Psychosocial factors partially explain gender differences in health-related quality of life in heart failure patients.

AIMS: There is little information about the influence of gender on quality of life (QoL) in heart failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the health-related QoL gap between men and women can be explained by the interaction between psychosocial factors and clinical determinants in a real-word cohort of patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a single-centre, observational, prospective cohort study of 1236 consecutive patients diagnosed with chronic heart failure recruited between 2004 and 2014. To assess QoL, we used the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). Female gender was associated with worse global QoL compared to male gender (MLHFQ overall summary score: 49 ± 23 vs. 43 ± 24; P value <0.001, respectively) and similarly had poorer scores in physical and emotional dimensions but scored better on social dimension. In univariate models and in models adjusted for clinical determinants, female gender behaved as a predictor of worse global, physical and emotional QoL, and better social QoL compared with men. In models only including psychosocial determinants and in comprehensive models including all psychosocial and clinical factors, these differences according to gender were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have shown that the gap in health-related QoL between men and women with chronic heart failure can be partially explained by the interaction between biological and psychosocial factors. Biological factors are the main drivers of QoL in HF patients. However, the contribution of psychosocial factors is essential to definitively understand the role of gender in this field.

Effectiveness of telemedicine in patients with heart failure according to frailty phenotypes: Insights from the iCOR randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The potential impact of telemedicine (TM) in the monitoring of patients with heart failure (HF) is still uncertain particularly in the frailest patients. The aim of this study was to define the efficacy of a TM-based managed care solution across different HF patient frailty phenotypes. METHODS: We performed a clustering analysis on the basis of 8 frailty-related dimensions to the HF-patients included in the 'insuficiència Cardíaca Optimització Remota' (iCOR) randomised study comparing TM vs. usual care (UC) in HF patients. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of a non-fatal HF event after 6 months of inclusion. The healthcare-related costs in each study group and cluster were also evaluated. The event rates of primary and secondary study endpoints were calculated for each cluster. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to evaluate the effect of cluster, treatment group and the interaction term cluster by treatment group on study endpoints. RESULTS: 5 different frailty phenotypes were identified. The positive effect of TM compared to UC strategy was consistent across all frailty phenotypes (p-value for interaction 0.711). The risk of experiencing a primary event was significantly lower in patients that underwent allocation to the TM arm compared to UC (p-value = 0.016). Ultimately, the healthcare costs were significantly reduced in patients allocated to the TM compared to UC in all 5 frailty phenotypes (all p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive TM-based follow-up tools are effective compared to UC follow-up in preventing HF events in the early post-discharge period, regardless of the 5 frailty phenotypes.

Quality of life and disease experience in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Spain: a mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVES: To gather insights on the disease experience of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and assess how patients' experiences and narratives related to the disease complement data collected through standardised patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Also, to explore new ways of evaluating the burden experienced by patients and caregivers. DESIGN: Observational, descriptive, multicentre, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study. SETTING: Secondary care, patient's homes. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients with HFrEF (New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification I-III) aged 38-85 years. MEASURES: PROMs EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and patient interview and observation. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients with HFrEF participated in the study. The patients' mean (SD) age was 72.5 (11.4) years, 65% were male and were classified inNYHA functional classes I (n=4), II (n=7) and III (n=9). The study showed a strong impact of HF in the patients' quality of life (QoL) and disease experience, as revealed by the standardised PROMs (EQ-5D-5L global index=0.64 (0.36); Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score=71.56 (20.55)) and the in-depth interviews. Patients and caregivers often disagreed describing and evaluating perceived QoL, as patients downplayed their limitations and caregivers overemphasised the poor QoL of the patients. Patients related current QoL to distant life experiences or to critical moments in their disease, such as hospitalisations. Anxiety over the disease progression is apparent in both patients and caregivers, suggesting that caregiver-specific tools should be developed. CONCLUSIONS: PROMs are an effective way of assessing symptoms over the most recent time period. However, especially in chronic diseases such as HFrEF, PROM scores could be complemented with additional tools to gain a better understanding of the patient's status. New PROMs designed to evaluate and compare specific points in the life of the patient could be clinically more useful to assess changes in health status.