 121 patients with SUVmax measurement after treatment were evaluated in the study. The baseline SUVmax value of the breast (SUVmaxBI) and axilla (SUVmaxAI) and the change in the SUVmax of the breast (ΔSUVmaxB) and axilla (ΔSUVmaxA) were measured. The optimal cut-off value of SUVmax and ΔSUVmax were determined by ROC curve analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: ΔSUVmaxB, pCRB, pCRA, and pCR parameters were found to be associated with relapse (p < 0.001, p = 0.033, p = 0.016, and p = 0.013, respectively). ΔSUVmaxB and SUVmaxAI were associated with mortality (p = 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Multiple Cox regression analyses revealed that ΔSUVmaxB value was an independent prognostic factor for relapse and mortality (p = 0.013 and p = 0.010, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results showed that ΔSUVmaxB was an independent prognostic factor for relapse and mortality in patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer who received NAC.

Characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer in younger women.

PURPOSE: Women under 40 years of age comprise a small proportion of patients with breast cancer. Clinical and pathological features of the disease in these patients are different from those in older patients with this type of cancer. In the present study we investigated the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors in young patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 249 consecutive breast cancer patients who were admitted to our department between August 2001 and December 2005. Clinicopathological features were determined both in patients under and over 40 years of age. RESULTS: 106 (42.5%) patients were under and 143 (57.5%) were over 40 years. The mean age was 35.2 years for those under 40 years and 54 for those older than 40 years. At diagnosis, 10.4% of the patients in the younger age group and 7.0% in the older age group had metastasis (p=0.500). Patients in the younger age group exhibited higher estrogen receptor (ER) negativity (48.1 vs. 37.1%) (p=0.425) and a higher percentage of family history of breast cancer (4.7 vs. 2.8%) (p=0.651). Breast cancer in younger women was more frequently associated with other poor prognostic factors such as perineural and/or lymphovascular invasion. The 5-year overall survival was 6.3% for the younger patients and 22.2% for the older ones (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that breast cancer in younger patients has significantly more poor prognostic features compared to older ones.

Respiratory distress due to endotracheal aspergilloma in an immunocompromised lymphoma patient: case report.

A 54-year old woman, intensively treated for aggressive, relapsed lymphoma had symptoms of severe dyspnea and hoarseness. The diagnosis of endotracheal aspergilloma was made by sputum culture, bronchoscopy and biopsy. The lesions consisted of endotracheal aspergilloma associated with tracheal obstruction due to the mass effect. The patient improved dramatically after removal of the mass.

The predictive role of Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) activity on survival in patients with metastatic and nonmetastatic gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress is known to be implicated in the pathogenesis of malignancies including gastric cancer (GC). Paraoxonase 1(PON1) is a member of antioxidant defense system which acts by hydrolysing peroxidases. Our aim is to assess the levels PON1 activity in different stages and localizations of GC and analyze the predictive role of PON1 activity on overall survival in GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty six patients with GC were enrolled to the study. Patients were divided into two groups; group I (nonmetastatic GC, n=65) and group II (metastatic GC, n=61). Paraoxonase 1 activity, albumine and lactate dehidrogenase levels and whole blood count were analyzed. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer system was used for staging procedure. RESULTS: Patients at advanced N or M stage have significantly lower levels of PON1 (34.26 U/L and 29.88 U/L, p=0.04 and p=0.03; respectively). Gender, Lauren's classification, grade, localization and T stage of tumor have nonsignificant impact on PON1 activity. PON1 activity was a significant prognostic factor in GC as well as metastasis, localization of tumor and low hemoglobine or albumine level. CONCLUSIONS: Lower levels of paraoxonase 1 activity in patients with metastatic gastric cancer may reflect the presence of enhanced oxidative stress in advanced stages of the disease. PON1 activity is a significant and independent predictor of overall survival. Identifying novel prognostic markers can help to establish appropriate therapeutic strategies, to determine preventive measures and to improve survival rates.

Is (18)F-FDG-PET/CT prognostic factor for survival in patients with small cell lung cancer? Single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Although a number of studies in patients with a variety of malignant tumors have shown that metabolic activity on fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) is correlated with survival, there are few studies about the impact of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. There is still some ambiguity as to whether FDG PET in patients with SCLC will ensure prognostic knowledge for survival. We performed a retrospective analysis of prognostic implication of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with SCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 54 patients with histologically or cytologically proven SCLC who had undergone pre-treatment (18)F-FDG-PET/CT scanning between September 2007 and November 2011 in the Dicle University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology. SUVmax and other potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with survival. RESULT: Among the eleven variables of univariate analysis, three variables were identified as having prognostic significance: Performance status (p < 0.001), stage (p = 0.02) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that performance status and stage were considered independent prognostic factors for survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, performance status and stage were identified as important prognostic factors, while (18)F-FDG-PET/CT uptake of the primary lesions was not associated with prognostic importance for survival in patients with SCLC.

Phase II study of lapatinib in combination with vinorelbine in patients with HER2 positive recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: a multicentric Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this explorative phase II study was to evaluate the activity and safety of lapatinib in combination with intravenous vinorelbine in women with HER2 positive metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. The primary objectives were response and clinical benefit (CB) rates, secondary objectives were toxicity, response duration and progression free survival. Patients received 1250 mg oral lapatinib continuously once daily and intravenous vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Although 25 patients were evaluable for response, according to intend to treat analysis of 28 patients; 14% had confirmed partial response (PR) and 36% had stable disease more than 24 weeks with a CB rate of 50%. Sixty four percent of the patients suffered from grade 3-4 hematologic and 18% from grade 3 extra-hematologic toxicities. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial provide evidence to further investigate the potential of this combination for patients unsuitable for trastuzumab or who become refractory to trastuzumab.

Education, economic status and other risk factors in gastric cancer: "a case-control study of Turkish Oncology Group".

Diet and lifestyle related to socioeconomic status emerged as risk factors for gastric cancer in several studies. However, the results were not always consistent with the socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors independent from education as a measure of socioeconomic status. Two hundred and fifty-three patients with gastric cancer diagnosed in 2005 and equal number of control subjects were interviewed for several characteristics and diet. Matching was done for age, gender, city of residence and also for the level of education. Despite these matching preferences, patients had significantly lower income when compared to the control subjects (P = 0.0001). Higher rate of patients were smoking more than 2 packs/day of cigarettes (P = 0.018). Also significantly higher rate of control subjects were using antibiotics (P = 0.002). Coffee (P < 0.0001), salad (P = 0.006), bread (P = 0.005), vegetable-derived cooking oil (P = 0.003) consumptions appeared as highly protective factors against gastric cancer in univariate analysis in the present trial. In multivariate analysis, significant risk reducing factors were bread (P = 0.005) and coffee consumption (P = 0.0001) other than the level income (P = 0.002). In conclusion, the goal of obtaining comparable socioeconomic status by including the level of education in the matching criteria was not met in our study because of the difference in income level. The only risk reducing factor that was not in accordance with income level was the unexpectedly higher rate of bread consumption in control group.

The importance of CD7 and CD56 antigens in acute leukaemias.

The prognostic significance of immunophenotypical properties of leukaemic cells is well known. However, the biological and clinical significance of CD7 and CD56 antigen expression in acute leukaemias are not clearly established. In patients with acute leukaemias, we identified CD7 and CD56 expression and analysed their associations with markers expressed early in haemopoietic ontogeny and clinical parameters. Among 22 patients with acute leukaemia [12 acute myeloblastic leukaemia (AML), 10 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)], we found CD7 positivity in 15 of 22 patients (68%) and CD56 positivity in four patients (18%). CD7 positivity was observed in seven patients (58%) with AML and in eight patients (80%) with ALL. CD56 positivity was observed in three patients (25%) with AML and one patient (10%) with ALL. Lymphadenopathy was present in five patients and associated with hepatosplenomegaly in three patients with ALL. Splenomegaly and hepatomegaly were present in three patients with AML. Central nervous system involvement was seen in one patient with ALL. Complete remission was achieved in nine patients (41%) (five ALL and four AML). Our data showed that CD7 and CD56 positivity at diagnosis associated with low remission rate and biological aggressiveness in a significant proportion of patients. We suggest the evaluation of CD7 and CD56 in all patients with acute leukaemias at the time of diagnosis in view of poor clinical outcome.