Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurosurg Rev ; 46(1): 302, 2023 Nov 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37973641

RESUMO

Shunt-dependent hydrocephalus (HC) is a common sequela following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, there is still poor evidence regarding the optimal timing of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement, particularly in the context of early aSAH-associated complications such as delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of early (< 21 days after aSAH) versus late (≥ 21 days after aSAH) VPS placement on the functional clinical outcome. We retrospectively analyzed data from 82 patients with VPS placement after aSAH enrolled in our institutional database between 2011 and 2021. We compared two groups, early VPS placement (< 21 days after aSAH) versus late VPS placement (≥ 21 days after aSAH) in terms of demographics, SAH grading, radiological parameters, externalized cerebrospinal fluid diversions, DCI, VPS variables, and functional outcome. We identified 53 patients with early and 29 patients with late VPS implantation. Baseline variables, such as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scale, the Glasgow Coma Scale, and Fisher grade were not significantly different between the groups. Postoperatively, the mRS (p = 0.0037), the Glasgow Outcome Scale (p = 0.0037), and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (p = 0.0032) showed significantly better functional results in patients with early cerebrospinal fluid diversion. The rate of DCI did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.53). There was no difference in the rate of VPS placement associated complications (p = 0.44) or overall mortality (p = 0.39). Early shunt implantation, within 21 days after aSAH and therefore during the timeframe of possible DCI, might not be harmful in patients developing HC after aSAH.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , Hidrocefalia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Humanos , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/cirurgia , Derivação Ventriculoperitoneal/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hidrocefalia/cirurgia , Hidrocefalia/complicações , Isquemia Encefálica/cirurgia , Isquemia Encefálica/complicações , Infarto Cerebral/complicações
2.
Cureus ; 14(10): e29894, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36348855

RESUMO

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) still put a high burden on public health worldwide. Medical and surgical treatment strategies are continuously being studied, but the role and indications of primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) remain controversial. In medically refractory intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury, secondary decompressive craniectomy is a last resort treatment option to control intracranial pressure (ICP). Randomized controlled studies have been extensively performed on secondary decompressive craniectomy and its role in the management of severe traumatic brain injuries. Indications, prognostic factors, and long-term outcomes in primary decompressive craniectomy during the evacuation of an epidural, subdural, or intracerebral hematoma in the acute phase are still a matter of ongoing research and controversy to this day. Prospective trials have been designed, but the results are yet to be published. In isolated epidural hematoma without underlying brain injury, osteoplastic craniotomy is likely to be sufficient. In acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) with relevant brain swelling and preoperative CT signs such as effaced cisterns, overly proportional midline-shift compared to a relatively small acute subdural hematoma, and accompanying brain contusions as well as pupillary abnormalities, intraventricular hemorrhage, and coagulation disorder, primary decompressive craniectomy is more likely to be of benefit for patients with traumatic brain injury. The role of intracranial pressure monitoring after primary decompressive craniectomy is recommended, but prospective trials are pending. More refined guidelines and hopefully class I evidence will be established with the ongoing trials: randomized evaluation of surgery with craniectomy for patients undergoing evacuation of acute subdural hematoma (RESCUE-ASDH), prospective randomized evaluation of decompressive ipsilateral craniectomy for traumatic acute epidural hematoma (PREDICT-AEDH), and pragmatic explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS).

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA