Biological treatments for paediatric psoriasis : a retrospective observational study on biological drug survival in daily practice in childhood psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Three biotherapies - etanercept, adalimumab and ustekinumab - are licensed in childhood psoriasis. The few data available on their efficacy and tolerance are mainly derived from industry trials. However, biological drug survival impacts long-term performance in real-life settings. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival rates of biological therapies in children with psoriasis in real-life conditions. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the factors associated with the choice of the biological therapy and to report severe adverse events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was an observational retrospective study. Data were extracted from the clinical records of 134 children. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to analyse drug survival overall and in subgroups of plaque psoriasis, bio-naïve and non-naïve patients. RESULTS: We analysed 184 treatment courses: 70 with etanercept, 68 with adalimumab and 46 with ustekinumab. Factors associated with the choice of first-line biological agent were age at initiation (younger for adalimumab, P < 0.0001), age at onset of psoriasis (younger for adalimumab and etanercept, P = 0.03) and baseline Psoriasis Assessment Severity Index and Physician global assessment (both higher for adalimumab, P < 0.001). Drug survival rates were higher for ustekinumab than for adalimumab and etanercept (P < 0.0001) for all treatment and all psoriasis types, plaque-type psoriasis (P = 0.0003), patients naïve for biological agents (P = 0.0007) and non-naïve patients (P = 0.007). We reported eight serious adverse events (SAEs): severe infections (n = 3), significant weight gain (n = 2), psoriasis flare (n = 1) and malaise (n = 1). Biological therapy was discontinued in three children (one with psoriasis flare and two with weight gain). Only the two cases of weight gain resulted in an unfavourable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-life comparative study found that ustekinumab had the best drug survival outcome. The profile of SAEs in children was comparable to that in adults. These results will assist dermatologists in the decision-making process when choosing treatment options for children with psoriasis in daily practice.

Methotrexate efficacy and tolerance in plaque psoriasis. A prospective real-life multicentre study in France.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is a major systemic treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. A randomized trial has recently been published evaluating a single weekly dosage (17.5mg), but few prospective real-life data are available. The main objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of MTX in real-life. The secondary objectives were to evaluate predictive parameters for treatment efficacy and the frequency of adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort involving consecutive at in 25 centres belonging to GEM RESOPSO included all adults with plaque psoriasis in whom MTX treatment was initiated. The efficacy criterion was achievement of PASI 75 at week (W) 12/16. The impact of demographic data, psoriasis characteristics (duration, topography, rheumatism), dosage (W12/16 dosage, cumulative dose after 4 weeks), and mode of administration (subcutaneous vs. oral, concomitant use of folic acid) on efficacy was evaluated. Intention-to-treat (ITT),per protocol (PP), and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-six patients (F/M: 105/151; mean age: 45.0 years; rheumatism: 12.6%) with plaque psoriasis were included. 99 patients were not analysed at W12/16 (16 because of inefficacy, 16 because of intolerance, 56 were lost to follow-up or had data missing). PASI 75 was achieved in 98 patients, with efficacy of 38.3% in the ITT analysis and 58.3% in the PP analysis. In the ITT analysis, absence of previous use of cyclosporine (P=0.01) and a cumulative dose of MTX>60mg after 4 weeks (P<0.0001) were associated with higher PASI 75 rates. In the PP analysis, only absence of previous use of cyclosporine (P=0.0009) was associated with a better PASI 75 results. There was no association between PASI 75 and patient characteristics (including body mass index), clinical aspects of psoriasis, route of administration, combination with folic acid, or W12/16 dose. Adverse events were reported by 34.8% of patients. These consisted mainly of digestive disorders (nausea, abdominal pain), asthenia and moderate hepatic cytolysis. The frequency of adverse events was correlated with methotrexate dosage. DISCUSSION: The efficacy of MTX in plaque psoriasis in this real-life study of 256 patients is consistent with the data in the literature, including the recently published randomized trial (41% PASI 75). This rate was unaffected by patient weight, route of administration and combined use of folic acid. Absence of previous use of cyclosporine appears to be associated with better efficacy although there is no clear explanation for this. The initial dosage (high dose in the first month) appears to be associated with superior efficacy for W12/W16.

Early relapse of psoriasis after stopping brodalumab: a retrospective cohort study in 77 patients.

BACKGROUND: Biological agents targeting IL-17 are very effective for clearing moderate to severe psoriasis. There is limited information regarding the frequency and pattern of psoriasis relapse upon treatment cessation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pattern of psoriasis recurrence in patients who were treated with brodalumab following Amgen's decision to stop the clinical programme in June 2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2015 and March 2016, we constructed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including patients who were treated with brodalumab in Amgen's protocols after the abrupt interruption of the drug development programme. The relapse was defined as the request of patient to initiate a new treatment after brodalumab withdrawal. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were followed up. At the time brodalumab treatment was stopped, 67 (87%) patients had reached PASI 90. After brodalumab discontinuation, all 77 patients relapsed after a follow-up of 9 months. The median time to relapse was 46 days (range 7-224 days). Concerning the type of relapse, 73 patients presented with plaque psoriasis, one patient presented with erythrodermic psoriasis, and three patients experienced pustular psoriasis. In seven patients who had no previous history of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the relapse of psoriasis was associated with inflammatory joint pain suggestive of PsA. At week 36, eight patients who had a limited relapse were controlled with topical treatment, 43 patients received a biological agent, two patients were included in a clinical trial with an investigational drug and 15 patients were treated with conventional systemic agents. CONCLUSION: Abrupt cessation of brodalumab is associated with a rapid relapse of psoriasis with some patients experiencing a rebound. It seems not advisable to stop treatment with IL-17 receptor antagonists abruptly even in patients who experience complete clearance of psoriasis.

New-onset vitiligo and progression of pre-existing vitiligo during treatment with biological agents in chronic inflammatory diseases.

BACKGROUND: The development of vitiligo during treatment with biological agents is an unusual event and only a few isolated cases have been reported. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical characteristics and evolution of patients developing new-onset vitiligo following initiation of a biological agent for chronic inflammatory disease; and also to report the clinical course of pre-existing vitiligo under biological therapy. METHODS: This nationwide multicentre, retrospective study, carried out between July 2013 and January 2015, describes the characteristics of a large series of 18 patients (psoriasis N = 8, inflammatory rheumatic diseases N = 8, ulcerative colitis N = 1, uveitis N = 1) who developed new-onset vitiligo while receiving a biological agent. RESULTS: TNFα inhibitors were the most common biological agent involved (13/18) while anti-IL-12/23 and anti-IL-17 agents or abatacept were less common (4/18 and 1/18 respectively). Mean duration of biological agent exposure before vitiligo onset was 13.9 ± 16.5 months. Outcome was favourable for most patients (15/17) while maintaining the biological agent. Data were also collected for 18 patients (psoriasis N = 5, inflammatory rheumatic diseases N = 10, inflammatory bowel diseases N = 2, SAPHO N = 1) who had pre-existing vitiligo when treatment with a biological agent started (TNFα inhibitors N = 15, ustekinumab N = 1, rituximab N = 1, tocilizumab N = 1). Vitiligo progressed in seven patients and was stable or improved in eight cases. CONCLUSION: Vitiligo may thus emerge and/or progress during treatment with various biological agents, mainly TNFα inhibitors and could be a new paradoxical skin reaction. De novo vitiligo displays a favourable outcome when maintaining the biological agent, whereas the prognosis seems worse in cases of pre-existing vitiligo.

Maintenance of remission following successful treatment of papulopustular rosacea with ivermectin 1% cream vs. metronidazole 0.75% cream: 36-week extension of the ATTRACT randomized study.

BACKGROUND: There are a limited number of approved treatments for papulopustular rosacea (PPR) and remission is difficult to maintain after successful treatment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate remission over a 36-week extension period in patients with moderate to severe PPR successfully treated with 16 weeks' treatment with ivermectin 1% cream once daily (QD) or metronidazole 0.75% cream twice daily (BID) in a randomized, parallel-group Phase III study. METHODS: Treatment was discontinued in patients initially successfully treated [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1] with ivermectin 1% cream QD (n = 399) or metronidazole 0.75% cream BID (n = 365; Part A) and patients were followed every 4 weeks for up to 36 weeks (Part B). Treatment with the same study treatment as used in Part A was only re-initiated if patients relapsed (IGA ≥ 2). Efficacy assessments were: time to first relapse; relapse rate; and number of days free of treatment. Safety assessments included incidence of adverse events and local cutaneous signs and symptoms. RESULTS: The median time to first relapse was significantly longer (115 days vs. 85 days) and relapse rates at the end of the study period significantly lower (62.7% vs. 68.4%) for patients initially successfully treated with ivermectin 1% compared with metronidazole 0.75%; Kaplan-Meier plot demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the two arms (P = 0.0365). The median number of days free of treatment was higher for ivermectin compared with metronidazole (196 days vs. 169.5 days; P = 0.026). The percentage of patients who experienced a related adverse event was equally low in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this relapse study showed that an initial successful treatment with ivermectin 1% cream QD significantly extended remission of rosacea compared with initial treatment with metronidazole 0.75% cream BID following treatment cessation.

Evaluation of the activity and safety of CS21 barrier genital gel® compared to topical aciclovir and placebo in symptoms of genital herpes recurrences: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Topical or systemic antiviral drugs reduce the duration of genital herpes recurrences but may not always alleviate functional symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of oxygenated glycerol triesters-based CS21 barrier genital gel(®) vs. topical aciclovir and placebo (vehicle) in resolving functional symptoms and in healing of genital herpes recurrences. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled, investigator-blinded trial of CS21 barrier genital gel(®) vs. topical aciclovir (reference treatment) and placebo (vehicle) was designed. The primary endpoint was the cumulative score of four herpes-related functional symptoms (pain, burning, itching and tingling sensations). Secondary endpoints included objective skin changes (erythema, papules, vesicles, oedema, erosion/ulceration, crusts), time to heal, local tolerance and overall acceptability of the treatment as reported by a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 61 patients were included. CS 21 barrier genital gel(®) was significantly more efficient than topical aciclovir and vehicle for subjective symptoms and pain relief in genital herpes recurrences; additionally, time to heal was significantly shorter with CS 21 than with vehicle, whereas no significantly difference was observed between patients receiving topical aciclovir and vehicle. The treatments under investigation were well tolerated and the adverse events were comparable in the three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Overall, these results support the interest of using of CS 21 barrier genital gel(®) in symptomatic genital herpes recurrences. Accordingly, this product offers a valuable alternative in topical management of recurrent genital herpes.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a CS20® protective barrier gel containing OGT compared with topical aciclovir and placebo on functional and objective symptoms of labial herpes recurrences: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Topical or systemic antiviral drugs reduce the duration of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) recurrences but may not alleviate functional symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of CS20 (Acura 24(®) ) protective barrier gel versus topical aciclovir and placebo in resolving functional symptoms in HSV-1 labial recurrences. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-centre, assessor-blinded study of CS20 versus topical aciclovir or placebo. The primary endpoint was the total score of four herpes-related functional symptoms (pain, burning, itching, and tingling sensations), evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints encompassed objective skin changes (oedema, crusting and erythema), evaluated by specific clinical scores. RESULTS: In a study of 106 patients, compared with placebo, a significant improvement in total functional symptom score was observed after 1 day of treatment in the CS20 group, but only after 7 days of treatment in the topical aciclovir group. Burning sensations were significantly reduced by CS20 compared with aciclovir (Days 1-2) or placebo (Days 1-7). Compared to placebo, CS20 significantly reduced pain intensity on Days 1-6. CS20 induced significant and early improvements in the clinical scores for oedema and crusting compared with placebo. Time to cure was similar for CS20 and aciclovir. The treatments were well tolerated and adverse events were comparable in the three treatment groups. Limitations The single-centre and single-blind design of the study and the preselection of patients. CONCLUSION: CS20 showed superior effectiveness against functional symptoms (pain and burning) associated with HSV-1 labial recurrences and was similar to aciclovir for time to cure.

Importance of treatment of skin xerosis in diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous complications are common in diabetes patients and previous studies have shown that diabetes can affect some biophysical skin characteristics. However, the interest of emollients in diabetes has never been clearly demonstrated; i.e. whether they are able to limit skin complications in diabetes patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerance and the effect of an emollient on patient with diabetes. METHOD: Forty patients with diabetes applied the emollient twice daily for 1 month on one arm and one leg, in normal conditions. RESULTS: A 1-month treatment with an emollient allows a similar skin hydration rate in diabetics to that in healthy people. This dry skin improvement is accompanied by a significant reduction in pruritus and desquamation, and a significant improvement in the skin barrier function. CONCLUSION: Emollient treatment can be useful in the management of diabetes by limiting skin complications associated with elevated blood sugar.

A phase IIIb, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of adalimumab with and without calcipotriol/betamethasone topical treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: the BELIEVE study.

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the use of topical therapies in combination with tumour necrosis factor blockers for the treatment of psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) with topical calcipotriol/betamethasone (C/B) in patients with psoriasis resembling those treated in routine clinical practice. METHODS: A 16-week, randomized, vehicle-controlled trial was conducted in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and previous failure, intolerance or contraindications to two or more systemic treatments. All patients received ADA (80 mg, week 0; 40 mg every other week, weeks 1-15) in addition to either topical C/B or drug-free vehicle applied once daily for 4 weeks, and as needed thereafter. The primary endpoint was 75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 16. RESULTS: A total of 730 patients received either ADA + C/B (n = 366) or ADA + vehicle (n = 364). PASI 75 response was initially higher with the combination therapy [14.8% for ADA + C/B vs. 5.8% for ADA + vehicle at week 2 (P < 0.001); and 40.7% vs. 32.4%, respectively, at week 4 (P = 0.021)]. After week 4, the trend was towards a higher response with ADA monotherapy, with no statistical difference in the PASI 75 response at week 16 (64.8% for ADA + C/B vs. 70.9% for ADA monotherapy, P = 0.086). Safety findings were consistent with previous ADA trials. CONCLUSIONS: ADA + C/B resulted in more rapid and higher efficacy within the first 4 weeks; thereafter, the trend was towards a higher response with ADA monotherapy. There was no statistical difference in the PASI 75 response at week 16. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated.

Emollient for maintenance therapy after topical corticotherapy in mild psoriasis.

Emollients or moisturizers can act as an important adjunctive therapy of topical treatment in psoriatic patients. However, the interest of emollients has never been clearly demonstrated; i.e. are they able to improve topical treatment efficacy and/or maintain continuous remission of the disease? The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an emollient on patients with mild plaque psoriasis during and after standard local corticosteroid therapy. Results showed that the use of an emollient can limit relapses after the end of corticotherapy, and maintain the improvement obtained after 1 month corticotherapy at clinical level (physician global assessment) and skin dryness.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of rucinol serum in patients with melasma: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Melasma is a hyperpigmentation disorder predominantly affecting sun-exposed areas in women, which is often refractory to treatment. Most commercially available treatments incorporate inhibitors of tyrosinase, a key enzyme in melanin production within the melanocyte. In general, however, the efficacy of these therapies is somewhat limited. Recent studies have identified other enzymes that play an important role in melanogenesis, including tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TRP-1), which catalyses the oxidation of the melanogenetic intermediate 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carbolylic acid. Rucinol (4-n-butylresorcinol) has been shown to inhibit the activity of both tyrosinase and TRP-1. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of rucinol serum 0.3% vs. the corresponding vehicle as a treatment for melasma. Secondary objectives were to evaluate local and general tolerability and to assess the skin acceptability of rucinol serum in the target population. METHODS: In this prospective, single-centre, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled, bilateral (split-face) comparative trial, 32 women with melasma were provided with two identical tubes containing rucinol serum 0.3% or vehicle. The products were each applied to one-half of the face, according to the randomization scheme, twice daily for 12 weeks (phase 1). A broad-spectrum sunscreen (sun protection factor 60) was also applied daily. Assessments at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks included clinical evaluations by a dermatologist, chromametry, ultraviolet and standard photography, and assessments of skin acceptability and tolerability. After 12 weeks, patients were given the option of an additional 3-month treatment period of open full-face rucinol treatment, with reviews at 16, 20 and 24 weeks (phase 2). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients completed phase 1 and 26 patients completed phase 2. After 12 weeks, the clinical pigmentation score for rucinol-treated skin was significantly lower than for vehicle-treated skin (P = 0.027). During phase 2, rucinol induced a significant reduction in mean pigmentation score on the half of the face previously treated with vehicle. There was also a further, significant improvement on the rucinol-treated side of the face. Chromametry measurements showed that skin was significantly lighter and less yellow, with a strong trend towards reduced redness, following rucinol therapy compared with vehicle. Rucinol serum showed good tolerability and acceptability and was considered to have good or fair efficacy by 78% of the patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Rucinol serum was shown to have significant efficacy compared with vehicle alone in improving melasma after 3 months of treatment, according to clinical and objective assessments of skin colour.

An open-label study of alefacept plus ultraviolet B light as combination therapy for chronic plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Alefacept, a fully human LFA-3/IgG(1) fusion protein, is a selective biological agent approved in the United States for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. In phase 3 trials, clinical improvement and prolonged off-treatment remission of psoriasis correlated with reductions in circulating memory T cells. Reductions in pathogenic epidermal T cells in psoriatic lesions also have been noted following phototherapy with ultraviolet B (UVB) light. Because alefacept and UVB target T cells in different ways, combination therapy with these two agents may lead to greater efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy trends of combination therapy with alefacept plus UVB light in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In an open-label, parallel-group study conducted at two sites, one in France and one in the United States, patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who were candidates for phototherapy received 12-weekly intramuscular injections of alefacept, 15 mg. In addition, patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: no UVB treatment, 6-week UVB treatment, and 12-week UVB treatment. UVB treatment consisted of narrowband (NB) UVB at the site in France and broadband (BB) UVB at the site in the United States. The 12-week treatment period was followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Clinic visits occurred weekly during treatment and every 2-4 weeks during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients (n = 30/site) were enrolled in the study. Alefacept was well tolerated when administered in combination with UVB treatment and as monotherapy. There was no evidence of increased phototoxicity or photosensitivity with the combination. At each study site, alefacept/UVB provided a higher overall response rate and led to a more rapid onset of response compared with alefacept monotherapy. Of patients who achieved > or = 50% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 50) at 2 weeks after the last dose of alefacept, 75-100% in the combination therapy groups maintained this response throughout follow-up in the absence of further psoriasis therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, combination therapy with alefacept plus short-term (6-12 weeks) UVB treatment is well tolerated with a trend toward greater and more rapid efficacy than alefacept alone.