Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
MedComm (2020) ; 5(4): e515, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525109

RESUMO

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease associated with B-cell hyperactivity. Telitacicept is a transmembrane activator, calcium modulator, and cyclophilin ligand interactor-Fc fusion protein, which can neutralize both B-cell lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation-inducing ligand. Patients with active SLE who received telitacicept were prospectively followed at month 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after telitacicept initiation. Thirty-seven participants were involved and followed for 6.00 [3.00, 6.00] months. SRI-4 rate at month 6 was 44.7%. The median dosage of prednisone was decreased by 43.8% (from 10 to 5.62 mg/d) at month 6. The anti-dsDNA level was significantly decreased, while complement levels were significantly increased at month 6 from baseline. Continuously significant reductions in serum immunoglobin (Ig)G IgA, and IgM levels were also observed. Patients experienced significant decreases in the numbers of total and naive B cells, whereas memory B cells and T cell populations did not change. The number of NK cells was significantly increased during the follow-up. At month 6, 58.3% (14 out of 24) patients experienced improved fatigue accessed by FACIT-Fatigue score exceeding the minimum clinically important difference of 4. Most adverse events were mild, but one each case of severe hypogammaglobulinemia, psychosis with suicidal behavior, and B-cell lymphoma were occurred. In our first prospective real-world study, telitacicept treatment led to a significant clinical and laboratory improvement of disease activity, as well as fatigue amelioration in patients with SLE. Safety profile was favorable overall, but more studies are greatly needed.

2.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 99(1): 26-38, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38176832

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of generic tofacitinib vs brand name tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a single-center comparative study based on a prospective real-world cohort. METHODS: Patients with RA receiving tofacitinib, either generic (Kelejia) or branded (Xeljanz), from March 2017, to December 31, 2022, were enrolled. The primary outcome was the simplified disease activity index (SDAI)-defined remission rate at month 6. Secondary outcomes included the rates of remission and low disease activity defined by other composite scores; European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology response rate, and ultrasonic synovitis scores at months 1, 3, 6, and 12. Cost-effectiveness was investigated. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting was adopted to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were enrolled: 59 in the generic group and 145 in the branded group. An SDAI-defined remission was achieved in 41.1% and 39.2% of patients in the generic and branded groups, respectively, at month 6 (P=.85). Rates of remission and low disease activity achievement, changes in clinical disease activity scores, and power Doppler and gray scale synovitis scores at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 were comparable between the 2 groups. Similar proportions of patients in the groups achieved moderate/good response at months 1, 3, 6, and 12. Rates of drug retention and adverse effects were also similar in the 2 groups. Both Kelejia and Xeljanz were cost-effective, but Kelejia had a lower average cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSION: Generic tofacitinib (Keljia) had equivalent clinical efficacy and safety and better cost-effectiveness compared with its originator (Xeljanz).


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Sinovite , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Sinovite/induzido quimicamente , Sinovite/tratamento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico
3.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 65: 152347, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38185079

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Long-term anticoagulant therapy is generally recommended for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) patients, however it may be withdrawn or not introduced in routine practice. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the risk of thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in non-anticoagulated TAPS patients, compared to anticoagulated TAPS, and secondly, to identify different features between those two groups. PATIENTS/METHODS: Using an international registry, we identified non-anticoagulated TAPS patients at baseline, and matched them with anticoagulated TAPS patients based on gender, age, type of previous thrombosis, and associated autoimmune disease. Thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding were prospectively analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a marginal Cox's regression model. RESULTS: As of June 2022, 94 (14 %) of the 662 TAPS patients were not anticoagulated; and 93 of them were matched with 181 anticoagulated TAPS patients (median follow-up 5 years [interquartile range 3 to 8]). The 5-year thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding rates were 12 % versus 10 %, and 6 % versus 7 %, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 3.56, p = 0.50 and HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.86; p = 0.32, respectively). Non-anticoagulated patients were more likely to receive antiplatelet therapy (p < 0.001), and less likely to have more than one previous thrombosis (p < 0.001) and lupus anticoagulant positivity (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Fourteen percent of the TAPS patients were not anticoagulated at recruitment. Their recurrent thrombosis risk did not differ compared to matched anticoagulated TAPS patients, supporting the pressing need for risk-stratified secondary thrombosis prevention trials in APS investigating strategies other than anticoagulation.


Assuntos
Síndrome Antifosfolipídica , Trombose , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/complicações , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros , Trombose/complicações , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Masculino , Feminino
4.
Med Rev (2021) ; 3(6): 511-513, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282799

RESUMO

This perspective discussed the available evidence on the involvement of mTOR pathway in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), from the aspects of endothelial cells, platelets, monocytes and anti-phospholipid antibodies (PLs), which may lead to future therapeutic applications of mTOR inhibition in APS.

5.
Adv Rheumatol ; 61: 64, 2021. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1345104

RESUMO

Abstract Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by episodes of thrombosis, obstetric morbidity or both, associated with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Studying the profile of a rare disease in an admixed population is important as it can provide new insights for understanding an autoimmune disease. In this sense of miscegenation, Brazil is characterized by one of the most heterogeneous populations in the world, which is the result of five centuries of interethnic crosses of people from three continents. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics of Brazilian vs. non-Brazilian primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) patients. Methods: We classified PAPS patients into 2 groups: Brazilian PAPS patients (BPAPS) and PAPS patients from other countries (non-BPAPS). They were compared regarding demographic characteristics, criteria and non-criteria APS manifestations, antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile, and the adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS). Results: We included 415 PAPS patients (88 [21%] BPAPS and 327 [79%] non-BPAPS). Brazilian patients were significantly younger, more frequently female, sedentary, obese, non-white, and had a higher frequency of livedo (25% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), cognitive dysfunction (21% vs. 8%, p = 0.001) and seizures (16% vs. 7%, p = 0.007), and a lower frequency of thrombocytopenia (9% vs. 18%, p = 0.037). Additionally, they were more frequently positive for lupus anticoagulant (87.5% vs. 74.6%, p = 0.01), and less frequently positive to anticardiolipin (46.6% vs. 73.7%, p < 0.001) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I (13.6% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001) antibodies. Triple aPL positivity was also less frequent (8% vs. 41.6%, p < 0.001) in Brazilian patients. Median aGAPSS was lower in the Brazilian group (8 vs. 10, p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, BPAPS patients still presented more frequently with livedo, cognitive dysfunction and sedentary lifestyle, and less frequently with thrombocytopenia and triple positivity to aPL. They were also less often white. Conclusions: Our study suggests a specific profile of PAPS in Brazil with higher frequency of selected non-criteria manifestations and lupus anticoagulant positivity. Lupus anticoagulant (not triple positivity) was the major aPL predictor of a classification criteria event.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA