The Comparison of the Right and Left Sigmoid Sinus Cross-Sectional Areas in Fetal Period and the Factors Affecting the Venous Dominance.

OBJECTIVES: Skull base is an important and a challenging area for surgeons. Success in skull base surgery depends on various factors such as pre-operative evaluation, appropriate surgical technique, anesthesia duration, intraoperative neuromonitorization and wound care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed in the Anatomy dissection laboratory of M.U. Medical Faculty (Ethical committee approval number 2010-103). Twelve fetuses between 17-33 gestational weeks fixed with formaldehyde were enrolled to the study. RESULTS: This study was planned to investigate the cross sectional areas of the sigmoid sinus in three levels to compare the right-left sides and the probable relationship among the levels in fetuses to further delineate the developmental factors on jugular foramen asymmetry. The cross-sectional measurements of sigmoid sinus lumen were done on 3 levels which are described as A1 level; sinodural angle, A2 level; the midpoint between the sinodural angle and endocranial orifice and A3 level as the entrance (endo-cranial orifice) of the jugular foramen. There is a strong positive correlation between left (L) A1 and L A2 and also the same for L A1 and right (R) A2. These strong and positive correlations are all valid between L A2-L A3, L A2-R A2, L A2-R A3, L A3-R A3, R A1-R A2. CONCLUSION: Multicenter studies would be beneficial to investigate the topic with greater number of fetuses also on the different regions for genetic differences.

The importance of macroprolactinemia in the differential diagnosis of hyperprolactinemic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Hypersecretion of prolactin (PRL) by lactotroph cells of the anterior pituitary may lead to hyperprolactinemia in physiological or pathological conditions. However, some of the patients may present with another cause of hyperprolactinemia, described by various authors as macroprolactinemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical, radiological and biochemical assessment of 124 patients were carefully evaluated for differential diagnosis in light of the literature. Macroprolactinemia was assessed by the polyethylene glycol (PEG) method in all of the patients, with high PRL level but without significant symptomatology, presenting to our clinic between 2004 and 2006. RESULTS: The sera from 124 patients with hyperprolactinemia were screened for macroprolactinemia using the PEG method and macroprolactinemia was detected in 10 patients (8%). The average age of the patients was 35 years (range 23-46). Nine of the ten patients were female (90%) and one was male (10%). All of the patients had MRI. An intrasellar mass and stalk lipoma were found in three of the ten patients (30%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, macroprolactinemia should be taken into consideration as a probable cause of high serum prolactin levels to avoid repeated hormone assessments, neuroradiological examinations and unnecessary medical and surgical treatments.