Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of hepatic encephalopathy: A multicentre study.

Background & Aims: Data on the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are conflicting, and data from multicentre studies are scarce. The aim of this study was to dissect the potential association between PPI use and minimal (MHE) and overt HE (OHE). Methods: Data from patients with cirrhosis recruited at seven centres across Europe and the US were analysed. MHE was defined by the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES). PPI use was recorded on the day of testing with PHES. Patients were followed for OHE development and death/liver transplantation. Results: A total of 1,160 patients with a median MELD of 11 were included (Child-Pugh stages: A 49%/B 39%/C 11%). PPI use was noted in 58% of patients. Median follow-up time was 18.1 months, during which 230 (20%) developed an OHE episode, and 224 (19%) reached the composite endpoint of death/liver transplantation. In multivariable analyses, PPI use was neither associated with the presence of MHE at baseline nor OHE development during follow-up. These findings were consistent in subgroup analyses of patients with Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis and after excluding patients with a history of OHE. PPI use was also not associated with a higher risk of OHE, neither in patients with an indication for treatment nor in patients without an indication. Conclusions: PPI use is not associated with a higher risk of HE in patients with cirrhosis. Based on these findings, at present, a prescription should not be prohibited in case of a generally accepted indication. Impact and implications: Data on the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are conflicting. In this study, PPI use was not associated with a higher risk of minimal HE at baseline or overt HE during follow-up in patients with cirrhosis. Based on these findings, prescription of a PPI for a generally accepted indication should not be prohibited in patients with cirrhosis.

PHES scores have limited impact on the risk of overt HE in patients with minimal HE.

BACKGROUND: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy, defined by the portosystemic hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), is associated with a higher risk of subsequent OHE. It remains unclear if there is a stepwise increase in OHE risk with worse PHES results. METHODS: In this multicenter study, patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy, as defined by abnormal PHES, were followed for OHE development. RESULTS: In all, 207 patients were included. There was no stepwise increase in OHE risk with worse PHES results. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal PHES is associated with a higher OHE risk, but we found no stepwise increase in OHE risk with worse PHES results below the established cutoff.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a patient with multiple myeloma: a case report and analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

This paper demonstrates a case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in a patient with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with nine different MM therapies. This case report contributes to the already published 16 cases of PML in patients with MM. Additionally, this paper presents an analysis of cases from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Report System database (n = 117) with a description of demographics and MM-specific therapies. Patients with MM, that developed PML, were treated with immunomodulatory drugs (97%), alkylating agents (52%), and/or proteasome inhibitors (49%). Prior to PML diagnosis, 72% of patients received two or more MM therapies. These results indicate that PML in MM is underreported and could be related to treatment with multiple immunosuppressive therapies rather than MM as a disease itself. Physicians should be aware of potential PML in the late stage of heavily treated MM patients.

Diroximel fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a new emerging therapy for patients with multiple sclerosis. The levels of its active metabolite, monomethyl fumarate, are bioequivalent to the levels generated from dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment. The efficacy and safety profiles of DRF are expected to be similar to the well-established profiles of DMF. The metabolism of DRF leads to lower concentration of methanol in the small intestine than with DMF and thus reduced severity and frequency of gastrointestinal adverse events. DRF seems a promising alternative to DMF and other first-line therapies for multiple sclerosis. The current review is based on the two existing Phase III trials of DRF: the interim analysis of the EVOLVE-MS-1 trial and the completed EVOLVE-MS-2 trial.