Lessons learned from CMS's National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care: a thematic synthesis of multiple stakeholder-engaged studies.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic prescribing in United States nursing homes (NHs) has decreased since the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Service debuted the National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care in Nursing Homes (NP); however, reductions have stalled. To help explain persistent antipsychotic use despite the NP's reduction efforts, the perspectives of diverse NP stakeholders were qualitatively assessed. This study aimed to re-evaluate these individual perspectives in combined thematic synthesis to discover NP improvement opportunities undetectable in single stakeholder assessments. METHODS: Thematic synthesis. Through immersive crystallisation, original source coding results were organised into related descriptive themes. Similarities and differences were identified, and descriptive themes were regrouped into new, increasingly abstract, analytical themes. This cycle continued until variances were resolved and analytic themes sufficiently described and explained all initial descriptive themes. RESULTS: Three analytic themes emerged regarding NP improvement opportunities. The NP's positive impacts would be augmented by: (i) a deeper and expanded appreciation of stakeholder perspectives; (ii) more urgent and rapid adaptation to unintended adverse outcomes; and (iii) greater recognition of the contextual and environmental factors influencing decisions to prescribe or not prescribe antipsychotic medications. Stakeholder groups described: perspectives they perceived as inadequately considered by the NP; insufficient NP engagement with the stakeholders capable of creating evidenced, affordable, and available non-pharmacologic therapies for dementia symptoms; recognition that dementia interventions effective for a specific individual at a specific time in a specific community may not generalise; and diverse ongoing undesirable outcomes from NP policies that could be mitigated by NP modifications. CONCLUSIONS: The NP has done much to advance dementia care in NHs. Notwithstanding, these results suggest the NP would only be improved through increasingly comprehensive inclusion of stakeholder perspectives, enhanced incorporation of individual contextual factors, and a more decisive mechanism for ongoing and continual adaptation.

Understanding Long-Stay Gabapentin Use Increases: A National Nursing Home Clinician Survey on Prescribing Intent.

OBJECTIVES: Explore the indications for long-stay gabapentin use and elucidate the factors spurring the rapid increase in gabapentin prescribing in nursing homes (NHs). METHODS: National cross-sectional survey of NH prescribers distributed anonymously using SurveyMonkey. Sampling for convenience was obtained through crowdsourcing, leveraging collaborations with NH clinician organizations. Developed by a multidisciplinary team, pilot data/existing literature informed survey content. RESULTS: A total of 131 surveys completed. Participants: 71% white, 52% female, 71% physicians. Off-label gabapentin prescribing was ubiquitous. Nearly every clinician used gabapentin for neuropathic pain, most for any form of pain. Many clinicians also prescribe gabapentin to moderate psychiatric symptoms and behaviors. Clinicians' prescribing was influenced by opioid, antipsychotic, and anxiolytic reduction policies because gabapentin was perceived as an unmonitored and safer alternative. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label gabapentin increases are closely linked to opioid reduction efforts as more NH clinicians utilize gabapentin as an unmonitored opioid alternative. Our results highlight, however, the less recognized significance of long-stay prescribing for psychiatric symptoms and the similar contribution of psychotropic reduction initiatives, a phenomenon warranting further scrutiny. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians perceive gabapentin as safer than the drugs it is replacing. Whether this is true remains unclear; the individual- and population-level risks of increased gabapentin use are largely unknown.

Community, Social, and Facility Factors and Long-stay Antipsychotic Use.

OBJECTIVES: Compare Virginia nursing homes in the top- and bottom-quintiles of antipsychotic use for variation in community, social, and facility factors. METHODS: 2018 CMS data ascertained Virginia nursing homes in the top and bottom quintiles for antipsychotic use. The Virginia Health Department provided social determinant of health (SDOH) statistics for each facility's county/city while claims identified facility demographics. Chi square and independent two-sample t-tests compared quintiles for regional, social, and demographic differences. RESULTS: Quintiles averaged 3000 residents and 56 facilities. Facilities with the lowest rates of antipsychotic use were more likely to be privately owned and had fewer African-American and minority residents and more white residents. All 18 SDOH statistics were superior for the communities of facilities with the lowest antipsychotic rates. Nine of these differences were statistically significant, including the aggregated "Health Opportunity Index." CONCLUSIONS: The antipsychotic prevalence rate for facilities in the top-quintile of antipsychotic use is fivefold the bottom-quintile's rate. Antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes is associated with regional, demographic, and social factors not addressed by existing antipsychotic reduction measures, with vulnerable populations at greatest risk. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The efficacy of measures aimed at curbing long-stay antipsychotic prescribing could be improved by addressing SDOH including economic opportunities.

Increased Reporting of Exclusionary Diagnoses Inflate Apparent Reductions in Long-Stay Antipsychotic Prescribing.

OBJECTIVE: Over the two years following the 2012 introduction of CMS's National Partnership, combined rates of schizophrenia, Tourette's, and Huntington's in US long-stay residents increased 12%. We evaluated trends in reporting of these diagnoses for the subgroup of long-stay residents on antipsychotics. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of Virginia Medicaid claims identified annual utilization rates of psychiatric diagnoses for long-stay seniors on antipsychotics. Chi-square analysis compared rates for the year before March, 2012 with the same 12-month period 1 year later. A 5-year pre-existing baseline rate was also obtained. RESULTS: Diagnosis rates for 2011 were unchanged from baseline. Comparing 2011 with 2013, diagnoses rates for schizophrenia, Tourette's, and Huntington's combined increased 40% (p < .0001), primarily because schizophrenia reporting nearly doubled (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: For long-stay seniors on antipsychotics, reporting of schizophrenia, Tourette's, and Huntington's began increasing in 2012 and at almost triple the rate CMS described for the general long-stay population. The increased reporting of these diagnoses described by CMS since 2012 appears to be new and concentrated in residents on antipsychotics Clinical Implications: Since antipsychotics prescribed for schizophrenia, Tourette's, and Huntington's are excluded from quality-measure auditing, apparent reductions in inappropriate long-stay antipsychotic use since the National Partnership may be exaggerated.

Prescribing Trends and Associated Outcomes of Antiepileptic Drugs and Other Psychotropic Medications in US Nursing Homes: Proposal for a Mixed Methods Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Pilot data suggest that off-label, unmonitored antiepileptic drug prescribing for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia is increasing, replacing other psychotropic medications targeted by purposeful reduction efforts. This trend accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although adverse outcomes related to this trend remain unknown, preliminary results hint that harms may be increasing and concentrated in vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVE: Using a mixed methods approach including both a retrospective secondary data analysis and a national clinician survey, this study aims to describe appropriate and potentially inappropriate antiepileptic and other psychoactive drug prescribing in US nursing homes (NHs), characteristics and patient-oriented outcomes associated with this prescribing, and how these phenomena may be changing under the combined stressors of the COVID-19 pandemic and the pressure of reduction initiatives. METHODS: To accomplish the objective, resident-level, mixed-effects regression models and interrupted time-series analyses will draw on cohort elements linked at an individual level from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) Minimum Data Set, Medicare Part D, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review, and Outpatient and Public Use Files. Quarterly cohorts of NH residents (2009-2021) will incorporate individual-level data, including demographics; health status; disease variables; psychotropic medication claims; comprehensive NH health outcomes; hospital and emergency department adverse events; and NH details, including staffing resources and COVID-19 statistics. To help explain and validate findings, we will conduct a national qualitative survey of NH prescribers regarding their knowledge and beliefs surrounding changing approaches to dementia care and associated outcomes. RESULTS: Funding was obtained in September 2022. Institutional review board exemption approval was obtained in January 2023. The CMS Data Use Agreement was submitted in May 2023 and signed in March 2024. Data access was obtained in June 2024. Cohort creation is anticipated by January 2025, with crosswalks finalized by July 2025. The first survey was fielded in October 2023 and published in July 2024. The second survey was fielded in March 2024. The results are in review as of July 2024. Iterative survey cycles will continue biannually until December 2026. Multidisciplinary dissemination of survey analysis results began in July 2023, and dissemination of secondary data findings is anticipated to begin January 2025. These processes are ongoing, with investigation to wrap up by June 2027. CONCLUSIONS: This study will detail appropriate and inappropriate antiepileptic drug use and related outcomes in NHs and describe disparities in long-stay subpopulations treated or not treated with psychotropics. It will delineate the impact of the pandemic in combination with national policies on dementia management and outcomes. We believe this mixed methods approach, including processes that link multiple CMS data sets at an individual level and survey-relevant stakeholders, can be replicated and applied to evaluate a variety of patient-oriented questions in diverse clinical populations. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/64446.

Quality Gap in Long-Stay Antipsychotic Quality Measure Performance Widens Over the Pandemic, Reversing Past Gains.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) grades nursing home performance in antipsychotic prescribing quarterly, publishing findings as a quality measure. While scores have improved since 2011, marked performance variation between facilities persists. To assess quality gap changes between best- and worst-performing deciles, we compared quarterly prescribing changes between these groups pre-pandemic (April 2011 to March 2020) and during the pandemic (April 2020 to March 2022). Antipsychotic quality measure scores, improving pre-pandemic, deteriorated during the pandemic. The pre-pandemic quality gap between the best- and worst-performing deciles narrowed as the worst-performing decile improved faster than the best-performing decile. During the pandemic, the quality gap widened as the worst-performing decile relapsed more than the best-performing decile (p < .0001). The pandemic disrupted quality performance gains and compounded disparities between facilities. A better understanding of the factors allowing high performers to weather pandemic stressors better than poor performers may reveal opportunities to improve nursing home quality and equity for all residents.

Trends in Antiseizure Medication Prescribing Among Nursing Home Residents With and Without a Seizure Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate current prevalence and changes in prescribing of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in Virginia nursing homes for residents with and without seizures. METHODS: Retrospective cohort. De-identified claims extracted from the Virginia All-Payers-Claims-Database defined annual and biennial cohorts of all insured long-stay residents with and without any claims-based seizure diagnoses. ASM prescribing prevalence rates for these cohorts were analyzed from 2011 to 2016. Multiple logistic regression compared prescribing prevalence rates within and between these 2 groups. RESULTS: Annual cohorts averaged 57,190. 65.6% Female, 38% white. 80% public insurance, 20% commercial secondary. Between 2011 and 2016, the claims-based prevalence of seizure diagnoses decreased (17.1% to 10.5%). However, ASM prescribing prevalence increased (10.4% to 11.6%). Increases were entirely among residents who never had any seizure-epilepsy claim, whereas ASM prescribing among residents with seizures decreased. Different drugs were used for patients with and without seizures. For residents without seizures, 85% of ASMs prescribed have alternative indications for mood or pain symptoms, and large gains in gabapentin and modest but significant increases in valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and topiramate prescribing were detected. Among residents with seizures, ASMs without alternative indications were more common (59%), with marked reductions in phenobarbital and phenytoin but significant increases in levetiracetam and lacosamide use observed. CONCLUSIONS: Long-stay ASM use is changing. ASM gains are unrelated to seizure-epilepsy prevalence. ASM prescribing increased only among residents without seizures, where ASMs with expanded indications were preferred. Long-stay ASM prescribing and prescribing indication should be included in mandatory CMS reporting similar to other CNS-active medications.

Patient perceptions of how physicians communicate during prostate cancer screening discussions: a comparison of residents and faculty.

BACKGROUND: Residents are required to demonstrate competency in communication skills. Prostate cancer screening discussions are examples of complex physician-patient communication processes, requiring an objective presentation of the known risks, potential benefits, and scientific uncertainties surrounding screening. National organizations recommend shared decision making (SDM) in these discussions. METHODS: A stratified analysis to contrast resident and faculty outcomes was planned as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing decision aids for prostate cancer screening in a suburban Washington, DC, residency practice. All eligible men between the ages of 50 and 70 years scheduled for a wellness examination with either a resident or a faculty physician were randomly assigned to one of two intervention arms (Web- or paper-based decision aid) or to the control group (no pre-visit education). Patients were asked to complete exit surveys that evaluated their perceptions of key elements of SDM for prostate cancer screening (PCS). RESULTS: Patients seen by resident physicians were younger than patients seen by faculty, and a smaller proportion had undergone previous prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Patients seen by residents and faculty reported similar levels of the elements of SDM (eg, knowledge about PCS, achieving their desired locus of control for the decision) and similar time spent discussing screening. Both groups also had nearly identical decisional conflict scores and PSA testing rates. Residents discussed more PCS topics (6.3 versus 5.3 topics), including more topics that might influence a patient to decide against screening, than did faculty physicians. CONCLUSIONS: According to patient perceptions, residents appeared to perform as well as faculty in SDM and other aspects of PCS discussions, although the topics that they covered with patients might have differed.

Primary Care Physician Perspectives about Antipsychotics and Other Medications for Symptoms of Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines, policies, and warnings have been applied to reduce the use of medications for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Because of rare dangerous side effects, antipsychotics have been singled out in these efforts. However, antipsychotics are still prescribed "off label" to hundreds of thousands of seniors residing in nursing homes and communities. Our objective was to evaluate how and why primary-care physicians (PCPs) employ nonpharmacologic strategies and drugs for BPSD. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews analyzed via template, immersion and crystallization, and thematic development of 26 PCPs (16 family practice, 10 general internal medicine) in full time primary-care practice for at least 3 years in Northwestern Virginia. RESULTS: PCPs described 4 major themes regarding BPSD management: (1) nonpharmacologic methods have substantial barriers; (2) medication use is not constrained by those barriers and is perceived as easy, efficacious, reasonably safe, and appropriate; (3) pharmacologic policies decrease the use of targeted medications, including antipsychotics, but also have unintended consequences such as increased use of alternative risky medications; and (4) PCPs need practical evidence-based guidelines for all aspects of BPSD management. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs continue to prescribe medications because they meet patient-oriented goals and because PCPs perceive drugs, including antipsychotics and their alternatives, to be more effective and less dangerous than evidence suggests. To optimally treat BPSD, PCPs need supportive verified prescribing guidelines and access to nonpharmacologic modalities that are as affordable, available, and efficacious as drugs; these require and deserve significant additional research and payer support. Community PCPs should be included in BPSD policy and guideline development.

Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy possesses the highest sensitivity of available screening tests for colorectal cancer and polyps, but it also carries risks. Appropriate intervals for repeating colonoscopy are important to ensure that the benefits of screening and surveillance are not offset by harms. The study objective was to examine whether endoscopists' recommendations for repeat colonoscopy, as communicated to primary care clinicians after the procedure, adhered to published guidelines. METHODS: Analysts abstracted medical records at ten primary care practices in Virginia and Maryland in 2006. The records of a random sample of men and women (300 per practice) aged 50 to 70 years were reviewed. The sample included patients who had a colonoscopy and a written report from an endoscopist, and who lacked designated risk factors. The main outcome was concordance between endoscopists' recommendations and published guidelines regarding repeat colonoscopy. RESULTS: Of 3000 charts reviewed, 1282 (42.7%) included records of a colonoscopy and 1021 (34%) included an endoscopist's report. In 64.9% of communications, the endoscopist specified when retesting should occur. Recommendations were consistent with contemporaneous guidelines in only 39.2% of cases and with current guidelines in 36.7% of cases. The adjusted mean number of years in which repeat colonoscopy was recommended was 7.8 years following normal colonoscopy and 5.8 years and 4.4 years, respectively, when hyperplastic polyps or 1-2 small adenomatous polyps were found. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopists often recommended repeat colonoscopy at shorter intervals than are advised either by current guidelines or by guidelines in effect at the time of the procedure. Endoscopists' communications to primary care clinicians often lacked contextual information that might explain these discrepancies. Unless appropriate caveats apply, adhering to endoscopists' recommendations may incur unnecessary harms and costs.

Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making.

PURPOSE: Many clinicians lack resources to engage patients in shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. We sought to evaluate whether previsit educational decision aids facilitate shared decision making. METHODS: This randomized controlled study compared a Web-based and a paper-based decision aid with no previsit education. Men aged 50 to 70 years undergoing a health maintenance examination at a large family practice were enrolled. The primary outcome was patient-reported level of control over the decision to be screened. Secondary outcomes included frequency of screening, patient knowledge, decisional conflict, and time spent discussing screening. RESULTS: A total of 497 men participated (75 control, 196 brochure, 226 Web site). Patients exposed to either aid were no more likely than control patients to report a collaborative decision: 36% of patients in each group reported equally sharing decision responsibility. Exposure to either decision aid increased patients' involvement in decision making compared with the control condition (Web site, P = .03; brochure, P = .03). Only 46% of control patients reported an active decision-making role, compared with 56% of Web site and 54% of brochure patients. Patients exposed to a decision aid answered a greater percentage of knowledge questions correctly (54% control vs 69% Web site, P <.001, and vs 69% brochure, P <.001) and were less likely to be screened (94% control vs 86% Web site, P = .06, and vs 85% brochure, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the decision aid groups were more informed and more engaged in the screening decision than their control counterparts. Exposure did not promote shared decision-making control, however. Whether shared decision making is the ideal model and how to measure its occurrence are subjects for further research.

Changes in Asthma Maintenance Therapy Prescribing Patterns Following the 2006 Long-acting ß-Agonist FDA Drug Warning.

PURPOSE: The US Food and Drug Administration issued a boxed warning on all products containing a long-acting ß-agonist (LABA) in March 2006, after the findings from a trial suggested an increased risk for death in patients treated with salmeterol monotherapy. Almost nothing is known about the impact of this warning on LABA prescribing patterns or on clinicians' approaches to asthma maintenance therapy. METHODS: A cohort of asthmatic adults on LABA therapy was retrospectively identified from a Baltimore-area Medicaid data warehouse. Pharmacy claims were used for determining the utilization rates of all asthma maintenance medications. Rates from the 6-month period before the warning (September 1, 2005, to February 28, 2006) were compared with rates from a similar 6-month period 1 year afterward (September 1, 2006, to February 28, 2007). The demographic characteristics of patients who continued LABA use were compared with those of discontinuers. In LABA discontinuers, utilization of alternative maintenance drugs was assessed. FINDINGS: In this cohort of 455 asthmatic patients, LABAs were prescribed only in combination with inhaled corticosteroids. Following the warning, 53% of patients discontinued LABA use, and the mean number of LABA prescription fills per patient decreased from 2.6 to 1.8 (P < 0.0001). Concurrently, the use of inhaled corticosteroids increased from 0.3 to 0.8 fills per patient (P < 0.0001). LABA continuers were younger (P = 0.0005), more likely to be black (P = 0.0079), and more consistent with LABA fills prewarning (P < 0.0001). Of the 243 LABA discontinuers, 155 were placed on no alternative maintenance therapy. IMPLICATIONS: The management of asthma changed significantly after the LABA warning. The use of LABAs combined with inhaled corticosteroids plummeted, while the use of inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy increased. More than half of patients who discontinued LABAs were not placed on alternative maintenance therapy.

Clinical inquiries. What nonpharmacological treatments are effective against common nongenital warts?

Cryotherapy has similar cure rates to topical salicylate (a pharmacologic therapy) for nongenital common warts (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, based on systemic review of variable quality randomized trials). Duct tape may be equivalent to cryotherapy (SOR: B, based on a single randomized trial). CO2 laser, photodynamic therapy, pulsed dye laser (PDL), and Er:Yag laser therapies may also be effective for recalcitrant warts (SOR: C, based on observational cohort studies).

Clinical inquiries. How should we follow athletes after a concussion?

Athletes sustaining a concussion should be held from contact activities a minimum of 7 days; they must be asymptomatic and their coordination and neuropsychological tests should have returned to their pre-injury baseline (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, based on multiple prospective cohort studies). High-risk athletes (eg, those with a history of previous concussion, high-school age or younger, or female) may need to avoid contact even after all these criteria are met (SOR: C, expert opinion).

An electronic linkage system for health behavior counseling effect on delivery of the 5A's.

BACKGROUND: A variety of factors limit the ability of clinicians to offer intensive counseling to patients with unhealthy behaviors, and few patients (2%-5%) are referred to the community counseling resources that do offer such assistance. A system that could increase referrals through an efficient collaborative partnership between community programs and clinicians could have major public health implications; such was the subject of this feasibility evaluation. METHODS: At nine primary care practices, an electronic linkage system (eLinkS) was instituted to promote health behavior counseling and to automate patient referrals to community counseling services. Patients were offered 9 months of free counseling for weight loss, smoking cessation, and problem drinking at a choice of venues: group counseling, telephone counseling, computer care, and usual care. The delivery of behavioral counseling, measured by the 5A's (ask, address, advise, assess, agree, arrange) and patients' reported experiences with eLinkS, was examined. RESULTS: For 5 weeks eLinkS was used, until high referral volumes depleted counseling funds. Of the 5679 patients visiting the practices, 71% had an unhealthy behavior. Of these patients, 10% were referred for intensive counseling from a community program, most often for weight loss. Counseling and referrals occurred regardless of visit type--wellness, acute, or chronic care. eLinkS was used more often for middle-aged adults and women and by more-experienced clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention increased the rate at which patients were referred for intensive behavioral counseling compared to current practice norms. Given the evidence that intensive counseling is more effective in promoting behavior change, implementing eLinkS could have substantial public health benefits.