Additional outlet occlusion as an important factor in avoiding retreatment after transvenous embolization for cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous embolization (TVE), such as selective shunt occlusion, is the first line treatment for cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CSDAVF). Despite the favorable outcomes of TVE, some cases necessitating retreatment due to recurrence or incomplete occlusion persist. Given the physical, psychological, and financial burden of multiple treatments, understanding the predictive factors for recurrence, spontaneous occlusion, or retreatment is important. However, few reports have addressed these factors, complicating decision making regarding the need for retreatment. This study analyzed predictive factors for retreatment and spontaneous occlusion to offer new insights into CSDAVF management. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study was conducted in two acute care hospitals. Patients aged 18-100 years undergoing endovascular treatment for CSDAVF from January 2011 to December 2022 were included. RESULTS: Of 65 patients treated with TVE, 29 experienced immediate complete occlusion. Meanwhile, 22 of 36 patients with incomplete occlusion had spontaneous occlusion, and retreatment was performed in 20% of patients. Additional outlet occlusion was negatively associated with retreatment (P=0.046), and it tended to promote spontaneous occlusion (P=0.056). Favorable functional outcomes were observed in all patients, and approximately 94% of patients showed complete occlusion at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSION: TVE is an effective treatment for CSDAVF. Outlet occlusion, when immediate complete occlusion is unattainable, is important to reduce retreatment and promote spontaneous occlusion. Substantially reducing shunt flow, carefully assessing dangerous drainage routes, and closely monitoring the residual shunt are crucial for preventing intracranial hemorrhage when outlet occlusion is performed.

Anatomical Flow Diversion by Hybrid Strategy for Intractable Large Cerebral Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Flow diverters (FDs) provide curative endovascular treatment for wide-necked sidewall aneurysms. The efficacy of FDs for bifurcation or branching sidewall aneurysms is probably limited. We used anatomical flow diversion (AFD) for intractable large cerebral aneurysms. We report our experiences with AFD. METHODS: The concept of AFD is the transformation from the bifurcation or branching sidewall type to the nonbranching sidewall type. Linearization of the parent artery by stenting, intentional branch occlusion, and aneurysmal coil embolization were performed. Furthermore, bypass surgery is performed for patients intolerant to branch occlusions. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of intractable aneurysms treated with AFD. RESULTS: AFD was performed in seven unruptured large aneurysms. Aneurysmal locations were the top of the basilar artery (BA), BA-superior cerebellar artery (SCA), internal carotid artery (IC)-posterior communicating artery (PcomA), and IC terminal. The mean dome diameter was 17.0 ± 4.6 mm. Six patients underwent bypass surgery. The occluded branches were the PCA + SCA, PcomA, and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) A1. An FD was used in three patients and a neck bridge stent in four patients. No intraprocedural complications occurred. Two postprocedural ischemic complications occurred in one patient. Six (86%) patients demonstrated a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 at the 3-month follow-up, and one with an ischemic complication showed an mRS 5. Complete occlusion of all aneurysms was maintained with a median follow-up duration of 60 months. CONCLUSION: AFD is useful for intractable large cerebral aneurysms with high curability, although safety verification is required.