RESUMO
Blastobotrys is a genus of rare yeast that is increasingly recognized as a cause of fungal infections in humans. However, there have been no reports of fungal infections in humans caused by Blastobotrys mokoenaii. We describe a case of invasive fungal infection (IFI) caused by B. mokoenaii in an immunocompromised patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A 46-year-old man with relapsed/refractory AML underwent a second allogeneic peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-PBSCT) during remission. The patient had prolonged neutropenia and received systemic steroid therapy for graft-versus-host disease before the second allo-PBSCT. Uncommon yeast was isolated from the blood cultures obtained on day 4. We initially suspected that the uncommon yeast was Trichosporon spp. based on its morphology. However, unlike Trichosporon spp., in vitro antifungal susceptibility tests showed that this yeast isolate was resistant to micafungin, caspofungin, voriconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole. We performed DNA sequencing and identified it as B. mokoenaii. B. mokoenaii was persistently isolated from blood cultures taken during combination therapy with liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole. The patient died of multiorgan failure on day 24. B. mokoenaii can cause severe IFI in immunocompromised patients; however, it may not be correctly identified by routine clinical microbiology testing in a hospital laboratory and DNA sequencing is useful for diagnosis.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is an important complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and while there are case reports and epidemiological studies, few studies have isolated Aspergillus strains from patients. Therefore, we analyzed the strains, sensitivities, and genetic homology of Aspergillus spp. Isolated from patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We investigated the Aspergillus strains detected from patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital from December 2020 to June 2021. A molecular epidemiological analysis of Aspergillus spp. was performed using drug susceptibility tests and TRESPERG typing, and data on patient characteristics were collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Twelve strains of Aspergillus were detected in 11 of the 122 patients (9%) with COVID-19. A. fumigatus was the most common species detected, followed by one strain each of Aspergillus aureolus, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus terreus. A. aureolus was resistant to voriconazole, and no resistance was found in other strains. All A. fumigatus strains were genetically distinct strains. Six of the 11 patients that harbored Aspergillus received antifungal drug treatment and tested positive for ß-D-glucan and/or Aspergillus galactomannan antigen. The results indicated that Aspergillus infections were acquired from outside the hospital and not from nosocomial infections. CONCLUSION: Strict surveillance of Aspergillus spp. is beneficial in patients at high-risk for IPA. When Aspergillus is detected, it is important to monitor the onset of IPA carefully and identify the strain, perform drug sensitivity tests, and facilitate early administration of therapeutic agents to patients with IPA.
Assuntos
Aspergilose , COVID-19 , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva , Humanos , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Aspergillus/genética , Aspergilose/tratamento farmacológico , Voriconazol/uso terapêutico , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
Mycobacterium virginiense, a species of the Mycobacterium terrae complex, was first identified in 2016. Although M. virginiense has only been reported to cause tenosynovitis, there have been only a few reports. Moreover, there is no established standard treatment, and no cases of M. virginiense infection have been reported in Japan. A 70-year-old Japanese man with a history of hand injury and wound contamination was diagnosed with synovitis and tenosynovitis of the left flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus muscles. M. virginiense was detected in perisynovial reservoirs and surgically removed synovium and was identified by hsp65 and rpoB sequencing. Postoperative chemotherapy with clarithromycin, rifabutin, and ethambutol was administered. Infection with M. virginiense can occur in patients with synovitis and tenosynovitis who have experienced injury or wound contamination, requiring surgery and long-term treatment with multiple antibiotics.
Assuntos
Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas , Sinovite , Tenossinovite , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Tenossinovite/etiologia , Tenossinovite/microbiologia , Japão , Músculos , Sinovite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinovite/complicações , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/etiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Genetic testing is gaining increasing importance as a part of antimicrobial stewardship (AS). Rapid identification and determination of methicillin susceptibility using the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay can improve the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) and reduce inappropriate antibiotic use. However, few reports have described the effectiveness of this approach. METHODS: The present study aimed to assess the influence of AS using the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay. Cases were classified into the pre-intervention group (n = 98 patients), in which SAB was identified by traditional culture (November 2017 to November 2019), and the post-intervention group (n = 97 patients), in which the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay was performed when necessary (December 2019 to December 2021). RESULTS: Patient characteristics, prognosis, duration of antimicrobial use, and length of hospital stay were compared between the groups. The Xpert assay was performed in 66 patients in the post-intervention group (68.0%). The two groups showed no significant differences in severity and mortality. The rate of cases treated with anti-MRSA agents reduced following the intervention (65.3% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.008). The number of cases involving definitive therapy within 24 h was higher in the post-intervention group (9.2% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.007). The hospitalization rate at >60 days was lower in Xpert implementation cases among MRSA bacteremia cases (28.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay has potential as an AS tool, especially for early definitive treatment to SAB and reduction of long-term hospitalization in MRSA bacteremia cases.
Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Japão , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Factors involved in the susceptibility of third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) to bacteremia caused by Citrobacter freundii complex, Enterobacter cloacae complex, and Klebsiella aerogenes were investigated based on a case-case-control design. Antimicrobial therapy administered 30 days prior to bacteremia and hospitalization within 90 days were common risk factors for the 3GC susceptible and 3GC non-susceptible groups, while hospitalization from an institution or another hospital was a specific risk factor for the 3GC non-susceptible group. We also attempted to examine the factors affecting the clinical outcome of bacteremia. Hospitalization more than 14 days before the onset of bacteremia was an independent factor indicating poor clinical outcome. In contrast, the implementation of source control was an independent predictor of successful treatment. Although a longer hospital stay before the onset of bacteremia was associated with worse clinical outcomes, implementation of source control may have contributed to improved treatment outcomes for bacteremia.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Cefalosporinas , Citrobacter freundii , Enterobacter cloacae , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , Humanos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Enterobacter cloacae/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Citrobacter freundii/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enterobacter aerogenes/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacter aerogenes/isolamento & purificação , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , AdultoRESUMO
Objective Third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) may be susceptible in vitro to Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes. However, treatment with mainly fourth-generation cephalosporins or carbapenems is currently recommended. Diversification of antimicrobial agents in therapy is required to avoid the selection pressure of resistant organisms by broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. This study investigated the clinical efficacy of 3GC therapy for Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes bacteremia in a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Methods Patients with Enterobacter spp. or Klebsiella aerogenes detected in blood cultures and treated with a susceptible antimicrobial agent were included in the study. Propensity score matching was performed to align patient background bases, and clinical outcomes between the 3GC and non-3GC groups were compared. Treatment success was defined as having no need for treatment escalation or the addition of other antimicrobial agents, no recurrence, or no death within 30 days. Results The study included 188 cases, of which 57 and 131 were included in the 3GC and non-3GC treatment groups, respectively; 53 patients in each group were matched by propensity score matching. There were no significant differences between groups in rates of switching to a susceptible antimicrobial or adding another agent, relapse within 30 days, or death within 30 days. In the 3GC group, source control was associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Conclusion Definitive 3GC therapy for susceptible Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes bacteremia is as clinically effective and valuable a targeted therapy as non-3GC therapy and can be implemented under conditions in which infection source control measures are in place.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Enterobacter aerogenes , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Enterobacter , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , beta-LactamasesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumomediastinum is characterized by the presence of interstitial air in the mediastinum without any underlying disease. Some cases of spontaneous pneumomediastinum have been reported in the past, although only few reports are available, and its management remains uncertain. This study reviewed our experience in the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous pneumomediastinum. METHODS: A retrospective study of 71 cases treated for spontaneous pneumomediastinum at the Yodogawa Christian Hospital between April 2005 and March 2020 was conducted. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 19.3 years (range, 7-48 years). A triggering event was noted in 69% of the cases. Seventy-six percent of the patients were admitted to the hospital, and 24% were outpatients. Treatment included analgesia, rest, antibiotics, and/or oxygen therapy. Thirty-six patients (51%) were treated with antibiotics. None of the cases presented any complications, including mediastinitis or worsening respiratory condition. Two patients (3%) had a recurrence of spontaneous pneumomediastinum. CONCLUSIONS: All the patients, with or without antimicrobial treatment and hospitalization, had favorable outcomes. We should therefore reconsider the need for hospitalization and antimicrobial therapy for patients with mediastinitis prophylaxis.