Second primary malignancies after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Recent studies demonstrate an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving maintenance lenalidomide after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We explored the possibility of other risk factors driving post-ASCT SPMs in patients with MM through analysis of our large transplantation database in conjunction with our Long-Term Follow-Up Program. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 841 consecutive patients with MM who underwent ASCT at City of Hope between 1989 and 2009, as well as a nested case-control analysis evaluating the role of all therapeutic exposures before, during, and after ASCT. Median duration of follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.4 years (range, 0.3-19.9 years). Sixty cases with a total of 70 SPMs were identified. The overall cumulative incidence of SPMs was 7.4% at 5 years and 15.9% at 10 years when nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) were included and 5.3% at 5 years and 11.2% at 10 years when NMSCs were excluded. Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort revealed associations of both older age (≥55 years; relative risk, 2.3; P < .004) and race (non-Hispanic white; relative risk, 2.4; P = .01) with an increased risk of SPM. Furthermore, thalidomide exposure demonstrated a trend toward increased risk (odds ratio, 3.5; P = .15); however, an insufficient number of patients were treated with lenalidomide to allow us to accurately assess the risk of this agent. Exclusion of NMSCs retained the association with these variables but was accompanied by loss of statistical significance. This large single-institution analysis identified associations between race and older age and increased risk of developing SPM. The trend toward increased risk with thalidomide exposure suggests a class effect from immunomodulatory drugs that might not be restricted to lenalidomide.

Impact of treatment site in adolescents and young adults with central nervous system tumors.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; aged 15-39 years) have inferior survival in comparison with younger (aged 0-14 years) cancer patients. Impact of care at specialized centers such as National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCICCC) for AYAs of all ages or the Children's Oncology Group (COG) for AYAs aged 15 to 21 years with central nervous system (CNS) tumors remains unstudied. METHODS: We constructed a cohort of 560 children and 784 AYAs with CNS tumors reported to the Los Angeles cancer registry from 1998 to 2008. Cox and logistic regression models were used, with two-sided P values from Wald χ(2) tests. RESULTS: In Cox regression analysis restricted to World Health Organization (WHO) grade II tumors, patients of all ages saw worse outcome if not treated at NCICCC/COG sites (non-NCICCC/COG vs NCICCC/COG: hazard ratio [HR] =1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09 to 2.72). Furthermore, the worse outcome for AYAs compared with children (HR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.98; P = .005) was abrogated (HR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.79 to 2.29; P = .27) by care at NCICCC/COGs. Those less likely to receive care at NCICCC/COG sites included young AYAs (aged 15-21 years vs children: odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.48; P < .001) and older AYAs (aged 22-39 years) with low socioeconomic status (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.89; P = .02), public/no insurance (OR = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.71; P < .01), and distance to care greater than 5 miles (OR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.57; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Population-based data reveal that care at NCICCC/COG sites mitigates inferior outcome in AYAs with WHO grade II CNS tumors compared with children. Compared with children, AYAs are less likely to receive care at NCICCC/COGs. Insurance, socioeconomic status, and distance serve as barriers to care at NCICCCs for older AYAs.

Using laboratory surveillance data to estimate engagement in care among persons living with HIV in Los Angeles County, 2009.

Poor engagement in HIV care has been associated with delayed access to antiretroviral treatment and increased HIV transmission. Using viral load (VL) results from HIV laboratory surveillance data to conduct longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses, we examined linkage to care, retention in care, and their associated factors in 37,325 persons living with HIV (PLWH) in Los Angeles County (LAC). Linkage to care was considered timely if a VL test result was present ≤3 months of diagnosis. Successful retention in care was defined as having two or more VL test results ≥90 days apart during 2009. Of 6841 persons newly diagnosed with HIV in 2007-2009, 67% were linked to care within 3 months of diagnosis. Factors associated with delayed linkage to care included being African American, Latino, and Asian/Pacific Islander (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]=0.81; 95% CI=0.75-0.87, AHR=0.83; 95% CI=0.77-0.89, AHR=0.82; 95% CI=0.71-0.94, respectively). Of the 37,325 PLWH, 52% were retained in care during 2009. Factors associated with lack of retention in care included injection drug use (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR]=0.88; 95% CI=0.84-0.93), incarceration at diagnosis (APR=0.56; 95% CI=0.51-0.61), being diagnosed in pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era (APR=0.94; 95% CI=0.92-0.96) or at a public facility (APR=0.97; 95% CI=0.95-1.00), age <45 years (APR=0.87; 95% CI=0.86-0.89), and having concurrent HIV/AIDS diagnoses (APR=0.94; 95% CI=0.92-0.96). This study demonstrates the value of using VL surveillance data to monitor engagement in care among PLWH, and its potential to improve linkage and retention efforts where disparities in care are observed.