Influence of Graft Ureter Length, a Donor-Related Factor, on Urinary Tract Infections After Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis of 211 Cases.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) occurs in 25% of recipients of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Female sex, age, and anatomical abnormalities have been reported as recipient-related risk factors for UTI after LDKT; few studies have reported donor-related factors. We retrospectively examined UTI occurrence within 5 years of transplantation in recipients (n = 211) who underwent LDKT at our hospital between April 2011 and April 2021. All nephrectomies were performed using a retroperitoneal pure laparoscopic approach. The ureter was dissected at the lower level of the common iliac artery and trimmed to the shortest length, enough to reach the bladder using extra vesicular ureterocystoneostomy with a 3 cm submucosal tunnel. Twenty-nine recipients (13.7%) developed UTI within 5 years, and the median time to onset was 40.0 days. After adjusting for the well-known factors, including recipient sex, graft ureter length was an independent factor for UTI occurrence (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02∼1.53, p = 0.028) in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. The long ureter is usually trimmed, and the widest part is used for anastomosis, which may increase the possibility of reflux from the bladder to the ureter in the standard technique. The ureter length may be associated with the incidence of UTI after LDKT.

Long-term impact of baseline serum uric acid levels on living kidney donors: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative characteristics of living kidney donors are commonly considered during donor selection and postoperative follow-up. However, the impact of preoperative uric acid (UA) levels is poorly documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative serum UA levels and post-donation long-term events and renal function. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 183 living kidney donors. The donors were divided into high (≥5.5 mg/dl) and low (< 5.5 mg/dl) UA groups. We analyzed the relationship between preoperative UA levels and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as adverse events (cardiovascular events and additional prescriptions for hypertension, gout, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus), over 5 years after donation. RESULTS: In total, 44 donors experienced 52 adverse events over 5 years. The incidence of adverse events within 5 years was significantly higher in the high UA group than in the low UA group (50% vs. 24%, p = 0.003); this was true even after the exclusion of hyperuricemia-related events (p = 0.047). UA emerged as an independent risk factor for adverse events (p = 0.012). Donors with higher UA levels had lower eGFRs after donation, whereas body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol did not have any impact on the eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that preoperative UA levels should be considered during donor selection and postoperative follow-up.

Prediction model of compensation for contralateral kidney after living-donor donation.

BACKGROUND: Compensation of contralateral kidney function after living-donor kidney donation is well known, and many predictive factors have been proposed. However, no prediction model has been proposed. This study was performed to establish a tool with which to estimate the degree of compensation of the contralateral kidney after living-donor kidney donation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 133 living donors for renal transplantation in our institution. We defined a favorable compensation as a post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year (calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) of > 60% of the pre-donation eGFR. We analyzed the living donors' clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: The median (range) donor age was 59 (24-79) years, median (range) body mass index was 22.9 (16.8-32.7) kg/m2, and median (range) body surface area was 1.6 (1.3-2.0) m2. All donors were Japanese, and 73% of the donors were biologically related. The median (range) donor pre-donation eGFR was 108.7 (82-144) ml/min/1.73 m2, and the median (range) post-donation eGFR at 1 year was 86.9 (43-143) ml/min/1.73 m2. Eighty-six percent of donors had compensatory hypertrophy. In the univariate analysis, age, female sex, history of hypertension, body surface area, and pre-donation eGFR were significantly associated with hypertrophy (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, age, female sex, history of hypertension, and ratio of the remnant kidney volume to body weight were significantly associated with hypertrophy (p < 0.05). Based on these results, we created a compensation prediction score (CPS). The median (range) CPS was 8.7 (1.1-17.4). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed strong diagnostic accuracy for predicting favorable compensation (area under the curve, 0.958; 95% confidence interval, 0.925-0.991, p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value of the CPS was 5.0 (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 89.5%). The CPS had a strong positive correlation with the post-donation eGFR (R = 0.797, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CPS might be useful tool with which to predict a favorable compensation of the contralateral kidney and remnant kidney function. If the CPS is low, careful management and follow-up might be necessary. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings in larger populations.

A Single-Center Retrospective Study of Re-Transplantation After Allograft Failure in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the outcomes of kidney retransplantation in patients with allograft failure at Kyushu University. METHODS: We reviewed data from 1043 consecutive patients (including 1001 in a first kidney transplantation [KT] group and 42 in a second KT group) who had undergone KT alone at our institution between January 2008 and September 2022. We also studied immunologic risks and outcomes of patients who had undergone preoperative testing for KT at Kyushu University during the same period. RESULTS: No patient received more than 2 transplants. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) had been detected in a greater percentage of patients in the second KT group than in the first (31% vs 11%, respectively; P < .001). There were no significant differences in 5-year death-censored/overall graft survival rates, rates of surgical complications, or incidence of delayed graft function between the groups. During the study period, significantly more candidates for second than first KT were rejected for this procedure because of their high immunologic risk (20% vs 2%, P < 001). Seven of the 42 patients in the second KT group required the removal of the primary graft during the second transplantation. CONCLUSION: There is a higher percentage of patients whose DSA has been detected among patients undergoing retransplantation after allograft failure than among those receiving first KTs, which often leads to remaining on the waiting list in the former group. However, if the immunologic risk is within acceptable limits, the graft survival for retransplantation is not inferior to that of a first KT.

Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir and Renal Dysfunction in Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a novel anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug, and it is currently the only drug available for patients with severe renal impairment. Here we report a case with renal dysfunction after an administration of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. CASE REPORT: The case was 66-year-old Japanese man who turned out to be HCV-positive 14 years ago at the time of his second deceased renal transplantation. He had no prior history of HCV treatment. HCV genotype was serogroup 1, and baseline HCV-RNA was 5.3 LOG IU/mL. Since glecaprevir/pibrentasvir became available, he started to take it for treatment of HCV. His immunosuppressants were tacrolimus (trough levels 4.3∼6.5 ng/mL) and 5 mg of prednisolone. His baseline renal function was serum creatinine (Cr) 2.1 mg/dL and urine protein (-). Shortly after starting glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, the serum Cr started to increase. Serum Cr reached up to 2.92 mg/dL and urine protein was (+) at day 36. Right pleural effusion was observed while cardiac function was normal. His liver function had been consistently normal. We concluded glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was the cause of renal dysfunction as no other drugs were added. Immediately after discontinuation of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir at day 36, serum Cr decreased to 1.9 mg/dL and urine protein turned negative at day 64. Although the patient completed a half course of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, HCV-RNA turned to be negative at day 36. CONCLUSIONS: We experienced a case with renal dysfunction after the initiation of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in deceased donor renal transplant recipient. Renal dysfunction caused by glecaprevir/pibrentasvir has not been reported so far.

HbA1c and Aortic Calcification Index as Noninvasive Predictors of Pre-Existing Histopathological Damages in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

We previously reported that allografts from living donors may have pre-existing histopathological damages, defined as the combination of interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), and arteriolar hyalinosis (ah) scores of ≧1, according to the Banff classification. We examined preoperative characteristics to identify whether the degree of these damages was related to metabolic syndrome-related factors of donors. We conducted a single-center cross-sectional analysis including 183 living kidney donors. Donors were divided into two groups: chronic change (ci + ct ≧ 1 ∩ ah ≧ 1, n = 27) and control (n = 156). Preoperative characteristics, including age, sex, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), aortic calcification index (ACI), and psoas muscle index (PMI), were analyzed. Comparing the groups, the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly different; however, we observed a significant difference for ACI (p = 0.009). HbA1c (p = 0.016) and ACI (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors to predict pre-existing histopathological damages, whereas PMI was not. HbA1c correlated with ct scores (p = 0.035), and ACI correlated with ci (p = 0.005), ct (p = 0.021), and ah (p = 0.017). HbA1c and ACI may serve as preoperative markers for identifying pre-existing damages on the kidneys of living donors.

Optimizing Intraoperative Blood Pressure to Improve Outcomes in Living Donor Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Adequate renal perfusion at the time of unclamping is important because it has been known to affect outcomes in renal transplantation. Nevertheless, the ideal intraoperative systolic arterial pressure (SAP) has not been well defined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 106 living donor renal transplants performed at our center from June 2010 to May 2019. We divided the cohort into 2 groups according to our center's goal SAP of ≥150 mm Hg: 57 patients had SAP ≥150 mm Hg and 49 patients had SAP <150 mm Hg. We analyzed pretransplant characteristics, intraoperative measurements, and postoperative laboratory values to validate our center's target SAP at the time of reperfusion. This study strictly complied with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration regarding donor sources. RESULTS: Patients with SAP ≥150 mm Hg had been on dialysis for a significantly shorter duration before transplant compared with those who had SAP <150 mm Hg. In the SAP ≥150 mm Hg group, urinary sodium excretion normalized earlier, and they had a significantly smaller stroke volume variation, higher cardiac output and cardiac index, earlier initial urination, and higher intraoperative urine output. There were no differences in intraoperative volume repletion, central venous pressure, or postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSION: Achieving SAP ≥150 mm Hg at the time of reperfusion may be associated with early stabilization of graft function. Nevertheless, our data suggested that recipients with a prolonged dialysis history are less likely to achieve SAP ≥150 mm Hg at the time of unclamping in living donor renal transplantation.

Is the Living Donor Kidney Profile Index Valuable in Japanese Patients?

INTRODUCTION: The Living Kidney Donor Profile Index (LKDPI) was recently proposed in the United States to evaluate living donor quality. Japan has a largely different renal transplant circumstance, such as a high ABO incompatibility rate. The aim of this study was to validate the LKDPI among the Japanese population and adjust the score. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 133 living donors in renal transplant in our institution. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes, and created a modified LKDPI score considering the favorable ABO incompatible kidney transplant outcomes in Japan. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) donor age was 59 (51 to 65) and median (IQR) body mass index was 22.9 kg/m2 (20.9 to 25.2). ABO incompatibility rate was 28.5%. Median (IQR) donor estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) was 108.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (99.9 to 115.5). The 1-year graft survival rate was 98.5%, and the 3-year graft survival rate was 97%. The incidence of antibody mediated rejection was 5.2%. The median (IQR) LKDPI score was 30.2 (11.8 to 46.8). This was significantly higher than the previously reported score in the United States, which was 12.8 (-0.8 to 27.2). The modified LKDPI (mLKDPI) score was 23.2 (4.1 to 35.1). LKDPI and mLKDPI did not show a diagnostic value in graft survival; however, LKDPI and mLKDPI showed significant diagnostic value in eGFR at 1 year (area under the curve [AUC]=0.627, P = .017; and AUC=0.673, P = .01). CONCLUSION: Our outcomes had better survival even though with higher ABO incompatibility rate. According to original LKDPI, our donor pool is higher than the general US population. In this study, lower LKDPI tended to be associated with good allograft function, and mLKDPI has better diagnostic value than LKDPI. To compare internationally, an adjusted model for Japan might be necessary based on the outcomes of a large population.

Impact of Very Low-Dose Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole on Serum Creatinine after Renal Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that high-dose trimethoprim, through its effect of inhibiting creatinine secretion, increases serum creatinine levels without changes in real glomerular filtration rate. However, there has been no report regarding the effect of very low-dose trimethoprim on serum creatinine levels after renal transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 76 renal transplantation recipient outpatients who completed their course of initial prophylaxis at our institution. Twelve patients who experienced events that might affect their serum creatinine levels were excluded. Fifty-one patients who required readministration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to prevent a possible outbreak of pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and 13 patients who did not receive readministration (control) were analyzed. Dosage was 80 mg/400 mg (per tablet), administered as 3 tablets per week for 30.6 ± 13.5 days. This study strictly complied with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul. Declaration regarding donor source. RESULTS: All patients completed readministration without adverse events. Serum creatinine increased significantly in the readministration group (1.40 ± 0.64 mg/dL to 1.48 ± 0.70 mg/dL, P < .01) while not in the control group. The higher the initial serum creatinine level, the greater the increase of Δ serum creatinine (R = 0.59, P < .001). Sex, baseline urine protein level, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use, donor type, and time after renal transplantation did not affect Δ serum creatinine. Serum creatinine returned to baseline levels after cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Very low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis significantly raised serum creatinine reversibly by 6% after renal transplantation.