Estimands for atopic dermatitis clinical trials: Expert opinion on the importance of intercurrent events.

Despite the emergence of novel targeted treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD), there is a lack of guidelines on standardizing analysis of clinical trial data. To define and estimate meaningful treatment comparisons, several factors, including intercurrent events, must be taken into account. Intercurrent events are defined as events occurring after treatment initiation that affect either the interpretation or existence of the measurements associated with clinical questions of interest. Due to the relapsing, unpredictable nature of AD, intercurrent events frequently occur in AD trials, such as use of rescue therapy for intense itch and sleep deprivation. Despite the impact of intercurrent events in AD, they are often handled in an inconsistent manner across trials, which limits results interpretation. The estimand framework is increasingly used to estimate treatment effects while accounting for intercurrent events. This review explores how guidance from the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) on the use of estimands can be applied to support AD clinical trial design and analysis. We propose that estimands are used in AD trials and defined early during trial design. The use of estimands can provide clinicians with interventional trial results that are more reflective of clinical practice, help facilitate comparisons across clinical trials, and are more informative to enable improved treatment selection for patients.

Upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Stratified analysis from three randomized phase 3 trials by key baseline characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous inflammatory skin disease with different clinical phenotypes based on factors such as age, race, comorbidities, and clinical signs and symptoms. The effect of these factors on therapeutic responses in AD has only been scarcely studied and not for upadacitinib. Currently, there is no biomarker predicting response to upadacitinib. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib across patient subgroups (baseline demographics, disease characteristics and prior treatment) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: Data from phase 3 studies (Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2 and AD Up) were utilized for this post hoc analysis. Adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized to receive once daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg or placebo; patients enrolled in the AD Up study received concomitant topical corticosteroids. Data from the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 studies were integrated. RESULTS: A total of 2584 patients were randomized. A consistently greater proportion of patients achieved at least 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, a 0 or 1 on the validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis, and improvement in itch (including an achievement of a reduction of ≥4; and score of 0/1 in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale) with upadacitinib compared with placebo at Week 16, regardless of age, sex, race, body mass index, AD severity, body surface area involvement, history of atopic comorbidities or asthma, or previous exposure to systemic therapy or cyclosporin. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib had consistently high skin clearance rates and itch efficacy across subgroups of patients with moderate-to-severe AD through Week 16. These results support upadacitinib as a suitable treatment option in a variety of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03569293 (Measure Up 1), NCT03607422 (Measure Up 2) and NCT03568318 (AD Up).

Nemolizumab plus topical agents in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and moderate-to-severe pruritus provide improvement in pruritus and signs of AD for up to 68 weeks: results from two phase III, long-term studies.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)-31 affects the inflammatory response, is involved in epidermal barrier disruption in atopic dermatitis (AD) and plays a key role in pruritus. Nemolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against IL-31 receptor A, reduced pruritus in patients with AD after a 16-week administration period. OBJECTIVES: To examine the long-term effectiveness and safety of nemolizumab in patients aged ≥ 13 years with AD and inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe pruritus. METHODS: In two long-term phase III studies, nemolizumab 60 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) was administered subcutaneously, concomitantly with topical treatments. Study-JP01 patients received double-blind nemolizumab or placebo for 16 weeks, and then entered a 52-week extension period in which all patients received nemolizumab (nemolizumab/nemolizumab and placebo/nemolizumab groups). Study-JP02 patients received nemolizumab for 52 weeks. Both studies included an 8-week follow-up period. RESULTS: Study-JP01 nemolizumab/nemolizumab and placebo/nemolizumab, and Study-JP02 nemolizumab groups comprised 143, 72 and 88 patients, respectively. In the nemolizumab/nemolizumab group, there were clinically meaningful improvements from the start of treatment to week 68 in the pruritus visual analogue scale (66% decrease) and Eczema Area and Severity Index (78% decrease). Quality of life (QoL) indicators improved after the first nemolizumab dose; improvements were maintained during the follow-up period. The long-term safety profile was consistent with previous studies, with no unexpected late-onset adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Nemolizumab 60 mg Q4W with concomitant topical treatments in patients with AD and inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe pruritus produced a continuous improvement in pruritus, signs of AD, and QoL for up to 68 weeks, with a favourable safety profile.

Atopic dermatitis: pathomechanisms and lessons learned from novel systemic therapeutic options.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, heterogenous, inflammatory skin disorder associated with a high skin-related health burden, typically starting in childhood and often persisting into adulthood. AD is characterized by a wide range of clinical phenotypes, reflecting multiple underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and interactions between genetics, immune system dysregulation and environmental factors. In this review, we describe the diverse cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in AD, including the critical role of T-cell-driven inflammation, primarily via T helper (Th) 2- and Th17-derived cytokines, many of which are mediated by the Janus kinase (JAK) signaling pathway. These local inflammatory processes interact with sensory neuronal pathways, contributing to the clinical manifestations of AD, including itch, pain and sleep disturbance. The recent elucidation of the molecular pathways involved in AD has allowed treatment strategies to evolve from broad-acting systemic immunosuppressive therapies to more targeted agents, including JAK inhibitors and cytokine-specific biologic agents. Evidence from the clinical development of these targeted therapies has reinforced and expanded our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AD and holds promise for individualized treatment strategies tailored to specific AD subtypes.

Longitudinal association between polypharmacy and development of pruritus: a Nationwide Cohort Study in a Japanese Population.

BACKGROUND: Although polypharmacy is known to cause side-effects due to drug-drug interactions, dermatological symptoms triggered by polypharmacy are not fully addressed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether polypharmacy is associated with the risk of pruritus. METHOD: A cohort study was performed to examine cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between polypharmacy and pruritus in a general population. Data were collected from the Norm Study conducted in 2016 and 2017, which is a nationwide survey based on a self-administered questionnaire with Japanese representative participants aged 16-84 years. Presence of polypharmacy which was defined as concurrent use of ≥5 prescribed drugs. Primary outcomes were the presence of severe pruritus at baseline for the cross-sectional analysis and the development of severe pruritus after one year for the longitudinal analysis. Multivariable modified Poisson regression analyses were performed to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) with adjustment for potential confounders (age, gender, smoking habits, drinking habits, depressive symptoms, moderate activities based on IPAQ score and presence of 11 comorbid conditions including skin disease). RESULTS: The study included 3126 participants (mean age, 48.7 years); nearly half (49.8%) were male. In all, 332 participants (10.3%) had polypharmacy in the cross-sectional analysis. Participants with polypharmacy were more likely to present with severe pruritus at baseline than those who were not using drugs (adjusted RR = 1.52 [95%CI 1.15-2.01, P = 0.003]). The longitudinal analysis (n = 1803) was limited to those without severe pruritus at baseline; participants with polypharmacy at baseline were more likely to develop severe pruritus after a one-year follow-up period than those not using drugs (adjusted RR = 1.46 [95%CI 1.14-1.87, P = 0.002]). CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy was associated with the presence of pruritus at baseline and may predict the future risk of developing pruritus.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a subanalysis of three clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor unit for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13. International phase II and III studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), but the effects of dupilumab in Japanese patients have not been reported. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: We analysed the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the Japanese cohorts of a 16-week, phase IIb dose-finding trial (AD-1021; NCT01859988); a 16-week, phase III, placebo-controlled monotherapy trial (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1; NCT02277743) and a 52-week, phase III, placebo-controlled study of dupilumab with topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS; NCT02260986). RESULTS: Twenty-seven, 106 and 117 Japanese patients were enrolled in AD-1021, SOLO 1 and CHRONOS, respectively. Baseline disease severity was numerically higher in the Japanese cohort than in the overall study population. Generally, dupilumab significantly improved signs and symptoms of AD, including pruritus and patient quality of life, compared with placebo in the Japanese cohort, consistent with the overall study population. The combined safety profile of dupilumab in the Japanese cohort was similar to that in the total study populations; dupilumab was associated with an increased incidence of injection-site reactions and conjunctivitis compared with placebo. Dupilumab was associated with rapid reduction in thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and gradual IgE reductions. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab alone or with topical corticosteroids improved signs and symptoms of AD, had an acceptable safety profile, and suppressed biomarkers of type 2 inflammation compared with placebo in Japanese adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. What's already known about this topic? Differences in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathology have been reported between Asian and Western populations, in which distinct helper T-cell activation profiles have been observed. International clinical studies in adults with moderate-to-severe AD have evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab, which blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key molecules in type 2 inflammation. The effects of dupilumab in Japanese patients specifically have not yet been reported. What does this study add? Dupilumab alone or with topical corticosteroids improved signs and symptoms of AD and had an acceptable safety profile compared with placebo in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The effects were comparable with those observed in the overall study population. Reported immunological differences in AD pathology in Asian patients may be secondary to type 2 immune activation.

Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials.

BACKGROUND: Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor, effectively reduced atopic dermatitis (AD) severity in a phase II study with concomitant topical corticosteroids. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who had an inadequate response to topical therapies. METHODS: In two independent, multicentre, double-blind, phase III monotherapy trials, BREEZE-AD1 and BREEZE-AD2, adults with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized 2 : 1 : 1 : 1 to once-daily placebo, baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg for 16 weeks. RESULTS: At week 16, more patients achieved the primary end point of Validated Investigator's Global Assessment of AD (0, 1) on baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg compared with placebo in BREEZE-AD1 [N = 624; baricitinib 4 mg 16·8% (P < 0·001), 2 mg 11·4% (P < 0·05), 1 mg 11·8% (P < 0·05), placebo 4·8%], and BREEZE-AD2 [N = 615; baricitinib 4 mg 13·8% (P = 0·001), 2 mg 10·6% (P < 0·05), 1 mg 8·8% (P = 0·085), placebo 4·5%]. Improvement in itch was achieved as early as week 1 for 4 mg and week 2 for 2 mg. Improvements in night-time awakenings, skin pain and quality-of-life measures were observed by week 1 for both 4 mg and 2 mg (P ≤ 0·05, all comparisons). The most common adverse events in patients treated with baricitinib were nasopharyngitis and headache. No cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, gastrointestinal perforation, significant haematological changes, or death were observed with any baricitinib dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Baricitinib improved clinical signs and symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe AD within 16 weeks of treatment and induced rapid reduction of itch. The safety profile remained consistent with prior findings from baricitinib clinical development in AD, with no new safety concerns.

What's in a name? Atopic dermatitis or atopic eczema, but not eczema alone.

BACKGROUND: The ideal nomenclature of atopic dermatitis (AD) / atopic eczema (AE) has long been contested. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the disparate nomenclature of this disease may have important deleterious ramifications for clinical care and research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic questionnaire regarding the preferred nomenclature for AD was sent to councilors of the International Eczema Council (IEC) (n=77), an international group of clinicians and researchers with expertise in AD/AE. The survey consisted of 2 questions for consensus regarding the preference for an atopic prefix, and preference for the term AD or AE, and an exploratory question about the acceptability of the terms AD, AE or eczema. Consensus was defined a priori as at least 90% agreement for each question with a response rate of at least 90%. RESULTS: Seventy-one of 77 (92.2%) IEC councilors and associates responded to the survey, with all respondents completing the entire survey. Consensus was reached for question 1, with 69 of 71 respondents (97.2%) preferring the atopic prefix. However, consensus was not reached for question 2, with 40 respondents (58.0%) preferring the term AD and 30 (43,5%) preferring AE. Sixty-three respondents (88.7%) and 55 (77.5%) felt that the terms AD and AE were acceptable, whereas only 11 (15.5%) felt that eczema was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The IEC noted that the term eczema is imprecise, and its use is confusing. The consensus of the IEC was to recommend use of the prefix "atopic" (i.e., AD or AE) in all publications, presentations and discussions about the disorder.

Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-12/23, may potentially be effective for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of ustekinumab 45 mg and 90 mg in patients with severe AD. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study, Japanese patients (aged 20-65 years) with severe or very severe AD entered a 12-week double-blind treatment period during which they received (1 : 1 : 1) ustekinumab 45 mg, 90 mg or placebo subcutaneous injections at weeks 0 and 4, with follow-up until week 24. The primary efficacy end point was percentage change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at week 12. Major secondary efficacy end points included the proportion of patients achieving EASI 50, EASI 75, Investigator's Global Assessment score 0-1, change from baseline Atopic Dermatitis Itch Scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were randomized [ustekinumab 45 mg (n = 24), 90 mg (n = 28), placebo (n = 27)]. Ustekinumab treatment showed nonsignificant improvement in least square mean change from baseline EASI score at week 12 [45 mg: -38·2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -21·02-19·51; P < 0·94 and 90 mg: -39·8%, 95% CI -21·84-17·14; P < 0·81] vs. placebo (-37·5%). A nonsignificant improvement in major secondary efficacy end points was observed in both ustekinumab groups vs. placebo. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis and worsened AD (higher in placebo vs. ustekinumab groups). CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab 45 mg and 90 mg did not demonstrate meaningful efficacy in Japanese patients with severe AD. The treatment was generally well tolerated.

Three-dimensional evaluation of subclinical extension of extramammary Paget disease: visualization of the histological border and its comparison to the clinical border.

BACKGROUND: In extramammary Paget disease (EMPD), Paget cells are sometimes detected outside the clinical border (subclinical extension). However, the spreading pattern of Paget cells in subclinical extension remains unclear. In addition, the macroscopic appearances of lesions accompanied by subclinical extension are totally unknown. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the spreading pattern of Paget cells as well as the macroscopic appearance of lesions of EMPD with subclinical extension. METHODS: Nineteen patients with primary anogenital EMPD underwent mapping biopsies and excisional surgeries; biopsy samples were then taken at the periphery of well-demarcated lesions. Samples were transparentized and subjected to whole-mount immunostaining with anticytokeratin 7 antibody to label Paget cells. The histological border was evaluated in three dimensions by two-photon microscopy. The shape and location of the histological border were compared with those of the clinical border. RESULTS: In 21 samples taken at the lesion where subclinical extension was not shown by mapping biopsy, the shape and location of the histological border were almost identical to those of the clinical border. However, two samples exhibited small foci of Paget cells outside the clinical border, showing subclinically extended satellite lesions. In the two samples taken at the lesions where subclinical extension was shown by mapping biopsy, a continuous arrangement of Paget cells extending beyond the clinical border was identified. Subclinically extended Paget cells were detected solely outside hypopigmented patches with erythema. CONCLUSIONS: In EMPD, at least two patterns of subclinical extension exist: continuous and satellite lesions. Subclinical extension might exist preferentially outside hypopigmented patches with erythema.