Cutaneous Strongyloides Infection Postchemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: While clinical symptoms of strongyloidiasis are often nonspecific, larva currens (with erythematous, serpiginous, and pruritic papules and plaques) should prompt investigation including stool microscopy, serology, and skin biopsy of the lesion. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment with ivermectin is necessary, especially in the immunocompromised patient who is at increased risk for hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated disease. CONCLUSION: We present a 61-year-old immunocompromised man with presentation of larva currens of cutaneous strongyloides infection without symptoms of hyperinfection or disseminated disease.

A unique retinal epitheliopathy is associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/Parkinsonism-Dementia complex of Guam.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to examine whether a linear retinal pigment epitheliopathy is associated with the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex of Guam. METHODS: A total of 918 Guamanian Chamorros, with and without amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex, were examined cross-sectionally for linear retinal pigment epitheliopathy (LRPE). Overall, 239 Guamanians, who were neurologically asymptomatic, were followed for up to 20 years to determine the risk of developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex. RESULTS: The epitheliopathy was present in 59.7% (117 of 196) patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex, but in only 24.7% (178 of 722) of subjects who were neurologically asymptomatic (age- and sex-adjusted risk difference: 35.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.5-42.6; p < 0.0001). Prospectively, 15 of 50 cases with epitheliopathy developed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex, compared to 4 of 189 cases without epitheliopathy (age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio: 13.1; 95% CI: 4.0-43.1; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex is associated with an LRPE and predicts future neurological disease. Identifying the cause of this retinopathy could provide an understanding about the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex and related diseases.

Illness in travelers returned from Brazil: the GeoSentinel experience and implications for the 2014 FIFA World Cup and the 2016 Summer Olympics.

BACKGROUND: Brazil will host the 2014 FIFA World Cup and the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games, events that are expected to attract hundreds of thousands of international travelers. Travelers to Brazil will encounter locally endemic infections as well as mass event-specific risks. METHODS: We describe 1586 ill returned travelers who had visited Brazil and were seen at a GeoSentinel Clinic from July 1997 through May 2013. RESULTS: The most common travel-related illnesses were dermatologic conditions (40%), diarrheal syndromes (25%), and febrile systemic illness (19%). The most common specific dermatologic diagnoses were cutaneous larva migrans, myiasis, and tungiasis. Dengue and malaria, predominantly Plasmodium vivax, were the most frequently identified specific causes of fever and the most common reasons for hospitalization after travel. Dengue fever diagnoses displayed marked seasonality, although cases were seen throughout the year. Among the 28 ill returned travelers with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, 11 had newly diagnosed asymptomatic infection and 9 had acute symptomatic HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis primarily identified infectious diseases among travelers to Brazil. Knowledge of illness in travelers returning from Brazil can assist clinicians to advise prospective travelers and guide pretravel preparation, including itinerary-tailored advice, vaccines, and chemoprophylaxis; it can also help to focus posttravel evaluation of ill returned travelers. Travelers planning to attend mass events will encounter other risks that are not captured in our surveillance network.

GeoSentinel surveillance of illness in returned travelers, 2007-2011.

BACKGROUND: International travel continues to increase, particularly to Asia and Africa. Clinicians are increasingly likely to be consulted for advice before travel or by ill returned travelers. OBJECTIVE: To describe typical diseases in returned travelers according to region, travel reason, and patient demographic characteristics; describe the pattern of low-frequency travel-associated diseases; and refine key messages for care before and after travel. DESIGN: Descriptive, using GeoSentinel records. SETTING: 53 tropical or travel disease units in 24 countries. PATIENTS: 42 173 ill returned travelers seen between 2007 and 2011. MEASUREMENTS: Frequencies of demographic characteristics, regions visited, and illnesses reported. RESULTS: Asia (32.6%) and sub-Saharan Africa (26.7%) were the most common regions where illnesses were acquired. Three quarters of travel-related illness was due to gastrointestinal (34.0%), febrile (23.3%), and dermatologic (19.5%) diseases. Only 40.5% of all ill travelers reported pretravel medical visits. The relative frequency of many diseases varied with both travel destination and reason for travel, with travelers visiting friends and relatives in their country of origin having both a disproportionately high burden of serious febrile illness and very low rates of advice before travel (18.3%). Life-threatening diseases, such as Plasmodium falciparum malaria, melioidosis, and African trypanosomiasis, were reported. LIMITATIONS: Sentinel surveillance data collected by specialist clinics do not reflect healthy returning travelers or those with mild or self-limited illness. Data cannot be used to infer quantitative risk for illness. CONCLUSION: Many illnesses may have been preventable with appropriate advice, chemoprophylaxis, or vaccination. Clinicians can use these 5-year GeoSentinel data to help tailor more efficient pretravel preparation strategies and evaluate possible differential diagnoses of ill returned travelers according to destination and reason for travel. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Travel-associated illness trends and clusters, 2000-2010.

Longitudinal data examining travel-associated illness patterns are lacking. To address this need and determine trends and clusters in travel-related illness, we examined data for 2000-2010, prospectively collected for 42,223 ill travelers by 18 GeoSentinel sites. The most common destinations from which ill travelers returned were sub-Saharan Africa (26%), Southeast Asia (17%), south-central Asia (15%), and South America (10%). The proportion who traveled for tourism decreased significantly, and the proportion who traveled to visit friends and relatives increased. Among travelers returning from malaria-endemic regions, the proportionate morbidity (PM) for malaria decreased; in contrast, the PM trends for enteric fever and dengue (excluding a 2002 peak) increased. Case clustering was detected for malaria (Africa 2000, 2007), dengue (Thailand 2002, India 2003), and enteric fever (Nepal 2009). This multisite longitudinal analysis highlights the utility of sentinel surveillance of travelers for contributing information on disease activity trends and an evidence base for travel medicine recommendations.

A review of amoebic liver abscess for clinicians in a nonendemic setting.

Amoebic liver abscess (ALA) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of infection with the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. E histolytica is widely distributed throughout the tropics and subtropics, causing up to 40 million infections annually. The parasite is transmitted via the fecal-oral route, and once it establishes itself in the colon, it has the propensity to invade the mucosa, leading to ulceration and colitis, and to disseminate to distant extraintestinal sites, the most common of which is the liver. The authors provide a topical review of ALA and summarize clinical data from a series of 29 patients with ALA presenting to seven hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, a nonendemic setting, over 30 years.

Leprosy chemoprophylaxis of household contacts: A survey of Canadian infectious disease and tropical medicine specialists.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is uncommon in Canada. However, immigration from leprosy-endemic areas has introduced the infection to a Canadian context, in which most doctors have little knowledge of the disease. Although post-exposure chemoprophylaxis (PEP) is reported to decrease leprosy transmission, no Canadian guidelines advise clinical decision making about leprosy PEP. Here, we characterize the practice patterns of Canadian infectious disease specialists with respect to leprosy PEP and screening of household contacts by yearly physical examinations. METHODS: Canadian infectious disease specialists with known experience treating leprosy were identified using university faculty lists. An online anonymous survey was distributed. Certain questions allowed more than one response. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 46.5% (20/43). Thirty-five percent responded that PEP is needed for household contacts, 40.0% responded that PEP is not needed for household contacts, and 25.0% did not know whether PEP is needed (multinomial test p = 0.79). Twenty-five percent responded that PEP should be given to all household contacts, 62.5% responded that PEP should be given to contacts of multibacillary cases, and 25.0% responded that PEP should be given to contacts who are genetically related to the index case. For specialists who prescribe PEP, 57.1% use rifampicin, ofloxacin (levofloxacin), and minocycline; 14.3% prescribe single-dose rifampicin; and 28.6% prescribe multiple doses of rifampicin (multinomial test p = 0.11). In addition, 68.4% recommend yearly screening of household contacts, whereas 31.6% do not (multinomial test p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Consensus among Canadian infectious diseases specialists is lacking regarding leprosy PEP and screening of household contacts.

HISTORIQUE: La lèpre est peu courante au Canada. Cependant, en raison de l'immigration de régions où la lèpre est endémique, cette infection existe, mais la plupart des médecins du Canada la connaissent peu. Même s'il est établi que la chimioprophylaxie post-exposition (PPE) réduit la transmission de la lèpre, il n'existe aucune directive canadienne pour éclairer les décisions cliniques sur la PPE de la lèpre. Les chercheurs caractérisent les schémas d'exercice des infectiologues canadiens au sujet de la PPE de la lèpre et du dépistage des contacts familiaux par des examens physiques annuels des aspects dermatologiques et nerveux périphériques. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont répertorié les infectiologues canadiens qui ont une expérience démontrée du traitement de la lèpre grâce aux listes des professeurs universitaires. Ils ont distribué un sondage anonyme en ligne. Pour certaines questions, les participants pouvaient fournir plus d'une réponse. Ils pouvaient aussi sauter certaines questions. RÉSULTATS: Le taux de réponse au sondage s'élevait à 46,5 % (20 cas sur 43). De cette proportion, 35,0 % ont répondu que les contacts familiaux avaient besoin d'une PPE, 40,0 %, qu'ils n'en avaient pas besoin, et 25,0 %, qu'ils ne le savaient pas (test multinomial, p = 0,79). Sur l'ensemble des répondants, 25,0 % ont répondu que tous les contacts familiaux devraient recevoir une PPE, 62,5 %, qu'elle devait être administrée aux contacts des cas multibacillaires, et 25,0 %, aux contacts génétiquement apparentés au cas de référence. Chez les spécialistes qui prescrivent une PPE, 57,1 % utilisent de la rifampicine, de l'ofloxacine (lévofloxacine) et de la minocycline, 14,3 %, une seule dose de rifampicine, et 28,6 %, de multiples doses de rifampicine (test multinomial p = 0,11). De plus, 68,4 % recommandent le dépistage annuel des contacts familiaux, et 31,6 % ne le recommandent pas (test multinomial p = 0,17). CONCLUSION: Il n'y a pas de consensus chez les infectiologues canadiens au sujet de la PPE de la lèpre et du dépistage des contacts familiaux.

Severe refractory erythema nodosum leprosum successfully treated with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor etanercept.

Erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), or type II reaction, is a common complication of lepromatous leprosy that can cause significant patient debility. First-line therapy includes prednisone and thalidomide, with clofazimine reserved for patients who do not respond to first-line treatment. We present the case of a 33-year-old woman with ENL that failed to respond adequately to conventional therapy over a 6-year period. Because of the severe nature of her disease and the adverse effects of therapy that she experienced, a trial of etanercept was undertaken, which led to full resolution of her ENL. The rationale behind our choice of therapy and its future implications are discussed.

Patterns of illness in travelers visiting Mexico and Central America: the GeoSentinel experience.

BACKGROUND: Mexico and Central America are important travel destinations for North American and European travelers. There is limited information on regional differences in travel related morbidity. METHODS: We describe the morbidity among 4779 ill travelers returned from Mexico and Central America who were evaluated at GeoSentinel network clinics during December 1996 to February 2010. RESULTS: The most frequent presenting syndromes included acute and chronic diarrhea, dermatologic diseases, febrile systemic illness, and respiratory disease. A higher proportion of ill travelers from the United States had acute diarrhea, compared with their Canadian and European counterparts (odds ratio, 1.9; P < .0001). During the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak from March 2009 through February 2010, the proportionate morbidity (PM) associated with respiratory illnesses in ill travelers increased among those returned from Mexico, compared with prior years (196.0 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers vs 53.7 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers; P < .0001); the PM remained constant in the rest of Central America (57.3 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers). We identified 50 travelers returned from Mexico and Central America who developed influenza, including infection due to 2009 H1N1 strains and influenza-like illness. The overall risk of malaria was low; only 4 cases of malaria were acquired in Mexico (PM, 2.2 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers) in 13 years, compared with 18 from Honduras (PM, 79.6 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers) and 14 from Guatemala (PM, 34.4 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers) during the same period. Plasmodium vivax malaria was the most frequent malaria diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Travel medicine practitioners advising and treating travelers visiting these regions should dedicate special attention to vaccine-preventable illnesses and should consider the uncommon occurrence of acute hepatitis A, leptospirosis, neurocysticercosis, acute Chagas disease, onchocerciasis, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, neurocysticercosis, HIV, malaria, and brucellosis.

Sex and gender differences in travel-associated disease.

BACKGROUND: No systematic studies exist on sex and gender differences across a broad range of travel-associated diseases. METHODS: Travel and tropical medicine GeoSentinel clinics worldwide contributed prospective, standardized data on 58,908 patients with travel-associated illness to a central database from 1 March 1997 through 31 October 2007. We evaluated sex and gender differences in health outcomes and in demographic characteristics. Statistical significance for crude analysis of dichotomous variables was determined using chi2 tests with calculation of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The main outcome measure was proportionate morbidity of specific diagnoses in men and women. The analyses were adjusted for age, travel duration, pretravel encounter, reason for travel, and geographical region visited. RESULTS: We found statistically significant (P < .001) differences in morbidity by sex. Women are proportionately more likely than men to present with acute diarrhea (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38), chronic diarrhea (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19-1.37), irritable bowel syndrome (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.24-1.57), upper respiratory tract infection (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.33); urinary tract infection (OR, 4.01; 95% CI, 3.34-4.71), psychological stressors (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.14-1.48), oral and dental conditions, or adverse reactions to medication. Women are proportionately less likely to have febrile illnesses (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10-0.21); vector-borne diseases, such as malaria (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.41-0.51), leishmaniasis, or rickettsioses (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.74); sexually transmitted infections (OR, 0.68; 95% CI 0.58-0.81); viral hepatitis (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.54); or noninfectious problems, including cardiovascular disease, acute mountain sickness, and frostbite. Women are statistically significantly more likely to obtain pretravel advice (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.23-1.32), and ill female travelers are less likely than ill male travelers to be hospitalized (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.42-0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Men and women present with different profiles of travel-related morbidity. Preventive travel medicine and future travel medicine research need to address gender-specific intervention strategies and differential susceptibility to disease.

Illness in long-term travelers visiting GeoSentinel clinics.

Length of travel appears to be associated with health risks. GeoSentinel Surveillance Network data for 4,039 long-term travelers (trip duration >6 months) seen after travel during June 1, 1996, through December 31, 2008, were compared with data for 24,807 short-term travelers (trip duration <1 month). Long-term travelers traveled more often than short-term travelers for volunteer activities (39.7% vs. 7.0%) and business (25.2% vs. 13.8%). More long-term travelers were men (57.2% vs. 50.1%) and expatriates (54.0% vs. 8.9%); most had pretravel medical advice (70.3% vs. 48.9%). Per 1,000 travelers, long-term travelers more often experienced chronic diarrhea, giardiasis, Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax malaria, irritable bowel syndrome (postinfectious), fatigue >1 month, eosinophilia, cutaneous leishmaniasis, schistosomiasis, and Entamoeba histolytica diarrhea. Areas of concern for long-term travelers were vector-borne diseases, contact-transmitted diseases, and psychological problems. Our results can help prioritize screening for and diagnosis of illness in long-term travelers and provide evidence-based pretravel advice.

Multicenter GeoSentinel analysis of rickettsial diseases in international travelers, 1996-2008.

We investigated epidemiologic and clinical aspects of rickettsial diseases in 280 international travelers reported to the GeoSentinel surveillance Network during 1996-2008. Of these 280 travelers, 231 (82.5%) had spotted fever (SFG) rickettsiosis, 16 (5.7%) scrub typhus, 11 (3.9%) Q fever, 10 (3.6%) typhus group (TG) rickettsiosis, 7 (2.5%) bartonellosis, 4 (1.4%) indeterminable SFG/TG rickettsiosis, and 1 (0.4%) human granulocytic anaplasmosis. One hundred ninety-seven (87.6%) SFG rickettsiosis cases were acquired in sub-Saharan Africa and were associated with higher age, male gender, travel to southern Africa, late summer season travel, and travel for tourism. More than 90% of patients with rickettsial disease were treated with doxycycline, 43 (15.4%) were hospitalized, and 4 had a complicated course, including 1 fatal case of scrub typhus encephalitis acquired in Thailand.

Spectrum of disease and relation to place of exposure among ill returned travelers.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 8 percent of travelers to the developing world require medical care during or after travel. Current understanding of morbidity profiles among ill returned travelers is based on limited data from the 1980s. METHODS: Thirty GeoSentinel sites, which are specialized travel or tropical-medicine clinics on six continents, contributed clinician-based sentinel surveillance data for 17,353 ill returned travelers. We compared the frequency of occurrence of each diagnosis among travelers returning from six developing regions of the world. RESULTS: Significant regional differences in proportionate morbidity were detected in 16 of 21 broad syndromic categories. Among travelers presenting to GeoSentinel sites, systemic febrile illness without localizing findings occurred disproportionately among those returning from sub-Saharan Africa or Southeast Asia, acute diarrhea among those returning from south central Asia, and dermatologic problems among those returning from the Caribbean or Central or South America. With respect to specific diagnoses, malaria was one of the three most frequent causes of systemic febrile illness among travelers from every region, although travelers from every region except sub-Saharan Africa and Central America had confirmed or probable dengue more frequently than malaria. Among travelers returning from sub-Saharan Africa, rickettsial infection, primarily tick-borne spotted fever, occurred more frequently than typhoid or dengue. Travelers from all regions except Southeast Asia presented with parasite-induced diarrhea more often than with bacterial diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: When patients present to specialized clinics after travel to the developing world, travel destinations are associated with the probability of the diagnosis of certain diseases. Diagnostic approaches and empiric therapies can be guided by these destination-specific differences.

Case Report: Central Nervous System Strongyloidiasis: Two Cases Diagnosed Antemortem.

Central nervous system (CNS) strongyloidiasis is a known but rare form of disseminated infection. The diagnosis is often made postmortem, with only five published cases of an antemortem diagnosis. We report two fatal cases of CNS strongyloidiasis diagnosed antemortem, with Strongyloides stercoralis larvae visualized in the CNS sample in one case. Risk factors for disseminated strongyloidiasis common to both cases included origination from the Caribbean, underlying human T-lymphotropic virus-1 infection, and recent prednisone use. Both cases occurred in Canada, where the occurrence of Strongyloides is uncommon, and serve as a reminder to maintain a high index of suspicion in patients with epidemiologic or clinical risk factors for dissemination.