RESUMO
Introduction: The effective induction of angiogenesis is directly related to the success of bone-substitute materials (BSM) for maxillofacial osseous regeneration. Therefore, the addition of pro-angiogenic properties to a commercially available bovine bone-substitute material in combination with hyaluronic acid (BSM+) was compared to the same bone-substitute material without hyaluronic acid (BSM) in an in-vivo model. Materials and Methods: BSM+ and BSM were incubated for six days on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of fertilized chicken eggs. Microscopically, the number of vessels and branching points, the vessel area and vessel length were evaluated. Subsequently, the total vessel area and brightness integration were assessed after immunohistochemical staining (H&E, alphaSMA). Results: In the BSM+ group, a significantly higher number of vessels (p < 0.001), branching points (p = 0.001), total vessel area (p < 0.001) as well as vessel length (p = 0.001) were found in comparison to the BSM group without hyaluronic acid. Immunohistochemically, a significantly increased total vessel area (p < 0.001 for H&E, p = 0.037 for alphaSMA) and brightness integration (p = 0.047) for BSM+ in comparison to the native material were seen. Conclusions: The combination of a xenogenic bone-substitute material with hyaluronic acid significantly induced angiogenesis in vivo. This might lead to a faster integration and an improved healing in clinical situations.
RESUMO
Regular screening through white light inspection of the entire oral mucosa is the most important examination method to identify precancerous lesions and early oral carcinoma. Additionally, the physiologic autofluorescence of the oral mucosa has been described as a novel screening method for the detection of mucosal lesions that are not visible by white light. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the autofluorescence examination. Seventy-eight patients were examined in this study. All of them suffered from suspicious oral mucosal lesions. Two different investigation methods were applied: the standard examination by white light and an examination by a novel light source of 400 nm that evoked a green light emission (>500 nm) in normal mucosa. It was proposed that malignant oral mucosal lesions show different autofluorescence characteristics than the green autofluorescence of healthy mucosa. Red autofluorescence indicated SCC with a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 98%. The results showed that dysplasia and carcinoma could be identified with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 18% by using the autofluorescence method. The sensitivity decreased according to the grade of mucosal keratosis and was influenced by the localisation of the lesion. In conclusion, benign as well as malignant oral lesions could not be distinguished by a diminished autofluorescence signal. A red autofluorescence signal, however, could indicate cancerous processes of the oral mucosa.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Bucais/diagnóstico , Biópsia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Eritema/diagnóstico , Eritema/patologia , Eritroplasia/diagnóstico , Eritroplasia/patologia , Feminino , Fluorescência , Neoplasias Gengivais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gengivais/patologia , Humanos , Leucoplasia Oral/diagnóstico , Leucoplasia Oral/patologia , Líquen Plano Bucal/diagnóstico , Líquen Plano Bucal/patologia , Luz , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Bucal/patologia , Neoplasias Bucais/patologia , Úlceras Orais/diagnóstico , Úlceras Orais/patologia , Fotografação/métodos , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Método Simples-Cego , Estomatite/diagnóstico , Estomatite/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: CAD/CAM systems enable the production of fixed partial dentures with small and reproducible internal and marginal gaps. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the marginal and internal adaptations of four-unit fixed partial denture frameworks produced using four CAD/CAM systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prepared dies of a master model that simulated the loss of the first left molar were measured. Fifteen frameworks were manufactured using four CAD/CAM systems (A-D). The internal fit was determined by the replica technique, and the marginal gap was determined by microscopy. ANOVA was carried out to detect significant differences, and the Bonferroni adjustment was performed. The global level of significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The mean gap size ranged from 84 to 132 µm (SD 43-71 µm). The CAD/CAM systems showed significant variance (p < 0.001), and system A (VHF) showed the smallest gaps. The smallest gaps for each system were in the molar part and in the marginal region of the frameworks (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CAD/CAM systems showed significantly different gap sizes, particularly between premolars and molars and among the marginal, axial and occlusal regions. All of the systems are suitable for clinical application.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Ultrasonic scalpel (UC) and monopolar electrocautery (ME) are standard equipment for soft tissue surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative patterns of patients using either UC or ME for skin incisions in neck dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized study of 30 patients, the thermal effects of UC (n = 15) and ME (n = 15) were examined using real-time infrared thermographic imaging. Additionally, tissue damage was evaluated histopathologically. The other measured variables were operation and bleeding time, postoperative pain score (only neck incision area), in-patient time, and complications. RESULTS: UC significantly reduces the thermal effects, compared to ME (p < 0.001). The mean depth of tissue damage (i.e., necrosis) was 272.7 µm for UC and 284.7 µm for ME with no significant difference (p = 0.285). From the third postoperative day, patients treated using UC had noticeably less pain in the neck incision area (t3 p = 0.010; t4 p < 0.001; t5 p < 0.005). Cutting time was reduced for ME by 36.1 s (p < 0.001) and the bleeding time was decreased by 40.9 s for UC (p < 0.001). The total preparation time was the same (p = 0.402). When comparing in-patient time (p = 0.723), as well as complications, no significant differences were seen. CONCLUSION: UC results in less postoperative pain and less bleeding in the neck incision area. Accordingly, UC is superior to ME for skin incisions in neck dissection.