RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate whether reducing the volume of intravenous iodinated contrast material injected during brain computed tomography (CT) provides reliable and accurate imaging without compromising diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients undergoing enhanced brain CT at a single tertiary hospital. Subjects who agreed to participate received a reduced dose of 60 ml contrast. The images were compared to an age and gender-matched control group who received the conventional 80 cc dose. Neuroradiologists assessed image quality and interpretation using a 5-point Likert scale with six specific domains. Based on ICC, inter-rater reliability was high at 0.873. Multiple linear regression predicted overall diagnostic accuracy based on contrast dose, age, and gender. Visual Grading Characteristics (VGC) analysis was also performed to quantify regional brain enhancement differences between the two contrast groups. RESULTS: The study included 47 patients in the 60 cc group and 55 in the 80 cc control group. The results showed the 80 cc group had significantly higher enhancement ratings compared to 60 cc for all six structures assessed. The differences between groups ranged from -0.241 to -0.433 (p < 0.001) on the 5-point scale.The VGC analysis confirmed significantly greater brain parenchymal enhancement in the 80 cc group compared to the 60 cc group. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that reducing the intravenous iodinated contrast material volume during brain CT from 80 cc to 60 cc leads to a statistically significant reduction in image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings and assess the clinical impact of these differences.