Using the Region of Interest from Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography to Differentiate Between Intracranial Arterial Dissection and True Atherosclerotic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Noncontrast three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (3D TOF MRA) is commonly used to examine intracranial arterial stenosis, although it can be difficult to identify the etiology of the stenosis. Our aim was to determine the effectiveness of 3D TOF MRA in differentiating an intracranial arterial dissection from atherosclerosis. METHODS: During 2015-2017, 356 patients had confirmed intracranial arterial stenosis based on high resolution-magnetic resonance imaging. This study ultimately included 51 patients with severe focal stenosis that was caused by dissection and atherosclerosis. We compared the dissection group with the atherosclerotic narrowing group by measuring the region-of-interest (ROI) values 3 mm proximal and 3 mm distal from sites of severe focal stenosis. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed between the median ROI difference values in the dissection group (n = 18) and the atherosclerosis group (n = 33; 35.6 [20.9-78.4] vs. 165.5 [99.8-328.5]; p < 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve was prepared to distinguish between dissection and atherosclerosis using the ROI difference values. The area under the curve was 0.919 (sensitivity 75.8%, specificity 94.4%). The optimal cutoff value for using ROI to distinguish between dissection and atherosclerosis was found to be 99.0 based on the Youden's index. CONCLUSION: The ROI difference value from 3D TOF MRA could help distinguish between dissection and atherosclerosis. If the ROI difference value from 3D TOF MRA is small (< 99.0), detailed testing should be performed to identify dissection.

Relationship between the Angle of the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery and Cardioembolic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: In patients with unilateral posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) territory infarction, the absence of relevant vessel stenosis may make it difficult to determine the etiology of the infarction. The incidence of cardioembolic (CE) infarction and the factors associated with infarction in such patients remains largely unknown. We hypothesized that the PICA angle would affect the flow direction of embolic sources. Thus, we analyzed the association between high-risk CE sources and the PICA angle. METHODS: Patients with an isolated unilateral PICA territory infarction without relevant vessel stenosis who were admitted between 2014 and 2017 were included from the Korea University Stroke Registry, which includes data from 3 university hospitals. We classified patients according to the presence of CE sources. For each case, we measured the angle between the vertebral artery (VA) and the proximal PICA. RESULTS: In all, 71 patients met the final study entry criteria. Multivariable analysis showed that the PICA angle was independently associated with the risk of a CE source. The optimal cut-off value using Youden's index was 89°. We classified the PICA shape based on the optimal cut-off value. A CE source was identified in 83.3% of cases in which the PICA angle exceeded 89°. CONCLUSIONS: The angle between the PICA and VA was an independent predictor of unilateral PICA stroke with high-risk CE sources without relevant artery stenosis, suggesting that an angle greater than 89° could be a new image marker for determining the stroke subtype.