Macrolides versus other antibiotics in pediatric scrub typhus: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: While Doxycycline is the recommended drug for treating scrub typhus, there is a growing trend of using Macrolides and Other antibiotics due to their perceived advantages. In this study, we compared the efficacy of Macrolides versus Other antibiotics in the treatment of pediatric scrub typhus. METHODS: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) application. Major databases were searched till 30th December 2022. Children of all age groups were included. Primary outcomes included mortality rate and time to defervescence (h). RESULTS: Of the 103 citations retrieved, 5 trials, including 383 children up to 15 years of age with probable and confirmed cases of scrub typhus, were included. None of the trials reported mortality rate. The pooled results from the trials found no significant difference between Azithromycin and Other antibiotics for any of the outcome measures. The certainty of evidence for the primary outcome was deemed to be of "very low certainty", while the certainty of evidence for the secondary outcomes ranged from "low to moderate certainty". CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis revealed that there was no significant difference between Azithromycin and Other antibiotics (such as Doxycycline and Chloramphenicol) in the treatment of scrub typhus in children. However, it's important to note that the evidence generated for the primary outcome was of "very low certainty". PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021276577.

Oral Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline in the Treatment of Children With Uncomplicated Scrub Typhus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of azithromycin versus doxycycline in treatment of children with uncomplicated scrub typhus in terms of percentage of children who attained remission of fever after 72 hours of administration of first dose of the study drug, mean time taken to attain fever defervescence, normalization of laboratory parameters, resolution of hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. DESIGN: Interventional, open-labeled randomized controlled trial. STUDY METHODS: Patients admitted with undifferentiated fever in the In-Patient Department (IPD), Department of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India, as per the inclusion criteria were randomized and was treated with azithromycin at 10 mg/kg/d in one group and doxycycline at 4.4 mg/kg/d for 5 days in the other group and was assessed based on the primary and secondary objectives. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the percentage of children who attained remission of fever after 72 hours of administration of azithromycin (98.2%) and doxycycline (96.5%) (P value 0.47) and the average time taken for fever defervescence (azithromycin: 24.53 hours; doxycycline: 25.82 hours; P value 0.36). The odds of attaining fever remission in the doxycycline group as compared with the azithromycin group was 1.01 (95% confidence interval -0.60 to -1.71), which was also statistically not significant. There was less incidence of adverse drug events in the azithromycin group (1.78%) as compared with the doxycycline group (8.6%), which was statistically significant (P value 0.02). CONCLUSION: Azithromycin is equally efficacious in terms of fever defervescence, resolution of clinical signs and laboratory parameters as doxycycline, is safer and better tolerated in children.