Racial Differences in the Risk of Prenatal Depression Among Women Experiencing Childhood and Adult Stressors.

INTRODUCTION: Stress exposure during a woman's own childhood and adulthood likely elevate risk of prenatal depression (PND). However, most PND screening tools fail to assess for events prior to conception. This study examined the differential effects of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and adult life stressors on PND. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 199 racially diverse pregnant women, ages 18 to 43, recruited from clinics and ongoing university-based studies between 2012 and 2018. The ACE Scale assessed maternal childhood trauma exposure. Validated scales examining subjective stressors assessed for chronic adult stressors. PND was assessed with the Edinburgh Depression Scale, with the Rini Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale as a covariate. Associations were measured using multivariable linear regression modeling. Results were stratified by self-identified Black or white race. RESULTS: Among 199 participants, mean age was 26.8 years and 67.8% were Black. Controlling for age, race, education, and prenatal anxiety, all participants reporting both childhood trauma and adult stressors were at increased risk for PND (p < 0.0001). PND risk was increased among Black women with childhood stressors (p < 0.01) or three or more adult stressors (p < 0.0001) and among White women following any number of adult stressors (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the importance of cumulative exposure to stress and trauma across the life span as indicators of risk for PND. Black and white participants had differential development of risk, depending on timing and number of exposures. Prenatal depression risk screening during routine prenatal care should include an assessment of current and historical trauma and stressors.

Who Are the Undiagnosed? Disparities in Hypertension Diagnoses in Vulnerable Populations.

This study builds upon a project that developed clinical criteria to identify undiagnosed hypertension patients "hiding in plain sight" (HIPS) by examining patient characteristics to understand whether there are disparities in hypertension diagnosis. We examined electronic health record demographic data for patients identified by the HIPS criteria and subgroups at 3 Missouri health centers. Identified patients who returned for a follow-up visit and were subsequently diagnosed with hypertension tended to be older, black/African American, uninsured, and classified as having obesity. Younger, white, healthy weight females were less likely to be diagnosed. These findings point to exploring possible biases/other nonclinical factors in hypertension diagnosis.

MS/MS networking guided analysis of molecule and gene cluster families.

The ability to correlate the production of specialized metabolites to the genetic capacity of the organism that produces such molecules has become an invaluable tool in aiding the discovery of biotechnologically applicable molecules. Here, we accomplish this task by matching molecular families with gene cluster families, making these correlations to 60 microbes at one time instead of connecting one molecule to one organism at a time, such as how it is traditionally done. We can correlate these families through the use of nanospray desorption electrospray ionization MS/MS, an ambient pressure MS technique, in conjunction with MS/MS networking and peptidogenomics. We matched the molecular families of peptide natural products produced by 42 bacilli and 18 pseudomonads through the generation of amino acid sequence tags from MS/MS data of specific clusters found in the MS/MS network. These sequence tags were then linked to biosynthetic gene clusters in publicly accessible genomes, providing us with the ability to link particular molecules with the genes that produced them. As an example of its use, this approach was applied to two unsequenced Pseudoalteromonas species, leading to the discovery of the gene cluster for a molecular family, the bromoalterochromides, in the previously sequenced strain P. piscicida JCM 20779(T). The approach itself is not limited to 60 related strains, because spectral networking can be readily adopted to look at molecular family-gene cluster families of hundreds or more diverse organisms in one single MS/MS network.

The relationship of bottle feeding and other sucking behaviors with speech disorder in Patagonian preschoolers.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that children's nonnutritive sucking habits may lead to delayed development of their oral anatomy and functioning. However, these findings were inconsistent. We investigated associations between use of bottles, pacifiers, and other sucking behaviors with speech disorders in children attending three preschools in Punta Arenas (Patagonia), Chile. METHODS: Information on infant feeding and sucking behaviors, age starting and stopping breast- and bottle-feeding, pacifier use, and other sucking behaviors, was collected from self-administered questionnaires completed by parents. Evaluation of speech problems was conducted at preschools with subsequent scoring by a licensed speech pathologist using age-normative standards. RESULTS: A total of 128 three- to five-year olds were assessed, 46% girls and 54% boys. Children were breastfed for an average of 25.2 (SD 9.6) months and used a bottle 24.4 (SD 15.2) months. Fifty-three children (41.7%) had or currently used a pacifier for an average of 11.4 (SD 17.3) months; 23 children (18.3%) were reported to have sucked their fingers. Delayed use of a bottle until after 9 months appeared to be protective for subsequent speech disorders. There was less than a one-third lower relative odds of subsequent speech disorders for children with a delayed use of a bottle compared to children without a delayed use of a bottle (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.10-0.98). A three-fold increase in relative odds of speech disorder was found for finger-sucking behavior (OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.10-8.00) and for use of a pacifier for 3 or more years (OR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.08-10.81). CONCLUSION: The results suggest extended use of sucking outside of breastfeeding may have detrimental effects on speech development in young children.