Clinical significance of decreased or loss of ABO blood group expression in acute myeloid leukaemia: A single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Decreased or loss of ABO blood group antigen expression has been observed in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients. We studied the clinical significance of this group in AML patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-centre cohort study in which the data were retrieved from April 2009 to December 2019. A total of 1592 AML patients with normal ABO blood group antigen (Group I) and 65 patients of decreased or loss of ABO blood group antigen (Group II) group were enrolled. Data were collected at the time of initial admission for pathological diagnosis. To interrogate the underlying mechanism, publicly available The Cancer Genome Atlas AML data were downloaded. RESULTS: Group II consisted of 3.9% (65/1657) of AML patients. The 90-day survival (D90) probability was higher for Group II with a mean survival of 86.4 days compared to 80.6 days for Group I (p = 0.047). Group II had higher haematocrit (28.6 vs. 27.4%) and lower d-dimer, fibrinogen degradation production and C-reactive protein. Publicly available data revealed that among 11 CpG methylation sites within the ABO gene, 4 sites with elevated methylation level were associated with improved D90 survival probability and demonstrated an inverse correlation with ABO gene expression. Lower expression of the ABO gene showed improved survival trends for D90 (p = 0.058) and 180-day survival (p = 0.072). CONCLUSION: AML with decreased expression or loss of ABO blood group showed better early survival during D90. Transfusion support for this subgroup of AML patients should be meticulously performed considering serum typing.

Carbapenem non-susceptibility overcalling by BD phoenix NMIC-500 panel.

We aimed to assess the accuracy of BD Phoenix for determining carbapenem susceptibility because we observed a decline in carbapenem susceptibility rate from the biannual cumulative data, after we transitioned to the BD Phoenix form Vitek 2 system. Between October 2021 and May 2022, we collected 82 non-duplicated Enterobacterales showing non-susceptible to at least one of the three carbapenems by BD Phoenix. We performed the broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD) according to the CLSI guideline. Compared to BMD, the categorical agreements for ertapenem (ERT), imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEPM) was 58.8%, 56.8% and 91.5% for BD Phoenix and it was 85.4%, 89.0%, and 97.6%, respectively, for DD (p value; 0.0001 for ERT and IPM, p value; 0.17 for MEPM). The major errors/minor errors for ERT, IPM, and MEPM were 14.0%/31.7%, 2.94%/40.7%, and 2.56%/6.10%, respectively for BD Phoenix, compared to 0%/14.6%, 0%/9.8%, and 0%/2.5%, for DD. While errors in the BD Phoenix showed tendency towards resistance, those in DD displayed no tendency towards either resistance or susceptibility. With DD, 21 out of the 27 isolates showing susceptible/intermediate/susceptible pattern (ERT/IPM/MEPM) and 13 out of the 16 isolates showing intermediate/susceptible/susceptible pattern (ERT/IPM/MEPM), were correctly categorized by DD. However, for 22 isolates showing resistant/susceptible/susceptible pattern (ERT/IPM/MEPM), only 13 isolates were correctly categorized by DD. In conclusion, to mitigate the risk of overcalling carbapenem non-susceptibility with BD Phoenix, it will be helpful to perform a complementary test using DD and to provide comments on the DD results to clinicians.