Why do not we talk about MIS fellowship? A short review of the short literature.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship has existed for three decades and has steadily grown in both number of positions available and variety of techniques practiced. Despite continued popularity, growth, and wide breadth of surgical techniques of the MIS fellowship, publication rates in medical journals regarding these fellowships have not been as robust as one may expect. Our goal was to review the available literature on MIS fellowship. METHODS: We reviewed PubMed to search for articles pertinent for MIS fellowship. The initial search included "MIS fellowship" "minimally invasive surgery fellowship" and "laparoscopy fellowship." Articles pertaining to MIS fellowship were then reviewed by title and abstract for content. Articles were excluded from subsequent analysis if they focused on disciplines that were not direct extensions of general surgery (such as urology, gynecology, oncology). Using similar search techniques, we tabulated unfiltered publications rates specific to other major surgical fellowship disciplines. The metric articles per position was created by dividing the total number articles for each discipline by the annual fellowship positions RESULTS: An initial review of available literature produced 134 articles pertinent to MIS fellowship. Further analysis for direct relevance to MIS yielded only 58 published articles. MIS had the fewest number of publications and smallest APP, 0.7, of any of the major fellowship disciplines. CONCLUSIONS: There is a surprising dearth of material on MIS fellowship. While, MIS fellowship is a one-year experience, we have the opportunity to build on three decades of clinical experience to continue optimize the fellow experience and improve subspecialized surgical training and patient outcomes. This could be facilitated through broadened focus of inquiry and publication of findings.

What is MIS fellowship? Community and academic program experience.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship is one of the most popular fellowship programs, but little is known about the individual fellow's clinical experience. Our goal was to determine the differences in case volume and case type in academic and community programs. METHODS: A retrospective review of advanced gastrointestinal, MIS, foregut, or bariatric fellowship cases logged into the Fellowship Council directory of fellowships during the 2020 and 2021 academic years included for analysis. The final cohort included 57,324 cases from all fellowship programs, that list data on the Fellowship Council website, including 58 academic programs and 62 community-based programs. All comparisons between groups were completed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: The mean number of cases logged during a fellowship year was 477.7 ± 149.9 with similar case numbers in academic and community programs, 462.5 ± 115.0 and 491.9 ± 176.2 respectively (p = 0.28). The mean data is illustrated in Fig. 1. The most common performed cases were in the following categories: bariatric surgery (149.8 ± 86.9 cases), endoscopy (111.1 ± 86.4 cases), hernia (68.0 ± 57.7 cases) and foregut (62.8 ± 37.3 cases). In these case-type categories, no significant differences in case volume were found between academic and community-based MIS fellowship programs. However, community-based programs had significantly more case experience compared to academic programs in all of the less commonly performed case-type categories: appendix 7.8 ± 12.8 vs 4.6 ± 5.1 cases (p = 0.08), colon 16.1 ± 20.7 vs 6.8 ± 11.7 cases (p = 0.003), hepato-pancreatic-biliary 46.9 ± 50.8 vs 32.5 ± 18.5 cases (p = 0.04), peritoneum 11.7 ± 16.0 vs 7.0 ± 7.6 cases (p = 0.04), and small bowel 11.9 ± 9.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.9 cases (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: MIS fellowship has been a well-established fellowship program under the Fellowship Council guideline. In our study, we aimed to identify the categories of fellowship training and the perspective case volumes in academic vs community setting. We conclude that fellowship training experience is similar in case volumes of commonly performed cases when comparing academic and community programs. However, there is substantial variability in the operative experience among MIS fellowship programs. Further study is necessary to identify the quality of fellowship training experience.

Decreasing Resident Vascular Case Volumes Have Not Changed National Numbers of Vascular Fellowship Applications in US General Surgery Residents Over the Past Twenty Years.

OBJECTIVES: With an aging workforce and high prevalence of vascular disease, the US is expected to face a pronounced shortage of vascular surgeons over the next 2 decades. This has driven initiatives to expand vascular surgery training positions leading to the rise of integrated residency programs (0 + 5) and the expansion of traditional fellowships (VSFs, 5 + 2). Given the increase in dedicated vascular surgery training positions, there has been a growing concern that general surgery residents (GSRs) are experiencing decreased vascular case volumes. We aim to evaluate trends in vascular surgery specialty choice relative to vascular case volumes for US GSRs over the last 20 years. DESIGN: Using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Case Log Graduate Statistics National Report, a retrospective analysis of ACGME-accredited GSR vascular case volumes was performed from academic year 1999-2000 to 2021-2022. Fellowship data was retrospectively reviewed using the available National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Fellowship Match Data & Reports for 2004-2023. RESULTS: Graduating GSRs logged increasing numbers of major cases between AY 1999-2000 and AY 2021-2022 (p < 0.001) with 2022 graduates logging on average 98 more cases per resident compared to 2000 graduates. Mean total vascular cases decreased (p = 0.005) with 2022 graduates logging approximately 78 fewer vascular cases on average compared to the 2000 graduates, a 40% decrease in vascular case volume. Despite the decrease, US GSRs have applied to VSF at a relatively consistent rate: 8.5% in 2001-2002, 8% in 2011-2012, and 6% in 2021-2022. 2023 demonstrated an increase to 8.3%. CONCLUSION: Over the past 2 decades, GSRs have experienced a substantial decrease in exposure to vascular surgery cases during their training; however, residents continue to apply for VSF at a relatively constant rate suggesting that interest in the specialty may be related to factors other than exposure to vascular cases.