RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is an early onset condition that affects individuals of all ages. Approximately 15%-25% of patients present before the age of 20 years, with peak onset occurring during adolescence. AIMS: To evaluate transition readiness among adolescents diagnosed with IBD and identify barriers to transition. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with IBD aged 12-21 years. Patients were stratified by age into three groups: A (12-14 years), B (14-17 years), and C (17 + years). Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire which assessed patient knowledge in three areas of transition: 'Taking Charge,' 'My Health,' and 'Using Health Care.' Fisher's Exact and Chi-Square tests were used to evaluate the associations between age and transition readiness. RESULTS: A total of 127 participants (68 males and 59 females) with a mean age of 16.14 years were included. Transition readiness increased with age from 60.7% in Group A to 63.2% and 77.9% in Groups B and C, respectively (p < 0.001). Patient confidence and the importance of transition increased with age, with means of 5.51, 6.17, and 6.94 in Groups A, B, and C (p = 0.02). Patient-reported knowledge of their health condition was > 70%, with no statistical differences between the groups (p = 0.65). Patient knowledge regarding 'Using Health Care' increased from 52% in Group A to 79% in Group C (p < 0.001). The greatest barriers to transitioning were carrying health information for Group A (100%) and obtaining provider referrals for Groups B (75%) and C (51%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that transition readiness increases with age in adolescents with IBD.
RESUMO
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine for improving metabolic and inflammatory outcomes in people with obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with obesity and MetS, but who did not have diabetes, were randomized to colchicine 0.6 mg or placebo capsules twice daily for 3 months. The primary outcome was change in insulin sensitivity (SI ) as estimated by insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests. Secondary outcomes included changes in other metabolic variables and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Of 40 participants randomized (21 colchicine, 19 placebo), 37 completed the trial. Compared with placebo, colchicine significantly reduced C-reactive protein (P <0.005), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P <0.01), white blood cell count (P <0.005), and absolute neutrophil count (P <0.001). Change in SI was not significantly different between colchicine and placebo arms (difference: +0.21 × 10-5 ; CI -1.70 to +2.13 × 10-5 min-1 mU-1 mL; P = 0.82). However, changes in some secondary outcomes, including homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (P = 0.0499), fasting insulin (P = 0.07) and glucose effectiveness (P = 0.08), suggested metabolic improvements in the colchicine versus placebo group. Adverse events were generally mild and similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study found colchicine significantly improved obesity-associated inflammatory variables and showed a good safety profile among adults with obesity and MetS who did not have diabetes. These results suggest a larger, adequately powered study should be conducted to determine whether colchicine improves insulin resistance and other measures of metabolic health in at-risk individuals.