Non-diabetic elderly populations: the MHR as a protective factor against bone abnormalities.

Objectives: In China, osteoporosis has become a major health concern among elderly population, imposing significant burden on the country's social and economic systems. The monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) has been currently recommended as a novel marker of inflammation and oxidative stress associated with osteoporosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, its reliability in non-diabetic elderly populations remains unclear. The present study was to evaluate the association between MHR and osteoporosis in a non-diabetic elderly population. Methods: The clinical data of 240 non-diabetic elderly subjects (115 in the osteoporosis group and 125 in the normal bone group) were retrospectively analyzed and all statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 26.0. Results: Differences in age, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, MHR, uric acid, creatinine, triglycerides,and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were found to be statistically significant between the two groups. A binary logistic regression model was conducted by including age, MHR, UA and Cr as variables. The results showed that age was an independent risk factor and MHR was an independent protective factor for bone abnormality in the non-diabetic elderly population. The ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve for the predictive effect of MHR, age and their combined test on osteoporosis in non-diabetic elderly populations was 0.623, 0.728 and 0.761, respectively; the correlation analysis showed that MHR was positively correlated with lumbar and hip BMD, and negatively associated with femoral neck stress ratio, femoral intertrochanteric stress ratio, and femoral stem stress ratio, showing statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusions: For the non-diabetic elderly population: the MHR is a protective factor against bone abnormalities and was significantly higher in the normal bone group than in the abnormal bone group.

Survival impact of gastrectomy and chemotherapy on gastric signet ring-cell carcinoma with different metastatic lesions: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive understanding of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is limited. The aim of our study was to analyze metastatic patterns of gastric SRCC and evaluate impacts of gastrectomy and chemotherapy for metastatic gastric SRCC. METHODS: We obtained data of gastric cancer patients between 2010 and 2017 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Chi-square tests were used to compare data significance. Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray competing risk analysis were used to analyze the difference in the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity-score matching was used to adjust numerical difference. RESULTS: Among 36,459 eligible gastric cancer patients, 6264 (17.2 %) were SRCC patients. Bone metastasis was more common in SRCC patients than in non-SRCC patients. The multivariate analysis showed that chemotherapy (HR = 0.30, 95 %CI = 0.27-0.33, p < 0.01) and gastrectomy (HR = 0.51, 95 %CI = 0.45-0.59, p < 0.01) were protective prognostic factors in certain stage Ⅳ SRCC patients. For the effect of gastrectomy, survival benefits could be found in patients with liver metastasis. The gastrectomy was not associated with improved OS in patients with lung or multiple metastases. In subgroup analysis, SRCC patients with metastasis who received gastrectomy and chemotherapy (HR = 0.17, p < 0.01; HR = 0.03, p < 0.01) had a better OS and CSS than those who had chemotherapy only (HR = 0.30, p < 0.01; HR = 0.18, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study analyzed the unique metastatic patterns of gastric SRCC and recommended chemotherapy as the first choice in metastatic SRCC. For patients with liver metastasis, gastrectomy plus chemotherapy can be considered.

Long-term overall survival of patients who undergo breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for early operable HER2-Positive breast cancer after preoperative systemic therapy: an observational cohort study.

Background: Understanding the survival outcomes associated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy after preoperative systemic therapy (PST) enables clinicians to provide more personalized treatment recommendations. However, lack of firm survival benefit data limits the breast surgery choices of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients who receive PST. We sought to determine whether BCT or mastectomy after PST for early operable HER2-positive breast cancer is associated with better long-term survival outcomes and determine the degree to which PST response affects this association. Methods: In this observational cohort study, we compared the long-term survival outcomes of BCT and mastectomy after PST for HER2-positive breast cancer and evaluated the impact of PST response on the relationship between breast surgery performed and survival outcomes. Our cohort included 625 patients with early operable HER2-positive breast cancer who received PST followed by BCT or mastectomy between January 1998 and October 2009. These patients also received standard postoperative radiation, trastuzumab, and endocrine therapy as indicated clinically. We used propensity score matching to assemble mastectomy and BCT cohorts with similar baseline characteristics and used Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regression to detect associations between surgery types and outcomes. Furthermore, in this study, we analyzed the original data of 625 patients using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to enhance the reliability of the comparison between the mastectomy and BCT cohorts by addressing potential confounding variables. Findings: Propensity score matching yielded cohorts of 221 patients who received BCT and 221 patients who underwent mastectomy. At the median follow-up time of 9.9 years, compared with BCT, mastectomy was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.57; P = 0.02). In patients who had axillary lymph node pathological complete response, mastectomy was associated with worse overall survival before matching (hazard ratio, 2.17; 95% CI: 1.22-3.86; P < 0.01) and after matching (hazard ratio, 2.12; 95% CI: 1.15-3.89; P = 0.02). Among patients with pathological complete response in the breast, the survival results did not differ significantly between BCT and mastectomy patients. IPTW method validated that BCT offers better overall survival in patients who had axillary lymph node pathological complete response. Interpretation: People with HER2-positive breast cancer who have already had PST are more likely to survive after BCT, especially if they get a pathological complete response in the axillary lymph nodes. These findings underscore the necessity for further investigation into how responses to PST can inform the choice of surgical intervention and the potential impact on overall survival. Such insights could lead to the development of innovative tools that support personalized surgical strategies in the management of breast cancer. Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Nantong Science and Technology Project (JCZ2022079), Nantong Health Commission Project (QA2021031, MSZ2023040) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82394430).