Preoperative urine nitrite versus urine culture for predicting postoperative fever following flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: Multiple studies have reported that preoperative positive urine culture is an independent risk factor for postoperative fever (POF) after ureteroscopy (URS). Urine nitrite is associated urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, none of studies has explored the role of urine nitrite in the prediction of POF after flexible URS (fURS). METHODS: Patients who underwent fURS by the same surgeon between 2009 and 2019 were screened. Sensitivity and specificity of urine culture and urine nitrite were calculated. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to get a baseline-balanced retrospective cohort to avoid potential bias. Receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) calculated was used to determine the predictive power of models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was plotted to obtain the clinical benefit of the models. RESULTS: Poseoperative fever (POF) is defined as the temperature of the patient higher than 38 ℃ within 72 h after operation, with no sign of infection in other systems. 31(2.8%) of 1095 cases had POF after fURL. Urine nitrite had a better specificity than urine culture for POF diagnosis (P < 0.001). After the PS matching, a well-balanced cohort of 24 POF group and 96 no-POF group was produced. The mean AUC from the bootstrap resampling method for urine nitrite model (AUC: 0.8736; 95% CI: 0.8731-0.8743) was significantly increased than that of the urine culture model (AUC: 0.8385; 95% CI: 0.8378-0.8392). The application of two kinds of POF predicting models could bring clinical net benefit when the probability is < 35%. However, urine nitrite model showed a better clinical net benefit acquirement compared to the urine culture model. CONCLUSION: Preoperative positive urine nitrite may play a pivotal role in the prediction of POF after fURS and needs to be validated by future evidence.

Preoperative positive urine nitrite and albumin-globulin ratio are independent risk factors for predicting postoperative fever after retrograde Intrarenal surgery based on a retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: To determine risk factors for postoperative fever (POF) after retrograding intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and a nomogram for prediction of POF in patients undertaking RIRS has been developed based on the risk factors found. METHODS: This is a retrospective designed-study. A continuous cohort from a single-center database that consisted of 1095 cases undertaking RIRS with complete preoperative medical records from January 2009 to December 2018 was obtained. Independent risk factors were identified according to the multi-variate logistics regression and a further nomogram was developed. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated through three aspects including net clinical benefit, calibration, and discrimination. RESULTS: A total of 31(2.8%) cases had POF after the RIRS. Risk factors included time in RIRS ≥30mins (only the flexible scope use period) (OR: 2.16, 95%CI; 1.01-4.62, P = 0.047), preoperative positive urine culture (OR: 2.55, 95%CI; 1.01-6.42, P = 0.047), preoperative positive urine nitrite (OR: 9.09, 95%CI; 2.99-27.64, P < 0.001), Albumin/globulin ratio (AGR) (OR: 0.14, 95%CI; 0.03-0.74, P = 0.020) were further included in the nomogram to predict the POF probability for individuals. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a goodness-of-fit. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between observation and prediction. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated it was clinical use in RIRS. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative urine nitrite, AGR, RIRS time, and preoperative urine culture are found to be independent risk factors associated with POF after RIRS. Then we have developed a nomogram taking these factors into account that accurately predicted POF after RIRS.

The relationship between blood lipid and risk of psoriasis: univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis.

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Dyslipidemia may be a risk factor of psoriasis. But the causal relationship between psoriasis and blood lipid still remains uncertain. Methods: The two data of blood lipid were obtained from UK Biobank (UKBB) and Global Lipid Genetics Consortium Results (GLGC). The primary and secondary database were from large publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) with more than 400,000 and 170,000 subjects of European ancestry, respectively. The psoriasis from Finnish biobanks of FinnGen research project for psoriasis, consisting of 6,995 cases and 299,128 controls. The single-variable Mendelian randomization (SVMR) and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) were used to assess the total and direct effects of blood lipid on psoriasis risk. Results: SVMR estimates in primary data of blood lipid showed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (odds ratio (OR): 1.11, 95%, confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.25, p = 0.082 in stage 1; OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.26, p = 0.002 in stage 2; OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.26, p = 0.006 in stage 3) and triglycerides (TG) (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10-1.35, p = 1.17E-04 in stage 1; OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.24, p = 0.001 in stage 2; OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.05-1.24, p = 0.002 in stage 3) had a highly robust causal relationship on the risk of psoriasis. However, there were no robust causal associations between HDL-C and psoriasis. The SVMR results in secondary data of blood lipid were consistent with the primary data. Reverse MR analysis showed a causal association between psoriasis and LDL-C (beta: -0.009, 95% CI: -0.016- -0.002, p = 0.009) and HDL-C (beta: -0.011, 95% CI: -0.021- -0.002, p = 0.016). The reverse causation analyses results between psoriasis and TG did not reach significance. In MVMR of primary data of blood lipid, the LDL-C (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.99-1.25, p = 0.396 in stage 1; OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.017 in stage 2; OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15, p = 0.012 in stage 3) and TG (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.22, p = 0.036 in stage 1; OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.15, p = 0.002 in stage 2; OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13 p = 0.015 in stage 3) positively correlated with psoriasis, and there had no correlation between HDL-C and psoriasis. The results of the secondary analysis were consistent with the results of primary analysis. Conclusions: Mendelian randomization (MR) findings provide genetic evidence for causal link between psoriasis and blood lipid. It may be meaningful to monitor and control blood lipid level for a management of psoriasis patients in clinic.

Association between antibiotic exposure and adverse outcomes of children and pregnant women: evidence from an umbrella review.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are widely prescribed among children and pregnant women, but their safety profile is controversial. This study aimed to summarize and appraise current evidence for the potential impact of antibiotic exposure on pregnancy outcomes and children's health. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception to June 2022. Meta-analyses of any study design comparing the impact of antibiotic exposure with nonexposure among children, pregnant women and prepregnant women on adverse health outcomes of children and pregnancy were retrieved. The quality of evidence was assessed by a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Data were reanalyzed, and the credibility of the evidence was determined. RESULTS: Out of 2956 studies identified, 19 articles with 39 associations were included. Totally 19 of the associations (48.72%) were statistically significant with a P value ≤ 0.05, while only six were supported by highly suggestive evidence. Children with postnatal antibiotic exposure had a higher risk of developing asthma odds ratio (OR): 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-2.17, wheezing (OR: 1.81, 95% CI 1.65-1.97) and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (OR: 1.66, 95% CI 1.51-1.83), with prediction intervals excluding the nulls. Quality assessed by both AMSTAR2 and GRADE of included meta-analyses were very low in general. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic exposure in early life was associated with children's long-term health, especially in cases of allergic diseases. Prenatal exposure might also influence children's health in some aspects but requires more high-quality evidence. Potential adverse effects of antibiotics on pregnancy outcomes were not observed in our study. Studies with higher quality and better quantification of antibiotic exposure are needed in the future.

Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To verify which phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) strategy is better for erectile dysfunction (ED) following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP). METHODS: This systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database to identify eligible studies from the startup of these databases to 1 November, 2019. The ED recovery rate was the main outcome. Traditional pair-wise meta-analysis and multivariate random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed to explore direct and indirect comparisons, respectively. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities was used to evaluate the efficacy of treatments. RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials with four kinds of PDE5is were included. Further pooled evidence suggested that PDE5is followed by NSRP had a benefit for penile rehabilitation compared to placebo using traditional pair-wise meta-analyses. Our NMA showed that Avanafil 200 mg on demand might be most likely to be the best treatment option according to the first rank of SUCRA both in NMA (SUCRA 83.5) and sensitivity analysis (SUCRA 90.2). CONCLUSION: Avanafil 200 mg on demand has the highest probability of being the best intervention among PDE5is in treating ED following NSRP. However, more randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this in consideration of the published data regarding Avanafil is relatively small scale.

Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of oral mucosa and penile skin flaps in the treatment of anterior urethral stricture. Methods: This meta-analysis was carried out according to the principle of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021277688). The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CKNI databases were searched and reviewed up to Sep 2021. Quality evaluation was performed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) system for non-randomized studies and Cochrane stools for randomized studies. Data synthesis was conducted with RevMan 5.4 software (Cochrane) and a Stata 15.0 environment (Stata Corpor, College Station, TX, USA). Results: After the research screening, eight studies (comprising 445 patients) were finally included in the quantitative analysis. In the success rate comparison, there was no significant difference between oral mucosa and penile skin flaps (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, Mantel-Haenszel statistic [M-H] fixed model, OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.47-1.34, P = 0.39). There was no significant difference in the post-operative complication comparison (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, Mantel-Haenszel statistic [M-H] fixed model, OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40-1.16, P = 0.15). However, considering that the site of oral mucosa is far from the anterior urethra, it may have advantages in operation time through simultaneous operations (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, MD: -40.05, 95% CI: -79.42, -0.68, P = 0.046). Conclusion: When the oral mucosal graft was used in the anterior urethra urethroplasty, it had a similar success rate and post-operative complication rate, and oral mucosa substitution had a shorter operation time. This evidence-based medical research further supports the view that oral mucosa is the preferred substitution material for the anterior urethra urethroplasty.

Stone removing efficiency and safety comparison between single use ureteroscope and reusable ureteroscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Urologists are gradually beginning to use single-use ureteroscopes (sufURSs), despite a lack of high-level evidence as to their efficacy and safety. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (no. CRD42020181808). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published before October 1, 2020. Jadad score tools were used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included nonrandomized studies. Two researchers independently extracted data according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) principles. A data synthesis was performed using Stata 15.0. Heterogeneity was mainly evaluated with I2 tests. In addition to funnel plots, Egger's and Begg's tests were used to detect publication bias. A sensitivity analysis was also performed. Stone-free rates and postoperative complications were the 2 primary outcomes; operation-time data were also extracted. RESULTS: Six studies (comprising 887 patients) containing the efficacy data and 5 studies (comprising 952 patients) containing the safety data that were finally included in the quantitative analysis. In relation to stone removal, no significant difference was found in terms of efficacy [Mantel-Haenszel statistic (M-H), relative risk (RR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-1.07, P=0.658) or safety (M-H, RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.96-1.75, P=0.093) between the sufURS and the reusable flexible ureteroscope (rfURS), and no significant heterogeneity was found. A publication bias was detected in the efficacy comparison; however, the trim-and-fill analysis indicated that the original synthesis results remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: In relation to stone removal, sufURSs were found to be comparable to rfURS, and no compromising complications were found. However, the results should be treated with caution due to limitations related to the small number of studies included in the analysis.

Risk Factors of Infectious Complications after Ureteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Adjusted Effect Estimate.

Background: Multiple studies have reported that gender, pre-operative stent insertion, positive pre-operative urine culture results, and diabetes mellitus are associated with infectious complication after ureteroscopy. A previous meta-analysis focused on this topic is based, however, on crude estimate. Further analysis based on adjusted estimates is needed. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database were searched with ureteroscopy, ureteroscopies, ureteroscopic surgical procedures, ureteroscopic surgery, ureteroscopic lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, ureteroscopy (URS), flexible ureterorenoscopy, risk factor, predictor, predicting model, and nomogram until December 15, 2019. The quality of research was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale system. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each risk factor were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata 15.0 software. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2. Publication bias was tested by the Egger test, and funnel plot. Meta-regressions and subgroup analysis were further performed. Results: There were 16 studies; 12,357 patients finally were included in this meta-analysis. The association between gender (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.48-2.23, I2 = 0%, p = 0.701), pre-operative ureteric stent insertion (OR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.26-2.91, I2 = 40.4%, p = 0.109), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.07-1.85, I2 = 34.1%, p = 0.168), positive urine culture before URS (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.34-3.57, I2 = 47.2%, p = 0.092), operation duration (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, I2 = 70.6%, p = 0.001) and infectious complications was positively significant. All four pooled results were different from results of meta-analysis based on crude estimate. Conclusion: Female gender, pre-operative ureteric stent insertion, diabetes mellitus, positive urine culture results before URS, and operation duration are risk factors for infectious complications after URS. Meta-analysis based on adjusted estimates may be more convincing.

Prognostic Role of C-Reactive Protein In Urological Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Growing evidence suggests serum C-reactive protein (CRP) can serve as a prognostic marker in urological cancers. However, some studies yield contradictory results. Our objective was to determine the relationship between baseline serum CRP and survival outcome in urological cancers. We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases until October 2014 without language restrictions. 44 independent studies investigating the association between baseline serum CRP and cancer-specific survival (CSS) or overall survival (OS) were selected. High CRP yielded a worse survival in renal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Combined results of meta-analyses indicated that CRP was a prognostic factor in urological cancers (CSS: p < 0.01; OS: p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses confirmed the significant association between CRP and prognosis, regardless of race and cutoff value of CRP. Specifically, prognostic impact of CRP was also noted in patients with localized RCC treated with nephrectomy (CSS: p < 0.01) and metastatic RCC treated with molecular-targeted therapy (OS: p < 0.01). In conclusion, serum CRP is an independent prognostic factor in urological cancers and risk stratification by serum CRP level could be helpful for prognostic assessment.

Selective Versus Hilar Clamping During Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of selective vs hilar clamping during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: Studies comparing the effect and safety of selective versus hilar clamping during PN were identified by a systematic search using MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2000 to November 2014. Quality of the selected studies was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: A total of seven retrospective studies were included. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in age, body mass index, tumor size, pre-estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), operative time, and length of stay. The selective clamping group had greater estimated blood loss (P<0.01) but similar blood transfusion rate (P=0.78) compared with the hilar clamping group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of urinary leaks, overall complication rate, and positive margin rate. Patients who underwent selective clamping had a lower change in eGFR (mean difference [MD]: 13.95; 95% CI 8.85 to 19.05; P<0.01) and a lower percent change in eGFR (MD: 18.51; 95% CI 14.18 to 22.84; P<0.01) at 1 week. Combined results from two studies showed a trend toward a lower percent change in eGFR at 3 months (MD: 5.47; 95% CI -0.28 to 11.22; P=0.06). At 6 months, two studies showed no significant differences in percent change of renal function between the two groups (MD: 16.85; 95% CI -10.47 to 44.16; P=0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Although selective clamping resulted in greater estimated blood loss, it provided comparable perioperative safety and superior short-term renal function preservation. The advantage of selective clamping in preservation of intermediate-term renal function remains to be evaluated in the future, however. There is a need for properly designed studies to confirm our founding.