Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717928

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The extent to which infection versus vaccination has conferred similarly durable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunity during the Omicron era remains unclear. METHODS: In a cohort of 4496 adults under continued serological surveillance throughout the first year of Omicron-predominant SARS-CoV-2 transmission, we examined incidence of new infection among individuals whose last known antigenic exposure was either recent (<90 days) or remote (≥90 days) infection or vaccination. RESULTS: We adjudicated 2053 new-onset infections occurring between 15 December 2021 through 22 December 2022. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, compared to individuals whose last known exposure was remote vaccination, those with recent vaccination (odds ratio [OR], 0.82 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .73-.93]; P = .002) or recent infection (OR, 0.14 [95% CI, .05-.45]; P = .001) had lower risk for new infection within the subsequent 90-day period. Given a significant age interaction (P = .004), we found that remote infection compared to remote vaccination was associated with significantly greater new infection risk in persons aged ≥60 years (OR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.13-3.14]; P = .015) with no difference seen in those <60 years (1.03 [95% CI, .69-1.53]; P = .88). CONCLUSIONS: During the initial year of Omicron, prior infection and vaccination both offered protection against new infection. However, remote prior infection was less protective than remote vaccination for individuals aged ≥60 years. In older adults, immunity gained from vaccination appeared more durable than immunity gained from infection.

2.
bioRxiv ; 2024 Mar 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38562888

RESUMO

Clinical biomarker development has been stymied by inaccurate protein quantification from mass spectrometry (MS) discovery data and a prolonged validation process. To mitigate these issues, we created the Targeted Extraction Assessment of Quantification (TEAQ) software package. This innovative tool uses the discovery cohort analysis to select precursors, peptides, and proteins that adhere to established targeted assay criteria. TEAQ was applied to Data-Independent Acquisition MS data from plasma samples acquired on an Orbitrap™ Astral™ MS. Identified precursors were evaluated for linearity, specificity, repeatability, reproducibility, and intra-protein correlation from 11-point loading curves under three throughputs, to develop a resource for clinical-grade targeted assays. From a clinical cohort of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (n=492), TEAQ successfully identified 1116 signature peptides for 327 quantifiable proteins from 1180 identified proteins. Embedding stringent selection criteria adaptable to targeted assay development into the analysis of discovery data will streamline the transition to validation and clinical studies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA