Polyethylene glycol hypersensitivity, patient outcomes in a 7-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immediate IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to polyethylene glycol (PEG) are rare. Our understanding of PEG hypersensitivity is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and investigation outcomes of the largest cohort of patients with PEG allergy reported. METHODS: A total of 44 patients investigated for suspected PEG allergy across 4 United Kingdom tertiary allergy centers between October 2013 and December 2020 were studied. Clinical characteristics, index reaction, and approaches to and outcomes of allergy investigations were analyzed. RESULTS: PEG hypersensitivity was confirmed in 42 of 44 cases. Macrogol laxatives were the most common index drugs reported (23%), followed by depo-medroxyprogesterone (19%), oral penicillin V (10%), and depo-methylprednisolone (10%). In general, 61% experienced grade III anaphylaxis. Intradermal testing (IDT) increased the diagnostic sensitivity from 51% to 85%. Five patients experienced systemic reactions during IDT. Of the 5 patients, 2 were skin prick test positive to a high molecular weight PEG. Three patients with negative skin test results had positive drug provocation test results. Seven patients with PEG allergy reported tolerance to H1-antihistamines containing PEG. Administration of messenger RNA COVID-19 or Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines was tolerated in all 16 patients to whom they were administered. CONCLUSION: PEG hypersensitivity is an uncommon cause of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Four index drugs accounted for two-thirds of the cases, and reactions to these drugs should prompt PEG hypersensitivity investigations. PEG IDT increases diagnostic yield. The role of skin prick test with higher molecular weight PEGs requires further attention. Further studies are required to understand PEG thresholds and PEG equivalent doses of various administration routes. COVID-19 vaccines were tolerated by all exposed.

Vitamin B12 Hypersensitivity: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin B12 (Vit B12) deficiency affects approximately 20% of those above the age of 60 years in the United Kingdom and United States. If untreated, it leads to detrimental health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate a cohort of patients with Vit B12 hypersensitivity (VB12H) referred to 3 UK allergy centers and design a pathway for the investigation of VB12H. METHODS: A total of 29 patients seen between 2014 and 2022 underwent skin prick testing (1 mg/mL) with cyanocobalamin (CC) and hydroxycobalamin (HC) and intradermal testing (0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL). Patients with negative skin tests underwent a Vit B12 drug provocation test (DPT) with either the index or the alternative drug. RESULTS: Of 29 patients, 18 (62%) presented with immediate VB12H. Eight experienced anaphylaxis (4 to HC and 4 to CC) and had positive skin tests to the index drug. One patient reacted to oral and 7 patients to injectable Vit B12. Seven patients sensitized to one form of Vit B12-tolerated DPT with an alternative Vit B12. One patient with immediate VB12H reacted to polyethylene glycol (PEG) in oral cobalamin. Of 29 patients, 8 presented with delayed hypersensitivity reaction; 4 patients tolerated the intramuscular index formulation, whereas 2 patients tolerated the per oral formulation. One patient presented with symptoms consistent with symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema. Three patients were referred because of cobalt allergy. CONCLUSION: Confirmed VB12H is rare. We propose a comprehensive evaluation protocol that includes Vit B12 skin tests and considers PEG allergy in patients presenting with VB12H.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Hypersensitivity: A Large, Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Piperacillin/tazobactam is a broad-spectrum penicillin. Hypersensitivity reactions are less commonly reported than with other penicillins except in patients with cystic fibrosis. OBJECTIVE: Detailed clinical characterization of a patient cohort referred with suspected piperacillin-tazobactam hypersensitivity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, investigation, and management of 87 patients presenting to 5 European allergy centers. Patients underwent skin prick and intradermal testing with piperacillin/tazobactam, major (penicilloyl-polylysine) and minor (sodium penilloate) determinants, amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin, co-amoxiclav, clavulanic acid, and meropenem with immediate and, where appropriate, delayed reading of tests. Skin test-negative patients underwent drug provocation to piperacillin/tazobactam and/or other penicillins. A multistep protocol was used, depending on risk assessment. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 87 (55%) patients were diagnosed with hypersensitivity to piperacillin/tazobactam with either positive skin or drug provocation test results, of whom 10 (21%) had a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Twenty-six (54%) patients presented with immediate and 22 (45%) with nonimmediate hypersensitivity. Patients with cystic fibrosis predominantly presented with nonimmediate hypersensitivity (70%). Reactions were severe in 52% of immediate reactors (Brown's anaphylaxis grade 3) and moderately severe (systemic involvement) in 75% of nonimmediate reactors. The number of patients with negative skin test results tolerating reintroduction was comparable in immediate (80%) and nonimmediate (88%) hypersensitivity. One-third of patients were cross-sensitized to other penicillins. The cross-sensitization pattern raised the possibility of tazobactam allergy in 3 patients. In 21 patients selectively sensitized to piperacillin/tazobactam (12 immediate, 9 nonimmediate), tolerance to other beta-lactams was demonstrated by drug provocation testing. CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin-tazobactam caused immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity with similar frequency. Most patients were selectively sensitized and tolerated other penicillins. Some patients may be allergic to the beta-lactamase inhibitor only.