Endoscopically guided sinonasal cultures: a direct comparison with maxillary sinus aspirate cultures.

Sinusitis is a common medical problem that can at times be challenging to treat. Although most cases respond to empiric therapy, success is not achieved universally. If empiric therapy fails, it is important to identify the causative bacterial pathogen. Antral puncture is the traditional diagnostic method to recover and identify pathogens in sinusitis; however, it remains a painful, invasive test with potential complications. In contrast, rigid sinonasal endoscopy permits recovery of mucopus emanating from the sinus ostia with little pain and few possible complications. Endoscopy also affords important visual information that can confirm or refute a historical/clinical diagnosis of sinusitis. Although previous studies have shown poor correlation between nasal cavity swab cultures and maxillary sinus aspiration cultures, few investigations have compared endoscopically guided middle meatal cultures with cultures obtained from maxillary sinus aspiration. Thirteen patients with maxillary sinusitis in one or both sinuses underwent endoscopically guided culture of the middle meatus and maxillary sinus puncture with aspiration and culture (16 total study samples). Results from the microbiologic analysis were compared. Endoscopically guided middle meatal cultures accurately identified the predominant bacterial pathogen and correlated with the cultures from maxillary sinus aspiration in more than 90% of infections. These preliminary results suggest that endoscopically guided sinonasal cultures hold promise as a viable alternative to maxillary sinus aspiration. Endoscopically guided cultures appear to be an effective, noninvasive diagnostic tool for otolaryngologists managing sinusitis.

Use of the superior meatus and superior turbinate in the endoscopic approach to the sphenoid sinus.

Endoscopic surgery of the posterior ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses can present the operator with a considerable challenge. Although endoscopic training and physician experience have increased significantly in the past decade, surgical complications such as optic nerve trauma and cerebrospinal fluid leak still occur. Surgeons reporting such complications cite a lack of orientation within the dissection field as a primary cause. Because endoscopic sinus surgery is now being performed more routinely, surgical strategies designed to reduce the risk of complications are more important than ever. An anatomic landmark that could reliably orient the dissection within the posterior ethmoids and guide the surgeon to the sphenoid sinus could reduce the possibility of such adverse outcomes. In our experience identification of the superior meatus and superior turbinate provides a reliable landmark within the dissection field that can ensure surgical orientation to the operator. This technique allows safe, reliable dissection of the posterior ethmoids and an efficient approach to the sphenoid sinus, especially in patients undergoing revision surgery. In this article our technique for the identification and definition of the superior meatus and superior turbinate is presented, and the advantages of using this landmark in sinus surgery are discussed. In our experience identification of the superior meatus, superior turbinate, posterior skull base, and medial orbital wall defines a parallelogram-shaped box, which delineates the sphenoid face. This box provides the necessary orientation to guide the surgeon's entrance into the sphenoid sinus through the posterior ethmoid sinus (as Messerklinger described). Techniques for identifying the superior turbinate and meatus and for entering the sphenoid are detailed.