A Japanese multi-institutional phase II study of moderate hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with image-guided technique for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multi-institutional phase II study was to confirm the safety and the potential efficacy of moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with prostate-based image-guidance for Japanese patients. METHODS: Patients with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer were eligible. Patients with a part of high risk (having only one of the following factors, cT3a, 20 < PSA ≤ 30, or GS = 8 or 9) were also included. Hypofractionated IMRT using daily image-guided technique with prostate matching was performed with a total dose of 70 Gy in 28 fractions. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for 4-8 months was mandatory for patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. RESULTS: From 20 institutions, 134 patients enrolled. The median follow-up was 5.16 years (range, 1.43-6.47 years). The number of patients with low, intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer was 20, 80, and 34, respectively. The 5-year overall, biochemical failure-free, and clinical failure-free survival was 94.5%, 96.0%, and 99.2%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival for patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease was 94.1%, 97.4%, and 93.9%, respectively. The incidences of grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) late toxicities at 5 years were 5.3% and 5.3%, respectively. There are no acute or late toxicities ≥ grade 3. Of 124 patients who were followed for up to 5 years, the grade 2 late GU or GI toxicities were 10.5% (90% confidence intervals, 6.3-16.2%, p = 0.0958). CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of moderately hypofractionated IMRT with prostate-based image-guidance was confirmed among Japanese patients with prostate cancer.

Final analysis of a Multicenter Single-Arm Confirmatory Trial of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery in Japan: JCOG0906.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation for Asian women after breast-conserving surgery. This is an updated report with 5-year follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Asian women who had invasive breast cancer with clinical tumor size ≤3 cm, pN0-1c and negative inked margins were enrolled. Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation of 42.56 Gy/16 fractions was delivered, and boost irradiation of 10.64 Gy/4 fractions was added when the surgical margin was ≤5 mm. The primary endpoint was the proportion of grade ≥ 2 late adverse reactions within 3 years. Secondary endpoints included early adverse events, overall survival, disease-free survival, ipsilateral breast relapse-free survival, late adverse reactions and cosmetic outcome. Toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE ver3.0. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed using a 4-point scale and CTCAE ver3.0 for hyper/hypopigmentation, breast nipple/areolar deformity and breast volume/deformity. RESULTS: Between February 2010 and August 2012, 312 patients were enrolled, and 306 received hypofractionated whole breast irradiation. Median follow-up was 70.5 (range 7.6-88.9) months. The proportion of grade ≥ 2 late adverse reactions within 3 years was 4.3% (90% confidence interval 2.5-6.7%). Grade 2 early adverse events occurred in 38 (12.4%); none had grade 3/4. Five-year overall survival, disease-free survival and ipsilateral breast relapse-free survival were 98.7, 95.4 and 98.0%, respectively. Of the 304 evaluable patients, 29 (9.5%; 95% confidence interval 6.5-13.4%) had grade 2/3 late adverse reactions; none had grade 4/5. At 5 years, 70/289 (24.2%) showed any worsening of breast cosmetic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation is considered a standard treatment for Asian women with margin-negative invasive breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.

Optimizing antiemetic treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japan: Update summary of the 2015 Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis.

Patients with cancer should appropriately receive antiemetic therapies against chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Antiemetic guidelines play an important role in managing CINV. Accordingly, the first Japanese antiemetic guideline published in 2010 by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) has considerably aided Japanese medical staff in providing antiemetic therapies across chemotherapy clinics. With the yearly advancements in antiemetic therapies, the Japanese antiemetic guidelines require revisions according to published evidence regarding antiemetic management worldwide. A revised version of the first antiemetic guideline that considered several upcoming evidences had been published online in 2014 (version 1.2), in which several updated descriptions were included. The 2015 JSCO clinical practice guideline for antiemesis (version 2.0) (in Japanese) has addressed clinical antiemetic concerns and includes four major revisions regarding (1) changes in emetogenic risk categorization for anti-cancer agents, (2) olanzapine usage as an antiemetic drug, (3) the steroid-sparing method, and (4) adverse drug reactions of antiemetic agents. We herein present an English update summary for the 2015 JSCO clinical practice guideline for antiemesis (version 2.0).

A primary analysis of a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, confirmatory trial of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery in Japan: JCOG0906.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation in Japanese women after breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: Japanese women who had invasive breast cancer with a clinical tumor size ≤3 cm, pN0-1c and a negative inked margin were enrolled. Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (42.56 Gy/16 fractions) was delivered, adding boost irradiation (10.64 Gy/4 fractions) when the surgical margin was ≤5 mm. The treatment course was meant to be completed within 29 days or 33 days (plus boost irradiation). The primary endpoint was the proportion of grade ≥2 of pre-specified late adverse reactions, including telangiectasia, ulceration, fibrosis, fracture, pneumonitis, cardiac ischemia/infarction, pericardial effusion and breast pain, within 3 years. A sample size of 310 patients was set, with one-sided alpha of 0.05, beta of 0.1, threshold value of 8% and expected value of 4%. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of treatment completion within the recommended period and early adverse events within 90 days. Adverse events/adverse reactions were evaluated using CTCAE-3.0. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2012, 312 women were enrolled; 306 received hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, but 6 chose conventional fractionated WBI, with 301 patients (96.5%) treated within the recommended period. Grade 2 early adverse events were found in 38 patients (12.4%); none had grade 3/4. Among the 303 evaluable patients, 13 (4.3%; 90% CI 2.6-6.7) had grade 2/3 late adverse reactions, including one with grade 3 pneumonitis, which was under the threshold value. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation is considered to be safe and one of the standard treatments for Japanese women with margin-negative invasive breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.

Prospective study of postoperative whole breast radiotherapy for Japanese large-breasted women: a clinical and dosimetric comparisons between supine and prone positions and a dose measurement using a breast phantom.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to compare dose volume histograms (DVH) of the breasts and organs at risk (OARs) of whole breast radiotherapy in the supine and prone positions, and frequency and severity of acute and late toxicities were analyzed. METHODS: Early-stage breast cancer patients with large breasts (Japanese bra size C or larger, or the widest measurements of the bust ≥ 95 cm) undergoing partial mastectomy participated in this study. CT-based treatment plans were made in each position, and various dosimetric parameters for the breast and OARs were calculated to compare the supine and prone radiotherapy plans. The actual treatment was delivered in the position regarded as better. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2010, 22 patients were prospectively accrued. Median follow-up period was 58 months. The homogeneity index and lung doses were significantly lower in the prone position (P = 0.008, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Cardiac dose showed no significant differences between two positions. By comparing two plans, the prone position was chosen in 77 % of the patients. In the prone position, ≥ grade 2 acute dermatitis were seen in 47 % of patients treated, whereas 20 % of the patients treated in the supine position had grade 2 and no cases of grade 3, although without a statistical significance of the rates of ≥ grade 2 acute dermatitis between the two positions (P = 0.28). The actual dose measurement using a breast phantom revealed significantly higher surface dose of the breast treated in the prone position than that in the supine position. CONCLUSIONS: Breast irradiation in the prone position improves PTV homogeneity and lowers doses to the OARs in the Japanese large-breast patients. However meticulous positioning of the breast in the prone board avoiding the bolus effect is necessary to prevent acute dermatitis.

Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines 2010 for antiemesis in oncology: executive summary.

The purpose of this article is to disseminate the standard of antiemetic therapy for Japanese clinical oncologists. On the basis of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument, which reflects evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, a working group of the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) reviewed clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis and performed a systematic review of evidence-based domestic practice guidelines for antiemetic therapy in Japan. In addition, because health-insurance systems in Japan are different from those in other countries, a consensus was reached regarding standard treatments for chemotherapy that induce nausea and vomiting. Current evidence was collected by use of MEDLINE, from materials from meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and from European Society of Medical Oncology/Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer guidelines for antiemesis. Initially, 21 clinical questions (CQ) were selected on the basis of CQs from other guidelines. Patients treated with highly emetic agents should receive a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT3) receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist. For patients with moderate emetic risk, 5HT3 receptor antagonists and dexamethasone were recommended, whereas for those receiving chemotherapy with low emetic risk dexamethasone only is recommended. Patients receiving high-emetic-risk radiation therapy should also receive a 5HT3 receptor antagonist. In this paper the 2010 JSCO clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis are presented in English; they reveal high concordance of Japanese medical circumstances with other antiemetic guidelines that are similarly based on evidence.

Definitive radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update and perspectives on the basis of EBM.

Radiotherapy plays an essential role in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiotherapy has a distinct advantage over surgical procedures in that it could achieve organ and function preservation with an efficacy similar to that of surgical series. To improve the clinical outcomes achievable by radiotherapy, altered fractionated radiotherapy has been prospectively tested for early and intermediate risk diseases, and was previously shown to be beneficial for local control and survival. Radiotherapy alone is insufficient for locally advanced disease; therefore, concurrent chemoradiotherapy is typically performed and plays an important role. A meta-analysis (Level Ia) revealed that the concurrent use of platinum agents appeared to improve tumor control and survival; however, this was accompanied by increases in the rates of both acute and late toxicities. Regarding radiation techniques, intensity modulated radiotherapy evolved in the 1990s, and has been globally used to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Intensity modulated radiotherapy reduces the exposure of normal tissue to radiation while preserving excellent dose coverage to the target volume; therefore, the rate of late toxicities especially xerostomia is minimized. Small size randomized studies and a meta-analysis have provided evidence to support the benefits of intensity modulated radiotherapy over two-dimensional or three-dimensional radiation therapy. Intensity modulated radiotherapy can also preserve quality of life following definitive chemoradiotherapy. Further improvements using intensity modulated proton therapy are warranted.

[The survey for anti-emetic guideline by using questioner].

BACKGROUND: Japan Society of Clinical Oncology published a guideline for anti-emetic therapy two years ago. This guideline was a first evidence based guideline of anti-emetic treatment for the patients who received chemotherapy in Japan. To investigate a current situation of anti-emetic treatment in Japan, we analyzed the data from nationwide questionnaire. MATERIAL: Questionnaire analysis; From June 2012 to August 2012, we gave 24 questionnaires on the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Website and collected the response from the member of 5 major academic oncology societies. The questionnaires included degree of recognition, penetration, usefulness, problems and user type of medial stuff for the anti-emetic guideline published by (JSCO). RESULTS: Questionnaire; 1,529 medical stuff responded to our questionnaire. 1,308 (85.5%) stuffs recognized JSCO guidelines, 586 (51%) had regard for guideline and 489 (42.6%) referred to the guideline. 899 (78.3%) changed their practice in clinic to recommended practice by the guideline. But 385 (33.5%) complained high medical cost of recommended anti-emetic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Degree of recognition and penetration of our guideline for anti-emetic therapy were very high in Japan.

Locoregional recurrence risk factors in breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes and the impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after mastectomy reduces the patient's quality of life and survival. There is a consensus that postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) helps establish locoregional control and reduces LRR in patients with ≥4 metastatic nodes. However, in patients with 1-3 metastatic nodes, the incidence of LRR and the role of PMRT have been the subject of substantial controversy. This study assessed the risk factors for LRR and the efficacy of PMRT in Japanese breast cancer patients with metastatic nodes. METHODS: This study analyzed 789 cases of invasive breast carcinoma with metastatic nodes from 1998 to 2008. We divided the study population into 4 groups: 1-3 positive nodes with/without chemotherapy and ≥4 positive nodes with/without chemotherapy. Risk factors for LRR were identified and the relationship between LRR and PMRT was analyzed. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 59.6 months, 61 (7.7%) patients experienced LRR. In patients who received chemotherapy, independent LRR risk factors were high nuclear grade, severe lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, and progesterone receptor-negative status in patients with 1-3 positive nodes, and severe lymphatic invasion and estrogen receptor-negative status in patients with ≥4 nodes. Although patients treated with PMRT had good outcomes, there was no significant difference, and PMRT did not significantly improve the outcome of the patients with all risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: With systemic therapy and adequate dissection, PMRT by itself was of limited value in establishing locoregional control. The indication for PMRT in patients with 1-3 positive nodes remains controversial.

Analysis of applicator displacement in accelerated partial breast irradiation using a strut-based design brachytherapy applicator.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors associated with strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) displacement in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using a SAVI device. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed computed tomography scans taken at the time of treatment planning and immediately before treatment in 61 patients (median age; 55 years, range; 40-85) treated with SAVI and determined the amount of SAVI displacement that occurred between the time from planning to the treatment. The displacement was calculated for the CT axis and SAVI axis, which is related to the SAVI structure. To investigate the cause of the displacement, multivariate analysis was performed on the calculated standard deviation and the insertion angle of SAVI with respect to the sternum in each cross-section, breast density, amount of air around the SAVI, and SAVI length inside the patient to obtain the ß coefficient (p-value). RESULTS: On the CT coordinate system, positive correlations were observed between the SAVI insertion angle and air volume in the lateral (ß coefficient:0.255-0.483) and rotational directions (ß coefficient:0.341). On the SAVI coordinate system, positive correlations were observed between the SAVI insertion angle and air volume in all lateral (ß coefficient:0.270-0.354) and rotational directions (ß coefficient:0.294). A negative correlation was observed between the SAVI length inside the patient and the rotational direction (ß coefficient: -0.262). CONCLUSION: SAVI insertion angle, the amount of the air outside SAVI and SAVI insertion length are factors which affect the displacement of the applicator. From the results, the applicator displacement and rotation must be <3 mm and 10o in order to meet all the dose criteria. Thus, we should be aware of these factors during insertion of the device to avoid the problem in treatment delivery for the APBI.

Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Accelerated Radiation Therapy Versus Standard Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Cancer (JCOG0701A3).

PURPOSE: We previously reported the primary results of JCOG0701, a randomized, multicenter, phase 3, noninferiority trial comparing accelerated fractionation (Ax) to standard fractionation (SF) for early glottic cancer. In the primary results, although the similar efficacy of 3-year progression-free survival and toxicity of Ax compared with SF was observed, the noninferiority of Ax was not confirmed statistically. To evaluate the long-term follow-up results of JCOG0701, we conducted JCOG0701A3 as an ancillary study of JCOG0701. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In JCOG0701, 370 patients were randomly assigned to receive SF of 66 to 70 Gy (33-35 fractions; n = 184) or Ax of 60 to 64.8 Gy (25-27 fractions; n = 186). The data cutoff date for this analysis was in June 2020. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and late adverse events including central nervous system ischemia were analyzed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up period of 7.1 years (range, 0.1-12.4), progression-free survival of the SF and Ax arms were 76.2% and 78.2% at 5 years and 72.7% and 74.8% at 7 years (P = .44). OS of the SF and Ax arms were 92.7% and 89.6% at 5 years and 90.8% and 86.5% at 7 years (P = .92). Among 366 patients with a protocol treatment, the cumulative incidence of late adverse events of the SF and Ax arms were 11.9% and 7.4% at 8 years (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-1.01; P = .06). Central nervous system ischemia of grade 2 or higher was observed in 4.1% for the SF arm and 1.1% for the Ax arm (P = .098). CONCLUSIONS: After long-term follow-up, Ax showed comparable efficacy to SF and a tendency for better safety. Ax may be suitable for early glottic cancer because of its convenience in minimizing treatment time, cost, and labor.

Comparison of outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma associated with follicular lymphoma, or de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) associated with follicular lymphoma (FL), which includes DLBCL with pre- or co-existing FL, remains controversial, and few previous reports have compared the outcomes after allo-HCT for FL, DLBCL associated with FL, and de novo DLBCL. We retrospectively analyzed 97 consecutive patients with FL (n = 46), DLBCL associated with FL (n = 22), or de novo DLBCL (n = 29) who received allo-HCT at our institute between 2000 and 2010. With a median follow-up of 53 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were, respectively, 77% and 70% for FL, 62% and 57% for DLBCL associated with FL, and 26% and 23% for de novo DLBCL. The 5-year cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality and disease progression/relapse were, respectively, 16% and 15% for FL, 19% and 24% for DLBCL associated with FL, and 36% and 41% for de novo DLBCL. By a multivariate analysis, the OS and PFS for DLBCL associated with FL were significantly better than those for de novo DLBCL, whereas they were not significantly different from those for FL. These results suggest that allo-HCT may be a promising option for patients with not only advanced FL but also DLBCL associated with FL.

A multicenter investigation of late adverse events in Japanese women treated with breast-conserving surgery plus conventional fractionated whole-breast radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate late adverse events in Japanese women treated with breast-conserving surgery plus conventional fractionated radiation therapy in 24 hospitals. METHODS: This is a prospective investigation into patients who have been followed for 3 years or more after the completion of radiation therapy. The women visited hospitals for routine medical follow-up between 1 March and 31 May 2008. All patients underwent interviews and visual/palpating examinations. Their clinical chart, past chest X-rays and laboratory findings were reviewed. Evaluation criteria for late adverse events and breast cosmetic outcome were based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3 and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Global Cosmetic Rating System. RESULTS: Seven hundred and three women, including 448 treated with whole-breast irradiation and 255 treated with whole-breast and boost irradiation, were examined by radiation oncologists in 24 hospitals. The frequent adverse events were breast pain (Grade 1, 115; Grade 2, 2), breast fibrosis (Grade 1, 72; Grade 2, 8), chest wall pain (Grade 1, 67; Grade 2, 3), telangiectasia (Grade 1, 29; Grade 2, 5) and pneumonitis (Grade 1, 20; Grade 2, 6; Grade 3, 3). Adverse events of Grade 2 or 3 were found in 27 patients (3.8%); 3 presented with radiation pneumonitis of Grade 3. The percentage of patients with an excellent or good cosmetic outcome was 69.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In the first multicenter investigation for Japanese women after breast-conserving therapy, the evaluation of late adverse events and breast cosmetic outcome was similar to several other reports from clinical trials in North America and Europe.

Patterns of practice in intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of treatment techniques including intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-guided radiation therapy in external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer in Japan. METHODS: A national survey on the current status of external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer was performed in 2010. We sent questionnaires to 139 major radiotherapy facilities in Japan, of which 115 (82.7%) were returned. RESULTS: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was conducted at 67 facilities (58.3%), while image-guided radiation therapy was conducted at 70 facilities (60.9%). Simulations and treatments were performed in the supine position at most facilities. In two-thirds of the facilities, a filling bladder was requested. Approximately 80% of the facilities inserted a tube or encouraged defecation when the rectum was dilated. Some kind of fixation method was used at 102 facilities (88.7%). Magnetic resonance imaging was routinely performed for treatment planning at 32 facilities (27.8%). The median total dose was 76 Gy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and 70 Gy with three-dimensional radiation therapy. The doses were prescribed at the isocenter at the facilities that conducted three-dimensional radiation therapy. In contrast, the dose prescription varied at the facilities that conducted intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Of the 70 facilities that could perform image-guided radiation therapy, 33 (47.1%) conducted bone matching, 28 (40.0%) conducted prostate matching and 9 (12.9%) used metal markers. Prostate or metal marker matching tended to produce a smaller margin than bone matching. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey identified current patterns in the treatment planning and delivery processes of external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer in Japan.

Evaluation of breast cosmetic changes with a computer-software; the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT. core) in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery-supplementary analysis of multicenter single-arm confirmatory trial: JCOG0906.

BACKGROUND: A good cosmetic outcome has been defined as an important endpoint in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Various evaluation methods have been studied, but the optimal method has yet to be identified. The present supplementary analysis of JCOG0906 focused on comparing evaluation methods for breast cosmetic outcomes following hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HFWBI) to examine whether a computer-software (the Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment cosmetic results [BCCT. core])-based program evaluation (CE) can be used for Asian women in clinical trials of BCT. METHODS: Of 306 women, 292 underwent institutional evaluation (IE) for breast cosmetic outcomes before (pre) and 3 years after (post) HFWBI using a 4-point scale (excellent/good/fair/poor), and they were evaluated by CE and a central panel evaluation (PE) on the same scale using 292 pairs of pre/post-HFWBI photographs. PE was performed twice by consensus of the same two experts with a 3-year interval. CE was assessed individually by two radiation oncologists, an expert and a non-expert. Intra-observer variability and inter-observer variability were calculated using the kappa (k) and weighted kappa (wk) statistics. RESULTS: The agreement between the first and second PE using pre/post-HFWBI photographs was moderate (k = 0.60, wk = 0.64. k = 0.53, wk = 0.60). The agreement between the expert and non-expert on CE was substantial (k = 0.72, wk = 0.76. k = 0.72, wk = 0.77). The inter-observer variability of CE was smaller than the intra-observer variability of PE. CONCLUSION: CE with BCCT. core was considered a reproducible and an appropriate evaluation method for Asian women in clinical trials of BCT, when breast cosmetic changes were compared between pre/post therapy.

A long-term follow-up study of prospective 80%-dose CHOP followed by involved-field radiotherapy in elderly lymphoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the long-term clinical outcome of elderly patients with localized aggressive lymphoma and to explore appropriate treatment strategies for this population. METHODS: Subjects of this multicenter prospective study were untreated patients aged ≥70 years with aggressive Stage IA-IIA lymphoma. Therapy with 80%-dose CHOP (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.1 mg/m(2) and prednisolone 80 mg/day for 5 days) was repeated every 3 weeks. After three cycles of chemotherapy, involved-field radiotherapy was performed with 30-50 Gy in 15-28 fractions. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (median age, 75 years; range, 70-84 years) were enrolled. Nineteen patients (79%) had non-bulky tumors <6 cm. The median follow-up period was 7.3 years. The 7-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 78.9% (95% confidence interval, 62.3-95.5) and 65.3% (95% confidence interval, 45.3-85.3), respectively. Six patients developed systemic relapse, two of them after 6 years. The median survival time after relapse was only 5 months (range, 2 weeks-5.2 years). Five patients developed second malignancies, and three other patients died from other causes without lymphoma progression. None of the patients developed local relapse within the radiation field and/or regional relapse in adjacent lymph node areas. CONCLUSIONS: Although systemic relapses, short survival time after relapse and death from other causes occurred, no loco-regional relapses were observed. Less intensive radiotherapy such as low-dose and small field might not compromise the treatment outcome for this population.

Prognostic Value of Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecules in T1-2N0M0 Glottic Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This is an ancillary study of a multi-institutional randomized non-inferiority phase III trial of accelerated fractionation (AF) versus standard fractionation (SF) radiation therapy for T1-2N0M0 glottic cancer (JCOG0701). Biopsy specimens of tumors from the patients enrolled in the JCOG0701 are collected and the association between clinical outcomes and histopathologic features such as expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), p53, and p16 were investigated. METHODS: Five slices of undyed slides from biopsy specimens were sent to the National Cancer Center Hospital and all the specimens were assessed for the expression of EpCAM, p53, and p16. The primary objective was to investigate the association between 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and expression of EpCAM, p53, and p16. RESULTS: A total of 88 out of 370 patients were enrolled in this ancillary study. The 3-year PFS for tumors with strong expression of EpCAM was 70.6% (95% CI 43.1%-86.6%), while that of tumors without strong expression of EpCAM was 77.5% (95% CI 65.9%-85.5%) with no remarkable difference between groups (P = .67). Likewise, there was no significant difference in 3-year PFS between tumors regardless of p53 or p16 status. However, in a subgroup analysis for 17 patients with a strong expression of EpCAM, AF showed better 3-year PFS than SF (100% vs 54.5%, P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: From the current study, it could not be concluded that EpCAM, p16, and p53 were prognostic factors for early-stage glottic cancer after primary radiation therapy. AF might be an appropriate fractionation for tumors with a strong expression of EpCAM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:1522-1527, 2021.

A phase I trial of 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin and concurrent standard-dose radiotherapy in Japanese patients with stage II/III esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In Japan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5, 8-12, 36-40 and 43-46 with cisplatin (CDDP) 40 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, 36 and 43 plus concurrent radiotherapy with 2 weeks planned interruption (60 Gy) was standard for the patients with esophageal cancer. This Phase I trial was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of 5-FU on Days 1-4 and 29-32 with CDDP on Days 1 and 29 plus concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) among the Japanese. METHODS: Escalating doses of 5-FU and CDDP were administered with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy). Treatment was continued until DLT appeared. RESULTS: Twelve patients with previously untreated clinical Stage II/III squamous cell esophageal carcinoma were studied. One of six patients given Level 1 (5-FU 800 mg/m(2) on Days 1-4 and 29-32 with CDDP 75 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 29) developed a DLT of incomplete protocol treatment due to Grade 3 esophagitis. The MTD was not reached at Level 2 (5-FU 1000 mg/m(2) with CDDP 75 mg/m(2)). The complete response rate was 67% at Level 1 and 100% at Level 2. CONCLUSIONS: Dose Level 2 with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy was recommended for Japanese patients.

A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708).

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin in patients with Stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The primary endpoint was proportion of complete response (%CR). METHODS: Patients with Stage I (T1N0M0) ESCC, aged 20-75 years, without indication of endoscopic mucosal resection were eligible. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) (day 1) and 5-FU 700 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-4) combined with 30 Gy radiotherapy (2 Gy/day, 5 days/week, days 1-21). The cycle was repeated twice with 1-week split. Salvage surgery was recommended for residual tumor or local recurrence. RESULTS: From December 1997 to June 2000, 72 patients were enrolled. No ineligible patient or major protocol violation was observed. There were 63 CRs for %CR of 87.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 77.6-94.1]. Six patients with residual tumor successfully underwent esophagectomy. There was no Grade 4 toxicity. Four-year survival proportion was 80.5% (95% CI: 71.3-89.7), and 4-year major relapse-free survival proportion was 68% (95% CI: 57.3-78.8) (mucosal recurrence removed by endoscopy was not counted as an event). CONCLUSIONS: High CR proportion and survival proportion with mild toxicity suggest that this regimen could be considered as a candidate of new standard treatment to be compared with surgery in patients with Stage I ESCC.

Quality assurance in the prospective multi-institutional trial on definitive radiotherapy using high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: the individual case review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with the radiotherapy protocol of a multi-institutional prospective study (JAROG0401/JROSG04-2), which investigated the efficacy and toxicity of definitive radiotherapy using high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) for early-stage uterine cervical cancer patients. METHODS: Individual case reviews (ICRs) were performed on all 60 study participants. Radiotherapy data were submitted to the quality assurance (QA) committee, which performed ICRs on 16 QA items according to previously selected criteria. The items focused on quality of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), HDR-ICBT and both. Each item was determined to be either acceptable or a deviation. The QA committee performed ICR three times as planned, two during the patient accrual and the final one just after the final patient accrued. The QA results of the first and second reviews were reported back to the investigators after each ICR. RESULTS: In 40 cases (67%), all 16 QA items were classified as acceptable. One deviation was found in 16 cases, two deviations were identified in 3 cases and three deviations were noted in 1 case. The most frequently observed deviation was missing the rules for determining point A (10 cases). The items described by quantitative values, such as prescribed doses, certain time intervals and overall treatment time, were well followed. The proportion of deviations gradually decreased during the ICR process. CONCLUSIONS: The present ICR demonstrated the favorable radiotherapy compliance with the JAROG0401/JROSG04-2 protocol. The QA process using ICRs can potentially be used to improve the quality of radiotherapy, including HDR-ICBT in the multi-institutional prospective studies for cervical cancer.