Allergies and COVID-19 vaccines: An ENDA/EAACI Position paper.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis, which is rare, has been reported after COVID-19 vaccination, but its management is not standardized. METHOD: Members of the European Network for Drug Allergy and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology interested in drug allergy participated in an online questionnaire on pre-vaccination screening and management of allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines, and literature was analysed. RESULTS: No death due to anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines has been confirmed in scientific literature. Potential allergens, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate and tromethamine are excipients. The authors propose allergy evaluation of persons with the following histories: 1-anaphylaxis to injectable drug or vaccine containing PEG or derivatives; 2-anaphylaxis to oral/topical PEG containing products; 3-recurrent anaphylaxis of unknown cause; 4-suspected or confirmed allergy to any mRNA vaccine; and 5-confirmed allergy to PEG or derivatives. We recommend a prick-to-prick skin test with the left-over solution in the suspected vaccine vial to avoid waste. Prick test panel should include PEG 4000 or 3500, PEG 2000 and polysorbate 80. The value of in vitro test is arguable. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations will lead to a better knowledge of the management and mechanisms involved in anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines and enable more people with history of allergy to be vaccinated.

Skin Test Results and Cross-Reactivity Patterns in IgE- and T-Cell-Mediated Allergy to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents.

Allergies to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are rare and manifest usually as an immediate drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR), compatible with an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated mechanism. Although the molecular structures of GBCA show some similarities and are either linear or macrocyclic, the frequency and pattern of cross-reactivity remain unclear. However, cross-reactivity has been described. The aim of this investigation was to assess cross-reactivity in patients with GBCA allergy based on skin tests and exposure. We retrospectively evaluated a total of 28 cases with a proven allergy to a GBCA, including 11 from the database of the allergy division of the Inselspital, Bern and 17 published cases from the literature, retrieved with a PubMed-MEDLINE search. The majority of cases were immediate DHR, with 8/11 cases from the database (72.7%) and 16/17 published cases (94.1%). In both groups macrocyclic GBCA were most often identified as causative drugs. A cross-reactivity based on skin test results was found in 2 out of 11 database cases (18.2%) and in 6 out of 17 literature cases (35.3%). Cross-reactivity occurred within macrocyclic GBCA in 1/11 database cases and 3/17 literature cases, and included both macrocyclic and linear GBCA in 1/11 and 4/17 subjects. There was no cross sensitization among linear GBCA. Skin test-negative GBCA were well tolerated, even in cases with sensitization to linear and macrocyclic GBCA. Overall, cross-reactivity in GBCA allergy is rare (approximately 29%), and may occur among macrocyclic GBCA or in between macrocyclic and linear GBCA. IgE to linear GBCA seems to be rarely cross-reactive. Skin test is helpful in identifying safe alternatives, as no reaction to skin test-negative GBCA was observed.

75% negative skin test results in patients with suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics: Influencing factors and interpretation of test results.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic approach for beta-lactam (BL) drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) is based on the history, clinical signs, skin tests (ST), in vitro tests, and drug provocation tests (DPT). The aim of this study was to assess the performance of an allergy workup with ST in a real-world use. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study the rate of positive ST in subjects with suspected DHR to penicillins and cephalosporins was investigated. Of special interest were correlations of ST positivity: 1) to the time intervals between index reaction and the allergic work-up, 2) time interval from drug exposure to the onset of signs, 3) pattern of manifestation in delayed DHR and involvement of test area in the index reaction, and 4) potential advantage of patch testing in delayed DHR. RESULTS: 175 patients were included between January 2018 and April 2019 (63.4% female), 45 (25.7%) with immediate DHR manifestation and 130 with delayed DHR manifestation (74.3%). A total of 44 patients (25.1%) had a positive ST (immediate DHR 37.8% versus 20.0% in delayed DHR). ST positivity decreased in both groups after 3 years from 47.8% [95%CI 29.2-67] to 23.5% [95%CI 9.6-47.3] in immediate DHR and 23.0% [95%CI 15-4-32.9] to 12.9% [95%CI 5.1-28.9] in delayed DHR. The proportion of positive ST was higher in patients with more severe forms of delayed DHR, and in subjects with a shorter latency period of onset of symptoms after drug exposure: 0-3d: 29.5% [95%CI 19.6-41.9] vs. >3d: 11.6% [95%CI 6.0-21.2]). No sensitization was shown in delayed urticaria or angioedema. ST done outside the skin area involved during the index reaction were negative in all cases (0/38 vs. 26/84 in cases with involved area). The combination of patch test and intradermal test (IDT) revealed an additional positive result in 2/77 cases. Additional in vitro testing reduced the proportion of negative test results to 72%. CONCLUSION: In most patients with negative test results, we could not clarify the cause of the BL-associated adverse events even with further investigations (including DPT). How to prevent new drug-induced adverse events in such patients has hardly been investigated yet. Corresponding cohort studies could improve the data situation.