[A Case of Intussusception Caused by Colon Cancer in A 25-Year-Old Woman].

A 25-year-old woman presented to our hospital with left flank pain and diarrhea. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography(CT)showed a target sign in the descending colon. She was diagnosed with intussusception of the colon. Colonoscopy revealed a tumor at the splenic flexure. We performed surgery and found an invaginated transverse colon at the splenic flexure. Reduction was unsuccessful with Hutchinson's maneuver, and we performed partial resection of the invaginated colon. Histopathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma, tub1, SM2. Adult intussusception is uncommon, especially in young adults. It is usually caused by a polyp or tumor. We report a case of intussusception caused by colon cancer in a young female patient, and review the literature.

[A Case of Long-Term Survival with Multidisciplinary Therapy for a Patient with Multiple Metastases from Rectal Cancer].

Combined modality therapy is sufficient to treat advanced rectal cancer with multiple metastases. Her, we report a case of long-term survival in a patient with multiple metastases from rectal cancer. A5 8-year-old man had previously undergone low anterior resection for advanced rectal cancer. Multiple liver and lung metastases were identified prior to operation; therefore, we initiated chemotherapy(FOLFOX). Partial resection of metastatic lesions and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)were also administered, but newly developed liver, lung, and adrenal gland metastases were identified. We changed the chemotherapy regimen and administered topical therapies(partial resection, RFA, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, radiotherapy)for each chemotherapy-refractory metastatic lesion. Although the patient is in a tumor-bearing state, he is still alive 10 years after his first operation. This combined modality therapy is an option for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastases from rectal cancer.

Direct Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety Among Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Japanese Patients: Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

Direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs) are available in addition to warfarin for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Anticoagulants are useful for practical pharmacotherapy in Asian populations, but their responses are different from those in Caucasian populations. Therefore, we aimed to identify the most useful anticoagulant using a nationwide insurance claims database in Japan. We extracted information on patients with NVAF treated with DOACs or warfarin for the first time between September 2015 and February 2018 to conduct a retrospective observational cohort study using the claims database of Japan. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) of effectiveness and safety endpoints among DOACs or warfarin after adjusting for backgrounds by propensity scores (inverse probability weighting). Using negative control outcomes, we considered renal function as an unmeasured confounding factor. After adjusting for their backgrounds, patients treated with DOACs showed higher effectiveness endpoints (stroke or systemic embolism) than those treated with warfarin (HR; 0.72-0.81) and higher safety in terms of safety end points (clinically significant bleeding) (HR; 0.80-0.88). The net clinical benefit, which reflects the actual clinical usefulness, indicates the advantages of DOACs over warfarin (HR; 0.75-0.82). Dabigatran had lower usefulness than edoxaban and rivaroxaban in Japanese patients treated with NVAF, even after considering the unmeasured confounding factor of kidney function. Based on practical clinical data, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were the most useful anticoagulants in Japanese patients with NVAF.