Intestinal ultrasound in patients with suspected Crohn's disease - results of a prospective evaluation by trainees.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) performed by experts is a valuable tool for the diagnostic work-up and monitoring of Crohn's disease (CD). However, concern about insufficient training and perceived high inter-observer variability limit the adoption of IUS in CD. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of trainee-performed IUS in patients with suspected CD. METHOD: Patients recruited to a prospective trial investigating the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance enterocolonography (MREC) in patients with clinically suspected CD underwent IUS performed by trainees. The primary end-point was IUS per-patient sensitivity and specificity for ileocolonic CD determined by ileocolonoscopy. RESULTS: 129 patients with clinically suspected CD and a complete IC and IUS were included in the analysis. IUS detected signs of CD in 49 cases (small bowel 31, colon 15, small bowel, and colon 3). The sensitivity and specificity for detection of ileocolonic CD by trainee performed IUS improved during the first to the second half of the study period from 57.1% (CI 34.0-78.2) to 73.1% (CI 52.2-88.4) and 76.5% (CI 58.8-89.3) to 89.7% (CI 72.6-97.8). The overall sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing CD with IUS were 65.4% (CI 50.9-78.0) and 80.5% (CI 69.9-88.7). There was no difference in diagnostic performance between IUS and MREC for the detection of CD. CONCLUSION: Trainees improved during the study, and IUS performance in disease detection corresponded to expert-evaluated MREC.Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03134586).

Danish national guideline for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection and use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).

Aim: This Danish national guideline describes the treatment of adult patients with Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile (CD) infection and the use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). It suggests minimum standard for implementing an FMT service.Method: Four scientific societies appointed members for a working group which conducted a systematic literature review and agreed on the text and recommendations. All clinical recommendations were evalluated for evidence level and grade of recommendation.Results: In CD infection, the use of marketed and experimental antibiotics as well as microbiota-based therapies including FMT are described. An algorithm for evaluating treatment effect is suggested. The organisation of FMT, donor recruitment and screening, laboratory preparation, clinical application and follow-up are described.Conclusion: Updated evidence for the treatment of CD infection and the use of FMT is provided.

Diagnostic accuracy of pan-enteric capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance enterocolonography in suspected Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Magnetic resonance enterocolonography (MREC) and pan-enteric capsule endoscopy (CE) offers visualization of the entire gastrointestinal tract in a single examination. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of MREC and CE in patients with suspected Crohn's disease (CD). METHOD: In a prospective, blinded, multicenter study, we included patients with clinically suspected CD. Patients were examined with MREC, CE, and ileocolonoscopy (IC) within 2 weeks. The primary outcome was per patient sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for ileocolonic CD. IC served as reference standard. RESULTS: 153 patients were included in the study and IC, MREC, and CE was performed in 152, 151, 133 patients, respectively. CD was diagnosed with IC in 59 (39%) patients (terminal ileum (TI) 22, colon 20, TI and colon 17). The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing ileocolonic CD with MREC was 67.9% (CI 53.7-80.1) and 76.3% (CI 65.2-85.3) (TI 76.9% and 85.6%; colon 27% and 93%) compared to 87.5% (CI 73.2-95.8) and 87.8% (CI 78.2-94.3) with CE (TI 96.6% and 87.5%; colon 75.0% and 93.0%). The sensitivity of CE was superior to that of MREC (p = 0.02). The patient experienced discomfort was equal with CE and MREC and significantly less than with IC. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected CD, CE has a high sensitivity for diagnosing CD in the TI and colon, which is superior to that of MREC. The sensitivity of MREC for diagnosing CD in the colon is poor. CE could be a patient-friendly alternative to IC in selected patients with suspected CD. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03134586.