Facility-Level Variation in Hospitalization, Mortality, and Costs in the 30 Days After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights on Short-Term Healthcare Value From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System (VA CART) Program.

BACKGROUND: Policies to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are intended to improve healthcare value by reducing costs while maintaining patient outcomes. Whether facility-level hospitalization rates after PCI are associated with cost of care is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 32,080 patients who received PCI at any 1 of 62 Veterans Affairs hospitals from 2008 to 2011. We identified facility outliers for 30-day risk-standardized hospitalization, mortality, and cost. Compared with the risk-standardized average, 2 hospitals (3.2%) had a lower-than-expected hospitalization rate, and 2 hospitals (3.2%) had a higher-than-expected hospitalization rate. We observed no statistically significant variation in facility-level risk-standardized mortality. The facility-level unadjusted median per patient 30-day total cost was $23,820 (interquartile range, $19,604-$29,958). Compared with the risk-standardized average, 17 hospitals (27.4%) had lower-than-expected costs, and 14 hospitals (22.6%) had higher-than-expected costs. At the facility level, the index PCI accounted for 83.1% of the total cost (range, 60.3%-92.2%), whereas hospitalization after PCI accounted for only 5.8% (range, 2.0%-12.7%) of the 30-day total cost. Facilities with higher hospitalization rates were not more expensive (Spearman ρ=0.16; 95% confidence interval, -0.09 to 0.39; P=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: In this national study, hospitalizations in the 30 day after PCI accounted for only 5.8% of 30-day cost, and facility-level cost was not correlated with hospitalization rates. This challenges the focus on reducing hospitalizations after PCI as an effective means of improving healthcare value. Opportunities remain to improve PCI value by reducing the variation in total cost of PCI without compromising patient outcomes.

The current and future landscape of urinary thromboxane testing to evaluate atherothrombotic risk.

Biomarker testing for efficacy of therapy is an accepted way for clinicians to individualize dosing to genetic and/or environmental factors that may be influencing a treatment regimen. Aspirin is used by nearly 43 million Americans on a regular basis to reduce risks associated with various atherothrombotic diseases. Despite its widespread use, many clinicians are unaware of the link between suboptimal response to aspirin therapy and increased risk for inferior clinical outcomes in several disease states, and biomarker testing for efficacy of aspirin therapy is not performed as routinely as efficacy testing in other therapeutic areas. This article reviews the clinical and laboratory aspects of determining whole-body thromboxane production, particularly as it pertains to efficacy assessment of aspirin responsiveness.

Improving healthcare systems' disclosures of large-scale adverse events: a Department of Veterans Affairs leadership, policymaker, research and stakeholder partnership.

BACKGROUND: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandates disclosure of large-scale adverse events to patients, even if risk of harm is not clearly present. Concerns about past disclosures warranted further examination of the impact of this policy. OBJECTIVE: Through a collaborative partnership between VA leaders, policymakers, researchers and stakeholders, the objective was to empirically identify critical aspects of disclosure processes as a first step towards improving future disclosures. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants at nine VA facilities where recent disclosures took place. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-seven stakeholders participated in the interviews: 38 employees, 28 leaders (from facilities, regions and national offices), 27 Veteran patients and family members, and four congressional staff members. APPROACH: Facility and regional leaders were interviewed by telephone, followed by a two-day site visit where employees, patients and family members were interviewed face-to-face. National leaders and congressional staff also completed telephone interviews. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative assessment processes. Themes were mapped to the stages of the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication model: pre-crisis, initial event, maintenance, resolution and evaluation. KEY RESULTS: Many areas for improvement during disclosure were identified, such as preparing facilities better (pre-crisis), creating rapid communications, modifying disclosure language, addressing perceptions of harm, reducing complexity, and seeking assistance from others (initial event), managing communication with other stakeholders (maintenance), minimizing effects on staff and improving trust (resolution), and addressing facilities' needs (evaluation). CONCLUSIONS: Through the partnership, five recommendations to improve disclosures during each stage of communication have been widely disseminated throughout the VA using non-academic strategies. Some improvements have been made; other recommendations will be addressed through implementation of a large-scale adverse event disclosure toolkit. These toolkit strategies will enable leaders to provide timely and transparent information to patients and families, while reducing the burden on employees and the healthcare system during these events.

Feasibility of proactive medical device surveillance: the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) program.

BACKGROUND: Timely identification and reporting of medical device problems is critical to postmarket device surveillance programs to maximize patient safety. Cardiac catheterization laboratories are high-device utilization areas well suited for device surveillance. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of the national VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) system, embedded in the electronic health record of all 76 VA cardiac catheterization laboratories, to document unexpected problems with medical devices at the point of care. METHODS: We evaluated 260,258 consecutive cardiac catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention procedures on 175,098 Veterans between August 2006 and February 2012. Unexpected device problems (UDPs) encountered for any equipment used during a procedure were entered by clinicians at the point of care as part of regular care documentation. All UDPs were reviewed in collaboration with the FDA to ascertain the likelihood of a device defect (eg, in manufacture or design) and/or contributing to a procedural complication (level I, unlikely; level II, possibly; level III, likely). RESULTS: Of the 260,258 procedure reports, 974 (0.37%) UDP's were reported by 71 (92.2%) of the 76 VA hospitals. After triage, 739 (75.9%) were deemed level I, 196 (20.1%) level II, and 39 (4.0%) level III. Of the 39 level III reports, 12 (30.7%) are in the submission phase as a FDA MedWatch report. The number of monthly UDP reports increased significantly from 2006 to 2012 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging a clinical application embedded in the electronic health record and in collaboration with FDA, a proactive national cardiac device surveillance program has been successfully implemented in the VA.

Strategies from a nationwide health information technology implementation: the VA CART story.

The VA Cardiovascular Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) system is a customized electronic medical record system which provides standardized report generation for cardiac catheterization procedures, serves as a national data repository, and is the centerpiece of a national quality improvement program. Like many health information technology projects, CART implementation did not proceed without some barriers and resistance. We describe the nationwide implementation of CART at the 77 VA hospitals which perform cardiac catheterizations in three phases: (1) strategic collaborations; (2) installation; and (3) adoption. Throughout implementation, success required a careful balance of technical, clinical, and organizational factors. We offer strategies developed through CART implementation which are broadly applicable to technology projects aimed at improving the quality, reliability, and efficiency of health care.

Mortality based on the presenting electrocardiogram in patients with myocardial infarction in the troponin era.

BACKGROUND: Studies reporting short-term mortality in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) based on the initial electrocardiogram (ECG) are often limited by requiring an ischemic ECG for inclusion. Because few patients with normal or nonspecific findings were included, outcomes in these patients are less clear, especially in the troponin era. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed as having MI using troponin I (TnI) over a 6-year period were included and classified into 8 mutually exclusive groups based on the initial ECG using standard criteria. Patients were included in only 1 group. The MI size was estimated using multiples of peak creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and 30-day mortality rate was assessed. RESULTS: Among 1641 patients with MI, patients with ST elevation represented only 22% of all MIs. Patients with ST elevation had the largest MI size, with 2 of 3 having a peak CK-MB greater than 10 times normal. In contrast, most of the patients representing all the other ECG groups had a peak CK-MB less than 5 times normal, with approximately 1 of 3 having no CK-MB elevation and were diagnosed by TnI elevation alone. Patients could be separated into a high-risk group (ST elevation, ischemia, other, or left bundle-branch block), in which mortality rate exceeded 9% (mean, 14%), and a lower-risk group (prior MI, left ventricular hypertrophy, nonspecific changes, and normal), in which the 30-day mortality rate averaged 6% (P < .001; range, 5.23%-7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Specific ECG findings other than ischemia portend poor outcomes in patients with MI. Once MI is diagnosed, patients are no longer low risk.

Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome.

CONTEXT: Prior mechanistic studies reported that omeprazole decreases the platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel, yet the clinical significance of these findings is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of patients taking clopidogrel with or without a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of 8205 patients with ACS taking clopidogrel after discharge from 127 Veterans Affairs hospitals between October 1, 2003, and January 31, 2006. Vital status information was available for all patients through September 30, 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality or rehospitalization for ACS. RESULTS: Of 8205 patients taking clopidogrel after discharge, 63.9% (n = 5244) were prescribed PPI at discharge, during follow-up, or both and 36.1% (n = 2961) were not prescribed PPI. Death or rehospitalization for ACS occurred in 20.8% (n = 615) of patients taking clopidogrel without PPI and 29.8% (n = 1561) of patients taking clopidogrel plus PPI. In multivariable analyses, use of clopidogrel plus PPI was associated with an increased risk of death or rehospitalization for ACS compared with use of clopidogrel without PPI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.41). Among patients taking clopidogrel after hospital discharge and prescribed PPI at any point during follow-up (n = 5244), periods of use of clopidogrel plus PPI (compared with periods of use of clopidogrel without PPI) were associated with a higher risk of death or rehospitalization for ACS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.46). In analyses of secondary outcomes, patients taking clopidogrel plus PPI had a higher risk of hospitalizations for recurrent ACS compared with patients taking clopidogrel without PPI (14.6% vs 6.9%; AOR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.57-2.20]) and revascularization procedures (15.5% vs 11.9%; AOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.30-1.71]), but not for all-cause mortality (19.9% vs 16.6%; AOR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.80-1.05]). The association between use of clopidogrel plus PPI and increased risk of adverse outcomes also was consistent using a nested case-control study design (AOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.54). In addition, use of PPI without clopidogrel was not associated with death or rehospitalization for ACS among patients not taking clopidogrel after hospital discharge (n = 6450) (AOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13). CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPI after hospital discharge for ACS was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes than use of clopidogrel without PPI, suggesting that use of PPI may be associated with attenuation of benefits of clopidogrel after ACS.

Predictive power of systolic function and congestive heart failure in patients with patients admitted for chest pain without ST elevation in the troponin era.

BACKGROUND: Impaired systolic function and congestive heart failure (CHF) are powerful predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). However, there are little data in which both of these variables were assessed in heterogenous patients admitted from the emergency department for exclusion of ischemia. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for MI exclusion who had ejection fraction (EF) measured were included. Systolic dysfunction was defined as EF <40%. Congestive heart failure was diagnosed based on clinical or x-ray evidence in the first 24 hours. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Of the 4,343 consecutive patients admitted, 3,682 (85%) had EF assessed (including 97% of the troponin I [TnI]-positive patients) and were included. One-year unadjusted mortality was 9.5%, but in the presence of systolic dysfunction or CHF, it increased to 22% and 26%, respectively. The most important multivariate predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality were similar and included CHF (OR for 1-year mortality 2.5, 95% CI 1.9-3.4), TnI elevations (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6), and severe renal failure (OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.7-7.2). Systolic dysfunction was predictive of 1 year (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5) but not 30-day mortality. Results were similar in the 3,018 patients who were troponin-negative. CONCLUSIONS: Congestive heart failure is an independent predictor of both short- and long-term mortality in patients admitted for MI exclusion. In contrast, systolic dysfunction predicts long-term but not short-term mortality. One cannot be used as a surrogate for the other.

Comparison of the modification of diet in renal disease and the Cockcroft-Gault equations for predicting mortality in patients admitted for exclusion of myocardial ischemia.

Renal dysfunction is an important predictor of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Until recently, the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) equation has been most commonly used to estimate renal function, although the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation is now recommended. Which equation better predicts mortality is unclear. Consecutive patients without ST elevation on the initial electrocardiogram admitted for exclusion of myocardial ischemia were included. Admission creatinine was used to estimate renal function, and 30-day and 1-year mortality were compared after classifying patients as having no (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] > or =60 ml/min/m(2)), moderate (eGFR 30 to 59 ml/min/ m(2)), or severe (eGFR <30 ml/min/m(2)) renal dysfunction using the 2 equations. Of the 4,343 patients (49% women, 64% African-American) included, 16% had troponin I elevations consistent with myocardial infarction, and 1-year mortality was 10%. Agreement between the 2 equations was high (r = 0.87 p <0.001, concordance 86%). Mortality was similar in the 2 renal function classifications, with no significant differences based on race or troponin I status at 30 days or 1 year. However, the area of the receiver operator characteristic curve was significantly larger for predicting 1-year mortality with the C-G equation (0.75 [0.72 to 0.77] vs 0.71 [0.68 to 0.73]; p <0.01); both were superior to creatinine alone (0.68 [0.66 to 0.71]; p <0.01 for both C-G and MDRD). Results for 30-day mortality were similar. In conclusion, the C-G equation appears to be superior to the MDRD equation for predicting short- and long-term mortality in patients admitted for exclusion of ischemia, although differences are minor.

Value of simultaneous functional assessment in association with acute rest perfusion imaging for predicting short- and long-term outcomes in emergency department patients with chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Rest tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has significant utility for clinical decision making in emergency department chest pain patients. The role of functional data, commonly acquired with perfusion, has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Low- to moderate-risk patients undergoing rest MPI for risk stratification were included. The patients' MPI findings were classified as normal (normal perfusion or function), abnormal (perfusion defect with abnormal regional function), or discordant (perfusion defect with normal regional function). Ejection fraction was determined from the gated MPI studies. Events based on perfusion classifications and ejection fraction were evaluated. A total of 2,826 consecutive patients (abnormal MPI results in 40%, normal in 32%, and discordant in 27%) were studied. Outcomes were similar for those with normal MPI results versus those with discordant MPI results (myocardial infarction [MI] based on troponin I [TnI], 3.5% vs 4.0%; MI based on creatine kinase-MB, 1.5% vs 1.7%; revascularization, 5.2% vs 5.5%; and MI/revascularization based on TnI, 7.9% vs 8.1%) (P = not significant for all). Both groups had significantly fewer events (P < .001 for all) when compared with patients with abnormal MPI studies (MI based on TnI, 15%; MI based on creatine kinase-MB, 10%; revascularization, 17%; MI based on TnI or revascularization, 24%). The mortality rate was not different among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that mild/moderate and severe systolic dysfunction were independent predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality rates (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent evaluation of perfusion and function (regional and global) with MPI provides significant risk/outcome predictive power.

Clopidogrel and long-term outcomes after stent implantation for acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between clopidogrel use and long-term outcomes after stent implantation for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with ACS receiving drug-eluting stent (DES) or bare-metal stent (BMS) and discharged from all Veterans Health Administration hospitals from 2003 to 2004. Clopidogrel use was assessed by pharmacy dispensing data. Multivariable Cox regression assessed the association between clopidogrel discontinuation and outcomes with clopidogrel use as a time-varying covariate and adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, hospital presentation, and treatment variables. Median follow-up was 538 days. RESULTS: Of 1455 patients with ACS, 65.8% received BMS and 34.2% received DES. The median number of days of clopidogrel use was 299. In multivariable analysis, clopidogrel discontinuation was associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-3.58). The findings were consistent for patients receiving BMS (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.59-4.42) or DES (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.06-3.75) and for the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and AMI or mortality. When follow-up was divided into 6-month intervals, the association between clopidogrel discontinuation and higher mortality remained consistent up to 18 months after hospital discharge. In secondary analysis of patients who were event-free at 6 months, clopidogrel discontinuation was associated with higher risk for AMI among patients receiving DES (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.13-11.3) compared with BMS (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.58-2.74). CONCLUSION: Clopidogrel discontinuation after extended use was still associated with increased mortality risk. Clinical trials are urgently needed to define the optimal duration of clopidogrel therapy after stent implantation for ACS.

Implication of the new low-density lipoprotein goals in dyslipidemia management of patients with acute coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to meet the recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal of 100 mg/dL and optional aggressive lowering to 70 mg/dL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed as having ACS who had lipid levels measured within 24 hours of admission from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002, were assessed for the ability to meet the 2 target LDL-C levels. Patients were considered to have ACS if they were diagnosed as having myocardial infarction, had significant disease on angiography, or had a history of coronary artery disease. Patients were classified into 1 of 4 groups on the basis of the degree of LDL-C lowering required to meet the 2 different goals: less than 33%, 33% to 39%, 40% to 49%, and 50% or more. Patients with myocardial infarction who had lipid sampling performed more than 24 hours after admission were excluded. RESULTS: The mean plus-or-minus SD LDL-C level was 111 plus-or-minus 43 mg/dL in the 1322 patients who met criteria for ACS and had LDL-C levels assessed. On the basis of a target LDL-C value of less than 100 mg/dL, 43% of patients were at goal and did not require treatment, and only 2.5% had an LDL-C level that required a 50% or greater reduction to meet goal. In contrast, using the newer LDL-C target of 70 mg/dL, 85% patients required treatment, and 23% of patients required a 50% or greater decrease in LDL-C level and therefore were likely to require more than 1 lipid-lowering agent. CONCLUSION: Decreasing the LDL-C target to less than 70 mg/dL substantially increases the number of patients with ACS who would require treatment. A significant proportion of patients will require a reduction in LDL-C level of 50% or more, which is not easily achievable with current lipid-lowering monotherapy.

Ability of myoglobin to predict mortality in patients admitted for exclusion of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Myoglobin can be used as an early marker to diagnose myocardial infarction (MI); and although nonspecific for myocardial necrosis, it seems to be a strong mortality predictor. Because myoglobin elevations are often present in patients with renal insufficiency, it is possible that the predictive value of myoglobin is secondary to identifying patients with renal insufficiency. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for MI exclusion without ST elevation on the initial electrocardiogram underwent serial assessment of cardiac markers (creatine kinase [CK], CK-myocardial band [MB], and troponin I [TnI]). Myoglobin was assessed at the time of admission and/or 3 hours later. Renal insufficiency was defined as a creatinine clearance <60 mL/min. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3461 patients were included in the analysis. Overall 30-day and 1-year mortality was 2.4% and 9.7%. Myoglobin was elevated in 675 (20%), CK-MB in 421 (12%), and TnI in 517 (15%). Among the 993 patients with renal insufficiency, myoglobin was elevated in 43%, CK-MB in 17%, and TnI in 21%. Independent predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality were similar and included age > or =65 years, prior MI, and an ischemic electrocardiogram, whereas myoglobin was the strongest multivariate predictor (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-3.7), including those with renal insufficiency (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.6-3.4). Troponin I had borderline predictive value (P = .08, OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.96-2.0), whereas CK-MB was not predictive in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the absence of cardiac specificity, an elevated myoglobin strongly predicts mortality, even in patients with renal insufficiency.

The prevalence and outcomes of in-hospital acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health System.

BACKGROUND: Most studies of the epidemiology and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have focused on patients who experienced onset of their symptoms in the community and then presented to the hospital. There are, however, patients whose symptoms of AMI begin after hospitalization for other medical conditions. The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of in-hospital AMI in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and to compare baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes according to whether individuals presented with AMI or had an in-hospital AMI. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 7054 veterans who were hospitalized for AMI in 127 VHA medical centers between July 2003 and August 2004. The main outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Key covariates included age, body mass index, admission systolic blood pressure, heart rate, previous use of lipid-lowering drugs, elevated admission troponin value, prolonged and/or atypical chest pain on admission, and ST-segment elevation on the initial electrocardiogram. RESULTS: There were 792 patients (11.2%) who had AMI while hospitalized for other medical conditions. These patients differed substantially from those who presented to the hospital with AMI. The odds of 30-day mortality were greater in the in-hospital group (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-4.3; P<.001) and remained higher after statistical adjustment (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.4; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Although most attention has been paid to patients with AMI admitted via the community emergency medical system or through the emergency department, AMI occurring during hospitalization for other medical problems is an important clinical problem.

Practical implementation of the guidelines for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Acute Cardiac Care), Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group, in Collaboration With the Society of Chest Pain Centers.

In the United States each year, >5.3 million patients present to emergency departments with chest discomfort and related symptoms. Ultimately, >1.4 million individuals are hospitalized for unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. For emergency physicians and cardiologists alike, these patients represent an enormous challenge to accurately diagnose and appropriately treat. This update of the 2002 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (UA/NSTEMI) provides an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and treatment of these patients in the emergency department, in-hospital, and after hospital discharge. Despite publication of the guidelines several years ago, many patients with UA/NSTEMI still do not receive guidelines-indicated therapy.

Meta-analysis of ischemia-modified albumin to rule out acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Because of possible adverse outcomes, many of the >6 million annual emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergo extensive evaluations. To minimize medical errors, chest pain evaluations are structured to identify accurately nearly 100% of patients with ACS. This is at a cost of negative evaluation rates that can exceed 90%. Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), a serum biomarker with a high negative predictive value (NPV) at ED presentation, may exclude ACS. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis of IMA use for ACS risk stratification. METHODS: By computer literature search and communication with authors of unpublished information, all IMA data were considered. This analysis included studies if they reported IMA results from an ED presentation for suspected ACS. We defined a negative triple prediction test (TPT) as a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram, negative troponin, and negative IMA. RESULTS: Eight studies of >1800 patients met the entry criteria. The TPT sensitivity and NPV for acute ACS were 94.4% and 97.1% and, for longer-term outcomes, were 89.2% and 94.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A negative TPT of a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram, negative troponin, and negative IMA has a high NPV for excluding ACS in the ED.

Relationship between risk stratification by cardiac troponin level and adherence to guidelines for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The threshold of troponin elevation that stimulates changes in clinical decision making for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACSs) has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: A total of 23 298 patients with NSTE ACSs from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) initiative were separated into categories of maximum troponin ratios (ratio of the highest recorded troponin value in the first 24 hours to the local laboratory troponin assay upper limit of normalization [ULN]). RESULTS: Unadjusted rates of in-hospital mortality increased from the group with troponin levels below the reference limit (maximum troponin ratio 0-1 x ULN; n = 5291) to those with minor (1-2 x ULN; n = 2499), intermediate (2-5 x ULN; n = 3825), and major (>5 x ULN; n = 11 683) elevations (-2.8% vs 4.6% vs 4.7% vs 6.0%). The use of early (<24 hours) aspirin, heparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and beta-blockers was similar for the group with troponin levels below the reference limit compared with those with minor troponin elevations, and greater use of medications was demonstrated in patients with intermediate and major troponin elevations. Use of cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention was higher in patients with troponin levels below the reference limit compared with those with minor troponin elevations, and procedures were used most frequently in patients with major troponin elevations. Similar patterns of care were demonstrated after excluding patients with chronic renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Any degree of troponin elevation is associated with a higher risk of mortality for patients with NSTE ACSs, but guideline-recommended medical therapies are used more commonly only in patients with intermediate and major troponin elevations, whereas patients with troponin levels below the reference limit underwent invasive procedures more frequently than those with mild troponin elevations.