RESUMO
Postoperative femoral nerve palsy (FNP) is a rare complication associated with urologic surgery. Inappropriate use of retractors, use of lithotomy position, and prolonged surgery that lead to the femoral nerve compression have been reported as risk factors for FNP. Here, we report two cases of FNP after pelvic surgery. Case 1: A 47-year-old woman underwent ureterocystoneostomy for a giant ureterocele. On the first postoperative day, she developed muscle weakness and paresthesia in the left lower leg. An orthopedic surgeon diagnosed her with FNP associated with the surgery. Case 2: An 82-year-old woman underwent radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. On the second postoperative day, she developed extension deficit in the left lower leg and was diagnosed with an iatrogenic FNP. Although this complication is infrequent, at onset, it leads to difficulty in walking and gait disturbance in the patient. As a result, it greatly reduces the patient's postoperative quality of life. Therefore, preventive measures should be taken to reduce the risk of this postsurgical nerve injury, such as appropriate placement of retractors and proper patient positioning during the operation.
Assuntos
Nervo Femoral , Neuropatia Femoral , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Nervo Femoral/lesões , Qualidade de Vida , Neuropatia Femoral/etiologia , Pelve , Paralisia/complicaçõesRESUMO
It remains unknown whether the early response to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) management in malignancies links to long-term survival. The objective of this study was to investigate the survival rates and predictive factors of early response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) managed by VEGFR-TKIs. From Jan. 2008 to Oct. 2018, 496 patients were treated with VEGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment at the eight Japanese hospitals (Michinoku RCC). Early cessation was defined as VEGFR-TKIs being given up within 3 months after their initiation. The number of patients in early cessation VEGFR-TKIs (Cohort I) was 173 (34.9%), and in long-term use (Cohort II) was 323 (65.1%). The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were better in Cohort II. IMDC Poor-risk was at risk of early cessation of a first-line VEGFR-TKI. Axitinib was the most preferred drug for long-term treatment. On closer examination, both Cohort I and II were divided into two groups, the patients ceased VEGFR-TKI due to adverse events (Group A [67 from Cohort I] and Group C [51 from Cohort II]) and disease progression (Group B [106 from Cohort I] and Group D [272 from Cohort II]). Despite that the cessation was adverse events, CSS and OS in Group A were worse than both Group C and D. Axitinib was administered with the safer profile. IMDC Poor risk was the risk factor for the early disease progression. Managing early adverse events may contribute to a better prognosis in mRCC patients treated VEGFR-TKIs.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Axitinibe/efeitos adversos , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
Although combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (immuno-oncology [IO]) therapy is the first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), it mostly causes resistance and tumor regrowth. Therefore, an optimal second-line therapy is necessary. Such therapy typically comprises vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of two TKIs-axitinib and sunitinib-in mRCC patients. From January 2008 to October 2018, we registered 703 mRCC patients from 8 Japanese institutes. Of these, 408 patients received axitinib or sunitinib as the first-line treatment. Thereafter, efficacy and survival rate were compared between the axitinib and sunitinib groups. To reduce the effects of selection bias and potential confounders, propensity score matching analysis was performed. Axitinib and sunitinib were administered in 274 and 134 patients, respectively. More than 25% of the patients received nivolumab sequence therapy. To calculate the propensity scores for each patient, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis. The objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), cause-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the axitinib group than in the sunitinib group. Furthermore, the OS was better in the nivolumab-treated patients in the axitinib group. Axitinib showed higher efficacy and afforded greater survival benefits than did sunitinib when administered as first-line therapy in mRCC patients. Thus, from among VEGFR-TKIs, axitinib might be a possible option for application in the middle of IO drug-based treatment sequences.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Axitinibe/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Sunitinibe/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Axitinibe/farmacologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Sunitinibe/farmacologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The use of elastography is limited for prostate cancer detection because of the difficulty in obtaining stable and reproducible images. To overcome these limitations, we developed a new technique called real-time balloon inflation elastography (RBIE); with RBIE, balloon inflation and deflation are used in place of manual compression. We present the accuracy and feasibility of the RBIE technique for detecting prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of a pathologic analysis of 55 prostatectomy specimens were compared with elastographic moving images obtained at the time of biopsy of the prostate. RESULTS: The RBIE technique generated stable and repeatable elastographic moving images. The percentage of images affected by artifact due to slippage in the compression plane was reduced to 1% using the RBIE method compared with 32% using the manual compression method. With regard to tumor location, elastographic moving images obtained using the RBIE technique were in complete agreement with clinicopathologic evaluation of tumor location in eight cases (15%), showed partial agreement in 43 cases (78%), and disagreed in four cases (7%). In three different regions of the prostate, 84% of anterior tumors, 85% of middle tumors, and 60% of posterior tumors were detected. The tumor detection rates by Gleason score were 60% in tumors with a Gleason score of 5 or 6, 73% in tumors with a Gleason score of 7, 72% in tumors with a Gleason score of 8, and 74% in tumors with a Gleason score of 9 or 10. CONCLUSION: The RBIE method improved the quality of elastographic moving images compared with the manual compression method. High-grade tumors and tumors of impalpable regions of the prostate were more frequently detected using RBIE. We conclude that RBIE is a promising method with which to detect prostate cancer.