Prevalence of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Veterans: Effects of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity.

GOAL: We sought to quantify the independent effects of age, sex, and race/ethnicity on risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced neoplasia (AN) in Veterans. STUDY: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of Veterans aged 40 to 80 years who had diagnostic or screening colonoscopy between 2002 and 2009 from 1 of 14 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Natural language processing identified the most advanced finding and location (proximal, distal). Logistic regression was used to examine the adjusted, independent effects of age, sex, and race, both overall and in screening and diagnostic subgroups. RESULTS: Among 90,598 Veterans [mean (SD) age 61.7 (9.4) y, 5.2% (n=4673) were women], CRC and AN prevalence was 1.3% (n=1171) and 8.9% (n=8081), respectively. Adjusted CRC risk was higher for diagnostic versus screening colonoscopy [odds ratio (OR)=3.79; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.19-4.50], increased with age, was numerically (but not statistically) higher for men overall (OR=1.53; 95% CI, 0.97-2.39) and in the screening subgroup (OR=2.24; 95% CI, 0.71-7.05), and was higher overall for Blacks and Hispanics, but not in screening. AN prevalence increased with age, and was present in 9.2% of men and 3.9% of women [adjusted OR=1.90; 95% CI, 1.60-2.25]. AN risk was 11% higher in Blacks than in Whites overall (OR=1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.20), was no different in screening, and was lower in Hispanics (OR=0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98). Women had more proximal CRC (63% vs. 39% for men; P=0.03), but there was no difference in proximal AN (38.3% for both genders). CONCLUSIONS: Age and race were associated with AN and CRC prevalence. Blacks had a higher overall prevalence of both CRC and AN, but not among screenings. Men had increased risk for AN, while women had a higher proportion of proximal CRC. These findings may be used to tailor when and how Veterans are screened for CRC.

Neoplasia at 10-year follow-up screening colonoscopy in a private U.S. practice: comparison of yield to first-time examinations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prior studies assessing the yield of a second screening colonoscopy performed 10 years after an initial screening colonoscopy with negative results did not include a control group of persons undergoing a first screening colonoscopy during the same time interval. Our aim was to describe the incidence of neoplasia at a second screening colonoscopy (performed at least 8 years after the first colonoscopy) in average-risk individuals and compare it with the yield of first screening examinations performed during the same time interval. METHODS: Review of a database of outpatient screening colonoscopies performed between January 2010 and December 2015 in an Atlanta private practice. RESULTS: A total of 2105 average-risk individuals underwent screening colonoscopy, including 470 individuals (53.6% female; mean age ± standard deviation [SD] 64.0 ± 3.9 years) who underwent a second screening examination. In those undergoing second screening, the mean (± SD) interval between examinations was 10.4 years (± 1.1 years, range 8-15 years). At second screening, the polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and advanced neoplasm rate were 44.7%, 26.6%, and 7.4%, respectively. Of 40 advanced neoplasms in 35 individuals, 33 (82.5%) were proximal to the sigmoid colon, and there were no cancers. During the same interval, 1635 individuals (49.4% female; mean age [± SD] 52.6 ± 3.4 years) underwent a first screening colonoscopy. The polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and advanced neoplasm detection rate were 53.5%, 32.2%, and 11.7%, respectively. Of 243 advanced neoplasms in 192 individuals, 152 (62.6%) were proximal to the sigmoid colon, and there were no cancers. After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and endoscopist, polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and advanced neoplasm detection rate were all lower at the second screening colonoscopies than at first-time colonoscopies (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being 10 years older, persons with a screening colonoscopy with negative results 10 years earlier had lower rates of adenoma and advanced neoplasm at the second screening examination compared with patients in the same practice undergoing a first screening colonoscopy, and they had no cancers. The fraction of advanced neoplasms that were proximal to the sigmoid colon was high in both first and second screenings. These results support the safety of the recommended 10-year interval between colonoscopies in average-risk persons with an initial examination with negative results.

Endoscopic suturing of esophageal fully covered self-expanding metal stents reduces rates of stent migration.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic suturing of fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FC-SEMSs) may prevent migration. The aim of this study was to compare rates of migration between sutured FC-SEMSs (S-FCSEMSs), unsecured FC-SEMSs, and partially covered SEMSs (PC-SEMSs) placed for benign esophageal leaks and strictures. METHODS: In a retrospective, single-center, cohort study, rates of migration for S-FCSEMSs, FC-SEMSs, and PC-SEMSs were assessed in patients with at least 1 month of follow-up or experiencing clinically significant stent migration (CSSM) any time after placement. CSSM was defined as proximal or distal displacement of the stent by ≥2 cm or passage into the stomach plus the recurrence of pre-SEMS symptoms or signs. A multivariable analysis was done to identify additional risk factors for stent migration. RESULTS: A total of 184 SEMSs were placed in 101 patients, including 32 S-FCSEMSs in 25 patients, 114 FC-SEMSs in 59 patients, and 38 PC-SEMSs in 30 patients. CSSM occurred with 56 of 184 stents (30.4%) in 36 of 101 patients (35.6%), including 3 of 32 (9.4%) S-FCSEMSs, 45 of 114 (39.5%) FC-SEMSs, and 8 of 38 (21.1%) PC-SEMSs (P = .005). Migration was less likely for S-FCSEMSs than for FC-SEMSs (9.4% vs 39.5%; P = .01) but not between S-FCSEMSs and PC-SEMSs (9.4% vs 21.1%; P = .07) or between FC-SEMSs and PC-SEMSs (39.5% vs 21.1%; P = .38). Previous stent migration (odds ratio [OR], 3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88-8.19; P = .01) and previous esophageal surgery (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.67; P = .002) were associated with increased and decreased risk of CSSM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic suturing of FC-SEMSs for benign esophageal disease reduces CSSM compared with unsecured FC-SEMSs but not PC-SEMSs. Patients with previous stent migration may benefit from prophylactic suturing of FC-SEMSs.

Evaluation of interprofessional relational coordination and patients' perception of care in outpatient oncology teams.

This pilot study was designed to measure teamwork and the relationship of teamwork to patient perceptions of care among 63 members of 12 oncology teams at a Cancer Centre in the Midwest. Lack of teamwork in cancer care can result in serious clinical errors, fragmentation of care, and poor quality of care. Many oncology team members, highly skilled in clinical care, are not trained to work effectively as members of a care team. The research team administered the Relational Coordination survey to core oncology team members-medical oncologists, nurse coordinators, and clinical secretaries-to measure seven dimensions of team skills (four relating to communication [frequency, timeliness, accuracy, and problem solving] and three relating to relationship [shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect]) averaged to create a Relational Coordination Index. The results indicated that among the team member roles, nurse coordinator relational coordination indices were the strongest and most positively correlated with patient perception of care. Statistically significant correlations were intra-nurse coordinator relational coordination indices and two patient perception of care factors (information and education and patient's preferences). All other nurse coordinator intra-role as well as inter-role correlations were also positively correlated, although not statistically significant.

Phase II study of fosaprepitant + 5HT3 receptor antagonist + dexamethasone in patients with germ cell tumors undergoing 5-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a Hoosier Cancer Research Network study.

PURPOSE: A phase III study adding aprepitant to a 5HT3 receptor antagonist (5HT3-RA) plus dexamethasone in germ cell tumor (GCT) patients treated with 5-day cisplatin combination chemotherapy demonstrated a significant improvement in complete response (CR) (J Clin Onc 30:3998-4003, 2012). Fosaprepitant has demonstrated non-inferiority compared to aprepitant in single-day cisplatin chemotherapy and is approved as a single-dose alternative. This single-arm phase II study is the first clinical trial evaluating fosaprepitant in patients receiving multi-day cisplatin regimen. METHODS: GCT patients receiving a 5-day cisplatin combination chemotherapy were enrolled. Fosaprepitant 150 mg was given IV on days 3 and 5. A 5HT3-RA days 1-5 (days 1, 3, and 5, if palonosetron) plus dexamethasone 20 mg days 1 and 2 and 4 mg po bid days 6, 7, and 8 was administered. Rescue antiemetics were allowed. The primary objective was to determine the CR rate-no emetic episodes or use of rescue medications. Accrual of 64 patients was planned with expected CR > 27 %. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled of whom 54 were eligible for analysis. Median age was 33. Fifty-one patients received bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy. CR was observed in 13 (24.1 %) patients (95 % Agresti-Coull binomial C.I. 14.5 %, 37.1 %). CONCLUSION: The data in this phase II study, in contrast to our prior phase III study, appears to indicate a lower CR rate with the substitution of fosaprepitant for aprepitant. It is unknown whether the substitution of fosaprepitant for aprepitant provides the same benefit in multi-day cisplatin that was achieved with single-day cisplatin. Trial registration Clinical trial information NCT01736917.

Knowledge and Awareness Among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3.

Knowledge is a prerequisite for changing behavior, and is useful for improving outcomes and reducing mortality rates in patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this article is to describe baseline CKD knowledge and awareness obtained as part of a larger study testing the feasibility of a self-management intervention. Thirty patients were recruited who had CKD Stage 3 with coexisting diabetes and hypertension. Fifty-four percent of the sample were unaware of their CKD diagnosis. Participants had a moderate amount of CKD knowledge. This study suggests the need to increase knowledge in patients with CKD Stage 3 to aid in slowing disease progression.

Multi-center colonoscopy quality measurement utilizing natural language processing.

BACKGROUND: An accurate system for tracking of colonoscopy quality and surveillance intervals could improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance. The purpose of this study was to create and test such a system across multiple institutions utilizing natural language processing (NLP). METHODS: From 42,569 colonoscopies with pathology records from 13 centers, we randomly sampled 750 paired reports. We trained (n=250) and tested (n=500) an NLP-based program with 19 measurements that encompass colonoscopy quality measures and surveillance interval determination, using blinded, paired, annotated expert manual review as the reference standard. The remaining 41,819 nonannotated documents were processed through the NLP system without manual review to assess performance consistency. The primary outcome was system accuracy across the 19 measures. RESULTS: A total of 176 (23.5%) documents with 252 (1.8%) discrepant content points resulted from paired annotation. Error rate within the 500 test documents was 31.2% for NLP and 25.4% for the paired annotators (P=0.001). At the content point level within the test set, the error rate was 3.5% for NLP and 1.9% for the paired annotators (P=0.04). When eight vaguely worded documents were removed, 125 of 492 (25.4%) were incorrect by NLP and 104 of 492 (21.1%) by the initial annotator (P=0.07). Rates of pathologic findings calculated from NLP were similar to those calculated by annotation for the majority of measurements. Test set accuracy was 99.6% for CRC, 95% for advanced adenoma, 94.6% for nonadvanced adenoma, 99.8% for advanced sessile serrated polyps, 99.2% for nonadvanced sessile serrated polyps, 96.8% for large hyperplastic polyps, and 96.0% for small hyperplastic polyps. Lesion location showed high accuracy (87.0-99.8%). Accuracy for number of adenomas was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: NLP can accurately report adenoma detection rate and the components for determining guideline-adherent colonoscopy surveillance intervals across multiple sites that utilize different methods for reporting colonoscopy findings.

Children with new onset seizures: A prospective study of parent variables, child behavior problems, and seizure occurrence.

OBJECTIVE: Parent variables (stigma, mood, unmet needs for information and support, and worry) are associated with behavioral difficulties in children with seizures; however, it is not known how this relationship is influenced by additional seizures. This study followed children (ages 4-14 years) and their parents over a 24-month period (with data collected at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months) and investigated the effect of an additional seizure on the relationship between parenting variables and child behavior difficulties. METHODS: The sample was parents of 196 children (104 girls and 92 boys) with a first seizure within the past 6 weeks. Child mean age at baseline was 8 years, 3 months (SD 3 years). Data were analyzed using t-tests, chi-square tests, and repeated measures analyses of covariance. RESULTS: Relationships between parent variables, additional seizures, and child behavior problems were consistent across time. Several associations between parent variables and child behavior problems were stronger in the additional seizure group than in the no additional seizure group. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that interventions that assist families to respond constructively to the reactions of others regarding their child's seizure condition and to address their needs for information and support could help families of children with continuing seizures to have an improved quality of life.

Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience.

BACKGROUND: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a validated marker of colonoscopy quality. However, the optimal measurement method is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aims of our study were to (1) define benchmarks for the number of adenomas per screening colonoscopy (APC) quality metric; (2) study the association between ADRs for screening, surveillance, and diagnostic indications; and (3) explore the association of the screening ADR with an overall ADR inclusive of all colonoscopy indications. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital and associated ambulatory surgery center endoscopy units. PATIENTS: Patients aged ≥50 years who underwent colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or diagnostic indications by 20 endoscopists between January 1, 1999 and April 30, 2012. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: ADR, APC for screening, surveillance, and diagnostic indications. RESULTS: A total of 21,766 colonoscopies were included. The indication was screening in 7434 (34.2%), surveillance in 8338 (38.3%), and diagnostic in 5994 (27.5%). The screening ADRs and APCs were significantly correlated (R = 0.91; P < .0001). For men, an ADR of 25% corresponded to an APC of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.57); for women, an ADR of 15% corresponded to an APC of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.13-0.27). Overall, the ADR stratified by colonoscopy indication was highest for surveillance, followed by screening, then diagnostic. For men, a screening ADR of 25% corresponded to a surveillance ADR of 31.9% (95% CI, 24.8%-38.9%); for women, an ADR of 15% corresponded to a surveillance ADR of 24.3% (95% CI, 18.3%-30.5%). The corresponding diagnostic ADRs were 17.0% (95% CI, 12.4%-21.6%) and 15.4% (95% CI, 11.5%-19.3%), respectively. There was significant correlation between screening ADR and an overall ADR inclusive of all colonoscopy indications. LIMITATIONS: External generalizability, retrospective design. CONCLUSION: We propose minimum screening APC detection benchmarks of 0.50 for men and 0.20 for women. ADRs for screening, surveillance, and diagnostic colonoscopy are correlated and can be used to derive a simplified overall ADR inclusive of all colonoscopy indications.

A risk index for advanced neoplasia on the second surveillance colonoscopy in patients with previous adenomatous polyps.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia on the second surveillance colonoscopy could help tailor surveillance. OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a risk index for advanced neoplasia on the second surveillance colonoscopy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Single-specialty practice; Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: A total of 965 patients with baseline adenomatous polyps, 2 surveillance colonoscopies, and no reported family history of colorectal cancer; validation cohort of 372. INTERVENTIONS: Multivariable logistic regression including demographics and previous colonoscopy results; derivation and validation of a risk index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Advanced adenoma (≥1 cm in size, villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia) on the second surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS: Mean age was 57.8 ± 9.8 years, 62% were men, and 36% had an advanced adenoma on the index colonoscopy. Associated with advanced adenoma on the second surveillance colonoscopy were age at index colonoscopy (scored 0 for younger than 55 years of age, 1 for 55-59 years of age, 2 for 60-64 years of age, and 3 for older than 65 years of age) and previous findings (non-neoplastic, nonadvanced, advanced [scored 0, 1, and 2, respectively]) on index colonoscopy and the first surveillance colonoscopy, with scores ranging from 1 to 7. Risks of advanced adenoma on the second surveillance colonoscopy with scores of 5 or less and more than 5 were 4.8% (95% confidence interval, 3.5%-6.4%) and 14.9% (95% confidence interval, 7.4%-25.7%), respectively, comprising 93% and 7%, respectively, of the cohort. Corresponding results in the validation cohort were 5.6% and 19.2%, respectively, comprising 86.1% and 13.9%, respectively, of the cohort. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study with potential for selection bias. CONCLUSION: This index stratifies the risk of advanced adenoma on the second surveillance colonoscopy. If validated independently, it may be useful for tailoring surveillance.

Performance characteristics of molecular (DNA) analysis for the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cysts.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cysts (MPCs) is challenging due to the poor sensitivity of cytology provided by EUS-guided-FNA (EUS-FNA). OBJECTIVE: To quantify the test characteristics of molecular (DNA) analysis in suspected low-risk MPCs. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study performed in between 2008 and 2011. SETTING: Academic referral center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of suspected MPCs. INTERVENTION: EUS-FNA and molecular (DNA) analysis of cyst fluid. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The sensitivity and specificity of molecular analysis in the diagnosis of MPCs using the criterion standard of surgical pathology in resected cysts. RESULTS: Patients with suspected MPCs underwent EUS-FNA and cyst fluid DNA analysis. Surgical resection was performed in 48 patients (17%), confirming a mucinous pathology in 38 (79%). In this group, molecular analysis had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 80% in identifying MPCs (accuracy of 56.3%). The combination of molecular analysis with cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytology resulted in higher MPC diagnostic performance than either one of its individual components, with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 73.7%, 70%, and 72.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in accuracy between molecular analysis and CEA/cytology in this group. LIMITATIONS: Single-center experience. CONCLUSION: Molecular analysis aids in the diagnosis of MPCs when cytology is nondiagnostic or cyst fluid is insufficient for CEA or its level is indeterminate. Our results do not support the routine use of molecular analysis, which should be used selectively after review of imaging findings and cyst fluid studies. Further studies are needed to assess DNA's performance in malignant cysts.

New colonoscope technology: impact on image capture and quality and on confidence and accuracy of endoscopy-based polyp discrimination.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A newer colonoscope series has optical magnification and improvement in image freezing function. We aimed to assess the impact on image capture, image quality, and polyp discrimination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In consecutive patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy images of colorectal polyps were taken with Olympus 190 or 180 series instruments. The number of image captures needed to obtain an adequate image, quality of stored images, proportion of polyps with a high confidence estimate of likely histology, and accuracy of interpretations were compared. RESULTS: An acceptable image at the first attempt was obtained in 97.3 % of photos with the 190 device vs. 83.8 % with the 180 instrument (P < 0.001). In the 190 group narrowband imaging (NBI) provided high confidence readings in 9 % more cases than in the 180 group, but did not improve accuracy of polyp categorization. The quality of the stored images was judged better for the 190 device. However, when images that had provided high confidence estimates of polyp histology were re-interpreted later by the original endoscopist, there was agreement with the original interpretation for > 98 % of polyps in both the 180 group and the 190 group. A second endoscopist agreed with the original high confidence interpretations for 90 % of polyps imaged with either the 180 or the 190 scope. CONCLUSION: The new colonoscope had less image blurring, improved subjective quality of stored images, and increased the proportion of high confidence endoscopic estimates of polyp histology, but did not improve accuracy in estimating polyp histology.

Language and social functioning in children and adolescents with epilepsy.

Individuals with epilepsy have difficulties with social function that are not adequately accounted for by seizure severity or frequency. This study examined the relationship between language ability and social functioning in 193 children with epilepsy over a period of 36months following their first recognized seizure. The findings show that children with persistent seizures have poorer language function, even at the onset of their seizures, than do their healthy siblings, children with no recurrent seizures, and children with recurrent but not persistent seizures. They continue to demonstrate poorer language function 36months later. This poor language function is associated with declining social competence. Intervention aimed at improving social competence should include consideration of potential language deficits that accompany epilepsy and social difficulty.

Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy quality is operator-dependent. Studies assessing the effect of interventions to decrease variation in colonoscopy quality have shown inconsistent results. Since 2009, endoscopists at our university-affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center have received a quarterly "report card" summarizing individual colonoscopy quality indicators as part of an ongoing quality assurance program. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the quality report card intervention on colonoscopy performance. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary-care, academic, university-affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center in Indianapolis, Indiana. PATIENTS: Data from 6 endoscopists practicing at the Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center were included. Patients were average-risk, aged 50 years or older, undergoing their first screening colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Quarterly report card. The study time frame was July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (before-intervention) and April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2011 (intervention). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were cecal intubation and adenoma detection rates (ADR), adjusted for physician, patient age, and sex. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with adenoma detection. RESULTS: A total of 928 patients (male 93%, white 78%) were included (before-intervention 336; intervention 592). There were no significant differences in patient age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, bowel preparation quality, colonoscope model, and proportion of colonoscopies performed with a trainee between the before-intervention and intervention phases. In the intervention phase, the adjusted adenoma detection and cecal intubation rates were significantly higher: 53.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.7%-58.1%) vs 44.7% (95% CI, 39.1%-50.4%); P = .013 and 98.1% (95% CI, 96.7%-99.0%) vs 95.6% (95% CI, 92.5%-97.5%); P = .027, respectively. A higher ADR trend in the intervention phase was found for 5 of the 6 physicians. The increment in ADR was due mostly to increased detection of proximal adenomas. There were no significant changes in serrated polyp detection, advanced neoplasm detection, number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy, and mean size of adenomas after implementation of the intervention. The report card intervention remained significantly associated with higher ADRs after adjustment for patient age, sex, and physician (odds ratio 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.94). LIMITATIONS: Single center, small number of endoscopists. CONCLUSION: A quarterly report card was associated with improved colonoscopy quality indicators. This intervention is practical to generate and implement and may serve as a model for quality improvement programs in different patient and physician groups.

Yield of the second surveillance colonoscopy based on the results of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) after the first surveillance colonoscopy is not well quantified. The aim of the current study was to quantify the risk of ACN on the second surveillance colonoscopy based on previous colonoscopic findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-site study of patients with index adenomas who underwent two surveillance colonoscopies. ACN was defined as advanced adenoma (≥ 1 cm, villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia) or as "high-risk" findings (advanced adenoma or ≥ 3 non-advanced adenoma [NAA]). RESULTS: Among 509 patients with low-risk index findings, 61 (12.0 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 9.3 % - 15.1 %) had high-risk findings on the first surveillance colonoscopy, 11 of whom (18.0 %; 95 %CI 9.4 % - 30.0 %) had high-risk findings on second surveillance colonoscopy compared with 39 (8.7 %; 95 %CI 6.3 % - 11.7 %) of the remaining 448 patients who had normal or low-risk findings on the first surveillance colonoscopy (relative risk [RR] = 2.07; 95 %CI 1.12 - 3.83). Among 456 patients with high-risk index findings, 91 (20.0 %; 95 %CI 16.3 % - 23.9 %) had high-risk findings on the first surveillance colonoscopy, 20 of whom (22.0 %; 95 %CI 14.0 % - 31.9 %) had high-risk findings on second surveillance colonoscopy compared with 40 (11.0 %; 95 %CI 8.0 % - 146 %) of the remaining 365 patients who had normal or low-risk findings on first surveillance colonoscopy (RR = 2.01; 95 %CI 1.04 - 3.32). Results were similar when only advanced adenomas were considered. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high-risk findings on index and first surveillance colonoscopies require close surveillance. Those with low-risk findings on index colonoscopy and normal/non-advanced findings on the first surveillance colonoscopy have low subsequent risk of ACN. These and previous data may be useful for generating recommendations for the timing of the second surveillance colonoscopy.

Creating Avenues for Parent Partnership (CAPP): an intervention for parents of children with epilepsy and learning problems.

Caregivers of children with both epilepsy and learning problems need assistance to manage their child's complex medical and mental health problems. We tested the cognitive behavioral intervention "Creating Avenues for Parent Partnership" (CAPP) which was designed to help caregivers develop knowledge as well as the confidence and skills to manage their child's condition. The CAPP intervention consisted of a one-day cognitive behavioral program and three follow-up group sessions. The sample comprised 31 primary caregivers. Caregivers reported that the program was useful (mean = 3.66 on a 4-point scale), acceptable (mean = 4.28 on a 5-point scale), and "pretty easy" (mean = 1.97 on a 4-point scale). Effect sizes were small to medium in paired t tests (comparison of intervention to control) and paired analysis of key variables in the pre- and post-tests. The CAPP program shows promise in helping caregivers build skills to manage their child's condition.

Whole brain radiotherapy for poor prognosis patients with brain metastases: predictably poor results.

BACKGROUND: Patients with brain metastases from solid tumors can be subdivided by characteristics into separate prognostic groups, such as the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group's Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) or the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). At our institution, patients falling into the poorest prognostic groups are often treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). OBJECTIVE: To determine if observed survival of poor prognosis patients treated with WBRT for brain metastases at our institution matches the survival predicted by RPA and GPA prognostic indices. METHODS: The charts of 101 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases from solid tumors who received WBRT were retrospectively reviewed. We calculated each patient's RPA and GPA and compiled treatment and survival data. Observed median survival was compared to that predicted by the RPA and GPA prognostic indices. RESULTS: RPA III patients (n = 25) had a median survival of 2.4 months in our study. GPA 0.0-1.0 patients (n = 35) had a median survival of 2.4 months in our study. These values did not vary significantly from those predicted by the respective indices. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective analysis and subject to selection bias. CONCLUSION: Given the delivery time for WBRT and the potential side effects associated with the treatment, the predictably short overall survival in poor prognosis patients calls into question the value of WBRT in this patient subgroup.

Using a mobile application to self-monitor diet and fluid intake among adults receiving hemodialysis.

Hemodialysis patients have difficulty self-managing a complex dietary and fluid regimen. The purpose of this feasibility study was to pilot test an electronic self-monitoring intervention based on social cognitive theory. During a 6-week intervention, 24 participants self-monitored diet and fluid intake using the Dietary Intake Monitoring Application (DIMA), and 20 participants served as controls by monitoring their activity using the Daily Activity Monitor Application (DAMA). Results from this pilot study suggest the intervention is feasible and acceptable, although few significant effects on outcomes were found in this small sample. The DIMA has potential to facilitate dietary and fluid self-monitoring but requires additional refinement and further testing.

Problem-solving intervention for caregivers of children with mental health problems.

UNLABELLED: Building Our Solutions and Connections (BOSC) focused on enhancing problem-solving skills (PSS) of primary caregivers of children with mental health problems. Aims were determining feasibility, acceptability, and effect size (ES) estimates for depression, burden, personal control, and PSS. METHODS: Caregivers were randomized to BOSC (n=30) or wait-list control (WLC) groups (n=31). Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 and 6 months post-intervention. RESULTS: Three-months post-intervention, ES for burden and personal control were .07 and .08, respectively. ES for depressed caregivers for burden and personal control were 0.14 and 0.19, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence indicates that the intervention had desired effects.

A critical assessment of post-prostatectomy prostate specific antigen doubling time acceleration--is it stable?

PURPOSE: We examined a retrospective cohort of patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy to determine whether prostate specific antigen doubling time would remain stable with time. We also examined the relationship between other clinical parameters and the change in prostate specific antigen doubling time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the prostate cancer database from 1989 to 2008 to identify patients treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer who experienced prostate specific antigen recurrence. Of the 2,237 patients identified 329 had biochemical recurrence. Prostate specific antigen doubling time was calculated at each visit and linear regression of prostate specific antigen doubling time with time was fit. Rate of change in prostate specific antigen doubling time was defined as the slope of the least squares regression line. RESULTS: Median followup was 5 years (range 0.2 to 18). High Gleason score and local recurrence within 5 years were significantly associated with shorter 2-year prostate specific antigen doubling time and a decreased rate of change in doubling time (p = 0.0096, 0.0119, 0.0195 and 0.0258, respectively). Metastasis within 5 years was significantly associated with shorter 2 and 5-year doubling time (p = 0.0006 and 0.0014, respectively). Using all prostate specific antigen values within 5 years of initial biochemical recurrence yielded an overall median prostate specific antigen doubling time of 52.8 months (range 5.4 to 100.0). The median rate of change in doubling time was -1.05 (range -64.7 to 27.0). Median time to metastasis after biochemical recurrence was 12.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Median prostate specific antigen doubling time decreases with time. This may influence the decision to offer secondary therapy to patients with biochemical recurrence sooner since initial prostate specific antigen doubling time is long and may not accurately reflect the biological nature of the disease.